I can't understand the people working in this industry of lasik. I mean some surgeons may be greedy and deceptive, wanting money, but all the staff and nurses etc?
How can you be in a business on human eyes with random factor in it, if they can't determine why am i having nightime lowlight issues, then this procedure is broken.
So what happens when old technology is used on you in 2011! and sold as not making a difference just because the surgeon is trying to squeeze your high myopia and thin corneas into some procedure he can legally do without telling you.
It's still happenning; the lieing. The lie to make the sale.
I had the procedure done and am completely satisfied. They alert you of the risks and then it is ultimately up to you. You are entitled to your own opinion, of course, but personally, I am happy to put drops in my eyes on a regular basis as opposed to having eight diopters of myopia.
@hcsbaseball That's what I thought. I'd love to know how you feel about it in 5 years. You need to go to my website and read about regression, late onset complications, and long-term consequences. Just saying...
@hcsbaseball And that is wrong, why do you still need to put eyedrops in? To me they told me 3months until nerves regenerate for tear film, after8 months it came back to normal, i lost my mind of all drops and wasting money. Why should you put drops if tear film is regenerated? And no drops cost money, so you spend more money than having glasses on nose for 5 years.
@hcsbaseball And i did this demonic procedure too. I have all nightvision issues, it's driving me crazy. And by all I was perfect candidate, surgery was done right, all they say it's right, but I can't see clearli in low light conditions as before? Are people really crazy to accept halved wualiyt of vision just not to wear glasses? Seems like it.
As someone who wears glasses thanks for the video. I am wondering if the Slade Character is related to Bill Clinton. I think he is going to say I did not have sex with that women. Most of the LASIK surgeons are the scum of the earth as they know they are destroying peoples lives.
My husband was permanently injured when his doctor performed LASIK surgery in 1997. We sued the doctor and the FDA refused to submit documents that were subpoena'ed, the doctor refused to supply documents that would have proven negligence. The doctor even covered up the fact that the surgery was done when he did not report the screw up on the reports he submitted to the FDA. I met with the staff FDA and they denied what Dr. Waxler is saying now.
Dr. Slade talked about how LASIK is the most researched elective surgery that exists. The fact is that research consistently shows that six months after LASIK approx. 20% of patients in FDA clinical trials continue to report dry eyes (even w/current technology). Other studies demonstrate that 30% to 50% of patients experience chronic dry eyes beyond one year after surgery. When LASIK surgeons quote complication rates of 1-3%, they completely dismiss this potentially debilitating complication.
@kkruecke Exactly, sick procedure and people working in lasik industry are sick. It seems no matter how good the procedure is done, and even all scans show all is ok, no wrinkles, no dry eye, no decentered ablation, and yet I see catastrophic at night or low light, and they say to me that's normal, they try to convince me. I just don't understand how people can be so stupid and accept that kind of vision, not going public, news etc. It seems a random procedure.
I can't understand the people working in this industry of lasik. I mean some surgeons may be greedy and deceptive, wanting money, but all the staff and nurses etc?
How can you be in a business on human eyes with random factor in it, if they can't determine why am i having nightime lowlight issues, then this procedure is broken.
Mario19676 1 day ago
I lost my faith in the FDA because of Food inc., I'm shocked that an honorable person like Waxler actually works for them.
foreseengust 9 months ago
@foreseengust He no longer works for the FDA.
LASIKComplications 9 months ago
So what happens when old technology is used on you in 2011! and sold as not making a difference just because the surgeon is trying to squeeze your high myopia and thin corneas into some procedure he can legally do without telling you.
It's still happenning; the lieing. The lie to make the sale.
badlasikeye 10 months ago
I had the procedure done and am completely satisfied. They alert you of the risks and then it is ultimately up to you. You are entitled to your own opinion, of course, but personally, I am happy to put drops in my eyes on a regular basis as opposed to having eight diopters of myopia.
hcsbaseball 11 months ago
@hcsbaseball I'm curious -- how long ago did you have LASIK?
LASIKComplications 11 months ago
@LASIKComplications A little over six months ago.
hcsbaseball 11 months ago
@hcsbaseball That's what I thought. I'd love to know how you feel about it in 5 years. You need to go to my website and read about regression, late onset complications, and long-term consequences. Just saying...
LASIKComplications 11 months ago
@hcsbaseball And that is wrong, why do you still need to put eyedrops in? To me they told me 3months until nerves regenerate for tear film, after8 months it came back to normal, i lost my mind of all drops and wasting money. Why should you put drops if tear film is regenerated? And no drops cost money, so you spend more money than having glasses on nose for 5 years.
Mario19676 1 day ago
@hcsbaseball And i did this demonic procedure too. I have all nightvision issues, it's driving me crazy. And by all I was perfect candidate, surgery was done right, all they say it's right, but I can't see clearli in low light conditions as before? Are people really crazy to accept halved wualiyt of vision just not to wear glasses? Seems like it.
Mario19676 1 day ago
As someone who wears glasses thanks for the video. I am wondering if the Slade Character is related to Bill Clinton. I think he is going to say I did not have sex with that women. Most of the LASIK surgeons are the scum of the earth as they know they are destroying peoples lives.
Adam6275 1 year ago
My husband was permanently injured when his doctor performed LASIK surgery in 1997. We sued the doctor and the FDA refused to submit documents that were subpoena'ed, the doctor refused to supply documents that would have proven negligence. The doctor even covered up the fact that the surgery was done when he did not report the screw up on the reports he submitted to the FDA. I met with the staff FDA and they denied what Dr. Waxler is saying now.
Princess0Zev 1 year ago
Dr. Slade talked about how LASIK is the most researched elective surgery that exists. The fact is that research consistently shows that six months after LASIK approx. 20% of patients in FDA clinical trials continue to report dry eyes (even w/current technology). Other studies demonstrate that 30% to 50% of patients experience chronic dry eyes beyond one year after surgery. When LASIK surgeons quote complication rates of 1-3%, they completely dismiss this potentially debilitating complication.
thetruth8699 1 year ago
Dr. Slade did not explicitly deny that LASIK causes halos or that many people, like myself, have 20/20 but cannot drive safely at night.
kkruecke 1 year ago 3
@kkruecke Exactly, sick procedure and people working in lasik industry are sick. It seems no matter how good the procedure is done, and even all scans show all is ok, no wrinkles, no dry eye, no decentered ablation, and yet I see catastrophic at night or low light, and they say to me that's normal, they try to convince me. I just don't understand how people can be so stupid and accept that kind of vision, not going public, news etc. It seems a random procedure.
Mario19676 1 day ago