Fabric of the Cosmos: Universe or Multiverse?

[z5i]

Thats it im going to become a sientist

[9999999712]

@z5i Why? Is English not working out so well for you? ;)

[paulxno1x]

not sure i subscribe to the multiverse theory

[1TheLoneWolf1]

It still doesn't expain the origin of the original universe though.

It's similar to the God theory. Who created the creator, etc.

[skillzflux]

saying that there could be copies of ourselves in identical universes doing different things is contradictory. I.E. if a copy of me in another universe would be a rockstar, he would have lots of illegitimate children with groupies that i would not have in this universe... and these children would be copies of who in THIS universe? If I was a copy of myself, why would I do things differently? It leaves very little room for free will and natural chaos, I find...

[zvolencan77]

@skillzflux no no no ..you dont understand.all there is different in this "other" universe is you.so it does not require other things from the "original" universe to have copies in the "other" universe and vice versa.if you really thing about it..its completely amazing!there is infinite number of ways the life can go..its crazy.so no matter what you do ...it does not matter..it would,did or will happen anyway infinite number of times !!! fucking crazy!!!

[Trisscarro]

my inner nerd cringes every time they describe and show the big bang as if it where an explosion.

[SwaggerKing22]

@MrDBarch but isn't much of science theories? because if that's the case then correct me if I'm wrong but, a theory is an idea or explanation not proven. That would mean that faith which is blind belief is required in order to uphold what you claim to be fact. You cannot argue that.

[4micaman]

@SwaggerKing22 theories and hypothesis are two different creatures. I'd suggest what all of the FOTC series talks about are hypothesis... for the most part. As for what MrDBarch is talking about, Religion, I'd say it's more an extrapolation than either a hypothesis or theory. XD

[bogieman987]

@4micaman I believe theory is a hypothesis that has enough evedence to say it's true, but not enough to call it fact. Something like that, i can't remember.

[bogieman987]

@bogieman987 And by true, i don't mean absolutely true, that would be fact, more of truth with a slight touch of uncertanty, can't think of the right word to use lol

[biffcornwall]

@SwaggerKing22 You are confusing a theory with a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction about what you expect to happen in a given study. A theory is a well established principle which is widely accepted through consistent, repeatable observation and testing. Think about theory this way: gravity is a theory.

[Ashwinswarup]

@SwaggerKing22 Theory remains a theory in science for a long time so as to be sure that there are no unknown exceptions to that theory. Therefore gravitation is still a theory but still it has irrefutable evidence in its favour. So its not blind faith ...if it had no supporting evidence then it would still be a proposition not a theory

[eddiebmx]

The only compliant I have is the volume is so damn low

[4micaman]

@eddiebmx Is the volume knob on your computer and-or speakers busted? ;c)

[Level80irl]

@4micaman it is low as F

[wagfinpis]

light changed very little

vibration changed more in concert with past and present

ideas and or information was very flexible and changed a-lot

information would concentrate around or adhere to the vibrations, which moved through time, and light would reflect the more resonant qualities within the vibrations; making the future (2-4 seconds) appear to shrink down to the present moment. the present would reveal the past in much the same way. 8sec. would unfold in 1sec. two directions.

[4micaman]

@wagfinpis I appreciate your comments and support, my friend! It's our hope that others will have even a slight understanding of where it seems you're coming from. Celebrating a transformation in my soul and eternally grateful for the wisdom of great teachers... and myself for allowing the transformation to come. ॐ

[wagfinpis]

@4micaman well if i can barrow your words i would like to say intern that "Like the earth is to our essence,

You are that and more, to my soul."

this is where it is that i am coming from in sharing experience.

[4micaman]

@wagfinpis You can as it belongs to the whole of mankind. :c)

Liberation does indeed reside in meditation! Peace abounds.

[wagfinpis]

i like the question in the opening when he asks why don't we ever see thing happen in reverse. i have had small glimpses of this existence. the light or image of what is happening tends to still appear to move regular, but the information can move back ward as well as some of the vibrations. i have never seen any thing just move in reverse, rather i've seen two directions become the same path while other paths never came into being. past present and future are the same time somehow.

[100chao]

i know the rest of the strory - i am god! big bang, big lie!

[4micaman]

@MrDBarch lol It's like telling a two year old to not touch the stove because it's hot. Nice try but I suspect, like you know too, it'll fall on deaf ears. Still, the "cut it out" ending is epic.

[MrDBarch]

Ok people, all you out there who seem to have to insist on calling atheism and or science, a religion..... puleeze. Religion is clearly based on faith, the absolute belief and worship of a concept which cannot be seen, or proven etc. Science and atheism are not about faith in something which cannot be proven. With practical. real science, there is no faith. Also, atheism requires no faith. The comments about atheism being a religion come from those lost in their own faith now cut it out! lol

[hjkl1229]

Love cosmos vids

[Graham6762]

Thanks for uploading this.

[Nez949]

Maybe a Big Divide of one universe into 2? instead of a Big Bang? This would also explain the recent acceleration of the universe in the past couple billion years, the universe is just in the midst of another division perhaps.

[Nez949]

I see so many correlations between the universe and cytology/biology, I look at the universe as one big "Cosmic-Cell" and everything within this Cosmic-Cell(stars, black holes, matter, dark matter) are just "Cosmic-Organelles" responsible for the cosmic-cell's functions.When I look at the baby picture of the universe I see cell division(Anaphase). We are the stuff of stars, the stars are the stuff of the universe; maybe the universe's nature/anatomy is not so different from our own? :]

[Awelsh23]

and if the UNIVERSE and SPACE are two different things, what did space come from?? why does it have all this energy??

[jack3volution]

@Awelsh23 Space is the vacuum inside our universe. Space or the vacuum gets its energy from the sub atomic levels in the world of Quantum Mechanics where strange things are going on. But we still don't know why it has all the energy.

The answer to your question below...what keeps the universes separate? My first guess would be the same laws of nature that surround us. Laws that can be described and explained with math and physics. We just don't know it.

[jack3volution]

@Awelsh23 I recommend watching The Mystery of Empty Space

A lecture by physicist Kim Griest.

Search "The Mystery of Empty Space" in the youtube searchbar ;)

[Awelsh23]

@jack3volution ty



[Awelsh23]

so what keeps the universes seperate???

[MrDBarch]

@Awelsh23 and for that matter, not only "what keeps them separate?" but, what surrounds the outside of all the universes??? What are all these paralell universes contained within??? Maybe THIS is what the true definition of nothingness truly IS!

[greenearthnazi20204u]

When science have directly confirms God---scientists have officially become a religion.

really a lot of science is base on beliefs just like religions my theory oneness base number of paradoxes similarity in opposites . or oddity is a better name

[illuminatedgirl]

this is very cool

[MrLawliet1307]

if the universe is in bubble, and the bubble kept expanding, wouldn't that mean that the universe could just "pop" or the bubbles could just collide with other bubbles? making a bigger universe or both bubbles just go "pop"??? someone answer this question.

[goldeena1]

@MrLawliet1307 I do believe it's allowed to happen this way too, I was watching a Michio Kaku thing and he was talking about that idea. I like it because I still struggle to accept the matter of the entire cosmos can be compressed to an infinitesimal point. Think of much smaller bubble universes impinging on a more massive one, where do these ever more tiny bubbles come from - why a big bang of course! I can accept the mass of our solar system or even a galaxy could be compressed like that.....

[ilmafwends]

Seriously guys. The existence of God in relation to science is completely irrelevant. God is hypothetically a supernatural being that acts outside the laws of our own world. That's why God is God. God cannot be falsified for this reason- only confirmed (In the exact same way that unicorns cannot be falsified- only confirmed). Get over it and move on with your lives. Science is about constantly destroying your world view and constantly rebuilding it to fit new information- that is all.

[bmwers]

I respect religions for their teaching of virtue and philosophy, but I despise religious people that do wrong in the name of god.

[bmwers]

Continue...

Scientists try everyday to find evidences that can disprove their theories. When they run out of evidences, and only when they do, that's when theories become facts. Somehow, that is science running away from god?

At this point I would just like to quote Gandhi: "I like your Christ. I just don't like your Christians."

[bmwers]

I've always been an advocate of choice and confident that truth will prevail, but people like Rizzy55 have proved me wrong. Religions are so viral that they can not only hold our society from moving forward, but literally move us backward. Science is not always right, and science never claim to be right. In fact that is the whole point of science. Constantly challenge itself to prove its assertions with evidence.

Continue...

[Eternidad195]

Those philosophers and geniuses living centuries ago had scientific theories hundreds of years old, but science has advanced past the dark ages theories of creationism.

Scientists are not looking for the languages of God written in the stars but for valid scientific theories explaing the universe

[knowallcity]

If space is a fabric-then how thin can it be stretched before it snaps?

[Rizzy55]

When science is directly trying to affirm atheism instead of just avoiding theories that lead to God---They have officially become a religion.

I urge you to look up what genius philosophers , who covered this centuries ago, say about the absurdities of infinite worlds and how it can be dismissed in 3 seconds by any human.

There would be entire languages written in the stars--and the odds would be less than the odds for consciousness in our universe. In short..it makes the odds worse not better

[4micaman]

@Rizzy55 Just as you appear to think this is Rhetoric, I see the same thing in the words you've typed. But for all those famous world travelers who've gone before us, we'd likely still believe the world to be flat.

Sure, any person could dismiss anything in [less than] 3 seconds but, others may call them narrow-minded fools. *cough cough*

But, I get your point. It's clear as day.

[PeterFormaini]

@Rizzy55 "I urge you to look up what genius philosophers , who covered this centuries ago..."

I urge you to reference thee same philosophers as they dismiss flight, evolution, the germ theory of medicine - and embrace leeches to cure disease, Earth as the center of the universe, and whether or not there are excrements in Heaven.

Why don;t you pontificate on some subject you have some knowledge - and leave the adult subjects to the adults?

[InvertedHorizon]

@Rizzy55 Science will affirm deism/theism when there's scientific evidence to support either of those hypotheses. Until then, the existence of a god would simply be a source of an unimaginable number of paradoxes and unverifiable claims.

[cyberhawkdesigns]

@Rizzy55 My uncle described it best....."It's more likely for a tornado to rip through a junkyard full of Fords and Chevys and out pop a fully waxed pink Cadillac." Just typing this reply is a mathematical impossibility. Many of us, including myself take everything around us for granted. We should be running around screaming with joy from the beautiful and complex design of our surroundings.

[MrDBarch]

@cyberhawkdesigns Mankind; humans, are a funny/odd bunch. We tend to see things around us and can say "see that car, we made that, see that toaster, we designed that for slices of bread, which we also invented, to make sandwiches, which is something we also designed to eat" Then we look at a flower, instead of saying, "wow, see that flower, isn't it naturally pretty?" we say "wow, look at that flower, it must have been designed... by... a god!" Projection of ourselves onto...

[MortenBoHansen]

@Rizzy55 Why do you HAVE to put things into boxes, when everything, never is as it seems. It seems irrelevant to me, to write about, atheism, og religion at all, when it comes to the univers. And not what you have bin taught, throug human understanding of morals and ethics. It is irrelevant! Get over old-school, and know, you do not know one single thing for sure. So stop with the boxes, they make a terrible mess!;)

[Rizzy55]

Saint Augustine said time itself was created. Scientists laughed because it led to God

A Christian physicists invented the Big bang theory--they didnt want to hear it because they knew it led to God--even though logic clearly showed an infinite regress is absurd.

We see all through science atheists not exploring anything that led away from atheism.

Now with Multiverse, which is overt and obvious attempt to combat the zero odds of life forming, they have committed the ultimate sin on reason.

[lypse14]

@Rizzy55 "scientists laughed because it led to God" Calling you on you BS now, because at the time Lemaitre there were scientists who were proponents and opponents of the big bang theory, and not because it "led to God", but because they envisioned the universe as being static.

You're comments are even more laughable because there are scientists of VARIOUS cultural and religious backgrounds who support the multiverse theory, not just "atheists"

[lypse14]

@Rizzy55 How about you offer up an actual counter-argument, rather than throwing a fit because modern science doesn't conform with your beliefs. The only reason why science appears to lead away from religion, is because ALL religion is based ignorant ideas of how the universe works.

The story of the cosmos and life is much more beautiful than any religion could have ever imagined, so quit your bitching.

[Rizzy55]

When scientists believe there are worlds with 10 thousand midgets riding unicycles under a sky whose stars spell out--this is the awesome multiverse I created to avoid God--they can no longer be called scientists

We should simply refer to them as the OJ Simpson Jury.

[culwin]

You think the universe is expanding rapidly?

You should see my mother-in-law.

[Malsiaime]

and is it possible that when the temperature of our universe falls to -1, we will have another big bang ?!

[DanDaMaN95cov]

what if one hits the other

[mrlogicalman1]

a gamma ray burst power is only second to the big bang itself. so can jesus withstand a grb blast., stand on a magnetar. lift a neutron star, jump on a pulsar . jump in and out a blackhole no . see how pathetic it is to call a human that ran to bushes for a shit god............

[mrlogicalman1]

if the universe is 150billion light years. people living 14billion light years away should see us travelling at faster than light speed , or atleast close to before we speeded past there perception threshold.

[jmm1233]

if eternal inflation is actually true then won't it be possiable for two maybe more universes to collide as they expand , like what we see with galaxies

[jmm1233]

so the big bang was really a ping 8:22 lol

[baldricksnosehairs]

brilliant !

[jPhotonica]

If a single universe of different variant from ours is born at any giving time, resulting in a similar reality to ours, even copies, wouldn't that mean that infinite universes had to be created at the same time as ours to share the same moment of time? So, in other words, we might have a similar copy of our universe out there, but, existing before or after ours emerged. Otherwise, a duplicate humanity in another universe would likely not even exist in our "now" frame of time.

[goldeena1]

The evidence is compelling and will eventually be set in stone there is no doubt in my mind, and it is burying religion shovel by wonderful shovel. But my major concern is that there are infinite numbers of totally delusional christian movements out there too, so please can I be in the one where the Romans managed to feed every last one of their ilk to the lions please. Thanks xxx

[4micaman]

@goldeena1 lol - be nice

namaste

[TachieBillano]

@4micaman: I second that -- "Be nice". LOL. These days I can't tell the difference between rabid atheists and religious fundamentalists, because they starting to behave the same way.

[4micaman]

@TachieBillano Thanks - I think! lol Your choice of words are interesting. We all know what 'rabid' refers to but I took a closer look at 'fundamentalists.' If we break the latter down funda = 'basic' and mentalist = 'appear to demonstrate highly developed mental or intuitive abilities.' That strikes me as peculiar. Zealot seems more appropriate in this context. Grateful you made me think on it more precisely. Namaste

[4micaman]

@TachieBillano PS. I am aware that fundamentalism has it's own definition, however, we feel that meanings are often lost in translation. The etymology of words are crucial to a true grasp of what's been/being said. We do agree with the general meaning of your reply. :c)

[TachieBillano]

@4micaman: :-) Namaste. Yes, you're right, "zealot" would be the more appropriate word.

[MrDBarch]

@TachieBillano Hahaha, they may both be rabid, but there's a big difference bewteen a raging fundie and a raging atheist. The raging atheist is angry/frustrated at hearing how wonderful his or her life would be if he she would simply accept some lunatic system making claims in the supernatural.... the raging fundie is raging/frustrated that he she is being told to let go of it and how stupid it is... but.... the raging fundie more than likely has god and a gun to vent their anger.

[Rizzy55]

@goldeena1

The Norm believes in God. YOU are abnormal.

Your the idiot who believes in a 1 in umpteen trillion billion quadzillion chance happening a billion times.

If you ever examined how demented you have to be to accept those odds it would be very easy...just read your evil comments. Your wicked and depraved and without any love for God--only hate

So here is your reward...completely abnormal thinking.

You will be paraded around the universe as one of its chief fools. I wouldnt laugh, Id cry

[goldeena1]

@Rizzy55 oh really - you silly man, we are what we are in the universe and my glorious tapestry is etched in to the fantastic brane which surrounds us i guess i'd be burned as a witch a hundred or so years ago by religious ignoramuses like you.

Go away and chew it in your silly man made story book because you lot are not holding up science any longer.

nobody listens to nutters like you anymore, err - thank GOD!

[RSpker000]

Wow: around 4:41, that multiplying thing looks awefully similar to cells reproducing. Maybe we're just part of one cell (among many others) inside a body (god maybe) that will be destroyed one day.

[RSpker000]

@RSpker000 ...and maybe we're a body inside a body inside a body.

[patje7]

I think this is not or only life we live.

[roont]

@patje7 why do you think that?

[patje7]

@roont

Beacuse, if there are many universes, at least many civilization's, it must be a waste of time to live only once.

[patje7]

And space also.

[roont]

@patje7 Why? Is it a waste of time to read a book, just because it will end? You will finish it?

[panther2598]

If I was a dragon I'd fly to Brian Greene's house and give him a high five and discuss quantum mechanics.

[eldazh]

hufh ...unfortunately the evidence of multiverse too difficult to obtain, math might say that's true but in physics we need experimental evidence.,

[VanionLOT]

@eldazh huh way to say what they already said in the film.  but im sure physics are caused by forces. and a multiverse clearly isnt a force.

[eldazh]

@VanionLOT but I think if we just rely on the evidence then the people who once dreamed of went to the moon, they would never have landed on the moon. It's the beauty of imagination and science itself, if we can't reach and get it, then we could assume it "has happened" or "it will be happened" (of course supported by math formulas), to be continued

[eldazh]

@eldazh for example: in 1956 the general theory of gravitation Einstein has not been proven due to lack of stuff to prove it, does not mean the theory was never proven, it has finally been proved after eksperimental equipment available in the 1990's.

[culwin]

@eldazh "eksperimental"... seriously?

[eldazh]

@culwin "experimental" dude..-__-,

[hulme76]

Awesome program.

[Thinkdeep420]

SCIENCE RULES!!!!

[MrBackflack]

thank you

[EnmaDarei]

In other episode they said the black holes make them think the cosmos might actually not be three dimensional and string theory recquires 9 space dimensions, wouldn't these ideas contradict eachother? Of course, one might be proven right in the future.

[EnmaDarei]

@EnmaDarei Also, when they used the multiverse idea to explain the mismatch in the dark energy prediction it seemed more like grasping to anything they could to justify their lack of understanding, to escape, than actually explaining it and backing it up, of course that's the idea THIS video gives and I know they don't fully explain the ideas in here, I don't know if there's a video or reading where this is better explained.

[4micaman]

@EnmaDarei I'm working on getting a video that I've been told does a better job of explaining it. Hope to have it up in the next week or so.

Thanks for your input, views and support!

[phantasmaniacal]

thx for upload!

[toughlightyear]

thanks for uploading

i wonder how they would come up with substantial evidence. our observable universe could be like a grain in Sahara. and yet we dont know what is beyond observable universe.

thinking about other universes having their own time and space, is just mind blowing.

[steintanz]

Wow ... in these comment conversations here, there is quite some brain gymnastics going on. Pfff, unfortunately I am not in the mood for "sports" at the moment, therefore I only want to mention that I am the only one here who is totally right and knows it all. Any doubt is beyond the acceptable and will be punished severely right now or later in the afterlife. - I gotta go now and feed the turtle otherwise it might drop the earth for lack of motivation.

Have a nice evening everyone!

[4micaman]

@steintanz Talk about brain gymnastics... hmphhh! Thanks for adding more fiddle to our faddle. :c)

I sense another parody video coming - huh? hint YT submarine

[steintanz]

@4micaman "You may be right, I may be crazy. Maybe it's just another lunatic you're looking for ..." :o) (Billy Joel)

[MrAgentGreeny]

@steintanz

There is no afterlife... why do you think there is?

[steintanz]

@MrAgentGreeny It's not so much about thinking. I rather perceive "it" when I look into the world.

[MrAgentGreeny]

@steintanz You have to base it on something. You can't just say you "know" and that's it. I obviously think it's based on wishful thinking and self-deception but I wanna know what makes you "percieve" it lol.

[steintanz]

@MrAgentGreeny Ahaa - got you already :o)

Question back: How do you prove to someone else that you are in love?

Ok, but I don't want to leave you with nothing, but try to draw from different world views: the afterlife may be what people think of it, but it may also be something so totally different from everything else that we can't put it in words. ...

[steintanz]

@steintanz ... Science argues hard to say that our perception of time is an illusion, mystics say there is only now - so no before and no after, only life in the now. Therefore afterlife is just an interpretation: skip the "after" and you end up with life, which has no beginning and no end (only in conceptual, artificial limitations people put to it, but not in reality).

...

[steintanz]

@steintanz ... Have you ever thought that the reason for you rejecting the possibilty of afterlife is that you already have your own concept of what comes after death, namely nothing in your view? (BTW what is that nothing then?) So, that would be your idea of an afterlife, right? Of course that's just playing with concepts and terminology, but we have to be aware of that, before we can transcend to the "truth" if it should exist.

...

[steintanz]

@steintanz ... There is no end to life even after an organism's death, only to the momentary form of that particular organisms. But careful: talking about "one organism" is again an over-simplification of reality, because where does an organism end and where does it begin both in time and in space and in content with particles and energy swishing in and out and round about all the while. ...

[steintanz]

@steintanz ... If we look at an organism from the viewpoint of an (eco-)system, death becomes very much obsolete; systems do not die out, they change, neither are they born like "snap" ... and there they are. They come from sth that was there before and that changed. ...

[steintanz]

@steintanz ...

So, you probably expected some fairy tale-like talk :o) , but that's far from what I consider, although since we create our picture of the world, our illusionary perception of the full reality second by second, there might still be the chance that the afterlife might just look like what people expect it to be - a self-made wolrld just like in this moment.

I am looking forward to your response . please try to be tough in your criticism! ;o)

[Thinkdeep420]

Thanks for the upload

[Groovnstar]

Thanks for uploading. Just hmm, why is the volume a bit low this time?

[steintanz]

@Groovnstar ... because time and space too are an illusion ;o)

[xSilverPhinxx]

Thanks for uploading these!

[4micaman]

@xSilverPhinxx Namaste

[Malangsufi]

Spend the last two hours watching Eisntein big idea and today I got up and this amazing thing was online, thank you very much, looks like today's do to things are going to be tomorrows to do things,

[4micaman]

@Malangsufi If you're married and blame the putting off of your "to-do" list on our channel - we'll hunt you down! LOL

Seriously. Glad you enjoyed them. Thanks for your views, support and comments! :c)

Take care...

[Malangsufi]

@4micaman what you are doing by putting this incredible jewels of knowledge is beyond my ability to comprehended with words. I really appreciate it.

[4micaman]

@Malangsufi You just did! Hope you're all doing well in Herat. :c)

[WolverinePlusbeaST]

don't get me wrong..i love science but this whole multiverse idea just retarded!!!

[xxxm23able]

@WolverinePlusbeaST it's not retarding..this is science and it takes time before it is established law...

[WolverinePlusbeaST]

@xxxm23able i know science..i don't need you to tell me about science....sometime you gotta go with common sense...this whole idea is just stupid as hell..even most of scientists in the world does not agree with this multiverse thing...you might wanna do somehome work before you go round tell people what is science.

[4micaman]

@WolverinePlusbeaST The Earth is flat? no.

The Earth is the center of the Universe? no. See where this is going, don't you?

Let's not be so hasty in forming conclusions. If you're a man of science, then prove the "hypothesis" wrong. To label a "hypothesis" as retarded by claiming it so, without proof, well... nevahmind

Now, notice the title of the video. It's in the form of a question - not a statement of fact. Perhaps you should watch the ending from around @47:21 again.

[WolverinePlusbeaST]

@4micaman i have watched the whole video...i know it does not talk about facts but more of a opinion...there is not much i know about science maybe a bit more then a normal person..but the fact is most of the scientists round the world does not believe in the idea of multiverse..it's not even a theory...now what it really is an interesting topic to make an documentary to my money out of it..nothing more then that.,...the earth is flat? no..an stupid example you gave there.

[4micaman]

@WolverinePlusbeaST If you're like me, the more I read a book or watch a video, the more points I find previously missed. Plus, big difference between hypothesis and theory. our two samples of previously held believes, proven wrong, were just samples. Simplistic? Yeah. Stupid? If you say so.

We think our arrow missed it's mark and that's OK.

[xxxm23able]

@WolverinePlusbeaST ..Don't be skeptic and prejudiced. If you know science then you should look at the history of science. Einstein, Copernicus and many more were criticised so very badly and it took decades for people to accept their theories. so be at peace and watch out as the time evolves.

[WolverinePlusbeaST]

@xxxm23able i know history...at first some were ignored later people accepted their theories..but this has nothing do with that..so anyone can come up wtih an crazy idea and if people says it's wrong..you just say well you will accept it one day because it has happend before...WRONG...these people are no Einstein..

[TheJermanRamirez]

@WolverinePlusbeaST your missing the point a bit, You can't say "this is clearly wrong" only because it makes you uncomfortable (just the same way you can't say it true simply because you like it) its only that this is the theory that best fits what we know at the moment, why, tomorrow there could be a new discovery that proves it correct, or renders it completly useless. The point is that until then we can't just go around making unbacked statements - even if it does turn out to be incorrect.

[WolverinePlusbeaST]

@TheJermanRamirez of curse it could be right or WRONG tomorray..there is 50/50 chance...but the fact is most of scientist round the world..does not think it is right..that's the point!...like i said before it's good video with special affects and al that.that's cool but that doesn't make it right though.

[TheJermanRamirez]

@WolverinePlusbeaST not to be a pain, but was there a census done to see how many scientists didn't support the theory? Because I was under the impression, from the latest astrophysics books that the majority of physicists are workingg on this leading theory. Of but of course, simply because it has the most supporters doesn't make it right either, which brings us back to my previous point: this argument is pointless.

[WolverinePlusbeaST]

@TheJermanRamirez where does it says majority of physicists are working on leading this theory? give me a link...it doesn't make sense what so ever..but of curse sometime new ides in science doesn't make sense at first..one we truly understand it then they do..but that's not the case always..why would there be a copy same human in the universe..does that mean there is God...if not then why would universe has same copy of every human just on a different universe?...is there a law of something

[TheJermanRamirez]

@WolverineP the book "the inflationary universe explains it in much greater detail, as well as the video "parallel worlds, parallel lives" which goes a bit more in depth dehind the quantom mechanics reasoning behind it.

Btw @4micaman, many thanks for taking my other recommendation seriously and actually uploading it!

[WolverinePlusbeaST]

@TheJermanRamirez i understand it very well...it's still wrong in my opinion...

[4micaman]

@TheJermanRamirez We're the ones who are grateful, Sir.

[4micaman]

@xxxm23able exactly, good sir!

hypothesis > test > more test > peer reviews > more test > conclusion and proven to be a sound theory or debunked as not possible.

Namaste

[xxxm23able]

thanks pal

[4micaman]

@xxxm23able You're welcome :c)

Be well