whats not healthy is that they are drinking and who knows if those kids were sober, and if they used protection if they got paid for it.... i guess it just one pair on teenagers so who cares right? :( :( :(
You lot are idiots, especially artistechick. You`d make a good lawyer for someone charged with possessing child porn artistechick. Just think, now when ever someone else gets caught and arrested with possession of child porn, they can quote from some of artistechick`s comments here and also say, "hey, Bill henson has this stuff in his possession so why can`t i?"
funny how people like Clive Hamilton or Melissa Tankard Reist like to present themselves as moderate and sensible and definitely not conservative reactionaries ..but Clive is a big fan of Arch Bishop Jenson who opposes gay and women priests and bans them from preaching in the Sydney dioceses and Melissa whose articles go back to the old conservative sterotypes of women as either passive victims or treacherous sluts has well documented links to anti abortion groups and the hard Catholic right
Bill Henson needs to be in jail. Soon he will be, cause he is not happy getting away with the bit he did. One day its naked pictures, the next he is stalking primary schools for "talent". Soon he wil go that one step where no one can defend him anymore, I just hope no more children are hurt before that happens!
How can you even say that? There has ALWAYS been naked images of humans in film, in paintings, in sculpture, in ceramics, in prints, so forth. Each representing the /human body/ in a symbolic way personally representing the artist's personal perspective. In this case, Bill Henson wanted to express the vulnerability that adolescents must go throught to reach that final stage of adulthood. His intentions and moral reasons behind it were reasonable and moral.
Secondly, Bill Henson had the written and parental consent of the child of the 13 yo girl in question as well as all the other adolescent models in question. Who are you to determine what's right for other people's chidren? Also, Henson did not go to stalk any of the primary schools. He had prior written consent from the principal of the school. And another fellow actor (i can't remember his name) said that movie directors follow the same process to recruit potential child actresses and actors.
Finally, there are past models who posed in Hensons' nude photographs as a child and they talked openly and happily about being able to share their empathy with the artist himself and what he was trying to express. Consequently, there is EVIDENCE that no child was harmed physically or emotionally ever. The only reason the children who posed nude in Henson's photographs would ever be harmed is the way the public has been reacting in such distaste and revolt towards their human body.
Furthermore, the narrow-minded people who have no knowledge of the art world will only view an artwork (any artwork for that matter) as being pornographic when it is not and will only say that everything is sexual and 'dirty'. /THAT/ woman Hetty Johnson even believes that nudity in all films, photography, paintngs and so forth should be BANNED. That is not protecting the children from sexual abuse. It is stifling the artistic community spirit and damaging the self-esteem of a person's own body.
It is BECAUSE of people like YOU who think that showing even just a little bit of the human body that there are self esteem issues and body image issues arising and now it is only becoming /worse/ in this day and age. Have at least SOME common sense and think before you speak. By the way, Bill Henson is a respected and talented moral artist and the art world will continue to support him.
The day that Kevin Rudd called Bill Henson's work 'revolting' was the day that he was forever cut off from the art world. Furthermore, the way he did not take into anyone's other opinions only strengthens the surrounding negative opinion of him as a narrow minded incompetent inexperienced prime minister who sees only one view and everything else means nothing. To that i say NO.
Finally, I would like to say that Bill Henson's censorship was unncessary and futile because...
not only did the police and the censorship board see SENSE and uncensored 4 of the images but Bill Henson will continue to be a respected and valued artist in the art world.
Overall..get all your facts straight and think before you speak because it's people like you who have no knowledge are corrupting the world. I'm not saying it's /just/ you but it's people who are LIKE you.
What do you think about parents who post their children's nude baby pictures online for others to see? I'm sure there is at least one pervert out there jerking off to things like that. Still, I can understand where you are coming from. Children are not old enough to responsibly decide whether they want to be nude subjects. What bothers me, however, are the people who find Henson's photos to be pornographic. Nothing about these photos suggest any intention of arousing the viewer.
whats not healthy is that they are drinking and who knows if those kids were sober, and if they used protection if they got paid for it.... i guess it just one pair on teenagers so who cares right? :( :( :(
shygurldance 1 year ago
You lot are idiots, especially artistechick. You`d make a good lawyer for someone charged with possessing child porn artistechick. Just think, now when ever someone else gets caught and arrested with possession of child porn, they can quote from some of artistechick`s comments here and also say, "hey, Bill henson has this stuff in his possession so why can`t i?"
ManFromMelbourne 1 year ago
funny how people like Clive Hamilton or Melissa Tankard Reist like to present themselves as moderate and sensible and definitely not conservative reactionaries ..but Clive is a big fan of Arch Bishop Jenson who opposes gay and women priests and bans them from preaching in the Sydney dioceses and Melissa whose articles go back to the old conservative sterotypes of women as either passive victims or treacherous sluts has well documented links to anti abortion groups and the hard Catholic right
teamredtard 2 years ago
That's a fantastic speech. i wish there was more being done to combat the decay of sexual morality.
eljay692005 3 years ago
Bloody well put mate!
MusashiTzu 3 years ago
Bill Henson needs to be in jail. Soon he will be, cause he is not happy getting away with the bit he did. One day its naked pictures, the next he is stalking primary schools for "talent". Soon he wil go that one step where no one can defend him anymore, I just hope no more children are hurt before that happens!
MusashiTzu 3 years ago
How can you even say that? There has ALWAYS been naked images of humans in film, in paintings, in sculpture, in ceramics, in prints, so forth. Each representing the /human body/ in a symbolic way personally representing the artist's personal perspective. In this case, Bill Henson wanted to express the vulnerability that adolescents must go throught to reach that final stage of adulthood. His intentions and moral reasons behind it were reasonable and moral.
Continued...
artistechick 3 years ago 2
Secondly, Bill Henson had the written and parental consent of the child of the 13 yo girl in question as well as all the other adolescent models in question. Who are you to determine what's right for other people's chidren? Also, Henson did not go to stalk any of the primary schools. He had prior written consent from the principal of the school. And another fellow actor (i can't remember his name) said that movie directors follow the same process to recruit potential child actresses and actors.
artistechick 3 years ago
Finally, there are past models who posed in Hensons' nude photographs as a child and they talked openly and happily about being able to share their empathy with the artist himself and what he was trying to express. Consequently, there is EVIDENCE that no child was harmed physically or emotionally ever. The only reason the children who posed nude in Henson's photographs would ever be harmed is the way the public has been reacting in such distaste and revolt towards their human body.
artistechick 3 years ago 2
Furthermore, the narrow-minded people who have no knowledge of the art world will only view an artwork (any artwork for that matter) as being pornographic when it is not and will only say that everything is sexual and 'dirty'. /THAT/ woman Hetty Johnson even believes that nudity in all films, photography, paintngs and so forth should be BANNED. That is not protecting the children from sexual abuse. It is stifling the artistic community spirit and damaging the self-esteem of a person's own body.
artistechick 3 years ago 2
It is BECAUSE of people like YOU who think that showing even just a little bit of the human body that there are self esteem issues and body image issues arising and now it is only becoming /worse/ in this day and age. Have at least SOME common sense and think before you speak. By the way, Bill Henson is a respected and talented moral artist and the art world will continue to support him.
artistechick 3 years ago 2
The day that Kevin Rudd called Bill Henson's work 'revolting' was the day that he was forever cut off from the art world. Furthermore, the way he did not take into anyone's other opinions only strengthens the surrounding negative opinion of him as a narrow minded incompetent inexperienced prime minister who sees only one view and everything else means nothing. To that i say NO.
Finally, I would like to say that Bill Henson's censorship was unncessary and futile because...
artistechick 3 years ago 2
not only did the police and the censorship board see SENSE and uncensored 4 of the images but Bill Henson will continue to be a respected and valued artist in the art world.
Overall..get all your facts straight and think before you speak because it's people like you who have no knowledge are corrupting the world. I'm not saying it's /just/ you but it's people who are LIKE you.
artistechick 3 years ago 3
What do you think about parents who post their children's nude baby pictures online for others to see? I'm sure there is at least one pervert out there jerking off to things like that. Still, I can understand where you are coming from. Children are not old enough to responsibly decide whether they want to be nude subjects. What bothers me, however, are the people who find Henson's photos to be pornographic. Nothing about these photos suggest any intention of arousing the viewer.
stinky472 1 year ago