Elizabeth Warren to Geithner It's called accountability! (4.29.09)

[alcraig]

Just one word, brilliant.

[borat443]

geithner is a slimy bastard, he wasnt really saying anything relavant in response just a lot of rhetoric, totally bs answers.....

[skshield3]

This guy is obviously a con artist.  His strategy is obvious: talk about the question, but avoid answering it.

In the real world, this guy would be fired, jailed, (or hired by the mob as an attorney). People like this only exist because of the protection of their office. Sad that patriotic American soldiers are dying and being maimed for the benefit of this kind of governmental leadership. They throw us under a bus and then expect us to fight their wars!

When will this crap change?

[throwerofturds]

bank bailout . auto bailout . they are both bad and both are draining the U.S. of its wealth .

i think this woman is just trying to give government money a "look' of reallity . she comes across acting like she is asking tgough questions but shes just playing around . what a phoney .

[julzabro]

@throwerofturds Playing around? I think these are VERY pertinent questions and come from a sincere concern!

[throwerofturds]

@julzabro

no doubt she is concered . but her questions are pathetic and allow geithner to squim around and not say anything . mind , he would do that anyway .

also who cares how one is treated compared to another . its a moot point . who cares how this or that was treated ???

it would have been nuch more interesting if Jim Rogers and Marc Faber were the bosses in this oversite commitee . they would have compared the US  situation with japan in the 90s and asked more pointed questions

[julzabro]

@throwerofturds No matter how pointed the questions, he would've danced around the answers as u pointed out. So to say she was playing around was odd.

[throwerofturds]

@julzabro

i agree with you about geithner sqirming around and not answering anything but her questions , at least in this youtube , were errlevant . who cares how the auto industry was teated compared to the banks .

all of them were incompetant and all of them should have been thrown a kiss instead of money . thats the way capitalism is supposed to work . and then it works extremly well .

i just believe that she was asking the wrong questions altogether

[julzabro]

@throwerofturds Well, ur entitled to your opinion. I think how the auto industry was treated vs. the banks is VERY relevant...they were given10 times more tax payer money with no restructuring requirements. And who has paid anything back? Not the banks! I agree all were incompetent but capitlism does NOT work and gov. bailouts are not what capitilism was s'posed to be anyways....companys should FALL based on incompetency.

[throwerofturds]

@julzabro

what i said was that those companies asking for a bailout should have been" thrown a kiss" instead of money . that means they would have fallen . that is supposed to be how capitalism works . it is a self cleaning method and works very well .

the bailouts were corporate socialism .

as for how certain groups were treated they should have all been treated the same way . NO MONEY

asking that question distacts from the NO MONEY question . the important one

are we on the same page ?

[julzabro]

@throwerofturds Yup! ;)

[throwerofturds]

that guy was lying ! his lips were moving . he could use a bullet in the head , it would be good for us all

[BrinkmanTraining]

watch Tim run the clock...good strategy!