Nazi {National Socialists} wow! that really makes sense cause I never knew what that meant, crap! my school had never taught me that at all, thank you Savage for informing me isn't he awesome for telling the truth to everyone.
Why jews hate muslims? what you are afraid of ? are they speaking the truth ? was the koran?
Why the jew always been in trouble ? after building their lives, they always go down and become homeless, because of this sooner or latter they will become homeless again it may take 50, 100, 200 years it will happen it's only the matter by who, I think the Chinese .
The government or the state is there to protect the position of the ruling class. Haven't you noticed how the wealthiest people have got richer and the poor poorer? When a capitalist state acts, it acts to preserve the position and profits of its ruling class.
Yes we shouldrid the world of 'the state'... Marx agrees with you.
Read " the state and revolution" by V I Lenin... you would be amazed at what Marxists really stand for.
I'd be interested in reading what version of the CM you have read?
Anyway, I'm member of the Socialist Party here in the UK. We are part of the CWI (Committee for a workers International). In the USA our party is called Socialist Alternative.
Look them up or 'google it' and it may help you to know where I'm coming from. Karl Marx supported 'personal property'. They used language differently back in the 1800's and translated from German. Marx supported the fullest democracy.
@tellyontellyon But you were right on one thing I'll give you that, Obama isn't a socialist or communist."
The aforementioned comment was posted when I was at work and I have no option to remove it in the dropdown "Reply" box. A fine example of Federal Government Encroachment.
@tellyontellyon Or do you just have the edited copy of The Communist Manifesto, made and proofread by Obama's Marxist Administration for University reading? Well, now the truth comes out. I don't need to read that, I already know what went wrong in the USSR: Neo-Marxism a.k.a Leninism/Trotskyism.
No... Marx makes a difference between personal property and private property in the Communist Manifesto... maybe you should read a bit before you make silly comments.
'Private property' to Marx mean't 'the means of production'... he wasn't talking about your personal stuff, your home, your car etc.
Anyway, the capitalists are losing the argument... you only have to open a newspaper to see what's happening.
I hope you catch up with the rest of the world comrade.
@tellyontellyon Well I already discussed ownership of a company by those who know nothing about it's output renders production random without a price system that accurately reflects consumer value. Capitalist are losing, open a Newspaper? You mean in the media controlled by the Radical Leftist Machine? According to the Rasmussen Polls as of Yesterday, the Presidential Polls of 2012 are 45% Romney, 39% Socialist Obama, and 5% of the American Voters think the Marxist Congress is doing a good job.
@tellyontellyon USA is a secular, center-right nation, not a Socialist one. If you support Socialism, as I've said, move to Cuba or to Mugabe's racist country. You haven't done anything to prove a point and the simple paste of F.A. Hayek's book counters anything you can post.
@tellyontellyon A Majority of the American people disagree DRASTICALLY with the tried-and-failed metho of Marxism. Keep filling your head with lies while the polls disagree.
The polls show that support for socialism amongst the poor, the young and ethnic minorities is growing rapidly in the USA. Oh, and it's not just about the USA by the way. Obama isn't a socialist... I wish he was. I've alread mentioned Trotsk's analysis of the USSR and the other similar distortions of Marxism.
You don't know enough to have a real discussion... so off to school now... I will continue in about 10 years time when you know a bit more.
@tellyontellyon And I already mentioned the Marxist stratgem of trying to interchange "Totalitarianism" or "Dictatorship" with "Socialism/Communism." It's a failed defense. Of course Socialism is popular amongst minorities, they grow up impoverished by the same Elitists that want to create the Marxist Utopia. Everyone knows the left controls the Universities and Media. Am I supposed to be surprised to hear that? Lol.
@tellyontellyon In reality I really couldn't care less, seeing as how almost every Communist society formed has inwardly disintergrated in 100 years or less; if Communism was to be restablished tomorrow as the US Economic Plan, I'd most likely live to see it collapse.
@tellyontellyon Whether or not Obama is a Marxist is open to interpretation of course, but I'm pretty sure any rationally thinking person would call the Nationalization of Healthcare, Domestic Automakers, and Student Loan Banking Houses Socialist/Communist actions. Not to even begin with the overt/admitted Communists appointed by Obama, some being shamed out (Van Jones), and his Communist mentor Frank Marshall Davis or Marxist Terrorist childhood friend Bill Ayers.
@tellyontellyon The fact of the matter is you received an edited "The Communist Manifesto", most likely from a college/university course or Barnes and Noble bookseller, and think you're some Socialist Scholar, when numerous Nobel Prize winners have dissolved the sugar coating you so helplessly throw to the lower class and forever shamed it into the duspile of history. Considering you said Karl Marx favored private property clearly shows your ignorance, and it's you who doesn't know enough to
@tellyontellyon have a real discussion. So yes, maybe I'll talk to you in 10-20 years when the neurons start firing properly across that corpus callosum.
Marx never objected to personal private property... in fact he thought we deserve to enjoy the fruits of our labour. But private property in the means of production is different.
The capitalist always gets out more than they put in, and, the worker always contribute more than they get back. That is how profit is made.
Capitalist 'owership' of the means of production is only a licence to rob workers of the value they have produced.
This is basic stuff... it's in the Communist Manifesto.
@tellyontellyon Marx never objected to personal private property... in fact he thought we deserve to enjoy the fruits of our labour. But private property in the means of production is different.
LOL?
"The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property."
@tellyontellyon Sounds like you need to re-read your hero's work, you keep spewing lies. And you can also read about how he was so destitute he couldn't afford to buy a coffin for one of his daughters who died in near infancy due to malnutrition/starvation; or about his 1 year old son who died as a direct result of malnutrition/starvation that he called a "Sacrifice to bourgeois misery." Infant children used as sacrifices for ideologies? When did we go back 5,000 years?
@MrReco12 Haha! I love it when a total dumbass like yourself tries to come on here and 'school' me...and someone who is from a Capitalist country none the less (Hey asswipe, why aren't you living in DPRK with your comrades you fucking hypocrite!)
Okay here's what I want you to do...
A. Give me the definition of the word: Privatization
Then B. Give me an example of Hitler privatizing.
Then define Democrat and give an example of that in the DPRK.
Hitler privatized these companies: Commerz-Bank, the Dresdner Bank, the Deutsche Bank, Deutsche Schiff-und Machinenbau AG Bremen “Deschimag”, the Deutsche Reichsbahn, Vereinigte Stahlwerke A.G. and other huge corporations.
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: The full title of North Korea.
Australia is far more socialist than Nazi Germany and the United states.
Socialism has always been centered around the idea that the workers (i.e. the creators of the wealth in the society) ought to run the society democratically. So, instead of bosses making the most profits off of your wage labor at the factory, you and everyone else that creates that wealth runs the factory. Seems pretty simple to me, and it also goes to show that every example Savage cites as Socialism isn't that at all. Savage is a fucking dumbass.
@guitarguy620 Given that he's spent great amounts of time (when he's not promoting hate and bigotry) spinning this hysterical lie that Obama, a centrist Democrat, is this flaming leftist who secretly plans to throw our nation into socialism, yeah, fucking dumbass is pretty much the appropriate description.
Socialism: A theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
DICTIONARY DOT FUCKING COM
COMMUNITY. gah... you right winged tea baggin' mother fuckers..
Socialism was a popular buzzword, and that's why they adopted the word "socialist" in the name of the party. Hitler was not a socialist, nor were Nazi party socialist in its ideology. Hitler persecuted the left, not the right. And while being mainstream right (or center right to be more specific) is not the same as Nazism, being a conservative capitalist was by far safer for those people than the trade unionist or the socialist or commie or Jew in Germany whereby they were all persecuted.
@Allmighty193 Last thing the U.S. needs is a bunch angry & ignorant cattle, so go ahead & get yourself killed. It will pave a path to a better future.
this guy is talking shit. Revolutionary Marxism does't want to put control on capitalism and it doesn't want to redistribute the wealth created by capitalism.
Revolutionary Marxism does away with capitalism completely... and if it is true socialism, it won't be administered by a central government...
... but by directly democratic workers councils...
oh yea"true"socialism wherethe workers rule. the onlyreason workers work is because the professional classcreates jobs for them. without an educated citizenry allthe great workers wil be doing under your "true" socialism is farming wheat 15 hours a day. and noones gonnawant to be a doctor/professor/engineer when you can shovel-shit and get paid the same.dont fall for the bullshit telly. theywant you to believe in the fairytale socialist paradise,the only thing close to "true" socialism is NKorea
North Korea is a dictatorship; it's only calls itself communist. (In truth, they made up their own ideology,called Juche)And you would not get paid the same as a doctor if you're a shit shoveler; you would simply pay more in taxes, (which would go back into the community,) because you make more.
u commie supporters really make me laugh. im sure the first time u put your hand on a hot stove you never did it again. why cant u see that everytime communism was attempted its always ended in tyranny (as planned) and the workers theyre supposed to save always get burned... every single time, and yall just keep wanting to put your hand back on the stove.
it will never work, the promises of equality by communist political intellectuals are nothing but a lie and highly worn out cliche. its not attainable on earth, but used to sucker the working class into thinking that communists are fighting for them, when in reality the workers are fighting for the communists
@tellyontellyon And how do you transition power from one man who built his own company to a number of workers who did nothing to run it? Who acts as an intermediary? The government.
And with the US Government, the largest criminal organization in world history, you truly believe they will take control of all industries in all markets and just give it all back? That's what the Roman's thought when they wrote the clause for the office of the Dictatorship in the Roman Republic. The result was
No... first you have to smash the government/state... it's called a revolution.
Then the mass of ordinary people set up their own way of running society. Marx favoured a temporary 'workers commune' to carry out these functions while there was still a threat of counter-revolution.
@tellyontellyon Marx also wrote children were property of the state, and more than half of his own died of unsanitary living conditions because he was too "smart" to work. So when you have children we'll make sure to leave them under state control.
@tellyontellyon Any moron knows Socialism never works, not only from clear examples throughout history across numerous cultures, but from The Communist Manifesto itself, which has hypocritical thoughts that make no sense. Proven Fact.
Socialism renders production random in the absence of a price system that accurately reflects consumer value. There is no center piece of value for all commodities hidden away in Africa somewhere; the value of one thing is whatever the people decide it to be.
@tellyontellyon Money in the U.S. holds value because people ACCEPT it as a means of currency, not because of any designation the Government gives it. Your entire creedo is in itself a fallacy: "Socialism, because we Politicians know how to run your business better than you do." Josef Stalin sezied a massive amount of agricultural land from the Kulaks in Soviet Russia, privately owned, family run farms, because he believed the Soviet Government know more and could run these farms better than
@tellyontellyon the actual farmers. The result was 25,000 people dying everyday of Starvation and Malnutrition, and whereas Russia was once one of the largest EXPORTERS of grain, they wound up IMPORTING millions of tons of grain annually after the government seize.
Aristotle also writes on the subject; saying that modern-day communists are hypocrites because liberality cannot exist without the use made of private property. But I can tell this kind of reading is WAY above your head lol.
@tellyontellyon In simpler words so you understand: Socialism/Communism are morons' ideologies, Capitalism an intellectual's. Because only a moron reads and doesn't question a single facet of a document or juxtaposes it to real world scenarios. When you can give me an example of either a politically or economically successful Socialist/Communist government we can talk. Until then, you can move to North Korea where they are eating each other because they're starving.,
Well, the Stalinist distortions you mention are neither socialist or communist in the sense that Marx would have advocated.
The world hasn't seen true socialism yet...
... but how many times have capitalism got it wrong... show me the successful capitalist society? Slavery, exploitation and murder of innocents... that's what I see.
Capitalism means freedom for the rich.
p.s. Calling somebody a 'Moron' isn't much of an argument... unless your only 12?
@tellyontellyon And one comment arguing the same thing you have been trying to argue "Socialism/Communism sounds so good on paper" only works to prove my point; There is paper, and there is reality. The Soviet Union's Constitution was beautifully written; nothing more than lip-service. Don't forget U.S.S.R = Union of Soviet Socialist REPUBLICS. Socialism is a ruse, in its ideological form it's hypocritical and counter-intuitive, in it's real-world form catastrophic.
@tellyontellyon Capitalism means freedom for all actually, via it's usage of private property, which Aristotle argues gives way to liberality itself, because liberality only exists with private property. Thusly, Socialist = Liberal = Fallacy/Hypocrisy, and rewards for the hard working AND the creative, one of Capitalism's most important inherencies. Without Creativity and Innovation, there can be no Sociological Progression, hence, you so-called "Progressives" are truly "Regressives".
@tellyontellyon Oh, and by the way, Capitalism and Conservatisim are not synonymous, which is why the TRUE Liberal is a Capitalist; Capitalism both encourages AND rewards Creativity and Innovation, thusly a true Progressive is a Capitalist.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Trust me. The Obama fraudster will leave plenty of room for health-care speculators to make big profits. We'll have an half-ass imitation of Britain's NHS. By the way, Britain has nationalized healthcare and it's still a CAPITALIST system running the economy. So what the fuck are you people worried about? Stop jerking yourselves off. You wish you had real socialism in America so we wouldn't have to bust our ass every day earn a few dollars and get a lousy 2 weeks off if you're lucky!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
All you idiot dingbats that believe there is political diversity in America, because phony Jew-propagandist polemicist servant of the Jewish lobby Savage makes you believe so! Wake-up dingbats! Obama and Savage have to give blow-jobs to the same people at the end of the day! This phony fraudster is afraid to come with me to Mexico and propagandize against the Zetas, preferring debate about non-existent "socialism" in the country! Who are our real enemies, ASSHOLE? Walk the walk -coward!
This is a country is part democracy and part republic. It does not need to be changed to socialism. Beats the purpose of what our founding fathers had planned for this country.
I'm Canadian, but my family is American going back to 1740 and beleive me, yur founding fathers are spinning in their graves......the U.S., i'm afraid is moving towards big brother faster than Canada & Europe combined.......it's not easy when the media is controlled by liberals.
But there are certain radio personnel who are trying to get our "Christian" nation back. but they don't want to follow the real doctrines of there own theology.
Ya Jesus was trying to put forth that nothing was Cesar's cuz everything was gods. So people shouldn't give to there government but to each other because God is in all of us... at least that's what i got from it but the bible is translated so many different ways there is no realism in it just good stories with the occasional moral uplift.
@Rottedvideo Guess you missed "Render on to Cesar what is Cesar's" and Jesus paid the tax.. oh yea and 1 Timothy 2 "First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.".
@Rottedvideo Jesus wasn't at all trying to put on that Cesar owned nothing because everything was God's. Jesus was saying Cesar owned the coin, the money and the land so pay back to Cesar what you owe to Cesar.
@Rottedvideo Also why would it say 1 Peter 2:13 "Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority, or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right. For it is God's will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish men."
He did that so they could concentrate on worshipping and teaching about God. It's the same with getting into heaven...you can't take anything with you.
Then shouldn't the Government be the same, If this is a Christian nation, and follow the conducts and doctrines of there own religion. Being a Capitalistic Society is the exact opposite of what Jesus was preaching, because a Capitalistic society becomes Greedy (its how or economy got this way, money is not recirculating cuz the rich horde it and give nothing to the poor) no one style of government has to date Worked for any ancient or recent society... We as the People need to rethink everything
Everybody does have the same chance of hetting into heaven, and everyone is equal in God's eyes. That means that everyone according to race, wealth, etc is equal. He's not saying someone is less of a person. He shared food amongst the poor and hungry. He fed them, He didn't "distribute wealth."
Didn't he have all his disciples give everything they had to to poor just to follow him around in the dessert. Back then there was a huge definition between the wealthy and the poor( kinda like today) and jesus was trying to make the wealth understand that they were lucky enough to be well off and should share that wealth with those less fortunate. i don't recall him every giving or doing anything awesome for a rich man or praising wealth... Please educate me!!!
Sorry he was a Communist. he believed that a rich man had the same chance of getting into heaven as a camel going through the eye of a needle, he believed in sharing amongst the poor sick and hungry(distributing wealth?), believed everyone was Equal. i don't these thing should be forced upon the public, but more as a Capitalistic society is the exact opposite of what he was preaching. Now, how is he not a Socialist/Communist???
Jesus was trying to teach that if you can help your fellow man then you should, if you can give and care for your fellow man and those in need then you should. so how am i mistaken???
Jesus said you have a choice, in communism you have 0 choices, the Gubment makes the decisions about who can produce what and who gets what they produce.
I wish i was a Lib, Dem, or Repub cuz that would make it easier to be ignorant and only see one way to live life in the world. And then i would also be able to never make a compromise between peoples afflicting ideas or issues. i guess i'll just have to go back to being a unselfish, give to the poor, walk a mile in another mans shoes, understanding Individual that believes you cannot love your God until you Love yourself and to love yourself you must Love your fellow man!
I am a Christian and care about my fellow man, though I thank God that I have enough sense to look at what socialism has done in the past... in places like NAZI Germany.
Nazi German was a Dictatorship. there was a little man by the name of Hitler who ran everything. he claimed they were socialist but how can you be a socialist society With a Dictator, doesn't that make it a Dictatorship...
Is this man really serious? Blackshirts, fascism.. look, the Obama administration won power through the normal political process, has respected democratic norms, and hasn't intervened in the economy or the private sector any more drastically than our ostensible European allies have been doing for decades. It's a shoddy, ludicrous parallel, and I can't for the life of me figure out why he'd make it.
It's all the more surprising since the man seems to have a firm grasp on the facts of history.
Hitler lied. Germany had indeed been defeated on the Western front. He didn't take into account the US entry into the war, which led to the collapse of the Western Front.
Hitler only used the word Socialism in order to procure the support of the working class, but he was not really a socialist. He always supported free enterprise.
Not at all, he exerted total control over the market through price controls, wage requirements, and turned the economy from a market economy, into a command economy.
Hitler was a capitalist, is a myth perpetuated by socialists to distinguish themselves from national socialists visa vi Hitler. If you really compare the USSR and Nazi Germany however, there is little difference between the two.
@GaiusIuliusTaberna Agreed, yet there are capitalist in a socialist society. People don't realize this. Its the Dictators that capitalize off of the backs of their people. Every society has capitalism. Ours is restricted capitalism, which is becoming pretty damn close to Marxism and just like any economist will tell you, economic systems evolve with society. Marxism eventually ends in totalitarianism. A free market capitalist society doesn't change it grows, unless you restrict it.
@austenbosten And that "lecture" is a load of shit. Nazism and socialism have NOTHING to do with one another, the Nazis were far RIGHT, not left. Socialism is an ECONOMIC theory, to say it's "totalitarianism" shows true ignorance of what the word even means. McCarthyism lives in the US, idiotic lies about socialism constantly pollute our discussion, and anyone who disagrees with the lies gets painted as an enemy of the nation. Total bullshit.
Yep, one slip of the tongue, and he can be safely dismissed.
Whew! That was close. You might have had to think about some complex historical, political and economic issues or counter some serious criticisms of the current political scene.
Why do all that, when saying, "France! Lol!" makes all those things magically vanish?
I'd not heard of this guy before he was banned by our government from entering the UK. I don't agree with him on most things but, do on some. Although he is not what I'd describe as a drinking buddy, I find it absurd to ban him from entering the UK on the grounds of promoting hatred. It's ok to hate anyone or anything as long as you aren't promoting violence and I don't believe he does.
@Uberaoshi mmm. He didnt mention , as no one does, Hitlers issue with the Jews was really that they controlled the money ! And still do ... Rothschild, Morgan..and the ilk run the Fed and most reserve banks around the world !! What appalled Hitler and the Germans, was that monetary issues , that were controlled by non government , could cripple his economy ! I wonder who , Besides Wilson , backed such harsh reparations post 1914...? Now that would be interesting , watch the USA Peso guys !
oxymoron??? how is that.? Socialism sucludid to a nation (National Socialism) as a aposd to (international) Socialism. the intracit construction of governmint is endless. if you can fathum it it can be so. its like saying a diamond can not be a square.ect
yes Mussolini was a fascist, but like I said Hitler supported capitalism if it benefited him, which defeats the purpose of socialism. I mean I guess he claimed to be a socialist but it really doesn't mean anything if he wasn't.
And that's exactly what it will be like here. Obama Soros... those two will be the ones making out like bandits (along with other powerful libs in gov. while the common man is left suffering.
Exactly, it doesn't matter what type of government he technically supported. all that matters is that he supported a government that has complete control.
Nazi {National Socialists} wow! that really makes sense cause I never knew what that meant, crap! my school had never taught me that at all, thank you Savage for informing me isn't he awesome for telling the truth to everyone.
Kakkerot86 19 hours ago
Why jews hate muslims? what you are afraid of ? are they speaking the truth ? was the koran?
Why the jew always been in trouble ? after building their lives, they always go down and become homeless, because of this sooner or latter they will become homeless again it may take 50, 100, 200 years it will happen it's only the matter by who, I think the Chinese .
manny054 1 week ago
I never posted that comment, and I have no option to remove it. It seems the Socialist Government has hacked my account. USSA.
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
@RightsAndPrivileges
Complain to YouTube. Who owns YouTube???
tellyontellyon 3 weeks ago
@RightsAndPrivileges
Oh, hang on... it must be that subversive communist cell called 'Google Inc.' But we all know that is just a front for the reds!
tellyontellyon 3 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon It's really not funny it's kind of amazing that this kind of government intervention goes on and no one does anything about it.
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
@RightsAndPrivileges
The government or the state is there to protect the position of the ruling class. Haven't you noticed how the wealthiest people have got richer and the poor poorer? When a capitalist state acts, it acts to preserve the position and profits of its ruling class.
Yes we shouldrid the world of 'the state'... Marx agrees with you.
Read " the state and revolution" by V I Lenin... you would be amazed at what Marxists really stand for.
tellyontellyon 3 weeks ago
I'd be interested in reading what version of the CM you have read?
Anyway, I'm member of the Socialist Party here in the UK. We are part of the CWI (Committee for a workers International). In the USA our party is called Socialist Alternative.
Look them up or 'google it' and it may help you to know where I'm coming from. Karl Marx supported 'personal property'. They used language differently back in the 1800's and translated from German. Marx supported the fullest democracy.
tellyontellyon 3 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon But you were right on one thing I'll give you that, Obama isn't a socialist or communist.
RightsAndPriviIeges 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tellyontellyon But you were right on one thing I'll give you that, Obama isn't a socialist or communist."
The aforementioned comment was posted when I was at work and I have no option to remove it in the dropdown "Reply" box. A fine example of Federal Government Encroachment.
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
If you want to know what went wrong in the 'USSR@ then you should read.."The Revolution Betrayed" by Leon Trotsky.
tellyontellyon 1 month ago
@tellyontellyon Or do you just have the edited copy of The Communist Manifesto, made and proofread by Obama's Marxist Administration for University reading? Well, now the truth comes out. I don't need to read that, I already know what went wrong in the USSR: Neo-Marxism a.k.a Leninism/Trotskyism.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 4
@RightsAndPrivileges
No... Marx makes a difference between personal property and private property in the Communist Manifesto... maybe you should read a bit before you make silly comments.
'Private property' to Marx mean't 'the means of production'... he wasn't talking about your personal stuff, your home, your car etc.
Anyway, the capitalists are losing the argument... you only have to open a newspaper to see what's happening.
I hope you catch up with the rest of the world comrade.
tellyontellyon 4 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon Well I already discussed ownership of a company by those who know nothing about it's output renders production random without a price system that accurately reflects consumer value. Capitalist are losing, open a Newspaper? You mean in the media controlled by the Radical Leftist Machine? According to the Rasmussen Polls as of Yesterday, the Presidential Polls of 2012 are 45% Romney, 39% Socialist Obama, and 5% of the American Voters think the Marxist Congress is doing a good job.
RightsAndPrivileges 4 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon USA is a secular, center-right nation, not a Socialist one. If you support Socialism, as I've said, move to Cuba or to Mugabe's racist country. You haven't done anything to prove a point and the simple paste of F.A. Hayek's book counters anything you can post.
RightsAndPrivileges 4 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon A Majority of the American people disagree DRASTICALLY with the tried-and-failed metho of Marxism. Keep filling your head with lies while the polls disagree.
RightsAndPrivileges 4 weeks ago
@RightsAndPrivileges
The polls show that support for socialism amongst the poor, the young and ethnic minorities is growing rapidly in the USA. Oh, and it's not just about the USA by the way. Obama isn't a socialist... I wish he was. I've alread mentioned Trotsk's analysis of the USSR and the other similar distortions of Marxism.
You don't know enough to have a real discussion... so off to school now... I will continue in about 10 years time when you know a bit more.
tellyontellyon 3 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon And I already mentioned the Marxist stratgem of trying to interchange "Totalitarianism" or "Dictatorship" with "Socialism/Communism." It's a failed defense. Of course Socialism is popular amongst minorities, they grow up impoverished by the same Elitists that want to create the Marxist Utopia. Everyone knows the left controls the Universities and Media. Am I supposed to be surprised to hear that? Lol.
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon In reality I really couldn't care less, seeing as how almost every Communist society formed has inwardly disintergrated in 100 years or less; if Communism was to be restablished tomorrow as the US Economic Plan, I'd most likely live to see it collapse.
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon Whether or not Obama is a Marxist is open to interpretation of course, but I'm pretty sure any rationally thinking person would call the Nationalization of Healthcare, Domestic Automakers, and Student Loan Banking Houses Socialist/Communist actions. Not to even begin with the overt/admitted Communists appointed by Obama, some being shamed out (Van Jones), and his Communist mentor Frank Marshall Davis or Marxist Terrorist childhood friend Bill Ayers.
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon The fact of the matter is you received an edited "The Communist Manifesto", most likely from a college/university course or Barnes and Noble bookseller, and think you're some Socialist Scholar, when numerous Nobel Prize winners have dissolved the sugar coating you so helplessly throw to the lower class and forever shamed it into the duspile of history. Considering you said Karl Marx favored private property clearly shows your ignorance, and it's you who doesn't know enough to
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
@tellyontellyon have a real discussion. So yes, maybe I'll talk to you in 10-20 years when the neurons start firing properly across that corpus callosum.
RightsAndPrivileges 3 weeks ago
Marx never objected to personal private property... in fact he thought we deserve to enjoy the fruits of our labour. But private property in the means of production is different.
The capitalist always gets out more than they put in, and, the worker always contribute more than they get back. That is how profit is made.
Capitalist 'owership' of the means of production is only a licence to rob workers of the value they have produced.
This is basic stuff... it's in the Communist Manifesto.
tellyontellyon 1 month ago
@tellyontellyon Marx never objected to personal private property... in fact he thought we deserve to enjoy the fruits of our labour. But private property in the means of production is different.
LOL?
"The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property."
- Karl Marx
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 3
@tellyontellyon Sounds like you need to re-read your hero's work, you keep spewing lies. And you can also read about how he was so destitute he couldn't afford to buy a coffin for one of his daughters who died in near infancy due to malnutrition/starvation; or about his 1 year old son who died as a direct result of malnutrition/starvation that he called a "Sacrifice to bourgeois misery." Infant children used as sacrifices for ideologies? When did we go back 5,000 years?
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 3
"The Constitution of Liberty"
- F.A. Hayek, an economist actually WORTHY of the Nobel Prize.
Pretty much embarasses you 10x worse than I just did.
P.S.: Interchanging "Your" with "You're" isn't much of an argument, unless you never passed 4th grade English.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 5
Stalin n'ai parlé rien? Oh lala..
Keep uploading savage plzzz!!!
KazzArie 5 months ago
stalin dictator of france......
ALLHOCKEY89 6 months ago
Socialism died in 1991. It is a dead ideology. People are still living with a Cold War mentality.
sandinista420 8 months ago
@sandinista420
i dont think comrade general secretary assclown AKA B Hussein Obama got the message
ObamaIsAMarxistTowel 7 months ago
What part of National SOCIALIST German Workers Party (NSDAP "nazi") do you not understand??....You do realize SOCIALISM is in the word.
To say an economic theory of total domination of all goods and services by a single governing body is not totalitarianism IS STUPID!!
Socialism is Totalitarianism you DUMBASS! and Nazism is Socialism.
austenbosten 9 months ago
@austenbosten
Your the dumbass
Hitler WAS THE FATHER OF PRIVATIZATION!
DEMOCRAT is also in the tital of North Korea.
Prisoner is right. YOU ARE A TOTAL MORON!
MrReco12 7 months ago
@MrReco12 Haha! I love it when a total dumbass like yourself tries to come on here and 'school' me...and someone who is from a Capitalist country none the less (Hey asswipe, why aren't you living in DPRK with your comrades you fucking hypocrite!)
Okay here's what I want you to do...
A. Give me the definition of the word: Privatization
Then B. Give me an example of Hitler privatizing.
Then define Democrat and give an example of that in the DPRK.
austenbosten 7 months ago
@austenbosten
Hitler privatized these companies: Commerz-Bank, the Dresdner Bank, the Deutsche Bank, Deutsche Schiff-und Machinenbau AG Bremen “Deschimag”, the Deutsche Reichsbahn, Vereinigte Stahlwerke A.G. and other huge corporations.
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: The full title of North Korea.
Australia is far more socialist than Nazi Germany and the United states.
MrReco12 7 months ago
@MrReco12 Hahaha. I'm not even going to try and respond to a moron like you. Those companies were never Government-owned you asshat.
austenbosten 7 months ago
@austenbosten
Transferring a publicly owned business, company etc. into the private sector!
Idiot!
MrReco12 7 months ago
Socialism has always been centered around the idea that the workers (i.e. the creators of the wealth in the society) ought to run the society democratically. So, instead of bosses making the most profits off of your wage labor at the factory, you and everyone else that creates that wealth runs the factory. Seems pretty simple to me, and it also goes to show that every example Savage cites as Socialism isn't that at all. Savage is a fucking dumbass.
guitarguy620 9 months ago
@guitarguy620 Given that he's spent great amounts of time (when he's not promoting hate and bigotry) spinning this hysterical lie that Obama, a centrist Democrat, is this flaming leftist who secretly plans to throw our nation into socialism, yeah, fucking dumbass is pretty much the appropriate description.
PrisonerNumber9653 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Socialism: A theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
DICTIONARY DOT FUCKING COM
COMMUNITY. gah... you right winged tea baggin' mother fuckers..
dowshipwigga 1 year ago
Socialism was a popular buzzword, and that's why they adopted the word "socialist" in the name of the party. Hitler was not a socialist, nor were Nazi party socialist in its ideology. Hitler persecuted the left, not the right. And while being mainstream right (or center right to be more specific) is not the same as Nazism, being a conservative capitalist was by far safer for those people than the trade unionist or the socialist or commie or Jew in Germany whereby they were all persecuted.
PsychoPunk1965 1 year ago
I think he may have been making a remark about France's socialist policies actually.
retardstupidass 1 year ago
1:20 "At the same time Stalin was the dictator of France"
Calvary48 1 year ago
@Calvary48 I just noticed that as well. Made me laugh
dstir009 1 year ago
rock and roll friday :)
ajgolfer1 1 year ago
who has told you for 80 years how evil socialism is?
Darusdei 1 year ago
WOW FRANCE ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING? I can't... wow i don't even know what to say... wow... fucking france... studied all his life...
sulkierknight 1 year ago
stalin the dictator of FRANCE?! unbelievable..
sunshinestatethelema 1 year ago
@sunshinestatethelema
I guess you never misspeak in your life especialy talking on the radio 4 hours per day 5 days per week 250 days per year.
stjdavis 1 year ago
I say Revolution the Second. BRING IT ON BUDDIES. BRING IT ON OBAMA. BECAUSE YOU WILL LOOSE AND WE WILL FIGHT UNTIL WE DIE.
Allmighty193 1 year ago
@Allmighty193 Last thing the U.S. needs is a bunch angry & ignorant cattle, so go ahead & get yourself killed. It will pave a path to a better future.
Bronzecop 1 year ago
@Bronzecop actually Mr I need the government to hold my hand the whole country is tired of bad spending of our money. It's our country, not Obamas.
Please tell us how Obamas excessive borrowing and spending will pull us out of the hole ?
CaptainSpauIding 1 year ago
Stalin was never the dictator of France. It was Russia. This guy flunked 8th grade.
magos2k6 2 years ago 2
He prolly listen to Hannity and Glen beck for all his info... what tools
Rottedvideo 1 year ago
The marxists want to control every aspect of your life, and will work to silence all opposition.
jmspflw 2 years ago 2
Michael,
you have a great knowledge of history. I know that was a freudian slip calling Stalin the dictator of France. But that was a good one.
nogov4me 2 years ago
i want to address to everyone where you think the idea of Communism started, and where did Hitler got his idea of a master race.
Jmerino7 2 years ago
watch the discovery channel they explained it in there.
Rottedvideo 1 year ago
this guy is talking shit. Revolutionary Marxism does't want to put control on capitalism and it doesn't want to redistribute the wealth created by capitalism.
Revolutionary Marxism does away with capitalism completely... and if it is true socialism, it won't be administered by a central government...
... but by directly democratic workers councils...
Control from the bottom up.
tellyontellyon 2 years ago 3
oh yea"true"socialism wherethe workers rule. the onlyreason workers work is because the professional classcreates jobs for them. without an educated citizenry allthe great workers wil be doing under your "true" socialism is farming wheat 15 hours a day. and noones gonnawant to be a doctor/professor/engineer when you can shovel-shit and get paid the same.dont fall for the bullshit telly. theywant you to believe in the fairytale socialist paradise,the only thing close to "true" socialism is NKorea
autocrat111 2 years ago
@autocrat111
North Korea is a dictatorship; it's only calls itself communist. (In truth, they made up their own ideology,called Juche)And you would not get paid the same as a doctor if you're a shit shoveler; you would simply pay more in taxes, (which would go back into the community,) because you make more.
Adeonothas 2 years ago
u commie supporters really make me laugh. im sure the first time u put your hand on a hot stove you never did it again. why cant u see that everytime communism was attempted its always ended in tyranny (as planned) and the workers theyre supposed to save always get burned... every single time, and yall just keep wanting to put your hand back on the stove.
autocrat111 1 year ago 12
I love how you use the word attempted. It means that they tried, and failed,correct?
Meaning,they tried to be communist,(or simply called themselves communist) and were not communist.
Adeonothas 1 year ago
yea just like someone "attempting" to jump off a 4 story building and live.. why would anyone else want to attempt that?
Reagan - socialism only works in two places, heaven where they dont need it, and hell where they already have it
autocrat111 1 year ago
Do you even know how socialism works?
Adeonothas 1 year ago
it will never work, the promises of equality by communist political intellectuals are nothing but a lie and highly worn out cliche. its not attainable on earth, but used to sucker the working class into thinking that communists are fighting for them, when in reality the workers are fighting for the communists
autocrat111 1 year ago
Avoiding the question.
Do you know how it works?
Adeonothas 1 year ago
@tellyontellyon And how do you transition power from one man who built his own company to a number of workers who did nothing to run it? Who acts as an intermediary? The government.
And with the US Government, the largest criminal organization in world history, you truly believe they will take control of all industries in all markets and just give it all back? That's what the Roman's thought when they wrote the clause for the office of the Dictatorship in the Roman Republic. The result was
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 3
@tellyontellyon the Roman Empire.
Office of the Dictatorship is VERBATIM exactly the same as the wording used in Executive Directive 51. Study history. You are an ignorant fool.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 9
@RightsAndPrivileges
No... first you have to smash the government/state... it's called a revolution.
Then the mass of ordinary people set up their own way of running society. Marx favoured a temporary 'workers commune' to carry out these functions while there was still a threat of counter-revolution.
tellyontellyon 1 month ago
@tellyontellyon Marx also wrote children were property of the state, and more than half of his own died of unsanitary living conditions because he was too "smart" to work. So when you have children we'll make sure to leave them under state control.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago
@tellyontellyon Any moron knows Socialism never works, not only from clear examples throughout history across numerous cultures, but from The Communist Manifesto itself, which has hypocritical thoughts that make no sense. Proven Fact.
Socialism renders production random in the absence of a price system that accurately reflects consumer value. There is no center piece of value for all commodities hidden away in Africa somewhere; the value of one thing is whatever the people decide it to be.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago
@tellyontellyon Money in the U.S. holds value because people ACCEPT it as a means of currency, not because of any designation the Government gives it. Your entire creedo is in itself a fallacy: "Socialism, because we Politicians know how to run your business better than you do." Josef Stalin sezied a massive amount of agricultural land from the Kulaks in Soviet Russia, privately owned, family run farms, because he believed the Soviet Government know more and could run these farms better than
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 2
@tellyontellyon the actual farmers. The result was 25,000 people dying everyday of Starvation and Malnutrition, and whereas Russia was once one of the largest EXPORTERS of grain, they wound up IMPORTING millions of tons of grain annually after the government seize.
Aristotle also writes on the subject; saying that modern-day communists are hypocrites because liberality cannot exist without the use made of private property. But I can tell this kind of reading is WAY above your head lol.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 2
@tellyontellyon In simpler words so you understand: Socialism/Communism are morons' ideologies, Capitalism an intellectual's. Because only a moron reads and doesn't question a single facet of a document or juxtaposes it to real world scenarios. When you can give me an example of either a politically or economically successful Socialist/Communist government we can talk. Until then, you can move to North Korea where they are eating each other because they're starving.,
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 2
@RightsAndPrivileges
Well, the Stalinist distortions you mention are neither socialist or communist in the sense that Marx would have advocated.
The world hasn't seen true socialism yet...
... but how many times have capitalism got it wrong... show me the successful capitalist society? Slavery, exploitation and murder of innocents... that's what I see.
Capitalism means freedom for the rich.
p.s. Calling somebody a 'Moron' isn't much of an argument... unless your only 12?
tellyontellyon 1 month ago
@tellyontellyon And one comment arguing the same thing you have been trying to argue "Socialism/Communism sounds so good on paper" only works to prove my point; There is paper, and there is reality. The Soviet Union's Constitution was beautifully written; nothing more than lip-service. Don't forget U.S.S.R = Union of Soviet Socialist REPUBLICS. Socialism is a ruse, in its ideological form it's hypocritical and counter-intuitive, in it's real-world form catastrophic.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 5
@tellyontellyon Capitalism means freedom for all actually, via it's usage of private property, which Aristotle argues gives way to liberality itself, because liberality only exists with private property. Thusly, Socialist = Liberal = Fallacy/Hypocrisy, and rewards for the hard working AND the creative, one of Capitalism's most important inherencies. Without Creativity and Innovation, there can be no Sociological Progression, hence, you so-called "Progressives" are truly "Regressives".
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 5
@tellyontellyon Oh, and by the way, Capitalism and Conservatisim are not synonymous, which is why the TRUE Liberal is a Capitalist; Capitalism both encourages AND rewards Creativity and Innovation, thusly a true Progressive is a Capitalist.
RightsAndPrivileges 1 month ago 5
What video game thing didn't he talk about?
Shadyac21 2 years ago
Comment removed
missle3944 2 years ago 7
@missle3944
I think everyone understands that, including Michael.
stjdavis 1 year ago
@missle3944 He misspoke obviously. Anyone over the age of 12 could tell you what country Stalin was from.
ColdCypher 1 year ago
@ColdCypher Georgia, presumably
arbeitsscheuer 9 months ago
@arbeitsscheuer Yes...
ColdCypher 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Trust me. The Obama fraudster will leave plenty of room for health-care speculators to make big profits. We'll have an half-ass imitation of Britain's NHS. By the way, Britain has nationalized healthcare and it's still a CAPITALIST system running the economy. So what the fuck are you people worried about? Stop jerking yourselves off. You wish you had real socialism in America so we wouldn't have to bust our ass every day earn a few dollars and get a lousy 2 weeks off if you're lucky!
calmaciurma 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
All you idiot dingbats that believe there is political diversity in America, because phony Jew-propagandist polemicist servant of the Jewish lobby Savage makes you believe so! Wake-up dingbats! Obama and Savage have to give blow-jobs to the same people at the end of the day! This phony fraudster is afraid to come with me to Mexico and propagandize against the Zetas, preferring debate about non-existent "socialism" in the country! Who are our real enemies, ASSHOLE? Walk the walk -coward!
calmaciurma 2 years ago
What's socialised healthcare of not socialism? You might want to re-think that.
ExquisiteDoom 2 years ago
you know its bullshit hen you see the phrase "wake up". what is it with people and jews?
errskin 2 years ago
This is a country is part democracy and part republic. It does not need to be changed to socialism. Beats the purpose of what our founding fathers had planned for this country.
ihateurmom5 2 years ago
I'm Canadian, but my family is American going back to 1740 and beleive me, yur founding fathers are spinning in their graves......the U.S., i'm afraid is moving towards big brother faster than Canada & Europe combined.......it's not easy when the media is controlled by liberals.
quincee33 2 years ago 2
Even people with bad English can make outstanding points. You really do understand what people should be more focused on. Kudos
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ha! Poor poor America having to live with idiots like this guy.
jtreach 2 years ago
Well according to this guy Obama, we aren't a Christian nation.
himynameisjustind 2 years ago
Of course not his eyes he is a muslim from kenya.
arkivx1 2 years ago
But there are certain radio personnel who are trying to get our "Christian" nation back. but they don't want to follow the real doctrines of there own theology.
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
Perhaps you forgot the Christian doctrine, render unto Caeser that which is Caeser's and render unto God that which is Gods'
autocrat111 1 year ago
Ya Jesus was trying to put forth that nothing was Cesar's cuz everything was gods. So people shouldn't give to there government but to each other because God is in all of us... at least that's what i got from it but the bible is translated so many different ways there is no realism in it just good stories with the occasional moral uplift.
Rottedvideo 1 year ago
@Rottedvideo Guess you missed "Render on to Cesar what is Cesar's" and Jesus paid the tax.. oh yea and 1 Timothy 2 "First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all people, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way.".
MRKetter81 1 year ago
@Rottedvideo Jesus wasn't at all trying to put on that Cesar owned nothing because everything was God's. Jesus was saying Cesar owned the coin, the money and the land so pay back to Cesar what you owe to Cesar.
MRKetter81 1 year ago
@Rottedvideo Also why would it say 1 Peter 2:13 "Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority, or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right. For it is God's will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish men."
MRKetter81 1 year ago
He did that so they could concentrate on worshipping and teaching about God. It's the same with getting into heaven...you can't take anything with you.
himynameisjustind 2 years ago
Then shouldn't the Government be the same, If this is a Christian nation, and follow the conducts and doctrines of there own religion. Being a Capitalistic Society is the exact opposite of what Jesus was preaching, because a Capitalistic society becomes Greedy (its how or economy got this way, money is not recirculating cuz the rich horde it and give nothing to the poor) no one style of government has to date Worked for any ancient or recent society... We as the People need to rethink everything
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
Everybody does have the same chance of hetting into heaven, and everyone is equal in God's eyes. That means that everyone according to race, wealth, etc is equal. He's not saying someone is less of a person. He shared food amongst the poor and hungry. He fed them, He didn't "distribute wealth."
himynameisjustind 2 years ago
Didn't he have all his disciples give everything they had to to poor just to follow him around in the dessert. Back then there was a huge definition between the wealthy and the poor( kinda like today) and jesus was trying to make the wealth understand that they were lucky enough to be well off and should share that wealth with those less fortunate. i don't recall him every giving or doing anything awesome for a rich man or praising wealth... Please educate me!!!
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
Rottevideo, how was Jesus a socialist?
himynameisjustind 2 years ago
Sorry he was a Communist. he believed that a rich man had the same chance of getting into heaven as a camel going through the eye of a needle, he believed in sharing amongst the poor sick and hungry(distributing wealth?), believed everyone was Equal. i don't these thing should be forced upon the public, but more as a Capitalistic society is the exact opposite of what he was preaching. Now, how is he not a Socialist/Communist???
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
From each according to his need, from each according to his ability, I'm no christian Jesus freak , but i can see how mistaken you are.
arkivx1 2 years ago
Jesus was trying to teach that if you can help your fellow man then you should, if you can give and care for your fellow man and those in need then you should. so how am i mistaken???
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
Jesus said you have a choice, in communism you have 0 choices, the Gubment makes the decisions about who can produce what and who gets what they produce.
arkivx1 2 years ago
Jesus was a Socialist- get over it Christian America
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
I am getting tired of idiot libs saying crap like this.
theinstantvincent 2 years ago
I wish i was a Lib, Dem, or Repub cuz that would make it easier to be ignorant and only see one way to live life in the world. And then i would also be able to never make a compromise between peoples afflicting ideas or issues. i guess i'll just have to go back to being a unselfish, give to the poor, walk a mile in another mans shoes, understanding Individual that believes you cannot love your God until you Love yourself and to love yourself you must Love your fellow man!
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
I am a Christian and care about my fellow man, though I thank God that I have enough sense to look at what socialism has done in the past... in places like NAZI Germany.
theinstantvincent 2 years ago
Nazi German was a Dictatorship. there was a little man by the name of Hitler who ran everything. he claimed they were socialist but how can you be a socialist society With a Dictator, doesn't that make it a Dictatorship...
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
Rolls Eyes....
ForzaJersey 2 years ago
You have pretty eyes!!!! :)
Rottedvideo 2 years ago
Stalin was the dictartor of France? WHAT? And you can't call it a "slip of the tongue", because he paused beforehand and thought about it.
VanDoodah 2 years ago
Is this man really serious? Blackshirts, fascism.. look, the Obama administration won power through the normal political process, has respected democratic norms, and hasn't intervened in the economy or the private sector any more drastically than our ostensible European allies have been doing for decades. It's a shoddy, ludicrous parallel, and I can't for the life of me figure out why he'd make it.
It's all the more surprising since the man seems to have a firm grasp on the facts of history.
rogue497 2 years ago
If there's one thing I've always learned is that history repeats it self.
MRKetter81 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
If there's one thing I've always learned is that history repeats it self.
MRKetter81 2 years ago
So did Hitler( he was ELECTEDon the promise of hope and change for the true germans).
arkivx1 2 years ago
Hitler lied. Germany had indeed been defeated on the Western front. He didn't take into account the US entry into the war, which led to the collapse of the Western Front.
paolosilv 2 years ago
Hitler only used the word Socialism in order to procure the support of the working class, but he was not really a socialist. He always supported free enterprise.
XxxNuMbxxX0301 2 years ago
Not at all, he exerted total control over the market through price controls, wage requirements, and turned the economy from a market economy, into a command economy.
Hitler was a capitalist, is a myth perpetuated by socialists to distinguish themselves from national socialists visa vi Hitler. If you really compare the USSR and Nazi Germany however, there is little difference between the two.
GaiusIuliusTaberna 2 years ago 10
@GaiusIuliusTaberna Agreed, yet there are capitalist in a socialist society. People don't realize this. Its the Dictators that capitalize off of the backs of their people. Every society has capitalism. Ours is restricted capitalism, which is becoming pretty damn close to Marxism and just like any economist will tell you, economic systems evolve with society. Marxism eventually ends in totalitarianism. A free market capitalist society doesn't change it grows, unless you restrict it.
drlovebutton 1 year ago
@GaiusIuliusTaberna There is a lecture on YT that proves "Why Nazism is Socialism and why Socialism is Totalitarianism."
austenbosten 1 year ago
@austenbosten And that "lecture" is a load of shit. Nazism and socialism have NOTHING to do with one another, the Nazis were far RIGHT, not left. Socialism is an ECONOMIC theory, to say it's "totalitarianism" shows true ignorance of what the word even means. McCarthyism lives in the US, idiotic lies about socialism constantly pollute our discussion, and anyone who disagrees with the lies gets painted as an enemy of the nation. Total bullshit.
PrisonerNumber9653 9 months ago
Stalin was the dictator of France? Classic!
Can we let this muppet into Britain so we can all laugh at his remedial understanding of 20th Century history...
kaeko249 2 years ago
Yep, one slip of the tongue, and he can be safely dismissed.
Whew! That was close. You might have had to think about some complex historical, political and economic issues or counter some serious criticisms of the current political scene.
Why do all that, when saying, "France! Lol!" makes all those things magically vanish?
You're intellectually lazy and pathetic.
neestle 2 years ago
"oops'.
paolosilv 2 years ago
classic Freudian slip
GaiusIuliusTaberna 2 years ago
Obama says the USA has 55 states i guess we can laugh at his special education lvl of geography.
arkivx1 2 years ago
@arkivx1 Well i made fun of that too, but think about why he said that he might have some country in mind to annex.
Jmerino7 2 years ago
I'd not heard of this guy before he was banned by our government from entering the UK. I don't agree with him on most things but, do on some. Although he is not what I'd describe as a drinking buddy, I find it absurd to ban him from entering the UK on the grounds of promoting hatred. It's ok to hate anyone or anything as long as you aren't promoting violence and I don't believe he does.
RuudVanDrijver 2 years ago
And most of America's "mental midgets" will argue, they are not dumb.
No, they are not, just lazy. And don't understand that liberty is not just given to someone, upon becoming an American citizen.
Liberty must be maintained and can be taken away, if not defended.
DD826 2 years ago
The simple truth is, Savage is a metal giant and most of America are mental midgets.
Unlike the left's Obama, Savage thinks and speaks at the same time, no telepropters or speach writers.
DD826 2 years ago 2
stalin dictator of france?lol
savage got tired of politics and i can understand him :(
proagentv5 2 years ago
Savage is getting old...
And is making mistakes from time to time...
And having HUGE moments of total lose of memory...
He is an old dude... he is nearly 70 right?
How many 70 year olds can behave like Savage does on a daily bases...
Or... maybe... a few times every 3 hours, he misspeaks...
You try to talk 3 straight hours, relying only on what you have in your brain... You will make a mistake or two...
TRUST ME... it is harder then it sounds...
Although... it does sound funny...
TKainZero 2 years ago 3
WTF? He claims that Stalin was dictator of France :-D
sjolinpeter 2 years ago
Doesn't Savage look like James Mason when he's at his desk?
FigurinItOut 2 years ago
THE WISE RABBI MIKE SAVAGE
Uberaoshi 2 years ago 5
@Uberaoshi mmm. He didnt mention , as no one does, Hitlers issue with the Jews was really that they controlled the money ! And still do ... Rothschild, Morgan..and the ilk run the Fed and most reserve banks around the world !! What appalled Hitler and the Germans, was that monetary issues , that were controlled by non government , could cripple his economy ! I wonder who , Besides Wilson , backed such harsh reparations post 1914...? Now that would be interesting , watch the USA Peso guys !
klnine 1 year ago
National Socialism was a misnomer, but I'm surprised how smart Savage sounded on this one. Usually he's nothing but a crazy wingnut.
ComradeSephiroth 2 years ago
Don't listen to him much eh?
He's probably off on a tangent 10-20% of the time. Rest of the time he's really spot on.
sammarkie 2 years ago
Stalin was the dictator of France???(1:23)Well, we all make mistakes....
dimon108 2 years ago
yeah, Im sure he meant to say Russia.
miniccc 2 years ago 2
Stalin tried to form an anti-Hitler alliance with France and Britain
booAHHHH 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Republicans and Al-Qaeda have one thing in common: they both want the American economy to fail.
FoShizzle951 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
9/11 is a inside too
Walkingtall123789 2 years ago
huh?
FoShizzle951 2 years ago
9/11 was an outside job.
3rdWorldInvasion 2 years ago
oxymoron??? how is that.? Socialism sucludid to a nation (National Socialism) as a aposd to (international) Socialism. the intracit construction of governmint is endless. if you can fathum it it can be so. its like saying a diamond can not be a square.ect
saxonhaste 2 years ago
thanks
apJAzzfusiondruMmer 2 years ago
it seems some people are confusing capitalism with 'corporatism '....
bebop54 2 years ago
Hitler was not a socialist. Socialism is international. National Socialism is an oxymoron.
globalsocialist 2 years ago
I thought he was a socialist
aksdufyaoiweursdl 2 years ago
In name only, he was pretty much a hardcore fascist, he supported capitalism to his own ends
RiseofFooTwo 2 years ago 3
Mussolini was the fascist, and national socialism and facism are virtually the same.
arkivx1 2 years ago
yes Mussolini was a fascist, but like I said Hitler supported capitalism if it benefited him, which defeats the purpose of socialism. I mean I guess he claimed to be a socialist but it really doesn't mean anything if he wasn't.
RiseofFooTwo 2 years ago
And that's exactly what it will be like here. Obama Soros... those two will be the ones making out like bandits (along with other powerful libs in gov. while the common man is left suffering.
theinstantvincent 2 years ago
Why play word games? The point he is making is about government control in general.
Subjugator1866 2 years ago 6
Exactly, it doesn't matter what type of government he technically supported. all that matters is that he supported a government that has complete control.
RiseofFooTwo 2 years ago
Ohh, Thats so much better,lmao. Hitler was a socialist, you may want to try a history book or dictionary.
arkivx1 2 years ago
Of course libs are too stupid to notice that... or too spineless to say so.
theinstantvincent 2 years ago
Global dumbass is more like it. Your whole argument is a lie.
theinstantvincent 2 years ago