out of all of these clips and videos, i have not seen one good clear shot of a united airlines plane hitting the building. i hate to say it was an inside job, but come on, thats what it seems like.
@quez76 I am not your librarian. Do Google image search United 175.
Also. Lisa Frost was on this plane (among others). They recovered her air miles card that she kept in her back pocket. They also recovered remnants of her hip. Which was all returned to her family.
Time to stop with all of this silly No plane nonsense. It happened. Deal with it.
@roquefortfiles lol, i knew you were gonna say that. i never said there was no planes, all im saying is theres not one clear footage that shows a united airlines plane hitting the building, and there are hundreds, all i see is blurred, black or completely grey planes.
@quez76 Don't spend your time looking at severely compressed YT video then. What you want to be looking for are the AP and UPI news photographer web pages. There are plenty. Hi resolution photo galleries. That kind of stuff. Lots of pics of the airline colors and name. Fully legible.
@roquefortfiles well which ones? provide me with a link. because all i see is the same thing, completely grey planes. i googled ua 175, all i see is the same thing i see here on youtube.
@roquefortfiles it proves what i said in the 1st place, i dont see a united airlines plane. dont get mad at me, im just stating what i see, whether its photos or videos.
@quez76 I am not getting mad at you. I am simply asking. There are plenty of videos where you can plainly make out the UA livery. You're just not looking hard enough. And there are loads of high quality still photos that show it as well. Research the press photographers who shot this. Then find their galleries on line
@roquefortfiles ok well i looked all over, i just see the same photos everywhere. perhaps you can provide me with a few links of what you feel are the high quality photos.
i'm weighted more towards the inside job theory simply becuase how the fuck does a steel structure crash at free fall speed with no resitance, even the designer of the building says it shouldnt have done that. there just to much EVIDENCE against the official story watch the doucmentarys and make the decission with all the information in front of you.
oh btw here is a cia analyst saying something was up.
@lotsoftrains123 well if what you say is true doesnt that make you a lil curious as to why their names are gone? did ur brother work for the government?
@MrCyUngle we are not saying it was 100% done by the government but we are saying that we are not being told the truth about 9/11. What about the Aug14th memo to the president that said terrorists were planning attacks in the coming weeks. The gov. dropped the ball big time and 9/11 did not have to happen.
@MrCyUngle I'm sorry for your loss. I bet your friend is having a great time with God and the other people in heaven. Those hijackers belong in hell and they should get murdered by the devil. Such cruel fags who would do such a thing! At least The World Trade Center is being rebuilt and 1 or 2 buildings is done.
@MrCyUngle Looks like the only way to make the conspiracy theorist shut the fuck up is to make magic and creatu a time machine, then make them travel to 9/11, make them enter into one of the 4 planes and then they will see what really fucking happened -.- Also, sorry for your loss man :(
@MrCyUngle So... honor your friend, and don't be a sheep. Just because you had a friend die there does not mean they didn't die at the hands of conspirators within our government. There are many many ways to perpetrate a conspiracy. It does not require one to actually plan and execute every aspect. In fact, it's far easier to simply help along the factions interested in carrying out such acts of terror.
@MrCyUngle Sir... *sniff* ...I do feel deeply sorry for the loss of your friend and coworker... but just remember one thing... they died... but their feelings for you will still live on...
All that you have done is prove that a plane DID fly into the towers... The paths all match up on your demonstration and there is nothing amiss in any of the clips... SOOOOO...
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
@GATENKAASx10 Naive? Who cares if it's an inside job or not. The point is thousands of people died. Whether it was a real attack or fake attack doesn't matter.. because it happened. Who cares if "truthers" are right? Them being right won't help relieve any suffering.
The best comment was "the hatred of Jews is Satanic possession". I did not know that. So off the wall.
This video is well done and I think anyone can see with it that the pilot was a lot better than these guys were supposed to be. I think it had to be a real plane.
See the video at 4:32? I knew there was something wrong with it and your anysis of the decent angle comparatively to the FOX video (which I also think is fake (blue tint altered). The "Al-Qaeda video". I recently did a slow motion zoomed color processed analysis and my computer said the video was digitally altered. It does not lie and picks up pixelation and anomolies that we cannot see. I am making a video. I recently found another 100% altered fake plane video in NIST FBI release #20 clip 3.
What began as the filming of an ordinary day in September of 2001, turns out to be the most complete chronicle of 9/11 attacks. New 9/11 movie on dvd: 'Tuesday Morning in September' 2011 For more information about how to get the dvd, please go to the channel that posted this.
If the plane's flight path is at a nearly perfect straight line approach shown in frames 0:52-1:29, then at the perspective shown at frame 1:30, the plane would be behind the building or not visible. It would not appear to be dive-bombing. The same plane can not be flying at a straight line and at a dive-bombing declining angle at the same time.
Also, the flight path shown starting in frame 3:35 from the clip below is not shown.
@muzicmaker2001 Indeed, your eyes, that's all. Unfortunately, your eyes cannot always be trusted when your seeing images taken through high-powered zoom lenses. Lens and perspective distortion are well known phenomena to photographers professional camera operators. The maker of this video used more than his eyes, he used trigonometry to triangulate the position of the plane from multiple known camera positions. When he plotted the path using a 3D model, no contradictions were found.
@muzicmaker2001 You wish my eyes? I've never commented on the "OV" which is irrelevant to this video. And if you haven't noticed, this video questions the "OV" at the end. Your inference about my "passion" is mistaken.
Then, we can agree to disagree. I'm not buying what you're seeling. The flight paths are obviously different. There is no real evidence of the wreckage and none of the wreckage has been official verified.
@muzicmaker2001 You've yet to offer any valid argument as to why the information presented in this video is erroneous (other than the "just using my eyes" argument). If your mind was at all open to discovering truth, you would at least be willing to consider well-reasoned evidence which might invalidate some of your doctrines. It's difficult, I know. It takes courage to admit you might be wrong (and I'm referring only to the this video and the flight path, spare me the "OV" red-herring).
And you are an endorser of this video because....? Sure. Just reconstructing the plane footage into computer animation and drawing flight path lines on it makes it fact, huh? But, its called two different opinions. Try and deal with that, ok? And again, give frame 3:35 a chew in the clip below. The flight path is not shown.
@muzicmaker2001 Again, you don't understand what you are seeing. "Just reconstructing the plane footage into computer animation and drawing flight path lines on it" does not describe how this video was constructed. It was done using triangulation with pinpointed camera locations. It's okay. I don't expect you to get it.
Regarding the Shack clip you refer to, that angle is covered here. Shack doesn't understand how depth can affect visual angle. And neither do you.
That's why its a good thing I have random people on YT to explain it to me..funny. And Shack clip? Do you mean Simon Shack? No, he didn't make the clip. I did. I'm curious. Do you get some sort of a commission for everyone that believes this animation? Are you achimspok?
@muzicmaker2001 The ulterior motive red-herring is always convenient. I wish I could take credit for this vid. Maybe I'm just a guy who get's irritated at "no plane" stupidity, an insult to the victims of 9/11. Who's paying you for all the propaganda you've posted?
BTW, the clip you gave me to "to chew" starting at 3:35 was from September Clues G @ 2:42. Taking credit for another's work doesn't help your credibility. "Shack clip? Do you mean Simon Shack? No, he didn't make the clip. I did." HA!
"Taking credit for another's work doesn't help your credibility"
Read my posts carefully next time. I put together the whole clip from parts to show the obvious (to some??)different flight paths of thesupposedly the same plane.
And now the biggest problem of all? The plane images don't even look real at all. They look like cheap computer graphics or something Wile E Coyote should be flying. Is there a video explaining how they are real? Keep tryng...
@muzicmaker2001 Keep dodging the subject with your straw men. At least that way you can continue to deceive yourself (and never have to say "Maybe I was wrong".)
Yes, computer animation matched up to the video footage proves what exactly? I got it. That someone has the talent to match computer animation up to the video footage. Thanx.
@muzicmaker2001 The flight path in the video is plotted in the 3D model with geo-referenced coordinates of the plane's position in time. Those coordinates remain the same for all angles shown. Whenever the viewing angle is shifted to show the perspective from the known camera positions of each video, the 3D animated flight path matches perfectly with each video clip. A coincidence? Due to programmer error? A software glitch?
There is no proof that the "shift" is accurate. Again, this is nothing but computer animation reflecting the video footage. That's it. Again, what exactly is your stake in this? You seem to be highly commited to defending it?
@muzicmaker2001 You're wrong. He provides the coordinates of each camera position as well as the flight path (at 9:18). It's there for anyone to recreate on their own using Google sketch-up and Google Earth. Perhaps you don't believe Google earth or it's 3D model of Manhattan is accurate. If not, you're beyond help. Regardless, If the model being used was inaccurate in some significant way, it would never match up with ALL the video clips. The 100% matching verifies the accuracy of the model.
Again, if one flight path is shown as a perfect straight line in one approach, another flight path, the plane takes a curve and in another, a dive bomb, the planes shown can not be the same plane. I don't know how more obviously I can put this. Save your animation, research, and compare ALL of the real footage of the flight paths. For example, any comment of "Shack's footage" which again is not illustrated here?
@muzicmaker2001 So we've come full circle. I will finally accept that I'm wasting my time. This is beyond your capacity for understanding. It has to do with time (length of the shot) and depth, but never mind. For the record the "Shack footage" can be found at 3:06, and again at 8:35. But I will guarantee that you won't understand it.. It is again because of depth and the viewing angle--the plane curves, the camera is looking up at the curvature creating the illusion of a climb before impact.
I am mistaken and you are correct. The Shack clip is there at 3:06.. But here's something interesting. The "drawn in" flight path is not the actual flight path that the plane takes. The plane's light path is so low that it dissapears behind one of the buildings. The drawn in flight path stays above the buildings to match the other flight paths. As stated before, how do we know the animation is correct? Answer: It obviously isn't as I have just shown.
@muzicmaker2001 "The "drawn in" flight path is not the actual flight path that the plane takes. The plane's light path is so low that it dissapears behind one of the buildings. The drawn in flight path stays above the buildings to match the other flight paths."
Not every single building in Manhattan was rendered for the animation. The building in the "Shack clip" which obstructs the flight path is not included. Why? He's SHOWING you the flight path, revealing how it curves behind that building.
"Not every single building in Manhattan was rendered for the animation"
The actual flight path is still considerably lower than what is shown and does not "match" up with the other flight paths. Therefore, proving that the flight paths and actual planes are fake. Anyone with half a brain can see that the plane images don't even look real. No offense...
@muzicmaker2001 I love the way you just threw in "Therefore, proving" without showing any good evidence. You're a typical conspiracy theorist that thinks their word alone is good enough.
Ok, if you missed it, the evidence is the flight paths are different, the plane images are fake, physics took a day off at impacts (no damage to the fragile aluminum plane/building, no falling debris) and none of the wreckage from ANY plane on 911 has been officially verified. But, if you want a good laugh, chck out the obvious eidting in one of the most famous clips.
@muzicmaker2001 You must not have watched the overlay of the "shack clip" which is shown at 8:35. It shows an exact match with the video (as with all the others). Don't forget--the building in the foreground obstructing the path is not included in the 3D model. The animation is correct.
This might help ya. Instead of showing the different viewpoints and how the perspective of the plane's path changes, let's focus on one structure and how its perspective changes with the plane's. The structure is WTC7. In the clip below, note how Flight 175 seems to fly to the left and right of WTC7 and how the Tower's perspective changes, but the WTC7's perspective never changes. But, WTC7's perspective MUST change with the Tower's perspective.
Why do I feel like you have some sort of agenda in defending this clip? Did you make this clip? Are you achimspok ? Third time, why are you so commited in defending this clip? It makes no sense.
Just a question but what if the hijack team went to the WTC before the big day and stood on either side of each tower with a GPS device and entered a plot point? Dead center on the tower? Then simply entered that data on the flight computers on the planes? I don't know if it is possible but theoretically i know it could be done. It would certainly eliminate the flying guess work and give the planes a reference point. Any pilots out there whaddya think?
Go to the site, New York Archetcture, and browse to the page for Verrazano-Narrows Bridge. Quote: "On the morning of September 11, 2001, United Airlines Flight 175 was hijacked and flown directly over the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge en route to the World Trade Center." Try flying from that bridge, then do the divebomb thing as suggested by this video.
Sorry. Even given the very odd angles, I don't think it's fake. The reason is not the video. The reason is simply that there are too many who would know.
What about the real flights? Those flights existed and they took off, where did the passengers go? Killed? Then you still have to move the plane out of the way, what about the ATCs? They'd notice something's not right if the planes go off course. All of them in on it?
Maybe it would be interesting to see what ATCs were on duty that day...
@0x777 First of all, your an idiot. Those terrorists were able to get on the plane because the security wasn't as tight before then (obviously). They took over the plane with force. DO YOU REALLY THINK THE ATCS WERE ABLE TO CONTROL AN AIRPLANE THAT IS IN THE CONTROL OF THE EXTREMISTS? I THINK NOT. So stop it with this ridiculous speculating. Anyone who does is an idiot and ignorant. Stop it. Stop scaring people and feeding them lies. You all disgust me.
The point I was trying to make is that you'd have to have a lot of people inside (or silence them) if you want to make it a fake. The ATCs would have talked with the pilots of the flights, the flights were scheduled and if they didn't take off, a lot of people would have noticed. There were a few hundred people on the "real" flights, what happened to them if this was fake?
My point is, this is real. Not a fake. Too many have to be silenced to "fake" that.
It's astonishing. Those who believe that planes didn't crash into the towers, that it was all a Jewish/Zionist conspiracy have actually refused to believe what they saw. This is an important lesson for people who read their comments. You see, their hatred of Jews is so deep and so completely encompassing, that it actually trumps all of their other senses. Only the hatred of Jews is this powerful. It is a satanic possession. Learn to recognize it when you see it.
@MarkB1ngham exactly! that came handy, huh? given the fact they were made to withstand forces as high as 34 hundred G and the maximum temperature jet fuel is capable of generating for half an hour, they should have survived this. In my eyes since they were located in the tail section of the fuselage they must have been blown away from the WTC on impact and fallen to the ground.
@MarkB1ngham Well the locator is actually is known as an ULB, underwater location beacon therefore its typically only activated by water immersion. but given the bright orange color of the black boxes they should be recognizable. but that wasnt the problem, since they were found but DESTROYED! too bad..
@zenoist2 Faked plane video??? OMFG!!!! (the mind BOGGLES!!)
Like for what reason? By who? What would it accomplish? What would it show differently that 50 other randomly shot videos and still photographs already show CLEARLY???!!!
WHERE? do you people come from?? How much of an idiot does one have to be to see this event shot from UMPTEEN angles OVER AND OVER!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
No idea what the point of this is, but it is insanely well put together. And BTW, anyone who believes that 9/11 was an inside job should go fucking hang themselves because they are a lost cause and a fucking waste of Earth's resources.
3:11 seconds part is not accurate....why?....where is the building thats supposed to be in the way........how does the plane descend and rise to hit on target.
Other than that......great vid. Shame the real conspiracists are using it as ammo..
Whatever...truth will win out in the end.....or........all is lost.....ugh
@FreedumbFighter28 Not every single building in Manhattan is represented in the 3D model. The point is to show the flight path--why would you include a building which obscured most of the trajectory?
I think this vid is great...you can even hear the fbi audio dubs too. I am sure hat was an accident but I think that is a neat lil addition to the trained 9/11 professional.
A great video. Thanks for pulling all this together.
By your radar plot the impact speed was 565 mph or 828 ft/sec or 252 metres/sec calculated by me from this table of radar-calculated geodesic points of the aircraft's flightpath you display on your vid at 9:19.
The whole vid serves as a complete vindication of the official explanation and a complete debunking of the "no planes" theory
I recently came across the No Plane Theory myself, and having personally witnessed the 2nd crash, felt someone needed to stand up for what actually happened.
Which is not to say that I know the source of the planes or even to make any kind of statement about 9/11. All I can say is there was a 2nd plane, and I saw it crash.
You did a tremendous job of reconciling many vantage points. Thank you for your effort.
Anyone who believes that hijackers flew this plane, buy the flight simulator program, X-Plane and start your descent from 150 miles away, perfectly, in order to get up to 550 mph when you get to Manhattan, and see if you can even hit the buildings at that speed in the first thirty tries.
@nehorlavazapalka oh i thought you were reffering to flight 175 as this video implies? oh wait... you were. atta flew the other plane. Which one you want babe?
@DonkeyBonrProduction jim sad that it is not easy to hit the tower at 600 mph in MS F. simulator. You replied by saing that you can do that at the first try - as well as the hijackers could. The discussion is not about the ability of the hij. to hit the towers but about Atta's ability to hit the middle column at 500 mph (+normal to the wall) ..... and if Shehhi could see the turning point in the air (explained in the previous video). Tudududum! There's hardly any need for any discussion!
Once I find a good recording program, I just might show you how possible it is, though I'll probably use Microsoft's Flight Simulator as it's what my uncle endorses, who is an actual pilot.
@stbays Good, I would like to see it when it's done. I've been working for the last year on making the scenery for X-plane, of New Your Harbor, to make it accurate. You can find some of my work on the X-plane forum for free downloads.
@jmdewey60 actually is not that complicated... you people who sit in front of the computer and talk your ass off think that everything is impossible, well it isn't! if you put in the hours you can learn to fly a plane... but I see you have moronic followers.
@jmdewey60 I thought you guys had already made the case that these planes couldn't be traveling at speeds that high at that altitude? Gadammit, make up your minds about what you believe.
@razorfett147 The thing I like to point out is the difference between Miles per Hour, and Knots. I calculated the speed from analyzing each frame from available video and locating the plane in its environment and using the frames per second. I come up with something close to 522 mph. Now if someone says the plane flew 550 knots, then they are lying because that would be 633 mph which is too fast.
c'mon people thumbs up mtanyc's comment for the truth!!!
pUgeciPe 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
isreal did it. why do you think we are always babysitting isreal.
doublexnchuck 3 months ago
Wow, I can't believe how stupid people are
jeffgard 3 months ago
your god just watch all that happen and do nothing to prevent ... tragedy
INS1977 3 months ago
out of all of these clips and videos, i have not seen one good clear shot of a united airlines plane hitting the building. i hate to say it was an inside job, but come on, thats what it seems like.
quez76 3 months ago
@quez76 Did you not watch the video?
jawsflounderace 3 months ago
@jawsflounderace i dont see proof it was a united airlines plane like they say
quez76 3 months ago
@quez76 Maybe find the news photographer still photographs of it where you can read UNITED AIRLINES on the side of it.
There are plenty
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
@roquefortfiles then where are they? show me
quez76 1 month ago
@quez76 I am not your librarian. Do Google image search United 175.
Also. Lisa Frost was on this plane (among others). They recovered her air miles card that she kept in her back pocket. They also recovered remnants of her hip. Which was all returned to her family.
Time to stop with all of this silly No plane nonsense. It happened. Deal with it.
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
@roquefortfiles lol, i knew you were gonna say that. i never said there was no planes, all im saying is theres not one clear footage that shows a united airlines plane hitting the building, and there are hundreds, all i see is blurred, black or completely grey planes.
quez76 1 month ago
@quez76 Don't spend your time looking at severely compressed YT video then. What you want to be looking for are the AP and UPI news photographer web pages. There are plenty. Hi resolution photo galleries. That kind of stuff. Lots of pics of the airline colors and name. Fully legible.
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
@roquefortfiles well which ones? provide me with a link. because all i see is the same thing, completely grey planes. i googled ua 175, all i see is the same thing i see here on youtube.
quez76 1 month ago
@quez76 And this proves what?
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
@roquefortfiles it proves what i said in the 1st place, i dont see a united airlines plane. dont get mad at me, im just stating what i see, whether its photos or videos.
quez76 1 month ago
@quez76 I am not getting mad at you. I am simply asking. There are plenty of videos where you can plainly make out the UA livery. You're just not looking hard enough. And there are loads of high quality still photos that show it as well. Research the press photographers who shot this. Then find their galleries on line
roquefortfiles 1 month ago
@roquefortfiles ok well i looked all over, i just see the same photos everywhere. perhaps you can provide me with a few links of what you feel are the high quality photos.
quez76 1 month ago
Nice video, that's a lot of work and I appreciate it.
MisterNail 3 months ago
i'm weighted more towards the inside job theory simply becuase how the fuck does a steel structure crash at free fall speed with no resitance, even the designer of the building says it shouldnt have done that. there just to much EVIDENCE against the official story watch the doucmentarys and make the decission with all the information in front of you.
oh btw here is a cia analyst saying something was up.
/watch?v=bl6w1YaZdf8&feature=feedlik
TheGonzaPoker 4 months ago
This is a very good video... who made this?
12OclockLow 4 months ago 2
well made video diagram
jbphotog712 4 months ago
My friend and coworker died in UA 175 on Sept 11th, 2001.
All you conspiracy theorists can go to hell and stay there.
MrCyUngle 4 months ago 14
@MrCyUngle BS
anthonyc31 4 months ago
@MrCyUngle my brother and his friend were on UA175 R.I.P James carson (my brother) and Joe Parker (his friend)
lotsoftrains123 4 months ago
@lotsoftrains123 dude OK LOOK I LOOKED THROUGH THE PASSENGER LIST I DIDNT SEE EITHER NAME YOU MENTIONED SO YOU ARE CONFUSED
way2easy2love 3 months ago
@way2easy2love i dont care what the passenger list says i know my brother and his friend were on THAT plane...
lotsoftrains123 3 months ago
@lotsoftrains123 well if what you say is true doesnt that make you a lil curious as to why their names are gone? did ur brother work for the government?
way2easy2love 3 months ago
@way2easy2love sorry, but im not allowed to tell you that
lotsoftrains123 2 months ago
@lotsoftrains123 lol always the same shit with yall
way2easy2love 2 months ago
@MrCyUngle we are not saying it was 100% done by the government but we are saying that we are not being told the truth about 9/11. What about the Aug14th memo to the president that said terrorists were planning attacks in the coming weeks. The gov. dropped the ball big time and 9/11 did not have to happen.
mtanyc 3 months ago 10
@mtanyc well said
Mandems96 3 months ago
@MrCyUngle I'm sorry for your loss. I bet your friend is having a great time with God and the other people in heaven. Those hijackers belong in hell and they should get murdered by the devil. Such cruel fags who would do such a thing! At least The World Trade Center is being rebuilt and 1 or 2 buildings is done.
YellowTheToonKiller3 3 months ago
@MrCyUngle Looks like the only way to make the conspiracy theorist shut the fuck up is to make magic and creatu a time machine, then make them travel to 9/11, make them enter into one of the 4 planes and then they will see what really fucking happened -.- Also, sorry for your loss man :(
AndSalX95 3 months ago
@MrCyUngle various theories, various people. some not implausible. throughout history.
punishalltrolls 3 months ago
@MrCyUngle So... honor your friend, and don't be a sheep. Just because you had a friend die there does not mean they didn't die at the hands of conspirators within our government. There are many many ways to perpetrate a conspiracy. It does not require one to actually plan and execute every aspect. In fact, it's far easier to simply help along the factions interested in carrying out such acts of terror.
birdmanmn 3 months ago
@MrCyUngle i'm sorry for your loss :*(.
belladonna4577 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrCyUngle when the conspiracy theorist turn out to be right i hope you eat shit and die
way2easy2love 3 months ago
@MrCyUngle what was his or her name? honor them
way2easy2love 3 months ago
@MrCyUngle Your friend would want people to know the truth.
MrRoachclips 2 months ago
@MrCyUngle and most of the victims now and first responders are conspiracy theorists.
tadanorm 2 months ago
@MrCyUngle im sorry for your loss. your friend was a victim of a terrible government.
wesdct 1 month ago
@MrCyUngle i am truly sorry for your loss but I am a truther and many 911 family members and firefighters want the truth also
poshuajerkins 3 weeks ago
@MrCyUngle Sir... *sniff* ...I do feel deeply sorry for the loss of your friend and coworker... but just remember one thing... they died... but their feelings for you will still live on...
ROBLOXChris 5 days ago
All that you have done is prove that a plane DID fly into the towers... The paths all match up on your demonstration and there is nothing amiss in any of the clips... SOOOOO...
eeyorelrn 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
Overhead panel? All the immediate flight controls are located in front of the Pilot's and Co's seats. If you hit the overhead panel, the aircraft isn't going to spiraling out of control. What, you think there's an "in case of emergency, press button to self-destruct" switch up there?
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
inside job...ppl wake up please!!! its a sad day and i really pray for these victims and theyre families :(
MissT786 4 months ago
@MissT786 Naive person:D
GATENKAASx10 4 months ago
@GATENKAASx10 Naive? Who cares if it's an inside job or not. The point is thousands of people died. Whether it was a real attack or fake attack doesn't matter.. because it happened. Who cares if "truthers" are right? Them being right won't help relieve any suffering.
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
@GATENKAASx10 yeah you are!! everyone knows its a inside job jus dont wanna admit it
MissT786 4 months ago
@MissT786 Your extremely stupid....
Fs9AirbusA300Pilot 4 months ago
@Fs9AirbusA300Pilot speak for yourself!!!
MissT786 4 months ago
@MissT786 I think you're extremely stupid as well. So that makes two of us speaking for ourselves in thinking that you're an idiot.
dh05z28 4 months ago
@dh05z28 lmaoo!!!!!!! you really think i could really care less what morons like you think? errrmmmm i dont think i do!!
MissT786 4 months ago
@MissT786 it wasn't an inside job.
breadsped98 4 months ago
@breadsped98 yes it was!! u know what you go ahead and think that if it makes you feel better at night!
MissT786 4 months ago
@MissT786 give me proof.
breadsped98 4 months ago
It wasnt even a United Airlines plane!
ScarfaceJameZ 4 months ago
The best comment was "the hatred of Jews is Satanic possession". I did not know that. So off the wall.
This video is well done and I think anyone can see with it that the pilot was a lot better than these guys were supposed to be. I think it had to be a real plane.
poexxope 5 months ago
nicely done. Thanks. Don't pay attention to the turds. They can't learn.
Cre8tvMG 5 months ago
really really REALLY REALLY REALLY GOOD VIDEO
dogmugga1 5 months ago
This is a great video and it explains the flight path well. Doesn't explain who was behind 9/11 though....
icemanisdangerous 5 months ago
Explain the great - thanks
wwwwaaaa2011 5 months ago
See the video at 4:32? I knew there was something wrong with it and your anysis of the decent angle comparatively to the FOX video (which I also think is fake (blue tint altered). The "Al-Qaeda video". I recently did a slow motion zoomed color processed analysis and my computer said the video was digitally altered. It does not lie and picks up pixelation and anomolies that we cannot see. I am making a video. I recently found another 100% altered fake plane video in NIST FBI release #20 clip 3.
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
What began as the filming of an ordinary day in September of 2001, turns out to be the most complete chronicle of 9/11 attacks. New 9/11 movie on dvd: 'Tuesday Morning in September' 2011 For more information about how to get the dvd, please go to the channel that posted this.
TuesdayMorningInSept 5 months ago
Thanx for pwning the noplaners
drifter402 6 months ago
I see different planes, coming in at different angles.
FAKED.
BlatendCrude 7 months ago
If the plane's flight path is at a nearly perfect straight line approach shown in frames 0:52-1:29, then at the perspective shown at frame 1:30, the plane would be behind the building or not visible. It would not appear to be dive-bombing. The same plane can not be flying at a straight line and at a dive-bombing declining angle at the same time.
Also, the flight path shown starting in frame 3:35 from the clip below is not shown.
watch?v=QRpcIZBSAfU
muzicmaker2001 8 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 Clearly you have not understood what was shown in this video. Might be a little above your head. But don't worry about it.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
Just using my eyes..just using my eyes..thats all
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 Indeed, your eyes, that's all. Unfortunately, your eyes cannot always be trusted when your seeing images taken through high-powered zoom lenses. Lens and perspective distortion are well known phenomena to photographers professional camera operators. The maker of this video used more than his eyes, he used trigonometry to triangulate the position of the plane from multiple known camera positions. When he plotted the path using a 3D model, no contradictions were found.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
Yes, I wish your eyes and your passion for protecting OV of 911.
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 You wish my eyes? I've never commented on the "OV" which is irrelevant to this video. And if you haven't noticed, this video questions the "OV" at the end. Your inference about my "passion" is mistaken.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
Then, we can agree to disagree. I'm not buying what you're seeling. The flight paths are obviously different. There is no real evidence of the wreckage and none of the wreckage has been official verified.
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 You've yet to offer any valid argument as to why the information presented in this video is erroneous (other than the "just using my eyes" argument). If your mind was at all open to discovering truth, you would at least be willing to consider well-reasoned evidence which might invalidate some of your doctrines. It's difficult, I know. It takes courage to admit you might be wrong (and I'm referring only to the this video and the flight path, spare me the "OV" red-herring).
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
And you are an endorser of this video because....? Sure. Just reconstructing the plane footage into computer animation and drawing flight path lines on it makes it fact, huh? But, its called two different opinions. Try and deal with that, ok? And again, give frame 3:35 a chew in the clip below. The flight path is not shown.
watch?v=QRpcIZBSAfU
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 Again, you don't understand what you are seeing. "Just reconstructing the plane footage into computer animation and drawing flight path lines on it" does not describe how this video was constructed. It was done using triangulation with pinpointed camera locations. It's okay. I don't expect you to get it.
Regarding the Shack clip you refer to, that angle is covered here. Shack doesn't understand how depth can affect visual angle. And neither do you.
watch?v=Q4vqOPXxwGo
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
That's why its a good thing I have random people on YT to explain it to me..funny. And Shack clip? Do you mean Simon Shack? No, he didn't make the clip. I did. I'm curious. Do you get some sort of a commission for everyone that believes this animation? Are you achimspok?
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 The ulterior motive red-herring is always convenient. I wish I could take credit for this vid. Maybe I'm just a guy who get's irritated at "no plane" stupidity, an insult to the victims of 9/11. Who's paying you for all the propaganda you've posted?
BTW, the clip you gave me to "to chew" starting at 3:35 was from September Clues G @ 2:42. Taking credit for another's work doesn't help your credibility. "Shack clip? Do you mean Simon Shack? No, he didn't make the clip. I did." HA!
lunartraveler 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lunartraveler
"Taking credit for another's work doesn't help your credibility"
Read my posts carefully next time. I put together the whole clip from parts to show the obvious (to some??)different flight paths of thesupposedly the same plane.
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 If 3D computer graphics are too complicated for you to understand, see if this helps you:
watch?v=kbwVVN5c-eI
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
And now the biggest problem of all? The plane images don't even look real at all. They look like cheap computer graphics or something Wile E Coyote should be flying. Is there a video explaining how they are real? Keep tryng...
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 Keep dodging the subject with your straw men. At least that way you can continue to deceive yourself (and never have to say "Maybe I was wrong".)
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
Yes, computer animation matched up to the video footage proves what exactly? I got it. That someone has the talent to match computer animation up to the video footage. Thanx.
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 The flight path in the video is plotted in the 3D model with geo-referenced coordinates of the plane's position in time. Those coordinates remain the same for all angles shown. Whenever the viewing angle is shifted to show the perspective from the known camera positions of each video, the 3D animated flight path matches perfectly with each video clip. A coincidence? Due to programmer error? A software glitch?
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
There is no proof that the "shift" is accurate. Again, this is nothing but computer animation reflecting the video footage. That's it. Again, what exactly is your stake in this? You seem to be highly commited to defending it?
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 You're wrong. He provides the coordinates of each camera position as well as the flight path (at 9:18). It's there for anyone to recreate on their own using Google sketch-up and Google Earth. Perhaps you don't believe Google earth or it's 3D model of Manhattan is accurate. If not, you're beyond help. Regardless, If the model being used was inaccurate in some significant way, it would never match up with ALL the video clips. The 100% matching verifies the accuracy of the model.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
Again, if one flight path is shown as a perfect straight line in one approach, another flight path, the plane takes a curve and in another, a dive bomb, the planes shown can not be the same plane. I don't know how more obviously I can put this. Save your animation, research, and compare ALL of the real footage of the flight paths. For example, any comment of "Shack's footage" which again is not illustrated here?
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 So we've come full circle. I will finally accept that I'm wasting my time. This is beyond your capacity for understanding. It has to do with time (length of the shot) and depth, but never mind. For the record the "Shack footage" can be found at 3:06, and again at 8:35. But I will guarantee that you won't understand it.. It is again because of depth and the viewing angle--the plane curves, the camera is looking up at the curvature creating the illusion of a climb before impact.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
I am mistaken and you are correct. The Shack clip is there at 3:06.. But here's something interesting. The "drawn in" flight path is not the actual flight path that the plane takes. The plane's light path is so low that it dissapears behind one of the buildings. The drawn in flight path stays above the buildings to match the other flight paths. As stated before, how do we know the animation is correct? Answer: It obviously isn't as I have just shown.
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 "The "drawn in" flight path is not the actual flight path that the plane takes. The plane's light path is so low that it dissapears behind one of the buildings. The drawn in flight path stays above the buildings to match the other flight paths."
Not every single building in Manhattan was rendered for the animation. The building in the "Shack clip" which obstructs the flight path is not included. Why? He's SHOWING you the flight path, revealing how it curves behind that building.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
"Not every single building in Manhattan was rendered for the animation"
The actual flight path is still considerably lower than what is shown and does not "match" up with the other flight paths. Therefore, proving that the flight paths and actual planes are fake. Anyone with half a brain can see that the plane images don't even look real. No offense...
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago 2
@muzicmaker2001 I love the way you just threw in "Therefore, proving" without showing any good evidence. You're a typical conspiracy theorist that thinks their word alone is good enough.
TheSmacca 4 months ago
@TheSmacca
Ok, if you missed it, the evidence is the flight paths are different, the plane images are fake, physics took a day off at impacts (no damage to the fragile aluminum plane/building, no falling debris) and none of the wreckage from ANY plane on 911 has been officially verified. But, if you want a good laugh, chck out the obvious eidting in one of the most famous clips.
watch?v=X5i07-kHgww
muzicmaker2001 4 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 Oh yeah, that's not offensive at all.
scaremengaviation 4 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 You must not have watched the overlay of the "shack clip" which is shown at 8:35. It shows an exact match with the video (as with all the others). Don't forget--the building in the foreground obstructing the path is not included in the 3D model. The animation is correct.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
@lunartraveler
This might help ya. Instead of showing the different viewpoints and how the perspective of the plane's path changes, let's focus on one structure and how its perspective changes with the plane's. The structure is WTC7. In the clip below, note how Flight 175 seems to fly to the left and right of WTC7 and how the Tower's perspective changes, but the WTC7's perspective never changes. But, WTC7's perspective MUST change with the Tower's perspective.
watch?v=gOLdfbK7iec
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
@muzicmaker2001 "Left" vs "Right". Well . . . okay, uh, I can only assume one of the following at this point:
1) You're pranking me, wondering how long you can string me along thinking you're serious.
2) You're ten years old and have not yet developed beyond the "concrete operational stage".
3) You're a grown adult with some sort of learning disability affecting spatial perception and/or abstract reasoning.
Whichever it is, I'm done wasting my time. Take it easy and best of luck.
lunartraveler 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lunartraveler
"1) You're pranking me"
Why do I feel like you have some sort of agenda in defending this clip? Did you make this clip? Are you achimspok ? Third time, why are you so commited in defending this clip? It makes no sense.
muzicmaker2001 5 months ago
Just a question but what if the hijack team went to the WTC before the big day and stood on either side of each tower with a GPS device and entered a plot point? Dead center on the tower? Then simply entered that data on the flight computers on the planes? I don't know if it is possible but theoretically i know it could be done. It would certainly eliminate the flying guess work and give the planes a reference point. Any pilots out there whaddya think?
roquefortfiles 8 months ago
You ever made a sim of the first plane's path? Even though it'd be harder to make with so few videos of the first attack.
than217 9 months ago
Go to the site, New York Archetcture, and browse to the page for Verrazano-Narrows Bridge. Quote: "On the morning of September 11, 2001, United Airlines Flight 175 was hijacked and flown directly over the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge en route to the World Trade Center." Try flying from that bridge, then do the divebomb thing as suggested by this video.
jmdewey60 10 months ago
IHS
robertk131 10 months ago
Sorry. Even given the very odd angles, I don't think it's fake. The reason is not the video. The reason is simply that there are too many who would know.
What about the real flights? Those flights existed and they took off, where did the passengers go? Killed? Then you still have to move the plane out of the way, what about the ATCs? They'd notice something's not right if the planes go off course. All of them in on it?
Maybe it would be interesting to see what ATCs were on duty that day...
0x777 11 months ago 2
@0x777 First of all, your an idiot. Those terrorists were able to get on the plane because the security wasn't as tight before then (obviously). They took over the plane with force. DO YOU REALLY THINK THE ATCS WERE ABLE TO CONTROL AN AIRPLANE THAT IS IN THE CONTROL OF THE EXTREMISTS? I THINK NOT. So stop it with this ridiculous speculating. Anyone who does is an idiot and ignorant. Stop it. Stop scaring people and feeding them lies. You all disgust me.
spairpartsdealer 4 months ago
@spairpartsdealer
The point I was trying to make is that you'd have to have a lot of people inside (or silence them) if you want to make it a fake. The ATCs would have talked with the pilots of the flights, the flights were scheduled and if they didn't take off, a lot of people would have noticed. There were a few hundred people on the "real" flights, what happened to them if this was fake?
My point is, this is real. Not a fake. Too many have to be silenced to "fake" that.
0x777 4 months ago
It's astonishing. Those who believe that planes didn't crash into the towers, that it was all a Jewish/Zionist conspiracy have actually refused to believe what they saw. This is an important lesson for people who read their comments. You see, their hatred of Jews is so deep and so completely encompassing, that it actually trumps all of their other senses. Only the hatred of Jews is this powerful. It is a satanic possession. Learn to recognize it when you see it.
koyunbaba73 11 months ago
Makes you wonder why they 'claimed' the black boxes were... "destroyed"!☺
MarkB1ngham 11 months ago
@MarkB1ngham exactly! that came handy, huh? given the fact they were made to withstand forces as high as 34 hundred G and the maximum temperature jet fuel is capable of generating for half an hour, they should have survived this. In my eyes since they were located in the tail section of the fuselage they must have been blown away from the WTC on impact and fallen to the ground.
mandrke2004 6 months ago
@mandrke2004 Thanks for that, AND aren't black boxes fitted with some sort of bleep to help locate them?
MarkB1ngham 6 months ago
@MarkB1ngham Well the locator is actually is known as an ULB, underwater location beacon therefore its typically only activated by water immersion. but given the bright orange color of the black boxes they should be recognizable. but that wasnt the problem, since they were found but DESTROYED! too bad..
mandrke2004 6 months ago
Outside job. Hamburg cell.
TheTodd1977 11 months ago
FAKE VIDEOS
whiteadderextras 1 year ago
1:36
show that path to a pilot, and he will laugh at you.
xNAJAFx 1 year ago
@xNAJAFx its perspective distortion you fool. Are you a pilot? do you have any idea what you talk about?
dumbnetworks 10 months ago
@dumbnetworks
who the fucked asked you about anything. Wank some more.
xNAJAFx 10 months ago
@xNAJAFx Well you just proved that you are a coksucker, nice I am already laughing at you
dumbnetworks 10 months ago
@dumbnetworks
get a life son.
xNAJAFx 10 months ago
this vid is a joke, the paths variate.
xNAJAFx 1 year ago
9/11 completed the zionist/jew takeover of America. From that day on we are all their slaves.
freedom013102 1 year ago
TQ for the video. Your hard work will not go waste. Expose the Zionists!
raficsulejmanovic 1 year ago
Superman can fly in a computer simulation.
Psy0psAgent 1 year ago
Bloody brilliant work!
Badwolf182 1 year ago
08:40 clearly shows in the video footage that the plane isnt following the flight path of some of the others.
Thank you for proving a lot of videos were faked.
zenoist2 1 year ago
@zenoist2 Faked plane video??? OMFG!!!! (the mind BOGGLES!!)
Like for what reason? By who? What would it accomplish? What would it show differently that 50 other randomly shot videos and still photographs already show CLEARLY???!!!
WHERE? do you people come from?? How much of an idiot does one have to be to see this event shot from UMPTEEN angles OVER AND OVER!!
And somehow you have a hard time with that??
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
THank you Michael. Done so well and carefully, you're genius.
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
No idea what the point of this is, but it is insanely well put together. And BTW, anyone who believes that 9/11 was an inside job should go fucking hang themselves because they are a lost cause and a fucking waste of Earth's resources.
qwerty112311 1 year ago
This is amazing work. Can you post the flight path coordinates?
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake Never-mind--I realized the coordinates are posted at the end of the video.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
3:11 seconds part is not accurate....why?....where is the building thats supposed to be in the way........how does the plane descend and rise to hit on target.
Other than that......great vid. Shame the real conspiracists are using it as ammo..
Whatever...truth will win out in the end.....or........all is lost.....ugh
FreedumbFighter28 1 year ago
@FreedumbFighter28 Not every single building in Manhattan is represented in the 3D model. The point is to show the flight path--why would you include a building which obscured most of the trajectory?
existenceisfake 1 year ago
@existenceisfake <---I guess your right...I was just sayin.
I think this vid is great...you can even hear the fbi audio dubs too. I am sure hat was an accident but I think that is a neat lil addition to the trained 9/11 professional.
FreedumbFighter28 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A great video. Thanks for pulling all this together.
By your radar plot the impact speed was 565 mph or 828 ft/sec or 252 metres/sec calculated by me from this table of radar-calculated geodesic points of the aircraft's flightpath you display on your vid at 9:19.
The whole vid serves as a complete vindication of the official explanation and a complete debunking of the "no planes" theory
beachcomber2008 1 year ago
Wow -- really impressive.
I recently came across the No Plane Theory myself, and having personally witnessed the 2nd crash, felt someone needed to stand up for what actually happened.
Which is not to say that I know the source of the planes or even to make any kind of statement about 9/11. All I can say is there was a 2nd plane, and I saw it crash.
You did a tremendous job of reconciling many vantage points. Thank you for your effort.
DanMcOgden1 1 year ago
nice upload
we never forget !
GadinhoTheLegend 1 year ago
Thank you for clearing that up.
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
This video is absolute genius, I commend you for all of your painstaking efforts!
Xenomorph911WTC 1 year ago
Good hard work. How do you know hijackers were flying through the cockpit though? You refer to "feefall" but I don't get it.
.
Are you saying the conditions in the cockpit resembled a parabolic flight?
loccysmif 1 year ago
Well done:)
roxxphatcox 1 year ago
es un muy interesante video..enhorabuena achimspok....gran trabajo
centuriahispanica 1 year ago
what is the program you used to track those flight paths of the airplane? thx... :)
fcbayern4everNo1 1 year ago
Anyone who believes that hijackers flew this plane, buy the flight simulator program, X-Plane and start your descent from 150 miles away, perfectly, in order to get up to 550 mph when you get to Manhattan, and see if you can even hit the buildings at that speed in the first thirty tries.
jmdewey60 2 years ago 23
@jmdewey60 maybe you dont know how to fly a fucking plane? Ill post the fucking video for your ignorant ass for you if you want.
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction Thanks for the help. Be sure to post a link here when you put it up.
jmdewey60 1 year ago
@jmdewey60 will do buttercup.
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction be sure to hit the middle column as Atta did
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka oh i thought you were reffering to flight 175 as this video implies? oh wait... you were. atta flew the other plane. Which one you want babe?
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction wait, if one of the planes was controlled by a computer.......
AA11 hit at 500 mph
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka you make no sense..
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction jim sad that it is not easy to hit the tower at 600 mph in MS F. simulator. You replied by saing that you can do that at the first try - as well as the hijackers could. The discussion is not about the ability of the hij. to hit the towers but about Atta's ability to hit the middle column at 500 mph (+normal to the wall) ..... and if Shehhi could see the turning point in the air (explained in the previous video). Tudududum! There's hardly any need for any discussion!
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka so what is your argument? If you want to see the video then by i'll do it just for you babe. Wait for my headset to return from RMA
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction so, you are going to hit the middle column at 500 mph? In your first try and normal to the wall?
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka sigh... i'll pm you the link.. forget the headset
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka done.. rendering
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka youtube.com/watch?v=MiqahFRysPI
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@jmdewey60 youtube.com/watch?v=MiqahFRysPI
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction wow! You really hit the middle column at 500 mph!!! Normal to the wall!!!! Oh, wait...you did not! Uhm, nvm.
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka and at constant banking as Atta did! Impressive! wow
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka Speed of impact: 537 knots
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction so you really hit the middle column and perpendicular to the wall? In a properly scaled model? Wow!
Ah, you didn not! Uhm, nvm.
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka Thats not what the other guy thinks, i even made another video just for him. PMED...
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction all right, but this is about what really happend that day, "Atta" hit the middle column, you didn't.
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@nehorlavazapalka wow congratufuckinglations.. point is still proven dumbass jew..
DonkeyBonrProduction 1 year ago
@DonkeyBonrProduction the shine of your bright intellect is unbearable
nehorlavazapalka 1 year ago
@jmdewey60
Once I find a good recording program, I just might show you how possible it is, though I'll probably use Microsoft's Flight Simulator as it's what my uncle endorses, who is an actual pilot.
stbays 1 year ago
@stbays Good, I would like to see it when it's done. I've been working for the last year on making the scenery for X-plane, of New Your Harbor, to make it accurate. You can find some of my work on the X-plane forum for free downloads.
jmdewey60 1 year ago
@jmdewey60 you're my man, but wait, it'S true, it was atta the mighty pilot who was in Nam in the 60s
PolDee187 10 months ago
@jmdewey60 actually is not that complicated... you people who sit in front of the computer and talk your ass off think that everything is impossible, well it isn't! if you put in the hours you can learn to fly a plane... but I see you have moronic followers.
dumbnetworks 10 months ago
@jmdewey60 I thought you guys had already made the case that these planes couldn't be traveling at speeds that high at that altitude? Gadammit, make up your minds about what you believe.
razorfett147 5 months ago
@razorfett147 The thing I like to point out is the difference between Miles per Hour, and Knots. I calculated the speed from analyzing each frame from available video and locating the plane in its environment and using the frames per second. I come up with something close to 522 mph. Now if someone says the plane flew 550 knots, then they are lying because that would be 633 mph which is too fast.
jmdewey60 5 months ago