Just imagine if he survived. If he actualy saw man walk on the moon as he had challenged. I am not an american, but JFK is someone who i look up to. Honest, mild mannered, and doing his job for the benefit of his country, instead of his party.
The reason for why JFK died was because he was a true american, he told the truth about everything, he spoke the words that frightend the government so they killed him, because they saw that he would sckrew up there plan to create there great empire, and JFK Was not the only one abe lincoln, che guevara, martin luther king jr, and many more.
NO ONE HAS A FUCKING BRAIN LET ME SPELL IT OUT JFK WAS A LIZARD HE WAS NOT HUMAN THE COPS LET ME GO WITH A PAT ON MY BACK. SEE YOUTUBE "REPTILIANS EXPOSED"
I read online that he was killed by a former marine that was corrupted after escaping from a russia jail. After that one of the possibilities is that they had done "things" to his head to make him kill JFK , but the other possibility is that they sent a russia double to kill kennedy but no one really knows
@AusVietnamesePride You know, that is an interested thought you just had. Maybe Wes Craven did remember that day in 1963 and linked that terror with the terror of Freddy Krueger. I mean that November day in 1963 was really a nightmare on Elm Street.
Oswald was the lone gunman, but he was set-up.The Mob hated the Kennedy's especially RFK after he disrespected the Mob boss and had him deported. The perfect guy to do the job was a nut case like Oswald. Oswald said he would be coming into a lot of money before the crime. But as soon as the "Head Shot" in Dealey Plaza was fired, everyone took off and left Oswald to fend for himself.
We still don't know the facts, but alot can be said about the Jimmy Hoffa murder too, but no one has.
It is of course very interesting for the Kennedy family to know more. But the Kennedy family has no intention to investigate more of this or of the RFK assassination as far as I know. They just wait and see what happens. That family is just a nice American family among many other great American families-with successful or unsuccessful members. But they are a normal but great American family in my point of view. I don't know so much about them to be honest, it's just a feeling I have.
Less than 20% of the American people think it was not what really happened, the way the Warren Commission presented the assassination.
Respect to the 80% of the American people who wants more accurate truth in this matter. It is very important to let official and private investigators to continue to search and find out about: 'What really happened that day in Dallas'. It's important also for the people to know more, the people who live in a great city called: Dallas
I'm not sure how I can be accused of wasting your time, when you specifically directed me to a video about WT7 (in order to bolster Bob Bowman's credibility), I watched the video, and gave my impressions on it. You then told me to go soak my head, and that my statements were rubbish. If you don't want to debate the JFK assassination, fine. But that's what we're doing here. There's plenty of other places to discuss WTC7 conspiracy theories.
Typical paranoid response. You issue a challenge, I respond, and instead of a rebuttal, you revert to name-calling and claim not to have time for "rubbish," which was purely in response to your challenge.
My impression of that photo? WTC7's collapse had been anticipated for hours ahead of time, nobody at the BBC knew which building they were talking about, and reports of "imminent collapse" were misinterpreted as conclusions by the BBC in haste. Lest you forget, there were a handful of reports that V.P. Johnson was shot on 12/22/63 as well. Don't confuse "early confusion" with "cover story."
Just stating again for the record: the "acoustic evidence" being presented by the this video is taken from Channel 2 of the Dallas Police Department, which NO other credible researcher believes contains any "acoustic evidence." The so-called acoustic evidence that the HSCA hung its hat on came from Channel 1. Although that was THOROUGHLY disproven later, I feel compelled to mention that the tape being discussed in this video is from the wrong channel (not the one with the open mic)
Bob Bowman, really? The man has already spent whatever respect his Phd would have commanded, by advocating various and sundry conspiracy and far-out theories without anything to show for it. At this point in his intellectual career, his opinion is, to my thinking, unworthy of consideration. I don't doubt his credentials, but his wayward politcal ambitions, combined with his outlandish personal theories cause me to reject anything he might have to say about any subject.
Oh my...the guy being interviewed at 7:00 is playing a tape of the Channel 2 radio traffic. This was not even the same tape the HSCA based their findings on. He's on his own. VERY misleading presentation here. (making it sound like he's analyzing the same tape the HSCA did)
Hmmm... couple of problems with the narration from the get-go. One: that the WC concluded that the 2nd shot missed. This is not true. They "proposed" it, but did not reach a firm conclusion on which shot missed. Two: that the open mic belonged to a policeman in the motorcade. This is almost certainly not true. There are NUMEROUS pieces of evidence which point to the open mic being at the Trade Mart at the time of the assassination.
Actually, belief in the Warren Commission's conclusions is (and has been) the *minority* viewpoint of Americans for decades. Belief in a conspiracy is much more the "typical American" viewpoint.
the fist shot missed, the second one hot kennedy and connaly around frame 222 at 59 yards, and the third shot hit kennedy in the head at frame 313 at 88 yards
the blanket statment of "All the evidence" is my only complaint regarding your statement. Clearly there was evidence that Oswald was a participant on some level. That's a lot of evidence your citing though by the way. A lot of imprisoned murderers have faced less and lived to actually see their trial.
its was his rifle that killed Kennedy. It was his gun that killed tippet. He pulled the gun on the officers that arrested him. Marina has never wavered from her statement that she took the backyard pic. Only 3 shells were found in the TSBD and NOTHING has ever come out otherwise. The case was sinple and LHO would have been convicted it a few days thats all
yeah well...as I said I'm not arguing the evidence that points to Lee Oswald (or was it H.Hidell). If you want to frame someone in advance you can create as much evidence against him as you like.
there was nothing complex here or complex he. For example the Magic Bullet theory did not come from the Warren Commision. It came from the misinformation of the Conspiracy theorists
Well the term "Magic Bullet" was a description that conspiracy theorists coined for the Warren Commision's explanation or accounting of all the wounds in Kennedy and Connally. Kennedy's neck wound in fact was a wound of entrance based on the angle from the TSBD to the limousine the back wound was too low to have exited from his neck.
and plenty has come out otherwise...Oswald's ties to the intelligence community...the intelligence community's use of the mafia for black operations. The acoustical evidence which the government itself used in 1978 to determine that there was a fourth shot and a "probable conspiracy".
The so called acoustic evidence was disproven a long time ago. Thewas also made up by conspiracy theorists. You can hear dallas police chief Bill Decker barking out orders to his policemen. The socalled four impulse sounds occured one minute after the shooting when the limo was long gone. The two Queens College audio "experts" could not understand the concept of print through and cross talk. I taught sound engineering and Music Production at college and leaned about this the first day of class.
The acoustics evidence is still very much considered valid. Not sure where your coming from on this one but if at your first day of teaching your course in college you learned something from one of your students that shows that you aren't close minded anyways.
and the acoustics evidence was NOT a conspiracy theorist creation it was judged by the HSCA to be valid. How come you trust the government when it suits you (Warren Commission) and disregard the conclusions of the House Select Committee when it doesn't?
Killuminatti
1234odis 1 month ago
jfk rocks
dvog1022 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
why would the C.I.A want to look into the assassination they obviously did it because he was wanting peace and like always the U.S wanted war.
EzraMurdock115 1 year ago
Just imagine if he survived. If he actualy saw man walk on the moon as he had challenged. I am not an american, but JFK is someone who i look up to. Honest, mild mannered, and doing his job for the benefit of his country, instead of his party.
Doctor699 1 year ago
The reason for why JFK died was because he was a true american, he told the truth about everything, he spoke the words that frightend the government so they killed him, because they saw that he would sckrew up there plan to create there great empire, and JFK Was not the only one abe lincoln, che guevara, martin luther king jr, and many more.
xXBLIZZDARKO49Xx 1 year ago
My butt is itchy..
MrKaoticGaming 1 year ago 2
NO ONE HAS A FUCKING BRAIN LET ME SPELL IT OUT JFK WAS A LIZARD HE WAS NOT HUMAN THE COPS LET ME GO WITH A PAT ON MY BACK. SEE YOUTUBE "REPTILIANS EXPOSED"
inspectorcritic 1 year ago
@inspectorcritic How was he a lizard???Think!
candyluver653 1 year ago
@inspectorcritic How was he a lizard?!?!?!?!?!?
candyluver653 1 year ago
black ops?
azndillon 1 year ago
I read online that he was killed by a former marine that was corrupted after escaping from a russia jail. After that one of the possibilities is that they had done "things" to his head to make him kill JFK , but the other possibility is that they sent a russia double to kill kennedy but no one really knows
ruletrent 1 year ago
@ruletrent You have been watching too many spy movies!!
KatheyAA 6 months ago
was that really on ELM st? Or is it just because of this that they made Nightmare on Elm St.
AusVietnamesePride 1 year ago
@AusVietnamesePride You know, that is an interested thought you just had. Maybe Wes Craven did remember that day in 1963 and linked that terror with the terror of Freddy Krueger. I mean that November day in 1963 was really a nightmare on Elm Street.
MIKESOWELL 11 months ago
Oswald was the lone gunman, but he was set-up.The Mob hated the Kennedy's especially RFK after he disrespected the Mob boss and had him deported. The perfect guy to do the job was a nut case like Oswald. Oswald said he would be coming into a lot of money before the crime. But as soon as the "Head Shot" in Dealey Plaza was fired, everyone took off and left Oswald to fend for himself.
We still don't know the facts, but alot can be said about the Jimmy Hoffa murder too, but no one has.
spreadeagle311 1 year ago
why they didnt ask the people on that day how many gun shots?
karan321 2 years ago
@karan321 they did but there were several different answers
SirTomothy 1 year ago
It is of course very interesting for the Kennedy family to know more. But the Kennedy family has no intention to investigate more of this or of the RFK assassination as far as I know. They just wait and see what happens. That family is just a nice American family among many other great American families-with successful or unsuccessful members. But they are a normal but great American family in my point of view. I don't know so much about them to be honest, it's just a feeling I have.
petereuropa 2 years ago
Less than 20% of the American people think it was not what really happened, the way the Warren Commission presented the assassination.
Respect to the 80% of the American people who wants more accurate truth in this matter. It is very important to let official and private investigators to continue to search and find out about: 'What really happened that day in Dallas'. It's important also for the people to know more, the people who live in a great city called: Dallas
petereuropa 2 years ago 2
the dictabelt recording was a minute after the assasination so those impulses click and pops are nothing more than that
Obelisk2290 2 years ago
Script got a little out of step.
TiredOldFart 2 years ago
I'm not sure how I can be accused of wasting your time, when you specifically directed me to a video about WT7 (in order to bolster Bob Bowman's credibility), I watched the video, and gave my impressions on it. You then told me to go soak my head, and that my statements were rubbish. If you don't want to debate the JFK assassination, fine. But that's what we're doing here. There's plenty of other places to discuss WTC7 conspiracy theories.
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
Typical paranoid response. You issue a challenge, I respond, and instead of a rebuttal, you revert to name-calling and claim not to have time for "rubbish," which was purely in response to your challenge.
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
My impression of that photo? WTC7's collapse had been anticipated for hours ahead of time, nobody at the BBC knew which building they were talking about, and reports of "imminent collapse" were misinterpreted as conclusions by the BBC in haste. Lest you forget, there were a handful of reports that V.P. Johnson was shot on 12/22/63 as well. Don't confuse "early confusion" with "cover story."
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
Just stating again for the record: the "acoustic evidence" being presented by the this video is taken from Channel 2 of the Dallas Police Department, which NO other credible researcher believes contains any "acoustic evidence." The so-called acoustic evidence that the HSCA hung its hat on came from Channel 1. Although that was THOROUGHLY disproven later, I feel compelled to mention that the tape being discussed in this video is from the wrong channel (not the one with the open mic)
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
Bob Bowman, really? The man has already spent whatever respect his Phd would have commanded, by advocating various and sundry conspiracy and far-out theories without anything to show for it. At this point in his intellectual career, his opinion is, to my thinking, unworthy of consideration. I don't doubt his credentials, but his wayward politcal ambitions, combined with his outlandish personal theories cause me to reject anything he might have to say about any subject.
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
Oh my...the guy being interviewed at 7:00 is playing a tape of the Channel 2 radio traffic. This was not even the same tape the HSCA based their findings on. He's on his own. VERY misleading presentation here. (making it sound like he's analyzing the same tape the HSCA did)
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
Hmmm... couple of problems with the narration from the get-go. One: that the WC concluded that the 2nd shot missed. This is not true. They "proposed" it, but did not reach a firm conclusion on which shot missed. Two: that the open mic belonged to a policeman in the motorcade. This is almost certainly not true. There are NUMEROUS pieces of evidence which point to the open mic being at the Trade Mart at the time of the assassination.
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
Actually, belief in the Warren Commission's conclusions is (and has been) the *minority* viewpoint of Americans for decades. Belief in a conspiracy is much more the "typical American" viewpoint.
ShutterBun2 2 years ago
its cakked doin research and not believing the baseless accusations of CT. Why would you want to defend a double murderer
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
Don't call him murder until he had a fair trail and proven guilty!
globeisnotpyramid 2 years ago
fine, then dont blame others saying that they conspired to kill kennedy when there is no evidence deal?
Obelisk2290 2 years ago
the fist shot missed, the second one hot kennedy and connaly around frame 222 at 59 yards, and the third shot hit kennedy in the head at frame 313 at 88 yards
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
When will we really know WHO is President Kennedy's true Assassin?
pilipinasmabuhay100 3 years ago
lee harvey oswald did it alone all the evidence points to him
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
all the evidence that wasn't tampered with.
grimdimly 3 years ago
when there is over 4 dozen pieces of evidence against LHO there is no way he could be innocent, not in the world we live in
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
the blanket statment of "All the evidence" is my only complaint regarding your statement. Clearly there was evidence that Oswald was a participant on some level. That's a lot of evidence your citing though by the way. A lot of imprisoned murderers have faced less and lived to actually see their trial.
grimdimly 3 years ago
its was his rifle that killed Kennedy. It was his gun that killed tippet. He pulled the gun on the officers that arrested him. Marina has never wavered from her statement that she took the backyard pic. Only 3 shells were found in the TSBD and NOTHING has ever come out otherwise. The case was sinple and LHO would have been convicted it a few days thats all
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
yeah well...as I said I'm not arguing the evidence that points to Lee Oswald (or was it H.Hidell). If you want to frame someone in advance you can create as much evidence against him as you like.
grimdimly 3 years ago
possible but there is no evidence of a second shooter
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
Oh and calling this a simple case is kind of hilarious. This is the amongst the most debated, complex, and disturbing murders in history.
grimdimly 3 years ago
there was nothing complex here or complex he. For example the Magic Bullet theory did not come from the Warren Commision. It came from the misinformation of the Conspiracy theorists
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
Well the term "Magic Bullet" was a description that conspiracy theorists coined for the Warren Commision's explanation or accounting of all the wounds in Kennedy and Connally. Kennedy's neck wound in fact was a wound of entrance based on the angle from the TSBD to the limousine the back wound was too low to have exited from his neck.
grimdimly 3 years ago
and plenty has come out otherwise...Oswald's ties to the intelligence community...the intelligence community's use of the mafia for black operations. The acoustical evidence which the government itself used in 1978 to determine that there was a fourth shot and a "probable conspiracy".
grimdimly 3 years ago
The so called acoustic evidence was disproven a long time ago. Thewas also made up by conspiracy theorists. You can hear dallas police chief Bill Decker barking out orders to his policemen. The socalled four impulse sounds occured one minute after the shooting when the limo was long gone. The two Queens College audio "experts" could not understand the concept of print through and cross talk. I taught sound engineering and Music Production at college and leaned about this the first day of class.
Obelisk2290 3 years ago
The acoustics evidence is still very much considered valid. Not sure where your coming from on this one but if at your first day of teaching your course in college you learned something from one of your students that shows that you aren't close minded anyways.
grimdimly 3 years ago
and the acoustics evidence was NOT a conspiracy theorist creation it was judged by the HSCA to be valid. How come you trust the government when it suits you (Warren Commission) and disregard the conclusions of the House Select Committee when it doesn't?
grimdimly 3 years ago