The Star Tri-Coil

[bastien067]

If wrapping some copper wire around a shape would enable time and space travel...

Well nothing to add:

"If wrapping some copper wire around a shape would enable time and space travel... "

Loool

I'm myself trying to make a black hole magnetron with chocolate and aluminium beer can..With my design it's possible to travel 5 time the speed of light..

[HorizonDelta]

Good vid ! More Tesla tech in "Wonderful electric lightinn" bu HorizonDelta ;-)

[db29db29]

seansalvador1 hard core :) keep the argument going i an learning here.

[Rhagedx86]

Oooooo Its a dream catcher......Id say stop there before you sink too much money into your dreams. Then again you can use that `Thing` to catch them.

[heliumbanana]

nice self inducting electromagnet >.>

[shepherdsmusic]

Now build the HEXAGRAM Coil. I made a Blue Print to guide you, I posted the Blueprint as the picture on my main page, also study about the Magnetron in the microwave ovens and use that knowledge after you see the video experiments "using spherical magnets and their reactions within the center of an energized Rodin coil see the electromagnetic forces it emits and how it effects surrounding magnets. at one point all the magnets will rotate harmoniously "

[seansalvador1]

Blah bah monopole... blah blah Tesla... blah blah blah antigravity... blah blah blah Rodin... blah blah blah physics... blah blah blah 'tight magnetic knot' [lol... yes i just typed 'lol']... blah blah blah dimension... square root of -1!!!? (that one was the best)

Just like Rodin you talk as though you know what you are talking about but when we get down to the brass tacks, all it is is pseudoscientific nonsense.

Study physics. You might improve your mind. This will only serve to degrade it!

[pauljs75]

@seansalvador1 Reproduce it, test it, and show all the failings. Show that regardless of how and when each of the coils are powered, it doesn't produce any observable phenomena of interest. Document them. Make a video. At least it would be much cheaper to show how it fails as compared to some other costly research device like the Tokamak. At least that would be further along than the current concept that something interesting may happen with stressed interleaved electromagnetic fields.

[seansalvador1]

@pauljs75

I don't need to. I can show the failings in your grasp of basic physics and that alone degrades your so called 'research'. If you had a doctor telling you he will manipulate your human energies you would rightly think him a quack and would not trust his medical oppinion. You are doing the exact same thing with your limited knowlegde, it seems, of basic sciency sounding words.

"stressed interleaved electromagnetic fields"

...come on!

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 It's called technological progression and discovery. While you're busy restricting yourself the dated rules - other people are making new discoveries. You're just too blind to see your scientific academy messiahs have political and egotistical motivations as opposed to scientific. There are a TON of things out there that will NEVER be accepted by mainstream science because they would have to rewrite everything. Your limited knowledge is holding you back. Wake up already.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979

No tit isn't, it's called obfuscation and pseudoscience. You have clearly no idea of the meaning of the words you use!

This whole comment dripps with the kind of psychobabble, rhetorical nonsense and propaganda that all you 'free energy' types tend to spew. It's always almost identical and always lacks substance!

It's called propaganda and it's designed to ignore the real science points and concentrate on the imagined conspiracy.

PS

It invariably ends with 'wake up'.

[pauljs75]

@seansalvador1 Sometimes the math doesn't work out on paper until other variables are found by actual observation. Only experiment can do that. The doodad is quite cheap and apparently harmless, so provided somebody already has the test equipment - the only cost is time. I lack the former, but I'd mail the thing for testing if anyone is willing to run different voltages and make an analysis video for free. It may be a dead end, but then at least some experimentalist curiosity could be satisfied.

[seansalvador1]

@pauljs75

You haven't listened to a word i've said have you? Science doesn't work like that. Yu need a hypothesis first, otherwise we would be testing literally every variant! ...and for what? What do you claim the effects of this coil may be?

You have no working hypothesis so why not make one with slightly more turns? Why not make one slightly bigger etc etc ad infinitum?

...because there are not enough hours in the human race's existence!

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 Blah Blah Blah Blah Public educated google monkey... Blah Blah Blah... learn to think outside of the box. You put so much faith in your mainstream science but know very little about it. You might be book smart on the subject but that just means you know how to memorize text. That does not mean what is in the book is always true even though it is represented in a way that would make it sound like fact.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979

Public educated? How could you possibly know this? I see you are one of those all too common youtubers (and people in general) who likes to add to the wealth of human misery by pretending to know things you cannot possibly know!

You claim i know little about science, for instance... which is also something you cannot possibly know, and clearly is incorrect as my profession is in science!

I have a terrible memory when it comes to text, so there's another wild unsubstantiated claim!

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 You are trapped in the box. It's ok... many many people are... it's the reason our world is in the state it is. How many of the scientific laws that are "unbreakable" end up broken but won't be published or studied by the mainstream as it would change everything? Don't talk down to the video poster. He's thinking outside of the box. It's a whole new world and as soon as you can accept that your messiah science academy might be wrong ... the better off you'll be. Progress.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979

More rhetoric and propaqganda in the placeof argument. I have learned that this is a very pervasive tactic amongst your group. You would rather ignore the science and logic of the matter at hand and say things like "you are closed minded" and "you are merely following convention" when in reality these things are all demonstrable and simple science! The point is that anyone can test these theories for themselves!

You make bold assumptions about me also (your messiah science academy).

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 You're gonna preach about science and logic? You hold on to your dear beliefs with a blind faith. There are many alternatives out there that suggest your science is wrong. I doubt very seriously you would look into them as most closed minded individuals, such as yourself, never do. I would love for you to prove FE/OU is 100% wrong. You know what you'll do for proof? You'll quote me an equation. That is it. Nothing more. You have nothing outside of that.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 actually I don't have to! I'll merely point out the common logical fallacy you have just made... You have demanded proof of a negative! THe burden of proof rests on those making an ontologicaly positives claim. This would have been known to you if you had even a cursory knowledge of logic. Also you have made an assumption about me. I have indeed looked at these alternate theories such as the electric universe and the idiot numerolgy that is vortex maths.

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 I'm sorry that you failed in your research. You more than likely walked into it with preconceived notions firmly embedded. Too many people do. You have absolute proof that you are correct? Please by all means show me that you are 100% correct. Let's see the your "logic mastery" at work.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 100 % correct about what exactly? ...you didn't say. If it's 'am I correct that you are incorrect?' Then yet again you are making the logical error of demanding negative proof... The burden is on you to prove your claim. I haven't made one.

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 You're trashing this like you're some kind of authority on the matter. So you must have some kind of proof that it is bogus. I see guys like you all the time knocking these things. Yet, none of you have the ability to offer proof of why it's bogus. You just run your mouth the whole time. It's all you will continue to do because you have nothing else to stand on.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 proof that what is bogus exactly? The video makes no empirical claims and all that's left is the pseudoscientific psychobabble that I have already dealt with in this very thread... Have you not even thought about it for one second? There is slight reference to free energy and the stupid link to rodin coils.

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 I'm aware of what References there are. Have you experimented with the Rodin? If so, did you objectively do it or play with it for 5 minutes and put it down? If no, then that would make you an idiot for making negative comments towards it. If no were really the case then you have no real authority to knock it and if you're in the habit, like too many others out there, of knocking things before experimentation then it's safe to say you're nothing more than an egotistical troll.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 you seem to be avoiding the question... Why is that? I asked you what claims you think it is I oppose... It's an easy question. I don't think you know, because this video doesn't specify clearly and precisely what this coil does. Rodin is. if same, ihe is one of those rare individuals who can talk nonsense for 4 hours and say nothing.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 ...Google 'burden of proof'... Of course I can't disprove it, just as you can't disprove the existence of fairies and santa! It's up to you to prove you claim, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. I'm not running my mouth, in fact I'm being quite reasonable and well spoken...

[seansalvador1]

"What if gravity happens to be polar, but only appears to be an attractive monopole because of dimensional superimposition of the poles?"

Oh deary deary me... exactly how sould a physicist respond to such nonsense?

Are you after the same notoriety as Rodin and his pathetic mystical coil based on numerology? ...well, your coil is just as unique, i'll grant you that boon. Otherwise, this is a useless piece of crap.

[pauljs75]

@seansalvador1 Got a better hypothesis as to what causes gravity then? I haven't seen much to separate the mass or inertia aspects from matter. I figure there'd be more progress if somebody explained it as a phenomena of energy density and instead of using mass, converted it to the energy equivalent and worked out the forces and numbers there. Maybe the coil is junk, but is there another way to find a possible loophole if dimensions of space happen to be defined by complex planes?

[seansalvador1]

@paulj

Please study physics before making such comments. You don't gain any credibility merely due to the fact that you have [mis]used scientific words!

In fact that was my original point.

For instance, "phenomena of energy density and instead of using mass, converted it to the energy equivalent and worked out the forces"

Is totally meaningless and useless nonsense. You may pass this type of drivel off down the pub to your laymen friends but it simply does not wash with those educated in physics

[seansalvador1]

@pauljs75 yes. It's not my theory, it's Einstein's... Gravity is caused by the bending of spacetime due to the presence of mass. It is geometry.

[tim22ism]

bang bang bang zap zap zap!!!

[pauljs75]

You tested it? Anything interesting in a vid?

[Objectivityiskey]

No, the Rodin coil is two coils, bifilar wound.

[alex681219]

test yourself is very simple. Make a joulethief (see make video...super easy)winding the same amounts of wire of your star, and try to light 5 LEDs for example.compares luminosity :)

[alex681219]

the winding is like a rodin coil?

[pauljs75]

Similar enough. The idea of interleaving is the same. But this one only has 5 points (a star), as where the Rodin has 9. The Rodin windings may be more effective. The bigger difference is that the Rodin has only one coil, this one also has two other differing coils that can be powered. So this might be interesting not just in what fields or RF may be produced, but in the intereactions between multiple fields. If I knew anybody with variable power supplies, o-scopes, etc. I'd go about testing it.

[seansalvador1]

@pauljs75 this stressed interleaved electromagnetic field business is pseudoscientific nonsense... Then you drop the bomb right at the end these by making the incredible (literally) claim that a coil can warp spacetime enough to cause time dilation or frame dragging, assuming gravity and magnetism interact... They don't

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 ..... Did you really just say that gravity and magnetism don't interact? What do you think gravity in it's truest nature is? "Earth warps the space around it" been proven that the space around the planet warps. Has not been proven if it's earth that actually warps the space or the magnetic field that does. The Rodin has the same magnetic field that the earth has and they act in the same manner. What do you think the implications of that are?

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 does mars have gravity? Yes. Does it have an electromagnetic field? No. I simply cannot believe that you would make such a wild claim with a straight face... It doesn't take a physicist to disprove your idiocy, I just did it in a few words!

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 easily refuted I'm afraid... I can do it with pure logic and without reference! Mars has proportionally as much gravity per mass as earth yet mars has no electromagnetic field... It cooled too quickly to have one! Also there is no link between the electromagnetic field of a planet and it's gravity field... You are completely wrong and have a profound lack of understanding when it comes to physics

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 You can't refute it with logic. I'd argue against the Mars comment but that would go into how worlds are actually formed and what is really going on inside of them. Again, there are more plausible alternatives to your view that you won't accept. Your logic is bunk equations based on man's "best accepted guess" at the time. Somehow they got dictated as being "absolute fact" as opposed to theories. Thus the reason we're even having this conversation.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 actually you are yet again completely incorrect, it is demonstrable that the sun is electromagnetically negative. This is demonstrable through pure logic alone... It simply has to be in order to avoid accumulating charge at an exponential rate! It is also demonstrable that mars has no ignificant

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 *significant charge at all... You do not even understand the very0basics of why a planets has a charge at all. The sun clearly doesn't but It clearly bends spacetime! It emits different ions (charged particles... I felt I needed to tell you that) but they net 0 charge... Obviously. They have to net 0 otherwise the sun would simply gain electromagnetic charge indefinitely.

[jadon1979]

@seansalvador1 Fail. Try again.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 just saying 'fail' is not an argument at all... I'll take it you concede? I have proven you know nothing of basic physics and astronomy and that your argument is based on this lack of knowledge.

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 I'll give you a clue... You have to prove mars has a magnetic field that is smaller than that of earth in the proportion relative to it's effect on spacetime. Same with all the other planets in the solar system... Then you have a theory, but the fact is that this is not what is observed!

[seansalvador1]

@jadon1979 here's another massive glaring error... The rodin boil has the same magnetic field as earth? I think not! Explain yourself... Explain how you 'know' this...

[TheDarkenedEvil]

I don't think there would be any applications for this but if you found a way to look at the shape of the magnetic fields produced you may eventually come up with an idea that really does something. You may find that you have traveled through time when you get a coil that works.