i guess no one remembers history. with unemployment dropping from 6% to 4% in just a few years, gdp growth getting as high as 5% in early 2004 as we left recession, and rising standards of livng for everyone, you could say our economy wasn't bad. you guys would have us believe that the economy was better from 1975-1981 than 2000-08 if it means making bush look bad. most of the american public cant explain why they hate bush. on the other hand, even the dumbest tea partiers have a few decent pts.
this guy is insane! i say that because his emotions block him from the truth. he was brutally proven wrong by peter schiff back it 2006 and he said during the 2008 and 2009, the economy would be doing great, the housing market would still be better than ever and that wealth would continue to grow for all americans. was he right? no Arthur, you failed at your job during that time, you failed, you made it worse and hurt many people. you should stop doing what your doing, for the safety of america.
@anglekan Absolutely wrong. Bush didn't even help out Republicans. Sure a lot of the housing market's crisis is due to Clinton's policies too, but Bush running the country was like having Charles Manson as president.
I love how people who cannot pose a real reason to object to another's arguments or positions revert to name calling. Can any of you Laffer detractors articulate why any one of his positions is logically incorrect?
It's interesting to note that Laffer is afraid to debate with Peter Schiff anymore and really, who can blame him, Pete figuratively ass-raped this moron with that stupid "penny" bet (which btw, laffer hasn't made good on yet lol) debate ....with that OTHER idiot as host... maria cabrerra carusso mpoutana or something like that.
Arthur Laffer is a used car dealer, nothing more. WHY he is even *considered* to be worthy of even discussing economic issues any longer is an insult to the average viewer. Think about how brainwashed the average viewer is and that statement is magnified 100 fold.
What was very good? Tell me one thing. He is same idiot as polish "genius" L. Balcerowicz who was supported by Jeffrey Sachs in 1989. J.S. pleaded guilty of mistakes L.B. didn't. There was nothing good in economy during last 100 years.
arthur laffer is a complete prick, thank fuck i do not have money with his firm. he was wrong two years ago and he is wrong now. i hope they take away his house in the hamptons and bankrupt him, the supercilious little asshole
laffer is a peice of shit douchebag. watch the clip of peter schiff on this show. all schiffs predictions were correct, and laffer was a complete asshole to him. FUCK YOU LAFFER.
Under Bill Clinton, the S&P 500 soared 210%. Since George Bush took office, the S&P 500 has lost 1%. That is right, 7+ years of negative stock returns.
We cannot afford another four years of Cheney/Bush economics under George W McCain.
7 years of negative stock returns? Here are annual returns for the S&P 500 for 2000-2007: 2007 3.81% 2006 12.80% 2005 3.01% 2004 9.00% 2003 26.39% 2002 -23.37% 2001 -13.04% 2000 -10.14% src: Bloomberg These returns are not adjusted for dividends, which would make them better, not worse.
None of your stats are adjusted for inflation, or in this case the Stagflation of the Carter years,so the Jimmy Carter numbers pretty much dont count.
Clinton shrank the size of Government even more dramatically than Reagan did, and tax rates were lower, plus NAFTA was passed. Clinton was also a big deregulator and more corporate mergers were allowed than ever before.
This is why Arthur Laffer voted for Clinton twice.
Kennedy pursued lower taxes than we had under Republican Eisenhower.
a. Cut individual income tax rates across the board, including reducing the top marginal rate from 91 to 70 percent. The lowest rate went from 20 percent to 14 percent.
b. Reduced the rate of corporate taxation from 52 percent to 47 percent.
c. Liberalized rules for the depreciation of capital
i guess no one remembers history. with unemployment dropping from 6% to 4% in just a few years, gdp growth getting as high as 5% in early 2004 as we left recession, and rising standards of livng for everyone, you could say our economy wasn't bad. you guys would have us believe that the economy was better from 1975-1981 than 2000-08 if it means making bush look bad. most of the american public cant explain why they hate bush. on the other hand, even the dumbest tea partiers have a few decent pts.
Welsh77 6 months ago
this guy is insane! i say that because his emotions block him from the truth. he was brutally proven wrong by peter schiff back it 2006 and he said during the 2008 and 2009, the economy would be doing great, the housing market would still be better than ever and that wealth would continue to grow for all americans. was he right? no Arthur, you failed at your job during that time, you failed, you made it worse and hurt many people. you should stop doing what your doing, for the safety of america.
TylerThrashPeace 1 year ago
bush was stupid, dumb, terrible......but better than obama!
anglekan 1 year ago
@anglekan Absolutely wrong. Bush didn't even help out Republicans. Sure a lot of the housing market's crisis is due to Clinton's policies too, but Bush running the country was like having Charles Manson as president.
HoGraz 1 year ago
i like this guy
Moonsabie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARhur Laffer is a CLOWN.
Research this mans analysis and predictions, he is a MORON, A CLOWN, A BUFFOON!
Who is stupid enough to listen to this moron?
MACKATTACK1970 1 year ago
Laffer is a completely discredited fool.
/watch?v=2I0QN-FYkpw
kmg501 2 years ago 3
It's too bad we got away from Laffer's principles under Bush in the 2000's, we could have avoided the mess we're in now.
rivi8840 2 years ago
@rivi8840 What? Laffer loved Bush's policies. People like you are the reason corporations own every part of America now.
billmeradeia 1 year ago
"No, the incomes are doing beautifully. We've had a great economy. Profits, incomes, jobs and everything is going right, Larry."
I think the question is - what part of this statement is right. By June - any economist who didn't see trouble on the horizon was way off base.
barrw 3 years ago
I love how people who cannot pose a real reason to object to another's arguments or positions revert to name calling. Can any of you Laffer detractors articulate why any one of his positions is logically incorrect?
Mothra69 3 years ago
mothra69: because we're in a big fucking worldwide depression, you fucking retard.
EscapeDummy 2 years ago 4
mothra69 -
OWNED
kidcapri009 2 years ago
@Mothra69
Watch the first two minutes of "Peter Schiff was Right" and you will see
rmccay88 1 year ago
Laffer is an asshole
warrencurrier 3 years ago
It's interesting to note that Laffer is afraid to debate with Peter Schiff anymore and really, who can blame him, Pete figuratively ass-raped this moron with that stupid "penny" bet (which btw, laffer hasn't made good on yet lol) debate ....with that OTHER idiot as host... maria cabrerra carusso mpoutana or something like that.
MrSkaramanga 3 years ago 4
Peter Schiff is a heavyweight. He hasn't been wrong yet . . . and I agree with you . . . Laffer is as worthless as a bag of wet hair.
Laffer needs to get a job in a pet store grooming poodles!!!!
UpTick21 2 years ago 5
Arthur Laffer couldn't balance my checkbook.
cmcphee 3 years ago 2
Arthur Laffer is a used car dealer, nothing more. WHY he is even *considered* to be worthy of even discussing economic issues any longer is an insult to the average viewer. Think about how brainwashed the average viewer is and that statement is magnified 100 fold.
MrSkaramanga 3 years ago
and your source is?
your point?
AlpondrickTheGreat 3 years ago
Arthur Laffer is a kid with a degree.
HansOloPL 3 years ago
that's why the economy was very good when he was advising?
super kid!
the dem congress of '06 brought good things to life?
you can give scarry reid and his mistress pelosi a big fat wet one for that!
and they're not even kids.
AlpondrickTheGreat 3 years ago
What was very good? Tell me one thing. He is same idiot as polish "genius" L. Balcerowicz who was supported by Jeffrey Sachs in 1989. J.S. pleaded guilty of mistakes L.B. didn't. There was nothing good in economy during last 100 years.
HansOloPL 3 years ago
arthur laffer is a complete prick, thank fuck i do not have money with his firm. he was wrong two years ago and he is wrong now. i hope they take away his house in the hamptons and bankrupt him, the supercilious little asshole
samirbensaheila 3 years ago 3
laffer is a peice of shit douchebag. watch the clip of peter schiff on this show. all schiffs predictions were correct, and laffer was a complete asshole to him. FUCK YOU LAFFER.
FarangBalls 3 years ago
Under Bill Clinton, the S&P 500 soared 210%. Since George Bush took office, the S&P 500 has lost 1%. That is right, 7+ years of negative stock returns.
We cannot afford another four years of Cheney/Bush economics under George W McCain.
Richardgwm 3 years ago
nospam2318 3 years ago 2
Thanks Nospam, I hate bastards like Richardgwn that spew misinformation.
Shadyhunter04 3 years ago 2
lyin' sack.
you mean since '06 dem. congress takeover.
AlpondrickTheGreat 3 years ago
Richardgwm 3 years ago
None of your stats are adjusted for inflation, or in this case the Stagflation of the Carter years,so the Jimmy Carter numbers pretty much dont count.
Clinton shrank the size of Government even more dramatically than Reagan did, and tax rates were lower, plus NAFTA was passed. Clinton was also a big deregulator and more corporate mergers were allowed than ever before.
This is why Arthur Laffer voted for Clinton twice.
Kennedy pursued lower taxes than we had under Republican Eisenhower.
LexPhilogus 3 years ago
You want facts !?
You're going to get em.
LexPhilogus 3 years ago
Facts are hard, real things. I know conservatives hate facts because they put the lie to the conservative ideology.
Richardgwm 3 years ago
Components of the Kennedy Tax Cut:
a. Cut individual income tax rates across the board, including reducing the top marginal rate from 91 to 70 percent. The lowest rate went from 20 percent to 14 percent.
b. Reduced the rate of corporate taxation from 52 percent to 47 percent.
c. Liberalized rules for the depreciation of capital
LexPhilogus 3 years ago
California is the wealthiest state in the union and it has the largest number of millionaires and billionaires in the world.
tylertyler82 3 years ago