They are hot and they have hatches, but they are not hot hatchbacks. A hot hatch should combine performance with practicality and these two don't. As some engineering pieces, they are fabulous,they are fast, flamboyant and mad. but they fail as everyday cars. And that's the point of a hot hatch: an everyday car that has a subtle evil side. I would take the standard Megane R26 with the Cup chassis, if I had to choose a hot Renault. If not, I would buy a Focus ST ( only an opinion )
@HENRYHOBBS1 yes, the R26 has the Cup as standard, my bad. I was confusing it with the Renaultsport 225. It's not soft, trust me. Maybe it's not as stiff as a Renault, but it is enough. Don't get me wrong, I love the Megane R26.R., but it doesen't do all the right things at all the right times. That's what would keep me away from buying one, the fact that you can't use it as an everyday car. But do I want to drive it ocasionally? YES, SIR !
As much as I have (A LOT OF) respects towards the incredible R26.R, I can't even hesitate. In my case, it will be without a doubt the outstanding and spectacular Clio V6 (preferably the 1st Generation). The clio V6 looks like a real prototype or concept car that was produced for the masses (in very low numbers, of course).
The review was ok. Sure it was a bit limp and the weather is typical UK spec, but it was nice to see some of Renaults fine heritage together...shame no Williams though :(
the guy is a dickhead! he's lucky to be drivin a Clio V6! ok it might not be that fast but it aint exactly slow is it?! with a car that looks that good who cares! when he's bangin his mom does he like it fast!? I dont think so
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Who cares who developed it or it's 0-60 times? V6 owners should just keep their mouths shut when it comes to performance and stick to the tired rhetoric that they bought it for looks instead of quoting 0-60 times that most people who know how to remove the rear seats can achieve in near bog standard 172's or even 15+ year old Mk1's. V6 is an interesting car, a performance car however it most certainly is not and will never be.
Although i do plan on buying a v6 this yr. it IS a hell ofa performance car, its just, for the money, and for the commitment, you could find alot faster both in a straight line and rounda corner, for a lot less. It true that you buy it for its looks, road prescence and sound though. take a golf r32, ridiculously quick, wud paste the v6 clio -but when you drive down the road, you might aswell be driving a diesel for all the looks you get. depends what you want!
Both cars i would love in my garage but if i had to chose, it would be the R26.R
AdamR32RSI 1 month ago
nice shakin' tits
zdzichu328 1 month ago
The R26 is gonna handle better but its always gonna be the V6 for me!!!!
Robcatist 2 months ago
That Clio is just stupid, but i love it.
sashaalx03 4 months ago
he sounds like baldrick from blackadder
petechett 6 months ago
i put regulary R888 for trackdays on my Clio V6 like that on the vid. And he make a lot of fun with and is very quick on cornering.
Veee6 7 months ago
3:14 lifted a tire at 10 mph.
SomecoolName1 8 months ago
They are hot and they have hatches, but they are not hot hatchbacks. A hot hatch should combine performance with practicality and these two don't. As some engineering pieces, they are fabulous,they are fast, flamboyant and mad. but they fail as everyday cars. And that's the point of a hot hatch: an everyday car that has a subtle evil side. I would take the standard Megane R26 with the Cup chassis, if I had to choose a hot Renault. If not, I would buy a Focus ST ( only an opinion )
horilazar 11 months ago
@horilazar r26 doesnt have a cup chassis option,its hardcore as standard.st to soft n thirsty
HENRYHOBBS1 11 months ago
@HENRYHOBBS1 yes, the R26 has the Cup as standard, my bad. I was confusing it with the Renaultsport 225. It's not soft, trust me. Maybe it's not as stiff as a Renault, but it is enough. Don't get me wrong, I love the Megane R26.R., but it doesen't do all the right things at all the right times. That's what would keep me away from buying one, the fact that you can't use it as an everyday car. But do I want to drive it ocasionally? YES, SIR !
horilazar 11 months ago
new megane rs just beats this lot..
it says on the box 250 hp.. but you get 275 on dyno..
and it just looks a whole lot better.. just more grown-up...
still, i want both of these anytime, anyday^^
wassernase 1 year ago
What a jewel the clio v6!!!
And the R26R one of the best front WD ever made!
Renault is one of the few brands that do "cheap" racing cars, born to be driven!
Huskymotard88 1 year ago
One thing that made Clios soo much fun was the light weight so im going for the Megane in this comparison
TheVtieg6 1 year ago
I'd take the Clio V6 at 8/10s any day. The R26 doesn't have any of the specialness of the V6. Not that I wouldn't want to drive the thing.
GrotrianSeiler 1 year ago 5
Pffffff someone to give a Redbull or a shot of Cocaine to the presentator?
QSSolar1 1 year ago 5
what r u on about the clio v6 dose no understeer
leehaslerpsp 1 year ago
What sac removed my comments! They were factually correct, considerably more so than the test driver.
ajrmotorsport 2 years ago 2
Woow... la R26:R fait 230ch, pas 225!
alazred 2 years ago
entre les ch et les bhp il y a une legere difference, c' est pas exactement pareil il me semble
offset31 2 years ago
Et la Megane RS 2.0T fait 250ch
Mateck69 1 year ago
La Megane 3 RS fait 250ch oui. Mais la Megane 2 RS fait 225ch, la R26, R26R et F1 Team (je crois) font 230ch.
alazred 1 year ago
As much as I have (A LOT OF) respects towards the incredible R26.R, I can't even hesitate. In my case, it will be without a doubt the outstanding and spectacular Clio V6 (preferably the 1st Generation). The clio V6 looks like a real prototype or concept car that was produced for the masses (in very low numbers, of course).
But at the end, both are real beasts.
RenaultSport, 4life!!!
prancinghorse25 2 years ago 10
Both excellent cars I would struggle on which to buy the faster r26r or the cooler v6 :P
AndrewStrang 2 years ago
Well, your worries are over, I have a v6 and raced a r26r yesterday. v6 is faster AND cooler :P
djmattwilson 1 year ago
i agrre
randomvidz14 1 year ago
The review was ok. Sure it was a bit limp and the weather is typical UK spec, but it was nice to see some of Renaults fine heritage together...shame no Williams though :(
BarneyWobba 2 years ago
This is a terrible review.
Olliejc1 2 years ago
the guy is a dickhead! he's lucky to be drivin a Clio V6! ok it might not be that fast but it aint exactly slow is it?! with a car that looks that good who cares! when he's bangin his mom does he like it fast!? I dont think so
Ash928GTR 2 years ago
this review sucks ASS.
the presenter is wrong about pretty much everything.
NaeJoy 2 years ago
LOL well i can not take my kids to school in either of those but i can in my Ford RS :)
xRxixcxhxtxexrx 2 years ago
Still, the Megane RS R26R is in front. And if you want a good one and 5 doors, the MRS exist also with 5 doors. ;-)
uneame 2 years ago
Comment removed
PierreReyesMusic 2 years ago
I do!
xRxixcxhxtxexrx 2 years ago
unfortunatelly the megane design is ugly and boring as fuck
redunndant 2 years ago
cocked its leg @ 3:19 nice
Soulvex 2 years ago 5
try 3:10
Soulvex 2 years ago
I like the review, particularly the commentators style. Can't wait to have the R26.R in a slug fest with Ford Focus RS.
Akshole 2 years ago
The idiot presenter on this video needs to check his facts, he talks so much shit I bet you can smell his breath at 100m.
djmattwilson 2 years ago
I wondered when someone else might feel the same way about this review. Journalists are all the same regardless of what they cover.
daredd5 2 years ago
TWR has nothing to do with the mk2 V6. god bless..... !!!!
TWR made a poor work on the mk1 !!!!
Veee6 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who cares who developed it or it's 0-60 times? V6 owners should just keep their mouths shut when it comes to performance and stick to the tired rhetoric that they bought it for looks instead of quoting 0-60 times that most people who know how to remove the rear seats can achieve in near bog standard 172's or even 15+ year old Mk1's. V6 is an interesting car, a performance car however it most certainly is not and will never be.
JediPimp007 3 years ago
Pffff. drive a Mk2 before u say this stupid things. It's avesome to drive and makes tonns of fun. Thats important.
Veee6 3 years ago
I have... and the Mk1. They look nice, other than that, no thanks
JediPimp007 3 years ago
Although i do plan on buying a v6 this yr. it IS a hell ofa performance car, its just, for the money, and for the commitment, you could find alot faster both in a straight line and rounda corner, for a lot less. It true that you buy it for its looks, road prescence and sound though. take a golf r32, ridiculously quick, wud paste the v6 clio -but when you drive down the road, you might aswell be driving a diesel for all the looks you get. depends what you want!
stitcha123 2 years ago
TWR did the mk1, Renaultsport did the mk2
Not that great to drive?? Layeth down ye pipe of crack!!
mrsclio 3 years ago
R26R is just a megane with ordinary mods?? what you smokin??
ugo3245 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cage - Can be bought
R888 - Can be bought
Coils - Can be bought!
Key factor is weight...As said if you want a proper track car buy a lotus or caterham!
Hi jesus! x
ajrmotorsport 3 years ago
hitting the limiter at 2:48, fail
gomez88 3 years ago
TWR developed the 1st mk1 clio NOT the mk2.
V6 - 5.7 to 60
182 - 6.8 to 60... Nothing in it...
Pisch report! V6 is wild! R26R is just an ordinary megane with mods!
ajrmotorsport 3 years ago