@SirSafer I agree but the first mistake was when the original Tea Party got excited about the support. One one wanted to listen when the ugly stuff was being spewed but now it's a republican problem. I like Ron Paul and I'm glad to know you are not just following along. He raises some interesting points like auditing the Fed but The Department of Education thing perplexes me.
@m This has NOTHING AT ALL to do with socialism so your implication only makes you look stupid. The REAL questions.
1 Can we produce abundant food, water, energy, etc for everyone or not?
2 Do we have the technology to automate most of the work or not?
If no, prove it.
If yes, 'money for labor' is OBSOLETE. So the only logical system is to produce abundance and just distribute it. There can only be force when there is NOT enough for everyone, ONLY with abundance EVERYONE is FREE. GET IT.
@michaelantonio To me socialism means democratic economy, and at best no government at all and no Price System. Ron Paul just stands apart from the rest, and I often agree with his critics. I just do not agree with their definition of socialism at all. Indeed if that is socialism, then I am not a socialist.
We can battle endlessly about semantics, so perhaps I should just say I decire a Peircean Technocracy.
Amy Kremer (& many like her) have found a place where they can be noticed (finally!) by all the white boys/men who ignored her from childhood on because of her weight. Folks like her are possibly even scarier than the corporo-fascists who back them because they'll do anything for "love," whereas the Koch brothers et. al.'s agenda is power & money.
I don't believe what they try to make the tea party out to be, the media shapes what we think of the tea party and tries to ignore the vast Ron Paul group of the tea party.
@SirSafer I don't think so. I think he would have spoken his mind and answered the questions. Not all his positions are agreeable and he knows it he get's evasive when he's asked to shoot straight on some issues because he knows they are generally not popular. I don't have a problem with the guy but his "followers" do the same thing they accuse everyone else of. They blindly follow him I have never seen an follower of his point out some of his clear madness.
@thundavolt Surely bring it to the state level raises taxes and having different curricula will cause confussion and make the price of text books higher. I also would really like to know what people don't want their children to learn and what they want their children to learn.
@sintruder: Let's NOT eliminate the social programs............... after all, there's always gonna be people who need it. ALWAYS. You can't deny that.
@lsdesign I was just thinking the same thing. I find it interesting to think about it this way. Defense spending (military, CIA, etc) is probably the single largest expenditure in the entire federal budget. The military by itself is probably the single largest socialist program in the US. And the US military is definitely the largest military in the world. So, it's quite possible that the US military is the largest socialist program in the entire world even when including communist countries.
making leaders is a means of discrediting an entire group, and bringing down organisations. As to who I am referring to, yes I am referring to private businesses given too much power, such as the federal reserve. I am also referring to the government officials who give such power out.
@ronaldoelpaso i dont know which of those party leaders has a tv program so that doesnt help either.
But yeah, considering i might punch one of those of those dudes in the face also, i am as serious as you are. tea party idiots arent worth my time though so its all hyperbole really.
Doesnt help that i am a peace loving leftist so they would have to do more than be idiots to gather enough ire for me to actually punch them.
@waltermh111 At this point, you are either being facetious, or you're mentally handicapped. I'm saying that the guy interviewing the tea party people is an ass.
@ronaldoelpaso lol, so your sayng hes no better than them?
I disagree, I think they cant answer a question when interviewed despite that when they feel they can make claims around their own base.
Reminds me of Christine O'Donnel who was apparently educated enough to complain about the job of the guy when he was county executive or running for it, but when asked by a talk show host, she then says shes not educated enough to discuss the matter.
@waltermh111 I don't think you can prove that the intelligence level of someone belonging to the tea party when checked against the general public is lower. They understand that when you pay money into a pension all your life and none of it actually goes into your pension, and gets blown, then there's nothing left. They understand that borrowing money that you can't mathematically ever pay back, doesn't make sense. Most non-teaparty ppl don't know this, or they'd become a tea party member.
@ronaldoelpaso your right, i dont know that its lower, but the leadership of each party and of the candidates should have an intelectual capacity higher than average.
Thats the usefulness of leaders, to have a better head on their shoulders amongst other things.
As for your second part, i dont get it, are you speaking against the crooked business practices of the private industry here?
@ronaldoelpaso Then you talk about debt issues, but we are only as well off as we are now because of spending more than we can ever pay back.
Yes, i do wish we didnt spend on wars, that would significantly lower the debt. We could spend more at home and still drop our debt. But sadly no candidate is against fighting somebody, except Ron Paul and i assume his son.
I guarantee these candidates will want to fight somebody if they go in. They are afraid of everything.
This guy did a good job. So many no-nothing Yahoos! Do you think these folks just want to make noise in the hopes that some rich benefactor will reward them later on with a cushy job? I think so. Nowadays people will say anything for a buck. They have no sense of honor.
I suppose I should give up on redistributionists who think government can make something out of nothing, but I wish you would at least make an effort to understand that the taxes corporations pay do not come from CEOs' salaries. They come from ordinary people who buy the companies' products or invest, the vast majority of whom are not rich. Corporations don't pay taxes; they just collect them.
@waltermh111 Have you ever been a libertarian? I didn't think so. I read comments all the time from people who used to be statists, as I was long ago, but who have studied and now understand that government is a failure at everything it does (except for killing and stealing, which it does very efficiently). But I have yet to see the opposite: a life-long libertarian who, after much study and thought, comes to the realization that the state really does know best how to order our lives.
@rwalkenhorst i said i was for capping management total salary and you wonder if i was ever a libertarian?
lol
silly libertarian.
I could never be one because i am not an emotional reactionary.
I am not afraid of my shadow, believe in conspiracy theories, nor do i believe in absolutes such as the gov is bad at everything except evil things.
I have done enough research to know that the libertarian approach is impractical on anything but the smallest of scales where everybody knows everybody.
@waltermh111 The main task of the creeps in D.C. is keeping us convinced that we need them. It appears that in your case, they've been very successful.
@rwalkenhorst that is one of the problems of a libertarian, you think the US is the world
I dont believe based on US example, i believe based on evidence from around the world, and i dont mean simply how govs act, but through study of many areas
I dont care what the politicians in US want, its about what we want and are willing to fight for
If you want anarchy then go for it, but we will fight for the way we want things. But please note, small gov is only as small as it gets you what you want
@dragonflychainsaw hold onto your hat but recent polling (and all previous polling) indicated that most "teapartiers" favor cutting every benefit that they aren't personally receiving. It's not exactly the Ron Paul R3VOLUTION we're talking about here.
"Will the leader of the Tea Party please raise your hand." Ha!
It saddens me that so many of these folks are so timid about defending free markets and libertarian principles, but the beginning of the interview is hilarious. Smirky O'Donnell just can't imagine any human activity not being centrally planned by wise overlords who lead us around like trained dogs.
@Bblackjackk but he does let them talk, so what are you talking about?
i am halfway through and he only interupted one guy to take a vote on the subject in question and a few other votes on related subjects, thats when he asked them to define socialism and then the lady went on a tangent ignoring the question, though he gave her enough time to spew her rhetoric, but only ignored her again to keep her on topic, a very important topic considering anti-socialism is a sticking point for tea party
Whatever name you call it by, the tea party is full of willfully ignorant, reactionary people and is in no way 'grass roots', it is manufactured by corporations.
he could be just as unfair to a republican or democrat. probably not a democrat watch him interview alvin greene. all members of a political party will get it wrong by definition. eliminate all social programs after you wien off those dependent on them.
the tea party wants to be a far right wing anonymous. the problem "far right wing" and "anonymous" are scary as fuck in these type of situations. get them both together and catnarök will begin
@iwillspyonyou Which one of the panelists is also named O'Donnell?
I didnt see the host get kicked around, so I cant tell which party member your talking about.
I guess you wanted the host to be more confrontational, but that wasnt his job there today.
His purpose was to ask questions and keep them on topic, and thats all he did. He wasnt interested in countering statements aside from clearing up the socialist issue which tea party was afraid to speak out on, lol
In 1992, The Tea Party was called, "WE THE PEOPLE" ... Ross Perot LOST, George H. W. Bush LOST and a Democrat was handed the Oval Office!!!
All they might do this time is make it a three party race again in 2012 and that will suffice to split the Republican vote so Obama will be re-elected. They're self-defeating.
Then they'll go away, again.
This is just History doing it's favorite thing ... repeating itself.
@grizzzlyjoe: Not quite all.............you do have to be a dupe at the very least, but there are a few good ones. And you see, the globalists would rather have us shout certain slogans that have no meaning, and such, than take a balanced and truthful look at reality. Why I seem to be amongst the company of only a true-blue few on here, I'll never know.
i wish o'donnell questioned that dude on agricultural subsidies. there are countless tea party people within the republican leadership who have taken them yet claim that they are wrong and anti-american.
The host has got them by the balls, live on air showing that they have no idea what they are talking about they are merely repeating foxnews talking points like all the other dittoheads who can't squeeze a single original thought out of that fat american head of theirs.
@oyate1960: LMAO.............Also, we can add folks like HyperBorealOperator and ExposeZionistCrimes to the 'shills' list, but I'm not sure how well their names would go with another parody of the theme of a certain '90s cartoon.............ah well. LOL ;-)
@dennist3hmenace You seem to be a part of a stream of negative rightist comments on this channel.. The host is not being a douche bag, the host is trying to confront them with their bullshit, you should try to discern bullshit from reality it might help you to not get so confused about the pretty flashing colors on your screen.
@MrBric12 Socialism has no single, clear, universally agreed definition. It's a difficult question to answer. It could be anything from state ownership of industry to redistribution of wealth and anything in between depending on who you ask.
@dennist3hmenace State run is socialist. Just because you would rather not call it socialist to suit your argument does not make it any less socialist.
@dennist3hmenace actually, socialism has a base definition, look in a dictionary sometime.
Ignorance is no excuse. And your argument is one based on ignorance.
Evne then, all of those represent medicare which is partial gov ownership of industry, that is, they are an insurer for elderly and people of other issues, replacing a private corp which could do it.
It also is a sort of redistribution of wealth since you can pull out more than you put in.
These idiots are gonna be the straw the broke the camel's back for this country.. Good thing I live in the forest away from major cities with my medicinal marijuana garden!
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM hush, the "experts" are coming on. Hey it's Denny! HFS they actually got somebody who knows what they are talking about for a change! Hey Denny what you are you going up there with those hacks? Guys what's Denny doing up there with the hacks?
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM Maybe in the media lense, and to some on the far left. To me, he will always be the leader, and I think most grass roots conservative agree. Beck, Hannity and O'Reilly can claim whatever they want- Dr. Paul has gained a lot of momentum since the 08 race and that element is always downplayed on MSM.
The fakes will be rooted out someday. One can't claim to be for small government and support $500 billion annual military budget and $100+ billion wars on a yearly basis.
@MiracleMile90 Oh yes- the guy who went to duke medical school, served as an flight surgeon in the air force, worked as a doctor in church hospitals, delivered over 4000 babies, then served 10 terms in congress as one of the ony members who has been anti-war, and a proponent of freedom and liberty for everybody, just just a few- yeah what a terrible person.
@ThePoliticalPugilist: Well, he isn't ENTIRELY bad, perhaps............but there's multiple examples of him of not just being a snake oil salesman, but a dishonest coward as well............for example why did he shy away and even lie about, some rather unscrupulous newsletters he had written in the '90s?
@ThePoliticalPugilist the problem is not that anybody wants to ignore him but that he refuses to connect with them much. Sure, i think rand paul has, but Ron Paul is steadfast in being a republican and focusing on that party and goes to very few tea party focused rallies to my understanding, he does not run a campaign seeking tea party specifically, and therefore its card to tie him to it.
So the people who get called on to represent it are those which do so the loudest.
@SirSafer I agree but the first mistake was when the original Tea Party got excited about the support. One one wanted to listen when the ugly stuff was being spewed but now it's a republican problem. I like Ron Paul and I'm glad to know you are not just following along. He raises some interesting points like auditing the Fed but The Department of Education thing perplexes me.
thundavolt 1 year ago
These Ron Paul wannabes are pretty lame
"Free market" is ROOT of problems
1. how do you stop corruption caused by profit motive?
2. how do you ensures that everyone has the minimum necessities?
ANSWER
1. FREELY Share ALL resources & knowledge worldwide, NO more money/property
2. Use LATEST technology to create an ABUNDANCE of all our needs, NO more waste/theft
3. Automate/localize ALL production and distribution, NO more central control/wage slavery
v=YxPPnCW6sMo
v=Cf1gZxmIDKw
dontblockmedk 1 year ago
@dontblockmedk - Your answers are Socialistic, & proven failures....
michaelantonio 1 year ago 3
@m This has NOTHING AT ALL to do with socialism so your implication only makes you look stupid. The REAL questions.
1 Can we produce abundant food, water, energy, etc for everyone or not?
2 Do we have the technology to automate most of the work or not?
If no, prove it.
If yes, 'money for labor' is OBSOLETE. So the only logical system is to produce abundance and just distribute it. There can only be force when there is NOT enough for everyone, ONLY with abundance EVERYONE is FREE. GET IT.
dontblockmedk 1 year ago
@dontblockmedk Hmmm have you looked at Technocracy by any chance? =)
RSFO 1 year ago
@michaelantonio I am a socialist and I like Ron Paul, but he cannot safe the economy or the self-defeating Price System.
Btw. why did you add me as a friend? I am just curious.
RSFO 1 year ago
@RSFO How can you be a socialist & like Ron paul?
michaelantonio 1 year ago
@michaelantonio To me socialism means democratic economy, and at best no government at all and no Price System. Ron Paul just stands apart from the rest, and I often agree with his critics. I just do not agree with their definition of socialism at all. Indeed if that is socialism, then I am not a socialist.
We can battle endlessly about semantics, so perhaps I should just say I decire a Peircean Technocracy.
RSFO 1 year ago
Jesus Christ he went to town on them.
Churchx77 1 year ago 2
Thank you Mr.O'Donnell for exposing these ignorant scum!
hunterswine 1 year ago
O'Donnell: AIPAC media whore & a pathetic excuse for "journalism"...
Who watches cable news? LOL
North2016 1 year ago
Question: What do the Tea Party groups have in common.
Answer: they are all on the list of targets for the Republicans to coopt.
RodneyAHampton 1 year ago
I'm no Tea Partier,, but I gotta say this Lawrence O'Donnell acts like a complete Douche bag almost every night. I hope MSNBC cans his show.
lestliness 1 year ago
??
HOW DID YOU GET 15:15 VIDEO LENGTH - LIMIT WAS 15 MIN
?
OvergrowDaGovernment 1 year ago
@OvergrowDaGovernment u answered ur own question, was
losarman 1 year ago
Amy Kremer (& many like her) have found a place where they can be noticed (finally!) by all the white boys/men who ignored her from childhood on because of her weight. Folks like her are possibly even scarier than the corporo-fascists who back them because they'll do anything for "love," whereas the Koch brothers et. al.'s agenda is power & money.
NoLongerDelusional 1 year ago
@NoLongerDelusional if u cant hit em with the policies, just get personal
losarman 1 year ago
@losarman screaming. the next best thing to being correct.
adzug 1 year ago
the tea party aka the KKK
Boogathegreat 1 year ago
AIPAC media whores, O'Donnell another pathetic excuse for a journalist....
North2016 1 year ago
I don't believe what they try to make the tea party out to be, the media shapes what we think of the tea party and tries to ignore the vast Ron Paul group of the tea party.
RyanR3volution 1 year ago
@SirSafer I don't think so. I think he would have spoken his mind and answered the questions. Not all his positions are agreeable and he knows it he get's evasive when he's asked to shoot straight on some issues because he knows they are generally not popular. I don't have a problem with the guy but his "followers" do the same thing they accuse everyone else of. They blindly follow him I have never seen an follower of his point out some of his clear madness.
thundavolt 1 year ago
@thundavolt Surely bring it to the state level raises taxes and having different curricula will cause confussion and make the price of text books higher. I also would really like to know what people don't want their children to learn and what they want their children to learn.
thundavolt 1 year ago
@sintruder: Let's NOT eliminate the social programs............... after all, there's always gonna be people who need it. ALWAYS. You can't deny that.
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
do any of these people want to cut the larges socialized military system in the world?
I bet they would never even think about cutting the war budget. why is that?
lsdesign 1 year ago
@lsdesign I was just thinking the same thing. I find it interesting to think about it this way. Defense spending (military, CIA, etc) is probably the single largest expenditure in the entire federal budget. The military by itself is probably the single largest socialist program in the US. And the US military is definitely the largest military in the world. So, it's quite possible that the US military is the largest socialist program in the entire world even when including communist countries.
MarmaladeINFP 1 year ago
tea party is for idiots.
lsdesign 1 year ago
KARL!
:)
iTellYouNoLie 1 year ago
making leaders is a means of discrediting an entire group, and bringing down organisations. As to who I am referring to, yes I am referring to private businesses given too much power, such as the federal reserve. I am also referring to the government officials who give such power out.
ronaldoelpaso 1 year ago
Anyone else wanna punch this dude in the face?
ronaldoelpaso 1 year ago
@ronaldoelpaso which one, there are 3 on the panel?
waltermh111 1 year ago
@waltermh111 serious? you don't know who I'm talking about? did you watch the video? i'm referring to the pompus moron with a tv program.
ronaldoelpaso 1 year ago
@ronaldoelpaso i dont know which of those party leaders has a tv program so that doesnt help either.
But yeah, considering i might punch one of those of those dudes in the face also, i am as serious as you are. tea party idiots arent worth my time though so its all hyperbole really.
Doesnt help that i am a peace loving leftist so they would have to do more than be idiots to gather enough ire for me to actually punch them.
waltermh111 1 year ago
@waltermh111 At this point, you are either being facetious, or you're mentally handicapped. I'm saying that the guy interviewing the tea party people is an ass.
ronaldoelpaso 1 year ago
@ronaldoelpaso lol, so your sayng hes no better than them?
I disagree, I think they cant answer a question when interviewed despite that when they feel they can make claims around their own base.
Reminds me of Christine O'Donnel who was apparently educated enough to complain about the job of the guy when he was county executive or running for it, but when asked by a talk show host, she then says shes not educated enough to discuss the matter.
Hmm, tea party idiots.
waltermh111 1 year ago
@waltermh111 I don't think you can prove that the intelligence level of someone belonging to the tea party when checked against the general public is lower. They understand that when you pay money into a pension all your life and none of it actually goes into your pension, and gets blown, then there's nothing left. They understand that borrowing money that you can't mathematically ever pay back, doesn't make sense. Most non-teaparty ppl don't know this, or they'd become a tea party member.
ronaldoelpaso 1 year ago
@ronaldoelpaso your right, i dont know that its lower, but the leadership of each party and of the candidates should have an intelectual capacity higher than average.
Thats the usefulness of leaders, to have a better head on their shoulders amongst other things.
As for your second part, i dont get it, are you speaking against the crooked business practices of the private industry here?
waltermh111 1 year ago
@ronaldoelpaso Then you talk about debt issues, but we are only as well off as we are now because of spending more than we can ever pay back.
Yes, i do wish we didnt spend on wars, that would significantly lower the debt. We could spend more at home and still drop our debt. But sadly no candidate is against fighting somebody, except Ron Paul and i assume his son.
I guarantee these candidates will want to fight somebody if they go in. They are afraid of everything.
waltermh111 1 year ago
hi Amy!
PartVIII 1 year ago
Just VOTE EM OUT. If 'they" are in office, vote em out with anyone. What are they going to do, NOT represent We the People.
Can we please get some people in Washington that aren't related, or screwing someone's cousin?
IronRangeSurvival 1 year ago
This guy did a good job. So many no-nothing Yahoos! Do you think these folks just want to make noise in the hopes that some rich benefactor will reward them later on with a cushy job? I think so. Nowadays people will say anything for a buck. They have no sense of honor.
KasparHauser5 1 year ago
Lawrence owned @ 9:50!
LibertyMike1 1 year ago
i wonder why most of these tea party folks want to cut programs for disadvantaged Americans yet the are all for cutting taxes for corporations
dragonflychainsaw 1 year ago
I suppose I should give up on redistributionists who think government can make something out of nothing, but I wish you would at least make an effort to understand that the taxes corporations pay do not come from CEOs' salaries. They come from ordinary people who buy the companies' products or invest, the vast majority of whom are not rich. Corporations don't pay taxes; they just collect them.
rwalkenhorst 1 year ago
@rwalkenhorst thats the CEOs choice how to handle taxes.
But technically it comes from profit.
But then I am for capping management "total" salary as an aside.
Lowering corp taxes does not help us even if you were right.
We have history on our side, the best of times for the middle to lower class is when taxes are high. Get over it, history isnt on your side here.
Doesnt mean there isnt a ceiling to the idea, its just not near the pitifully low level we have now.
waltermh111 1 year ago
@waltermh111 Have you ever been a libertarian? I didn't think so. I read comments all the time from people who used to be statists, as I was long ago, but who have studied and now understand that government is a failure at everything it does (except for killing and stealing, which it does very efficiently). But I have yet to see the opposite: a life-long libertarian who, after much study and thought, comes to the realization that the state really does know best how to order our lives.
rwalkenhorst 1 year ago
@rwalkenhorst i said i was for capping management total salary and you wonder if i was ever a libertarian?
lol
silly libertarian.
I could never be one because i am not an emotional reactionary.
I am not afraid of my shadow, believe in conspiracy theories, nor do i believe in absolutes such as the gov is bad at everything except evil things.
I have done enough research to know that the libertarian approach is impractical on anything but the smallest of scales where everybody knows everybody.
waltermh111 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@waltermh111 You have proven my point. Some people grow and some don't.
rwalkenhorst 1 year ago
@waltermh111 The main task of the creeps in D.C. is keeping us convinced that we need them. It appears that in your case, they've been very successful.
rwalkenhorst 1 year ago
@rwalkenhorst that is one of the problems of a libertarian, you think the US is the world
I dont believe based on US example, i believe based on evidence from around the world, and i dont mean simply how govs act, but through study of many areas
I dont care what the politicians in US want, its about what we want and are willing to fight for
If you want anarchy then go for it, but we will fight for the way we want things. But please note, small gov is only as small as it gets you what you want
waltermh111 1 year ago
@dragonflychainsaw hold onto your hat but recent polling (and all previous polling) indicated that most "teapartiers" favor cutting every benefit that they aren't personally receiving. It's not exactly the Ron Paul R3VOLUTION we're talking about here.
oyate1960 1 year ago
Together they could not find their fat asses with their own hands!!!!
Francebrasil 1 year ago
"Will the leader of the Tea Party please raise your hand." Ha!
It saddens me that so many of these folks are so timid about defending free markets and libertarian principles, but the beginning of the interview is hilarious. Smirky O'Donnell just can't imagine any human activity not being centrally planned by wise overlords who lead us around like trained dogs.
Vee must haff uniformity!
rwalkenhorst 1 year ago
@rwalkenhorst It's united states for a fucking reason. States have their powers, and so do the national government. It's an elementary concept.
SwobyJ 1 year ago
@SwobyJ Yep, it's elementary all right, and spelled out in crystal clear language in the Tenth Amendment.
rwalkenhorst 1 year ago
OBVIOUSLY Lawrence is afraid to let them talk.
they are afraid of the tea party for good reason.
Bblackjackk 1 year ago
@Bblackjackk but he does let them talk, so what are you talking about?
i am halfway through and he only interupted one guy to take a vote on the subject in question and a few other votes on related subjects, thats when he asked them to define socialism and then the lady went on a tangent ignoring the question, though he gave her enough time to spew her rhetoric, but only ignored her again to keep her on topic, a very important topic considering anti-socialism is a sticking point for tea party
waltermh111 1 year ago
Whatever name you call it by, the tea party is full of willfully ignorant, reactionary people and is in no way 'grass roots', it is manufactured by corporations.
SuperfluousTrousers 1 year ago
God damn O'Donnell is a hostile little douche.
tarossi400 1 year ago 2
he could be just as unfair to a republican or democrat. probably not a democrat watch him interview alvin greene. all members of a political party will get it wrong by definition. eliminate all social programs after you wien off those dependent on them.
sintruder 1 year ago
the tea party wants to be a far right wing anonymous. the problem "far right wing" and "anonymous" are scary as fuck in these type of situations. get them both together and catnarök will begin
nailo1 1 year ago
Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: I don't like the name Lawrence, only faggots and sailors are called Lawrence. From now on you're Gomer Pyle.
sintruder 1 year ago
O'Donnell gets his *ss kicked here.. Pretty awesome!
iwillspyonyou 1 year ago
@iwillspyonyou Which one of the panelists is also named O'Donnell?
I didnt see the host get kicked around, so I cant tell which party member your talking about.
I guess you wanted the host to be more confrontational, but that wasnt his job there today.
His purpose was to ask questions and keep them on topic, and thats all he did. He wasnt interested in countering statements aside from clearing up the socialist issue which tea party was afraid to speak out on, lol
Yeah, medicare isnt socialism
waltermh111 1 year ago
eliminate DoD
chocobosage420 1 year ago 2
Karl Denniger rules.
jerthemessiah 1 year ago
This was epic. He systematically broke them down. This was sad. Very sad.
thundavolt 1 year ago
Get rid of socialized bank bailouts and socialized war for the corporations.
OmarThePug 1 year ago 2
wah wah im not a expert on the US budget, go read a fucking book like maybe the CBO. 7:01
sclf 1 year ago
The leaders of the tea baggers are the Koch bros, Dick Armey, G. Beck, the Chamber of Commerce... These guys are just the tools.
jstncbllr 1 year ago 2
In 1992, The Tea Party was called, "WE THE PEOPLE" ... Ross Perot LOST, George H. W. Bush LOST and a Democrat was handed the Oval Office!!!
All they might do this time is make it a three party race again in 2012 and that will suffice to split the Republican vote so Obama will be re-elected. They're self-defeating.
Then they'll go away, again.
This is just History doing it's favorite thing ... repeating itself.
grizzzlyjoe 1 year ago
@grizzzlyjoe: Ross Perot and 'Daddy' Bush were crooks, too!
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
@MiracleMile90 THEY'RE ALL CROOKS. No honest person can get elected. Except maybe Nixon ... he was emphatic about NOT being one. LOL
grizzzlyjoe 1 year ago
@grizzzlyjoe: Not quite all.............you do have to be a dupe at the very least, but there are a few good ones. And you see, the globalists would rather have us shout certain slogans that have no meaning, and such, than take a balanced and truthful look at reality. Why I seem to be amongst the company of only a true-blue few on here, I'll never know.
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
The Roundtable of astroturfing?
BioCapsule 1 year ago
@BioCapsule
Yep except Karl
simply2ghetto 1 year ago
The Tea Party is OFFICIALLY dead... NOW what are you goin to do Amerika?
highwaysong007 1 year ago
@highwaysong007 hopefully nothin their a bunch of retards
espinoza2110 1 year ago
@espinoza2110 - Sad but true... well maybe they will get their act together soon.
highwaysong007 1 year ago
Bunch of clowns..
indio2dr 1 year ago
i wish o'donnell questioned that dude on agricultural subsidies. there are countless tea party people within the republican leadership who have taken them yet claim that they are wrong and anti-american.
blackknight007 1 year ago
The host has got them by the balls, live on air showing that they have no idea what they are talking about they are merely repeating foxnews talking points like all the other dittoheads who can't squeeze a single original thought out of that fat american head of theirs.
ShaktipatSeer 1 year ago 2
agriculture subsidies??? huh? what's that??
stupid bitch
ragenut2112 1 year ago
D-d-d-denny and the Shills. Denny, Denny, Denny, Denny and the shills.....
oyate1960 1 year ago
@oyate1960: LMAO.............Also, we can add folks like HyperBorealOperator and ExposeZionistCrimes to the 'shills' list, but I'm not sure how well their names would go with another parody of the theme of a certain '90s cartoon.............ah well. LOL ;-)
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
Wow that host is a serious douche bag. Hostile barking, loaded questions, ridiculous presumptions.
MSNBC is as bad a Fox News.
dennist3hmenace 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace - upset he is using complete sentences and not crying XD
clownporn1 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace You seem to be a part of a stream of negative rightist comments on this channel.. The host is not being a douche bag, the host is trying to confront them with their bullshit, you should try to discern bullshit from reality it might help you to not get so confused about the pretty flashing colors on your screen.
ShaktipatSeer 1 year ago 2
@ShaktipatSeer Isn't it nice that we can have a nice civil discussion?
dennist3hmenace 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace No, I don't think so. Those Tea Bag members didn't know want socialism was.
MrBric12 1 year ago
@MrBric12 Socialism has no single, clear, universally agreed definition. It's a difficult question to answer. It could be anything from state ownership of industry to redistribution of wealth and anything in between depending on who you ask.
dennist3hmenace 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace State run is socialist. Just because you would rather not call it socialist to suit your argument does not make it any less socialist.
thundavolt 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace actually, socialism has a base definition, look in a dictionary sometime.
Ignorance is no excuse. And your argument is one based on ignorance.
Evne then, all of those represent medicare which is partial gov ownership of industry, that is, they are an insurer for elderly and people of other issues, replacing a private corp which could do it.
It also is a sort of redistribution of wealth since you can pull out more than you put in.
So yes, tea party people failed there.
waltermh111 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace
Both sides are angry because they are being voted the hell out.
RonPaulSwede 1 year ago
@dennist3hmenace He just asked them question they couldn't answer. It's not his fault if their though process stopped at the talking point.
thundavolt 1 year ago
divide & conquer
BabybooR33 1 year ago
david duke is the leader of the Tea party
clownporn1 1 year ago
These idiots are gonna be the straw the broke the camel's back for this country.. Good thing I live in the forest away from major cities with my medicinal marijuana garden!
ShaktipatSeer 1 year ago
does larry o'donnell still get checks from the cia?
FreedomAtRisk 1 year ago
@FreedomAtRisk: LOL. Does David Duke still receive his CIA payments, btw?
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
if Ron Paul isn't there, is not a discussion amongst tea party leaders.
ThePoliticalPugilist 1 year ago 8
@ThePoliticalPugilist
I'm Very VERY Sorry to say It's NOT Ron Paul's Tea Party anymore :(
MOXNEWSd0tCOM 1 year ago 18
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM hush, the "experts" are coming on. Hey it's Denny! HFS they actually got somebody who knows what they are talking about for a change! Hey Denny what you are you going up there with those hacks? Guys what's Denny doing up there with the hacks?
oyate1960 1 year ago
Denninger is no dipshit. He's sharper than all the rest put together.
oyate1960 1 year ago 2
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM Maybe in the media lense, and to some on the far left. To me, he will always be the leader, and I think most grass roots conservative agree. Beck, Hannity and O'Reilly can claim whatever they want- Dr. Paul has gained a lot of momentum since the 08 race and that element is always downplayed on MSM.
The fakes will be rooted out someday. One can't claim to be for small government and support $500 billion annual military budget and $100+ billion wars on a yearly basis.
.
ThePoliticalPugilist 1 year ago
@ThePoliticalPugilist: Hey, I'm all for rooting out crooks, but Ron Paul has his own skeletons.
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
@MiracleMile90 Oh yes- the guy who went to duke medical school, served as an flight surgeon in the air force, worked as a doctor in church hospitals, delivered over 4000 babies, then served 10 terms in congress as one of the ony members who has been anti-war, and a proponent of freedom and liberty for everybody, just just a few- yeah what a terrible person.
/facepalm
ThePoliticalPugilist 1 year ago
@ThePoliticalPugilist: Well, he isn't ENTIRELY bad, perhaps............but there's multiple examples of him of not just being a snake oil salesman, but a dishonest coward as well............for example why did he shy away and even lie about, some rather unscrupulous newsletters he had written in the '90s?
antifascistencyclopedia{dot}com/allposts/ron-pauls-90s-newsletters-rant-against-blacks-gays
That's just one thing, too.
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM: I kinda disagree, Moxy. It IS Ron Paul's tea party..........because's he's a snake oil salesman too.
MiracleMile90 1 year ago
@MiracleMile90
What the hell are you blabbering about?
RonPaulSwede 1 year ago
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM
Exactly, the fat guy took it over.
RonPaulSwede 1 year ago
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM
Now its a group of people bought by the same interests that buy Dems and Repubs
pokeyugi13 1 year ago
@MOXNEWSd0tCOM : It really isn't is it. I guess this has been happening for a year and now in the last months it is 100% true.
We are watching
OvergrowDaGovernment 1 year ago
@ThePoliticalPugilist the problem is not that anybody wants to ignore him but that he refuses to connect with them much. Sure, i think rand paul has, but Ron Paul is steadfast in being a republican and focusing on that party and goes to very few tea party focused rallies to my understanding, he does not run a campaign seeking tea party specifically, and therefore its card to tie him to it.
So the people who get called on to represent it are those which do so the loudest.
waltermh111 1 year ago
@ThePoliticalPugilist Ron paul and the current tea baggers are two different things.
cerebus2099 1 year ago