@ChiroExplainPlox watching this is confusing... but heapsort is O(nlogn) and competes with quicksort in effeciency. Quicksort if used right is slightly more efficient but has a worst case time of O(n^2). It's an excellent choice when needing to sort over a 1000 elements.
@AstralAbraxas heapsort is also more immune to those stupid attacks on servers than quicksort (because quicksort hates sorted data - gets O(n) complexity...), so it's much more secure in many apps ;)
@Alarindris man that's not a game. it's a sorting method used to arrange elements of an array depending on the characteristics they are sorted. Example with numbers: 5.6.7.9.8.10.1.4.3.2 ->(after sorting) 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10
@fermixx of course; this algorithm is efficient when sorting more numbers. for sorting around 15 numbers, O(n^2) algorithms might be faster than O(nlogn) algorithms.
@brunocafeo did you animate this with a toaster?
jrzzl33 1 month ago
isn't tree selection less of a mindfuck and faster ?
ChiroExplainPlox 1 year ago
@ChiroExplainPlox watching this is confusing... but heapsort is O(nlogn) and competes with quicksort in effeciency. Quicksort if used right is slightly more efficient but has a worst case time of O(n^2). It's an excellent choice when needing to sort over a 1000 elements.
AstralAbraxas 11 months ago
@AstralAbraxas heapsort is also more immune to those stupid attacks on servers than quicksort (because quicksort hates sorted data - gets O(n) complexity...), so it's much more secure in many apps ;)
rasmeta 10 months ago
Very nice! But resolution could be better ;)
Piotr3kM 1 year ago
nice creativity.
harish223 1 year ago
So who won?
Alarindris 1 year ago 9
@Alarindris man that's not a game. it's a sorting method used to arrange elements of an array depending on the characteristics they are sorted. Example with numbers: 5.6.7.9.8.10.1.4.3.2 ->(after sorting) 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10
putzmitt3l 1 year ago
@putzmitt3l
jokes, develloper don't get them.
ChiroExplainPlox 1 year ago
great work!!!!!
manish9mati 1 year ago
Nice work.
enriquearaizam 1 year ago
thats a lot of movements. seems like selection sort would move less elements and take less time.
however things are not as they seem
fermixx 2 years ago
@fermixx of course; this algorithm is efficient when sorting more numbers. for sorting around 15 numbers, O(n^2) algorithms might be faster than O(nlogn) algorithms.
stefys 1 year ago
Intuitively, it doesn't look efficient watching this.
Enjoyable video, would watch again.
willowtreephoto 2 years ago
supposed to be faster?
frosty1433 2 years ago
@frosty1433 Are you stupid? This is an animation, not an actual run.
kotapaka 9 months ago
righteous.
binary132 2 years ago
sehr geil!
bomi76 2 years ago
amazing!!
tottis44 2 years ago
nice
peterwilson69 2 years ago
nice vid! looks cool
hataryou 2 years ago
OMG! this is great.
snasebrase 3 years ago 5