Added: 4 years ago
From: ForaTv
Views: 116,028
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,774)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hitchens may be a more interesting speaker, but he's just as much of a fanatic as someone like Bill O'Reilly. "Destroy your enemies!" And who might those be, exactly? With such a broad definition, your enemies could be anyone. What a prude

  • with that said R.I.P. Hitch, miss you already.......and if there is a God may he bless you and if not ? Oh well.......

  • I love Hitchens and as a Christian I hope to see him in heaven , so i can have a scotch and a cigarette with him. But its plain as day he vitriol of "religion". And while he a GREAT speaker and writer and provacatuer he is no theologian nor philosopher. What truly amazes me is that many of the youtube crowd , who claim there is no God , fair enough, but then act as if Hitchens is a God lol. Especially when so may of his arguments are bombastic and non sensical

  • Well we arnt worshiping him, making a statue of him and making a religion out of him. He like Ghandi is a man to be respected, for his words, his actions, his intellect and his contribution to the world, if you consider that acting like he is god then you have a loose definition on what god is. How are ghosts supposed to smoke something that is well not ghostly? Your lungs wont work either.

  • "Expiable"? Oh come on! Now you're just makin' that up!

  • if i were to answer your question, in a way which would answer it, i would rephrase to say that, in my following speech that my answer could be phrased as....JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION FOR FUCK SAKE

  • @ivlfounder I doubt it buddy. He's likely trying to figure out how to defend his man made ideology without people booing him.

  • @rightwing52000 haha

  • POPE'S BALLS!

  • What?...

  • While McGrath talks, Im looking at Hitchens' body language and Im trying to figure out what is going through that brilliant mind of his. LoL I can think of so many funny things...

  • @test123ok

    When McGrath looks at Hitchens he's trying to figure out on what part of the head Hitchens mother dropped her child.

  • @test123ok I do the same thing in all his videos hahaha

  • McGrath says absolutely nothing. Answer the fucking question, you idiotic hypocrite.

  • I'm an atheist and I have great respect for Christopher Hitchens, but he was wrong. The Christian was right in not dehumanizing the supposed "enemy" and ignore the possible motivations (political, religious whatever). Hitchens was too extreme.

  • can someone explain to me the difference between hitchens and a terrorist fundamentalist? they are both proponents of the us v. them mentality, and both use words such as enemy, immoral, evil, and preach the violence and destruction of anything that's disagreeable with "us." only difference is that fundamentalists hide behind religion and hitchens hides behind "logic", as he calls it. by the way, i'm not religious, i'd just like a common sense perspective on this man. thanks.

  • @izzimarczak It's extremely hard to believe you're not religious if all you picked up are those words.

  • @hmsrenown you missed my point, but ok... i pointed it out that he's using words that "religious" ppl use, but he's using them under his own umbrella promoting the same message he's fighting: violence. he thinks he has a right to it under his perspective, while others don't cause they're "religious." i didn't ask for someone who doesn't know me to put a label on me, i genuinely want a common sense perspective on this man in regards to this particular segment of the video.

  • @izzimarczak I think you missed the point wildly. The focal point of the debate is whether violence in organized religion today is at the core or only on the fringes, and Hitchens was arguing for the former. Now he did not advocate violent eradication of religion at any point, I fail to see how you concluded what you did.

  • @hmsrenown I listened to the entire debate and i think i got his point, i just don't completely agree with it. i like this man, i support many of his points, but it's very hard for me to just "agree" when I hear what he says at 3:40. to me those words sound as if they were coming from a radical, except hitchens is on the opposite side of the extreme. he's become the thing he's fighting except he thinks he's right. well, so does the other side. what do we as a society do about this clash?

  • @izzimarczak If I understood his words correctly, he was disputing the idea of "love your enemy" as moral. His argument against that is due to the fact that the "enemy" may have committed appalling crimes, "loving your enemy" is clearly immoral. I have struggled to find a different meaning to the clip.

  • @hmsrenown i heard the same words, along with "educating a cold steady dislike of them and encompass their destruction"... who will define our enemies, how far do we go to destroy them? loving your enemy is not "clearly" immoral, otherwise everyone would agree on it. i think it's more moral to learn why someone does what they do and how do we influence it, politically, culturally, religiously, before we accept hitchen's proposal to just go and "destroy" them. it all seems to rest on opinion...

  • @izzimarczak I would agree that he went further than he should. But loving your enemy from a literal understanding is quite absurd.

  • @hmsrenown i agree too, it is absurd...along with a whole bunch of other things that religion promotes. in no way am i supporting religious dogma, i'm not even bothering to comment on the other guy, no point. but with hitches he actually has good points but he's also extreme and i think he needs to be challenged on that. i think we need to be extra cautious with people who have a platform cause sometimes they go too far even though they mean well.

  • @hmsrenown If all people operated on the principles Hitchins proposes, then war would be perpetual (and it is). I think Christianity has a point here, though religion certainly isn't behind the origin of this concept. One of the parties involved must break the paranoid cycle of conflict in a strategic and innocuous way or we could very easily end in a nuclear war. We've evolved to the point where both mindlessly defending yourself and turning the other cheek are just as suicidal.

  • @hmsrenown And just to clarify, I don't think turning the other cheek is any more logical. A logical person wouldn't hold a "cold steady dislike of [his enemy] and encompass their destruction", or "turn the other cheek" as they get pissed on. Instead, they would first defend themselves, attempt to understand their enemy, and finally, attempt a diplomatic approach to solving the issue. If that fails, war it is. THAT is logical.

  • @borreLore Absolutely agree with you, I'm just arguing Hitchens's words aren't radical.

  • Has Hitchens ever gone up against a real theologian with teeth like John MacCarther, Piper, or Sproul? This McGrath appears to be handpicked by Hithchens.

  • hitchens for the win, every single time!

  • Christopher would do better to first say that we should first attempt to dissuade our enemies before we try to destroy them. It's only fair. But then...

  • "Our faith based forces are about as much use as the pope's balls in this struggle." Too true.

  • Hitchens is so bored. So bored. Just like me. Stay your tongue, you theist scum.

  • @Kir0l

    Oh yeah after all being a theist makes one a scum.

  • @ivlfounder Ignorant and gullible yes, scum? Not really. Mcgrath though who the poster your responding to was clearly referencing, yes.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    Why even mention he's a theist if kirlol wasn't insulting theists in general?

  • @ivlfounder To emphasize the likley core reason of him being scum. Theism can make many people ignorant and scum, not all, but certailny sum. Citing the source doesn't take away from the fact that he quite blatantly never even sounded to insinuate it as a wide brush.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    I guess Jewish people shouldn't be offended them when say you call them dirty jews.

  • @ivlfounder Of cousre they should, what part of the comment being targeted at a single person and not an entire group of people did you not seem to grasp?

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    Oh I'm sorry after all when you call someone say a dirty Jew it's in no way wrong.

  • @ivlfounder If they're actually dirty then you're right, it isn't wrong. If you're calling them dirty "just because" they're a Jew, then it's wrong. What part of your simple mind can't grasp this simple concept?

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    Tell you what Cartman.

    Why don't you go ask a Rabbi why it's wrong to call some one a dirty Jew?

  • @ivlfounder Tell you what moron, why don't you stop taking every negative comment as an attack on someones religion even when it's very clearly explained it has nothing to do with their beliefs, no matter how stupid said beliefs may be when compared to reality.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    Why don't you just tell me to shut my dirty jew mouth?

    You know you want to.

  • @ivlfounder You sure like pretending to play the victim don't you? Also I already explained why I haven't, because I don't know that you're dirty, let alone a Jew. The dirty part would only be justified if you where dirty, it would be irrelevant to your faith or lack there of.

    What I do know is that you're a moron that seems addicted to attention.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    Come on Cartmen get it over with.

  • @ivlfounder I'm still waiting for you to defend your point with any amount of reason or sensibility, failing to do this again however will let me comfortably abandon your dismally pathetic drivel and lack of any sort of rational or sensible point beyond proving yourself nothing more than a child desperate for attention.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    Keep telling yourself that Cartman.

  • @ivlfounder Ironic for an idiot that's crying about name calling. Have fun being a deceitful joke of a human being.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    "a deceitful joke of a human being"?

    Why don't you tell me to shut my jew mouth like you want to?

  • @ivlfounder Because I never insinuated that I wanted to call you nor anyone else that ding dong. Of course if you had anything more than the reading comprehension of a 2 year old you'd know that, instead you're intellectually dishonest and it's just easier to block your dumb ass.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    Oh no you just support calling people theist scum which is nothing like calling someone a dirty jew.

  • @ivlfounder Right because it's not like I said that he was referring to a single person and not to an entire group of people right? Though I could see how you could miss that, it would require reading my first response before you went on your cartmen dribble you stupid fuck.

  • @DarkBunnyLord

    I guess there's nothing wrong with you calling Obama a Black Bastard then is there?

  • Hitch looks absolutely bored to tears while McGrath is speaking. Obviously, because McGrath didn't even answer the question.

  • I cannot believe the patience that Hitchens shows.

    He fails, in certain ways, but he should have.

    The fucking charlatan (there really is no other way to say it) that he's arguing with is pathetic.

  • Hitchens, ' God is not great' is one of my favourite books. For similar great thoughts try Dan Barker, John W. Loftus, Robert M Price, Valerie Tarico, Victor Stenger, Bart Ehrman, Ken Humphreys, Richard Carrier, Ken Pulliam, Keith Parsons, Gary Greenberg, Robert Ingersoll, Thomas Paine, Mark Twain, Earl Doherty, Israel Finkelstein, Daniel Dennett, C Dennis Mckinsey, Joseph Wheless, Bertrand Russell, Sam Harris

  • "Love Thy Enemy"

    Why the fuck should I do that? Fuck Terrorists. Fuck the Westboro Baptist Church. Fuck anyone who wants to destroy the human race. I don't love you, I want you fucking dead.

  • Hitchens comments only make sense if the enemy is truly evil.

  • @rightwing52000 But sadly, he is INCREDIBLY smart. It such a waste that he spends so much of his time trying to prove the currently unprovable.

  • implying the pope has balls....

  • FORA TV sucks. Stay away from it. It's all just a big gimmick.

  • @buddybleau Why is it edited? Seems to me we are hearing both sides of the argument here.

  • @buddybleau Bit like religion then I suppose. haha

  • @SilverBallers47 Yep! Thats for sure!

  • you would need to be a saint ' forgive the pun ' to put up with the stupidity of the average christian speaker so i do not blame him for getting a little annoyed . but i did not think he was that bad .. i have seen him verbaly destroy people who were a lot smarter than this guy .

  • Hitchins came across like a clown there!!! I am shocked that people are supporting him in their comments... He came across bitter, angry, hateful and vengeful. Incredible that people here think his statements are a progression on the original question in the debate about the 'bitter, angry, vengeful' nature of God. All that Hitchins said was "so long as you agree with my judgment on moral matters and right and wrong, the methods of enforcing them are irrelevant'. Sounds like Stalin.

  • @ocblenheimpl " He came across bitter, angry, hateful and vengeful. "

    - And right.. you left off , right.

    Sorry it upsets you... next time you want someone to point out the short comings of your superstitious beliefs... be sure to ask for somene nicer.

  • @ocblenheimpl

    Hitchens has never gotten over his father leaving him.

  • @ivlfounder Most probably. There will be something similar wrong with Dawkins. But, Hitchins is a clown. He sounds eloquent; but in fact, some of the words he uses don't even exist! I suspect, in his fervor, he gets a little to excited, and confused.

  • @ocblenheimpl "There will be something similar wrong with Dawkins" Where is your evidence for this? or are you trying to demean someone without a source of evidence, and then use that same lack of evidence to confirm your belief in fantasy? All you have done is Suspect, assume, and make up, then present them at truths. Well done Sherlock.

  • @ocblenheimpl It is brilliant how you attack someones character, because you can not wiggle out of the corner that you have been pushed into. Instead you talk about their personal life (And falsely) and attack that because the comments from that person have gave you a stuttering none answer, well done you.

  • @BunWackettBuzzard Wriggling out of what corner?! you have no idea what my position is. I am discussing the personal attributes of a man who has put himself in front of the world (to be judged) by staging this debate. I am not attacking his personal life; just he persona that he carried across in this debate. He ranted like a madman; like a clown, performing.

  • @ocblenheimpl Yes you are right, I have no idea what your position is because you indulged yourself with attacking someone for rambling without pointing out the floors in his arguments. You used Buzz words like "excited, confused, suspect, fervor" And not comment on the parts you disagree with. What parts don't you disagree with? You have said a whole load of nothing.

  • The Christian fellow, just rambled about his personal feelings on how to interpret scripture, in that it is an ongoing thing that will "FIT" in the future. Of course it will "FIT". It will be "MADE" to "FIT". It was utter nonsense and it's hard to deny Hitchens logic, even though Im not with him on all his insights, he is clearly the most logical level head there. By a long, long way. I do feel organized religion has to be overcome and defeated. This in no way portends to spirituality.

  • white noise nonsense from Mr McGrath

  • Christopher Hitchens! Keep up the good fight. You are my hero.

  • Everyone always points to the old testament for hatred and violence, but how many times have the Jewish people been guilty of hatred and violence??

  • @pboisei see: the Israeli government, it's military and it's Zionism. Oh yeah, and the book, the Buybull that clearly states they are better humans than everyone else. Israel = Isis, Ra and Elohim. Get informed.

  • @cuttingedgecomix

    Israel is in fact a free democracy with rights guaranteed to all, no matter what religion or race, you should get informed and stop acting like a pretentious no it all.

  • Always amazes me, the sophistry of these "Christian scholars". They invent nonsense as required to prop up and resuscitate their ridiculous Frankenstein monster (the christian faith). They always have.

    "we must avoid dehumanization of our enemies" according to the dumbass professor.

    Mr Hitchens is of course right. We must destroy our enemies, muslim fanatics, extremists. They cannot be reasoned with. They WISH to die for "Allah" by destroying non-believers, the 'great Satan', the infidel ..us

  • Hitchens asks, who after 9/11 heard the clergy say we should love our enemies. I did. I'm in church, and Hitchens isn't. I'm in a better position to know.

  • Progressive revelation, lol

  • BABIES ARE PURE.

  • prof mcGrath ,is nauseating ,he turns my stomach ,the creep:(

  • @badslabber Yes I agree, I find him very disturbing. Infact he is a very good reprisentive for the christian church I find that repulsive too.

  • @badslabber I think it's cognitive dissonance, not nausea.

  • @v33punk NAH , hes just a fucking annoying dickhead ,AMEN

  • @badslabber Pretty smart there!

  • jews aren't god's people , logicians are,see it here = theoreticalphysics.webs.com

  • isn't there more?

  • @PhysicalsimForever

    That claim seems to pop up often whenever someone sees their champion fall.

  • god = logic  theoreticalphysics.webs.com

  • I'm gonna have to repeat that phrase - "as much use as the pope's balls." Perfect!

  • I agree witth neither, simple

  • McGrath is a lying dodging bible-kisser

  • Am I the only person here who wants to punch the good 'Dr'? Thank God for academics...

  • @hdmccart Fuck God, hard up his rotten ass.

  • @WHIREAS

    I'm so sorry your parents treatest you so bad.

  • You don't have to love your enemy, but you can turn an enemy into a friend by showing them compassion

  • The option of atheism makes less sense than any religion...

  • @mirnesalic What exactly are the options you speak of??

  • @TheDano1947 Well, I was just observing the way communication between the parties takes place: rationale, tone, behavior, treating the other party. And if one speaks for a party, naturally ... the way he speaks and what it is being said reflects his option. So between arguing just for the sake of arguing and insulting + lying, I don't buy that as a way of life nor proving that the other side is wrong. And by the way, I prefer Islam.

  • @mirnesalic

    ...makes less sense to you obviously, right? That's what you meant? or you meant that it makes less sense for everybody?

  • Is it just me or does this guy want to be Hitchens?

  • @RytanEmpire

    Why would anyone want to be him?

  • @ivlfounder He's probably the most controversial speaker of our time(and without corruption from outside forces. Not to mention the immense amount of knowledge and experience he's collected and interpreted for the impoverished nations most would rather forget about. And before you try it, he didn't support Bush overtime and if you would listen to his reasons for wanting to go into the middle east, you'll see how little him and the Bush administration agreed on.

  • @RytanEmpire

    Are you really this naive?

  • The Pope's balls. There's a song in there somewhere. It'd be an instrumental.

  • he s like ali at his best

  • As much use as the pope's balls. Pretty much sums his opponent up.

  • You would think someone who went to oxford would be more intelligent (and im not talking about hitchens, he's brilliant)

  • @FinalHeresy : I agree with you. It is funny how McGrath talks so much but says nothing. He reminds me of Cornel West by spinning and never really answering the questions presented before him. I believe his intelligence is overrated.

  • @7A35

    The man has a PHD in natural science from where again?

  • the more I read into hitchen's ideas the more I'm convinced he is a complete fool. his idea of dehumanizing a person simply because you are enemies is not just offensive against the laws of god, but even the laws of humanist man. and by the way this is the same concept that was used by adolf hitler in his justification of the holocaust he murdered millions of people because he viewed them as animals not as gods creation.

  • @sourheart73 In 'Mein Kampf', Hitler wrote he was "doing God's work". Hitler did those things because he was a megalomaniacal racist with a facistic political dogma in his hands. If you are arguing a man's lack of belief in God will lead to genocide, I suggest you have a massive re-think.

  • @jazz4 I actually wasnt saying that at all. I was merely pointing out that certain aspects of darwins theories such as survival of the fittest, and man is an animal have influenced things such as the holocaust. also the founder of communism Karl Marx was greatly influenced by evolution he saw communism as the final evolution of man. and of course communism led to a lot of problems so you can probably blame Darwin's theories for that

  • @jazz4 Adolf Hitler did make a number of references to a divine providence, and given his seemingly miraculous escapes from harm, such as surviving a mustard gas attack in World War I and escaping numerous assassination attempts, I don't doubt that he was sincere. But whether or not this constituted a personal God- I'm not so sure.

  • @sourheart73 hahahahahahahahahhahahahhhahah­ahahahah

  • Go Hitchens!!!!!!!

  • 0:30 - 2:00

    You can almost see the steam coming out of Hitchens' ears.

  • you gotta love him!

  • Apparently the old testament saying slavery is O.K. human sacrifice is good etc can be reinterpreted through Jesus as being love your neighbour. Hmm

  • I've really tried listen to McGrath, in hope of an interesting, intellectually challenging theist point of view, but he spews the same nebulous bullshit, that his fellow christian thinkers do.

  • @Chulacker

    Your failure to understand McGrath is not his fault.

  • @ivlfounder

    who can? at least i cant.....ill have to suspend mi ability to reason in order to understand that much bullcrap

  • @sl3ya44

    Ah so because you disagree with him everything he has to say is bullcrap.

  • Got Hitch-slapped!!

  • I applaud Christopher Hitchens thank you - hope you recover friend.

  • Mcgrath is a joke. I can't understand why anyone would give him any time at all.

  • 3:44-55 Hypocrite. This question was "Is God on the fringe because he destroys his enemies" Why are we as humans allowed to "encompass the destruction of our enemies" but Almighty God is heaped upon with hate and criticism for the account of his warring with horrendous nations that killed there children in sex rites; cured illness with shit-milk and were always totalitarian brutes. ALSO loving your enemies merely mean not lowering yourself and and partaking in their guilt.

  • "An atheist doesn't call what is beyond his intelligence & knowledge a "god", he views it as a place to explore and learn; not worship or pray to." - Me

  • Of course he'd like to look at the scripture through a lens. That's what brainwashed individuals need to do.

    It is only when you decide to trust your own mind's power (as opposed to blindly believing that you NEED to look at an issue in a certain light) that you can begin to actually analyze anything.

  • @theNimboo

    I guess every faith hater that's ever ead the bible is brainwashed then.

  • @ivlfounder Don't be absurd, those who are anti-theist are that way because the books of faith that claim to be true spread wickedness. Read the story of Lot, whom offers his daughters to be humuliated and violated by a mob so that angles (which according to tradition don't have sexual organs to be violated) could be spared. "its a story about hospitality" thats madness! would you offer your daughters to be raped in the name of hospitality?

  • @jessiesims

    Really?

    None of them have psychological issues?

  • @ivlfounder who? Theists? Please be a bit more specific in your question.

  • McGrath looks and talks like a pompous cock.

  • @ahmedeox And Hitchens doesn't?

  • McGrath has to have the most annoying way of talking I've ever heard.

  • I've never thought about the pope's balls before. I'm forced to agree. They are pretty much useless and irrelevant.

  • "Turn the other cheek" and "love your enemies" are not suicide pacts.

    A slap in the face is not a threat against life, livelihood or even health; it is merely and insult. So by "turn the other cheek" Christians simply hold to the idea of "don't sweat the small stuff" or "consider the source", just don't let ego and pride lead to escalation of conflict. Suffer unjust indignity humbly.

    By "love your enemies" we are to war justly, not with vindictiveness, but with honor and respect for life.

  • @BlakeRudy

    I'm not sure I agree with you but this is a wonderful post.

  • i was an enemy of God, and He loved me, and it changed my life. it was not empty. I am not empty anymore. Praise Him.

  • @mouthbeats11l2l

    Well said.

  • Hitchens says after 9/11 nobody preached "love your enemy" from the pulpit. Um, I beg to differ. I heard a lot of that.

  • this guy didnt answer the question!

  • tHIS MC GRATH DUDE JUST SOUNDS LIKE A FOOL HE HAS NO IDEA. LISTEN TO HIM AND JUST PISS YOURSELF.

  • McGrath doesn't answer the question, he skated around it and found the tree.

  • @sol3a1 Dawkins and Hitchens constantly skate around questions so why can't ALister?

  • Everyone who tries to debate Hitch, just makes themselves look so silly and stupid. What a President Hitch would have made. Maybe we could have gotten something done.

  • @rep300 McGrath won.

  • @Sneezlebob You can't be serious. If you are....you clearly don't understand what constitutes a legitimate argument. McGrath is nothing here. His arguments are meaningless, because scripture isn't evidence.

  • @rep300 Anyone with eyes, ears, and a working brain could see that McGrath won the debate.

    Sadly you have none of those traits.

  • @Sneezlebob Lets suppose he actually did win. A funny thing is that no debate has ever been won in favour of the existence of a god...

  • @VC106893 John Lennox was voted the winner in 3 of his debates with Dawkins.

  • @Sneezlebob Well I cant count on my hands how many times Hitchens and Dawkins kicked a theologian out the room... Whats your point? There still is not a single shred of evidence for a god. And the only reason to believe in it is out of fear and blind faith.

  • @VC106893 If theres not a single shred of evidence then Dawkins and Hitch should win the debate.

  • @Sneezlebob They do when they're debating whether there is a god yes or no...

  • @VC106893 Apparently not because their debates span 9-part 10 minute youtube videos.

  • @Sneezlebob

    I thought he had only debated with Dawkins twice.

    Might you have a link?

  • @ivlfounder Wikipedia Lennox. It says who he has debated