Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • @TheSharksky I was born in America and live in California. Scottish? You are wrong about 9/11 .... and me.

  • Wasn't this the first plane impact as the camera pans up @ 0:24 ?

    As @ 0:27 you can see smoke travelling upwards from the lobby direction from the tower on the right.

    If so, they guy was describing a bomb exploding in the lobby before any of the planes hit.

  • my brother wittnessed both airplanes and i was on cell with him when the second hit.

  • @milehigh714 Really? Hmmmm. The official line says there were some cell phone issues because of the transmitter on top of the first tower, your brother must have been one of the lucky ones. The local news reporters could not get reception. Curiously there are some very serious issues with the planes as well. I get these kinds of comments all the time, most of the time they turn out to be people making up stories to support the lie.

  • @IranContraScumDid911 Agreed. Either that, or they later believe that they saw it, or heard it, when they didn't, because they were close and others said so, or they want to make it appear that they had some role in it, whether as a witness, a friend of a witness, etc. In fact, this video has some audio issues. I have seen enough other information, now, to believe that there were no airliners. Was there a roaring sound edited into this video? Or, another event to mimic jet engines on location?

  • Omg. Was that the first plane hit?

  • @ScottishAtheist no he is explaining the explosions in the lobby, and u know it

  • @IranContraScumDid911

    It takes a LOT of patience dealing with the uninformed, oftentimes uneducated American public, regarding events like 9/11, and how the government's theory is quite simply impossible. Even though that's the case, I see you day in and day out preaching truth from your YouTube to dozens of sleeping, official story zombie-heads, and for that, I wanted to THANK YOU. Keep doing what you're doing. It's vital.

  • The sound fades out twice in this clip as though someone edited something out.

    Is there another copy of this clip where the sound the sound is NOT EDITED ?

    It seems they may have wantd to edit out reference to which Building is being referenced for the EXPLOSION ie WTC-1 LOBBY

    This is not the only CLIP that has been tampered with....

  • @blavatsky3 Was something also edited in? Perhaps the jet engine sound? I'd also like to see another copy of this. You remember all of the pictures of Flight 175's belly? What was assumed to be an external piece of equipment? I don't think so. I entertained that for many years, until I saw Richard D. Hall's anlysis of 9/11 and I think he is right. So, if they had audio issues, or there was somethign removed, was there also something added? Like a jet sound?

  • Will NIST be held responsible for CRIMINALLY tampering with ALL of this video evidence? Technically, and perhaps a legal argument could be made supporting this, there has NOT been ANY official INVESTIGATION into these attacks. . . there has only been a commission, which is NOT an investigation - even by the commission heads own words! NIST has altered and edited almost every video they released - is that not CRIMINALLY TAMPERING with EVIDENCE?!

  • Silversten, Silverstein, watcha gonna do / watcha gonna do when they come for you?

  • @Thetan1974 Whats he gonna do? If they don't put him in solitary he will be known as Larry 'pull it' silverstein.

  • @SlackerSlayer

    Well, isn't he already? ; )

  • @Thetan1974 Too many know him as 'lucky'. That idea makes me want to burp up a little vomit.

  • @SlackerSlayer

    Yup.

    Have you by the way checked the conspiracy facts surrounding the Titanic and J.P. Morgans "cancellation" for the trip?

  • @Thetan1974 If I just say that my folks were in the ship building biz as well as me for a while, and both from Belfast would that answer it for you?

  • @SlackerSlayer

    M'kay...! So they've always known about it along with others in the biz in that area?

    My point was the way Morgan cancelled the trip - and apparently has been a great inspirational source for Lucky Larry's Dental "Appointment."

  • @Thetan1974 How about we just took more of an interest in the entire story. If you had someone in your family that worked on it, would you ignore it??

    Are you on the bust JPM wagon?

  • video of some of these explosions in the lobbies and elevator lobbies would be nice. I know they exist.

  • @Tailss1 The french brothers videos have the aftermath of the lobby detonations.

  • Absolute proof of 911 being an inside job.

    Explosions in the building and then the first plane hits.

  • Hi GenerationWTF - "Absolute proof"?

    In this clip we see the second plane hitting the South tower

    From 0.26 you can clearly see the plume of smoke from the first impact on the North tower drifting from left to right ABOVE the fireball of the second impact (which we see just after it's occurred).

    Not taking sides. Just sayin.

  • @hceggeberth

    I guess you`re right. That`s the second tower being hit.The title is a bit confusing.

    Nano-Thermite in the dust remains absolute proof.

  • @hceggeberth I have a hundred plus videos that correspond with this one. This is one drop in the 5 gallon bucket. You will have to come up with so many excuses it will be pathetic. After a few your odds become astronomical when unified. Using science that is hundreds of years old, I can give you ABSOLUTE PROOF. The case is closed. NIST committed fraud and all your assumptions or just saying is based on BUNK science, biased theoretical lies, and pure cover-up of hundreds of witness accounts.

  • @GenerationWTF

    -

    Except, thats the second plane. When they pan up you can see black smoke coming from the other building.

  • this video will gwet some serious hits over th next short while, this debunks any theory that ther were no pre planted explosives, if those that refused to look for explosived didn't dismiss the possibility that (foreign) terrorists could have planted the explosives then they would have an escape right now. But instead they wanted to hide the exisitance if the highly engineered incendiaries thay they actually used.... that plan failed as well.

    It is a shame that their plan to go to war did not.

  • Is that the North tower getting hit in this video? (the first to be hit, and the second to crumble) or the South Tower? (last to be hit and first to crumble)

  • It doesn't get any better than this to show people that there were prior explosions!!! When you can see the first plane hitting the building like this... Simply amazing!

  • Can a FOIA request obtain the name/s of the people who edited the video ?

  • This is the most incredible revelation about how edited the video evidence is...holy shit, as they say.

  • why aren't these video clips LONGER????

  • @ruddip There was no video before or after this in the NIST file. WNBC has the complete footage. I feel your frustration, we deserve to see the whole truth in full context.

  • @IranContraScumDid911 NIST edited audio and clips the videos on purpose. They make a mockery of the FOIA agreements. If they are not held in contempt it shows their direct link to the government, which in either case they need to be taken to court or outed as fraud and put out of business.

  • @dallasgoldbug Releasing clips of WTC7 collapsing without the penthouse shown dropping is a give away.

  • @SlackerSlayer yep If NIST is hauled into court and held responsible then I really leave us with little choice than to all go camp out in DC with sheehan and bring the city to a halt. They cant arrest all of us. Its really a shame that people aren't screaming mad and following eric holder from the time he leave his front door toil the time he returns protesting to the point he cant hear himself think.

  • @IranContraScumDid911 nist, eh? no wonder. we can't expect to get any REAL footage clips that would prove there were explosives/explosions.....

  • while were at it put eric holder on trial too. ups! wait a sec, I guess that wouldn't work since hes the agency that is supposed to protects us from criminal acts perpetrated on the people by government . Guess we will all just have to stop paying taxes and starve the monster.

  • yep they cut out the word explosion and expect nobody to say anything i was born at night but it wasn't last night!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more