Added: 3 years ago
From: Fly0High
Views: 301,773
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (845)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ** Any more comments added to this video will be deleted. Please follow the instructions on it. **

  • really how long had he been sleeping?

  • @playerdepimp nearly 800,000 years. lol.

  • Whoa wtf? 2030? People in the 1950s thought we would be in flying cars by now and were not. Also idk about the outcome of the future but right now we have a horrible economy and some things just aren't working out.

  • @Pearlharbor350 We would have flying cars by now if we worked on developing useful technology instead of iPhones and 3D shit.

  • @Al3xX420 Forget the flying cars, I want my jetpack.

  • when they show those airplanes travelling over the city, I suppose they are stopped in midair! I mean... its like one year every second, and they take several seconds to cross the screen!

  • Dark Knight Rises ending... similar to this?

  • i love it ! i wish i could have this machine...

  • this movie sucked ass, 1960 one was way better. i watched this one first and was so disappointed i immediately went to the 1960 one, because the story was way too broken up and choppy, it was sloppy in the storyline dept and like just jumped into things way too quick i liked how in the 1960 one he slowly finds out wats up, plus it doesnt make sense that the eloi are like intelligent but they dont fight back in this one they just accept it strays to far from the original idea and makes 0 sense

  • i want that time machine...whine could get REAAALY EXPENSIVE! XD

  • He could actually help the doctor fight the daleks or marty stop biff from taking over hill valley or the eloi from becoming enslaved to the morlocks and...oh wait of course that's why he's there. Sorry got a bit carried away there!

  • Many people have their opinions about this movie but I think it's an amazing piece of work.

  • this movie sucked so much.... whit the tittle they should of done much more better. another production should take over the name

  • i would either take that machine as back as far as i could go or as far forward as possible...or as imposable as i could

  • See you guys May 24, 2030! :3

  • "I bet that makes a hell of a cappuccino!"

  • But if he was really staying still in space, wouldn't the earth revolve around the sun from under him?

  • @MrBranchFreeman Excellent point

  • @MrBranchFreeman If he was truly frozen in space-time, the entire solar system would've moved out from under him.

  • @notessimodude Yes. It annoys me that H.G. Wells would overlook this kind of detail. For me it really hurts the experience.

  • he should have invested in seat belts. Oh wait, they weren't invented yet...

  • it only shows a single ice age? an interglacial period lasts 20000 years while an ice age can last the same amount of time, soin the span of 800,000 years, at least 20 ice ages would have passed.

  • When this baby hits 88 mph your going to some serious shit.

  • I'm not sure, does this time machine fall under steampunk? If so, this is where my love affair with it began :)

  • ahh the foto sigh

  • i want a time machine .. id go into the future get the stock market reports and some powerball #s and then come back to the present

  • @Evile9669

    That won't work. By traveling into the future you become missing in the present, that shapes the future. Police will look for you, you will be on the news. It creates a tiny chain reaction that affects peoples actions in the world in some small way. It will change the future than what it otherwise would be. If you come back and live your normal life, you marry someone who would have married someone else, then the future will not be the same as the future you visited.

  • @SuperBlobsterMan It would if you were inevitably going to go back

  • wait up guys somehow lets tie in phili experiment to it also , because it is so.

  • The real question is why didn't he end up in space. I mean, it's not like the Earth doesn't move.

  • @HatakeKakashi2345 True, but he stays in the same position for the same reason as how he is still able to breathe. While he does not exist in time, he does exist in space. He moves through time very quickly qhile still occupying the same location as before. Like I said, thats how he's still able to breathe. In the original movie they explain it as the machine is moving through time, but not space. It stays in the same physical location but is moving through quantum fields even as they speak.

  • @HatakeKakashi2345 Gravity? Why would he stand still whilst the earth moves..?

  • All of the reviews I've read about this film all say the same thung.

    That it wasn'ty a good remake of the original film or a good adaptation of the original book.

    While I agree with those comments I think a film should always be judged on it's own merits and not by how well it follows in the footsteps of something else.

    In the case of this film I have to say that I enjoyed it and that it certainly doesn't deserve the hate people seem to keep throwing at it.

    But that's just me.

  • @TheJboy88 I do agree, but here's my gripe:

    This is a good movie. It has good characters, a good story and decent effects coupled with fantastic music.

    BUT ITS NOT A GOOD ADAPTION OF THE NOVEL. That is the only thing that holds it back, I think. Now, if they hadn't called it 'The Time Machine' and didn't call the Morlocks and Eloi what htey called them, then this could have been a magnificent movie! I do enjoy it, but I could've enjoyed it more if it wasn't so different from the book.

  • ok i recorded this movie last night on DVR and i watched it form beginning to end then i got about idk say 20 to 30 min into it after the first time i watched anyway my question is how dose his girlfriend die the second time the steam wagon hit her or something because in the movie it didn't look like it it looked like it just passed her up so how did she die i cant figure it out ....( just putting it out there i watched it about 20 times scene i recorded it last night so could someone help me)

  • @GrizzlyDeath92 He built the time machine because of his girlfriends death, if she survived it wouldn't have existed, so he can't use his time machine to go back and save her

  • 3:45

    what made that explosion, i know the moon broke up, but was it that the moon crahsed into earth ofr soemthing. plz reply!

  • @alexgets98 I'm not certain, but before it, when he runs to the time-machine, the ground under his feet is cracking apart and you can see some lava, so maybe it has something to do with that. And then there was a big flash of fire, so I thought maybe a car blew up or something. I do agree though, I don't know what it could be. Still, we can speculate... *smokes pipe*

  • @TheStealthX The moon acts as a stabilizer of sorts for the axial wobble of the earth's rotation. If you were to actually crack the moon into pieces (a dubious thing to even try, considering the mass of the moon), it would have immediate and catastrophic consequences for the Earth. Everything from tides to plate tectonics would be effected. I'm speculating but unimaginably massive earthquakes would definitely occur and I wouldn't be surprised if you saw a flood basalt or two.

  • @phuturephunk THERE YA GO.

    Thats the explanation I was looking for. Thanks mate.

  • @alexgets98 See my answer to The Stealth.

  • 5:04: oh, I've left the damn thing running!

  • The T.A.R.D.I.S. for sure :P

  • @Fly0High It's not the TARDIS, but I would name it that! :))

  • HMMMM What time machine should i take today, this one, the Deloreans or the tardis?

  • @luvmuchly1

    Lol good one! :P 

  • year 802,701 A.D!!!

  • the 1960s is much better

    Enough said.

  • @MRresievil310 fuck you

  • how the hell was the planes moving at normal speed?

  • I would love to have have a machine like this. I would have brought my Dad a few hours in the future, and he never would have died.

  • @pettyofficer30 relaz cpo who says he is dead. ?

  • just watched the 1960 version and that version is closer too the book, which is a great read.

    This version isn't as good if you read the book.

  • shit!!!

  • wasnt a bad movie

  • iv postulated that this may not actually be a re-make in a way its possible that theres a second time traveler named george and he lives in england its possible both travelers could be in the same universe but then again the world blew up in 1967 in a nuclear holocaust so maybee there were time travers that prevented that .

  • I vote for a fucking sequel!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @Cmaster1heroes yeah thats a brillant idea there needs to be a sequel. problem is in the 2002 movie he blew up is time machine as a bomb to kill the morlocks. if we were to do a sequel it would have to be a diffrent timeline were either he does not detroy his time machine or another traveler comes along and makes another time machine. then again this was a re-make and if we reach the year 2030 in real life the thinkers will postulate another way the current day civilization gets destroyed.

  • @TheNecropolis20 A sequel on this movie is actually already under work. I personally can't wait for it being released, I loved this first movie.

  • @Zeissca what is your source? a web page perhaps?

  • @928baller Wikipedia.

  • @TheNecropolis20 Yes he blew up his time machine but what of the scientific equations written on the board in his town home? Maybe someone just as smart came along and began to start on another time machine?

    = problem solved. and yeah about the 2030 time, problematic. Hahaha. Bad ass movie!

  • @928baller wow dude you blew my mind i never thought of that. yeah what if another thinker comes aong and sees hes stuff on the chalk board.. i was too worried that the old woman care taker of his house was going to erase that stuff. your brilliant.

  • @TheNecropolis20 I thought they were gonna make one but the bastards cancelled it!

  • that's 1 week b4 my birthday!!!!!!!

  • but the 2030 sequence was kickass!!!!!!!!! what happened to the delorean though????????

  • @Cmaster1heroes hahahaha. Delorean? lmao.

  • Comment removed

  • time travel is possible, however it is obviously for certain minds to exercise for certain purposes unknown to mortals for the sake of the higher unknown, unseen creative forces. the time travel i refer to is one of the mind... altered consciousness. it is a tortured existence, because all of the information one gains stays within the original self. some of that information is archaic beyond words... real dirty human stuff. well, god bless...

  • the time machine doesn't jump from one moment in time to another..It travels in a straight line through time but faster than the rest of us so it would always be visible and never disappear ! to the observer. the time traveller would always be there but never aging... because it occupies avery single moment in time and never "misses out" any bits

  • I love movie based on time travel.

    This one was fantastic.

  • I always think that you can never go back and change history because if you went back and did something like kill a badger, then it becomes part of the constant time line, and you couldn't go back and stop yourself because that action would be part of the constant timeline aswell so you would still end up killing the badger!

    To conclude- "If you were there, you're always going to be there!"

    Oh and i have nothing against badgers!

  • In an otherwise poor retelling of the story the first time-travel sequence zooming out to a ship landing at a lunar colony is far and away the best sequence. Nice music, too.

  • I need a time machine for the same thing as him!

    And the stupid part of the movie: The mans of the future are nothing but a bunch of frightened pieces of meat! They serve as the underground's race food.

  • time always forward its physics, but wow if you could go back :)

  • @Skyclad65 If you could create a wormhole between two points, and accelerate one of them so it would travel faster forward in time; you could effectively travel backwards in time.

  • I haven't seen this movie so what if somebody steps where the time machine is but in a different time, then he appears right where the person was standing. Would they join together? If not, what would happen?

  • The movie is very cool

  • THIS IS SIMPLY....EPIC!!!!

  • when I was child... this movie inspire me to take a espectacular road in my life =), and I listen this song all the time in my 7-adventoures o yeah!!! lol

  • This is something that happens to me. Im am not making this up.

    Me and my brother discussed about timetravel. I told him if it was possible, I would appear near to us that moment were discussing it and wave to us. That never happened of course.

    This last years people unknown to me greeted me like pals or asked me "did you find it". The crepiest is my brother calling to me in phone to ask were I was. He was sure he saw me outside our home and went away. And my brother is not that kind of liar.

  • @movienaut dude, give me your email, i wanna be near you when you have the time machine so you can share it with me

  • The original book was set new years eve 1899.

  • this movie would have gone a lot faster if he just went back to the cretaceous period and brought back a t-rex

  • @RexMineCraft Jurassic Park all over again except he uses a time machine =/

  • Some people say that if time travel was possible, we'd see travelers by now, and even throughout history. Isn't that what UFOs basically do? We've had sightings since prehistoric times. They haven't made contact because it might have negative consequences on their timeline. Many alien encounters resemble humans( the nordics) could they be future humans? Maybe the "grays" are just robotic servants, disguised as aliens to fool people. Or they could be aliens, working in league with future humans.

  • if time travel was posible,it would be terrible if someone bad got hold of the machine and used it,because they would change all the good things that happend to this world,then when they got back everythink would be diffrent,so it would only be ok if a sensible person was to use it.

  • The ground level just happens to be the same after a million years??

  • The 4 people who disliked this video are stuck in a time warp to hell.

  • Fantastic movie, definitely didn't deserve the awful reviews it received.

  • I always wondered: If you can't change what is already written. Wouldn't it mean by going back and forth that the future part has been written already? So you actually sealed your fate by writing the future?

  • @Sproeikoei What happened, happened, would always have happened, has already happened and will happen. O_o

  • If its gana happen, it would of happend. thinkin like that makes everthing ,,,one second..one blip. Everthing just condensed on to its self. not projecting out.

  • Don ask me why, but i like the 1960's Version of the "Time Machine" more. Here are too many effects and less story.

  • greatest movie i ever saw i was trying to find this video since i was 6 im 14 now

  • I Dont know if time travel would be a good idea cause it looks awsome to travel through time but u dont know which year or decade u will end up in i mean u might end up on a day wen the world might end or something or enter a world where there might be different creatures, rulers or end up in a strict place.

    thumbs up if u agree with me

  • Scientist have proven that we can't travel in the past because it will create paradoxes........but we can travel in the future....for example if you are situated very close to a black hole time goes slower there because of the immense gravitational pull........just watch discovery science for more or google it :P

  • A horrible movie. For some reason they decide to mix the great story with Final Destination and The First Men in the Moon, among other things. This sequence is the only part that is really great, both the music and the visuals.

  • a great movie and these sequences are super

  • Damn, he slept for like a couple of hours but he already took millennial age. I mean, damn, the next Ice Age already came and Earth actually started over again from a prehistoric event. 

  • In the year 1 000 000 and a half, humankind is enslaved by giraffe...

  • @19Lenoch92

    And the giraffe is enslaved by the hippopotamus

  • There's one scene in this movie that I don't understand.

    Spoilers incoming by the way.

    In the end of the movie, where he's fighting the creepy-looking white guy, he kicks him off the time machine, and he starts to rot away, because he's not on the time machine. How is that possible? From the creepy-guy's perspective he must've been hanging there for months, but he's still struggling trying to get on the time machine. This movie is awesome, but some parts just doesn't make sense.

  • @lundell100 Not really. According to the film's perspective he actually travels in time (you see the blue bubble of the TM disapear). The white guy, grabbing the TM continued in the time line of the machine while stuff around him changed. He would view the professor at the same speed as him while the world arround him in fastforward (like what we see when he travells). As such, he would see his body degradate at a much faster rate as he was partly outside the bubble.

  • @Fly0High yeah, but if time around him moved faster, he would to. everything speeds up, your hearth beat, your toughts, everything.

  • @Fly0High hmm, if Alexander sees the Uber morlock "fastforwarded"

    Then the Morlock whether hangs from the nowhere without hands (timetravel should cut things which are crossed with the sphere: i.e. when he returned to save Mara: the machine just appeared from the "nowhere"), or sees Alexanger is a slowmotion.

  • @Fly0High I thought only his hand was in the time bubble.... I always just assumed we was hanging there until he died.

  • @Fly0High Actually, in my humble opinion, when he fell off of the Time Machine, his arm should have been severed, because his body was in another moment in time.

  • @Fly0High very much right, it would be what we call a Time Dialation Field. The bubble and everything inside represents its own time while everything outside represents its own time and its own speed. In this video as we see he loses his picture of the girl his hand partially protrudes the Time Dialation field, the gravity the field generates is strong enough to push away anything outside the field while everything inside the fieldis held in, as you can see it was quite hard for him to pull it.

  • Also, his hand has actually aged faster than the rest of his body, which is why it hurt so badly at first. His body had to get used to the change. but due the the ageing process his hand endured, his body will soon fail because of the aged cells and blood in the hand that has now spread thru the body and reproduced. Now, for the Time Dialation Field he can see everything outside but anyone who would have looked in his direction would have seen an empty space because since the field has

  • generated its own Dialation and gravity it has become its own "Force" as i may put it. Take the movie harry potter for instance, the newer one which included Hermione laying a "spell" to hide them from the death eaters. This is Almost exactly like that except she has not generated enough gravity and electricity to create a Thick enough field to Slow or speed time. She can walk thru it either way and sound can travel at the same speed and time in and out of the field.

  • @chriskrieger91 Well explained dude =)

    I have to say though...

    If you don't do physics its quite a mouthful lol

    Luckily i do! =P

    So i get where you're pulling it from

    Great movie btw

  • @chriskrieger91 uhmmm, one little modification, it's "time dilation". :)

  • @Fly0High that still doesnt explain why he rotted up

  • @lundell100 becuz, the machine is on, so hes rapidly aging, it also explains y his hand didnt rot.... his body, out of the machine, in theory, hung there 4 yrs....... not surr if that answered ur question.....

  • @irockw101

    You basically repeated my question but ok ^^

  • @lundell100 It was a very dramatic scene. The Uber=morlock could have just had his arms taken off and fell thru the void? This fiction time machine was demonstrating a movement in linear time; most likely real time travel would resemble something more of a 'light-speed' journey into the future with no way back to the past... but that could cause problems for telling a dramatic story?

  • @lundell100

    me too, if he doesn't move (just around him running fas) that mean every one can see him in that time machine when machine was operate. sorry, my english worst.

  • @lundell100 Time paradox analogy is a tricky bitch my friend. :]

  • @lundell100 true, time travel has so many paradoxes that it doesnt even worth trying.

    If he hangs years from the machine, then the gravity pulls him stronger than Alexander could hold him with his neck.

  • @lundell100 well time traveling itself doesent make any sense ...:-)

  • @lundell100 When the villain first fell out of the machine, the level was in the NEUTRAL position (somehow -w e do not see how it got there). The hero then pushes it forward to reiniytiate time travel - and he falls apart.

  • @lundell100 yea i can find some problems myself... in this scene alone.

    1. He is going through time, the buildings are building around him at an insane speed, yet the airplanes in the sky are going slowly.

    2. How coincidental is it that nothing ever gets built or place where his time machine is?

  • @xXLoneWolfZz i agree the airplanes and space craft are not going in real time but there changing types to show progression of technology. good point though.

  • @lundell100 i do understand and i'll explain it to you. when the time machine travels it disappears moving from one time to another. . . that white man's hand was inside that blue light while his head and body was outside of the machine. The time machine cut his arm.

  • Thier is a vintage painting several hundred years old in italy perhapse , It has a man with his head sticking OUTSIDE of a perspective realm . a picture is a thousand words you know since most couldnt read back then.. Maybe this painting is related. All The vintage art screems at us , were just not listening.  look up look up : cover Attribution Index . look close at all . thier is a lot there.

  • @lundell100 Do you want my techno-babble explanation?

  • we ar locked " in place from conception on . this lock from 4th and 5th dimentional overtone can be  manipulated (in thery /de173) . / einstien express @1933 pulp. now in film i see peices of etheric from above and below . the pilot says "handles like a dream" they mean it, , now guess how you get to this dream perhapse half dead can be true....

  • I have a question about opening a worm whole to travel through time. I will learn to control it after i succeed in making the machine work.

  • I dont know what the 1st plane was but the 2nd was a Lockeed Constellation and the other of course was a Boeing 747

  • good movie, excellent soundtrack

  • This movie is such a mind fuck. Not to mention sad on sooo many levels.

  • @DirkMcgee

    Back in 2004, I had a terrible Bike Crash in Scotland. I was only an American tourist there. It messed me up so much mentally that before you knew it 6 years went by before I returned to America.

    Now that I'm back, a lot of things have changed, just like the Time Traveller in the time machine. I feel fine now. I'm recovered, but I missed out on so much.

    It felt like all those years were a blur to me.

  • i sat in my sofa when this movie came on i thougth what is this bullshit. when i started to watch i went like. THIS MOVIE IS EPIC

  • @GraphiteGum: I think the bubble he is in is a Quantum Bubble also later in the film it show u that he disapires competly

  • Wait.. how does that Bubble work that he's in?... shouldn't be look frozen at that time scale for years to people?... if not... then he must be invisible?... so why hasn't anything been built or put right where he's sitting? O_o

  • I like this would you like joint venture with me

  • Always wear your seat belt

  • @gusbakker When you see the different airplanes and satellites flying around Earth, it's only an image of evolution... As for the sun, it's not only day, you see the planet rotating. If you mean when about the camera is still filming in N.Y, It's because the days are running so fast that it stops and turn only on day instead of night (probably a mistake, but maybe more to see what is happening over the years). Everything running at the same time would have been annoying or creepy you know

  • Lol I have to say it. All the advanced technology for that age at his disposal, nearly centuries ahead of it's time...and he ties up the stairs...with a string...ROFL

  • hey... thats my bday in 802701 xD

  • funny

  • i hate his face

  • This movie was set in 1899

  • i can't find the answer here...not here ..not now...

  • July 27, 807201?!

  • what year was the setting of when the movie began? was it the early 1900's or late 1800's? I mean for the move to have a person successfully create a time machine that allows you to travel to the past and impossibly to the future. That means the main character, the inventor, during his time and possibly for the next 500+ or so years was/is the smartest man in the world.

  • @jetliigor I can't remember the street lamps in the park are gas or electrical? The first electric generator was set um november 1882 e Manhattan and I assume expanding thought the island in the next 2-3 years. Gas lamps would put it around 1880-83

  • @Fly0High how can i faind films that are all about time traveling? time cop? back to the future what els?

  • @jetliigor 1899

  • @jetliigor The Time Machine was written in 1895, so I have to assume that is when it was set.

  • @jetliigor Emma dies in 1899, and he completes his time machine in 1903.

  • @jetliigor 1899

  • @jetliigor

    It's January 18, 1899

  • @jetliigor The book by HG Wells was written in 1895.

  • @jetliigor H.G. Wells' book (which the film was based on) was written in 1895, during the latter years of the Victorian Era. It's safe to say that the film is set in and around the turn of the century.

  • @jetliigor he mentions einstein's relativity papers which weren't published until 1905 so im guessing early 1900's

  • @jetliigor the original book was published in the mid 1800s if i remember correctly.

  • @Defensivelax 1895

  • @jetliigor H.G. Wells wrote The Time Machine in 1895, so I imagine it would have been set about then. At that point the first cars were appearing along with all sorts of other gizmos and electrical devices (that make the iPod, iPhone and iPad look lame by comparison), and Wells tapped into the fascination with new inventions with a machine that wouldn't seem too crazy to his readers. That being said, the inventor would still have to be the smartest person in the world for the next 500 years.

  • @jetliigor He mention's talking to Einstein so i guess the 1900's

  • I'm watching it on tv right now :). I've already seen it twice, but there's something about this movie... you know what I mean... :)

  • yea i know what you mean, it's like when back to the future first came out i bet a lot of people were saying the same thing as you're saying about this movie.

  • I'm watching it on tv right now :). I've already seen it twice, but there's something about this movie... you know what I mean... :)

  • There's something I've always wonder about time traveling. Having a mind that declares humans have a soul, the existence of God [higher power if you will] and the infinite presence of paradoxes ... the first question I'd have is ... if I have a time machine .. that means I'm controlling God's time? Second, if a loved one died, and I got back in time to prevent that from ever happening. That means his/her soul comes back from death? but actually, he/she never died b/c I saved him/her.

  • @astro1O'Controlling god's time' not really.If the Bible is correct, than logically It is timeless as it created time (somewhere in Genesis).Timetravell if possible would not actually be controlling time itself but controlling how you navigate through it.If I'm not mistaken the old testament says something about the soul never dying so theoretically you would just prevent it from lacking physical form.But then again I'm making explanations based on an unproved 1900yo book, theres no way to know.

  • @astro1O a God wouldn't necessarily have to experience time. As for your second question, it depends whether or not you believe the dimension where souls live is temporally-locked to the physical world. If both world are tied to each other in time then she never would have died and her soul never left. If they are not tied to each other in time then she would not be able to be rescued (unless her soul came back to her body anyways or unless it is possible for a soulless human to exist)

  • @astro1O hmmm, it's kind of hard to base a question on the bible. The bible was written in a time when people didn't know you could bend and morph time, as it is a fabric of space and time, called space-time.

  • @astro1O

    You forget the theme of the entire movie.....if she never died, he never would have built the time machine, it never would have existed without her death....it's the exact definition of a paradox......soul or no soul, without her death none of it happens.....

  • @astro1O Save yourself the time. Time travel is by definition faulty logic. You cannot physically travel through a concept that exists in the mind. That is to say that time is observed by man only for the purpose of measuring the rotation of the earth . It is relative to nothing but that. Dolphins don't give a shit about it because it's insignificant.

    So if you're going to start trying to rationalize something based on faulty logic you're playing a fools game.

  • @astro1O u cant travel so dont think to much about it otherwise ww2 and stuff didnt happen prove me wrong if one day u can time travel but dont think to much bout it gus if u think like that about the unniverse and stuff then u get crazy real fast