Added: 3 years ago
From: Plymhistnet
Views: 59,465
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,293)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I subbed to this channel even though I don't go to that school.

    *TROLLFACE*

  • Outta here - got better things to do.

    Betcha like the modern life, eh?

    You can thank the glorious British Empire for enabling all of that!!

    HUZZAH!!

  • @trouzerpants

    I love modern life, though if anything isn't all of this the creation of the Americans? lol!

  • @suryavajra

    No. The Americans are not an innovative people. Instead, they rely on what's begged, borrowed, bought or stolen from elsewhere (particularly GB and Germany.)

  • @trouzerpants

    Be that as it may, the world we live in today is the result of a post war order that has been run and operated by Americans. Americans who take your ideas, and actually know what to do to realize their potential.

  • @trouzerpants

    So it must be worldly men like you who intrude upon everyone's peace and quiet, hey? lol!

  • @suryavajra

    You're blissfully unaware of the price we paid for LL...

    How am I intruding?

  • BTW - what exactly is an "American?"

    Anyone can be American, it's an immigrant nation. "American" endeavour usually involves a great deal of foreign ingenuity..

  • @trouzerpants

    And this is a problem? lol!

  • @suryavajra

    A "problem?" Depends upon your disposition. I'm glad that the UK's demographic is 90% Caucasian. I like to be with my own people (Anglos/Aryans). You understand.. I don't feel at home surrounded by those gibbering away in Spanish..

    English is the Lingua franca.

  • @trouzerpants

    Well trouzerpants, it doesn't bother me. I understand Spanish as well as English. I'm stronger at English but I'm also strong enough in Spanish to get by.

    Well I happen to be Aryan. I certainly do not consider you one of "my kind"...lol! You may be a nice guy but we ain't brothers from the same mother...lol!

  • @trouzerpants

    Ofcourse you had to pay a price for it. You didn't expect it for free, did you??

    It's worldly men like you who form the banking and global political elites who intrude upon our peaceful lives, all the while judging us and our ways even while you take our photoes and chatter about us to your friends at the social club right there...lol!

  • @suryavajra

    Yes. As an alleged "ally", why couldn't you have been a lil' more philanthropic, followed the Canadians role and helped out from inception, instead of profiteering from Hitler whilst we were at war with him?

    You only joined when finally forced through self preservation, that's hardly noble..

  • @trouzerpants

    Because we were not part of your Empire. We were not even your allies. We were not cosignatories in that crap treaty you signed with a group of Polish colonels. America wanted to be left alone. And joined only when it was forced to join out of self defense.

  • @suryavajra

    So, you're just fair-weather friends, right?

    You can't be mates just when it suits you. You're either in for the long haul or you're not.

    Whilst we were fighting Hitler, you were trading with him, even named him Man of the Year (Time, 1938.)

    A disgrace, just like your Vietnamese debacle (which you asked for our help with, gladly, we refused.)

  • Moreover, you were quite happy to be cosignatories during the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 prior to once more becoming isolationist, sitting back and watching as Germany descended into chaos.

    I don't even know why you bothered to show up in WWI, we didn't even need you. The Triple Entente had already defeated Germany. I guess you just did what you always do ie wait for the hard fighting to be carried out before stepping in at the last to steal the glory from others..

  • I have more dirt on America than you could ever hope to deal with...

  • @trouzerpants

    Well didn't you guys weasel us into WWI as well??

  • @trouzerpants

    Well here are the facts trouzer. We were not allies back then. We had no standinfg defense treaty between us.

    Also one more thing. While friendships exists in the private sphere, this does not exist in the anarchic world of international relations.

    Third, Man of the Year is given to whoever is moving and shaking the world most, not because he's a nice guy and Americans like him somehow.

  • @trouzerpants

    So let me see if I get this straight. It's morally fine for you guys to look at your own national interest and see if you wanna fight in an American War or not, but we must out of moral obligation fight for you all the time even when it goes against American interest?? Wow. Hypocritical much?

  • WWII was a morally just war we declared to thwart Hitler's obvious plans for global domination. If we'd fell, Hitler would've invaded, taken control of the RN & used our atomic expertise (which we supplied you in exchange for oil, not to mention our gold reserves, computational research etc) to destroy the US. Through our stymieing Hitler's plans (alone, post June '40), we bought time for the rest of the world to get their shit together.

    'Nam was NOT morally just hence our refusal.

  • You're that fella that annoyed the Hell outta the LibKnight, right? I can remember you now.

    It's late (1:25 GMT), I'm goin' to bed.

    zzzzzzzzz

  • @trouzerpants

    Yep that's me! lol! I'm the fella.....

    Anyway, yes it must be late over there! Good night! Talk more later!!

  • @trouzerpants

    Hitler had no plan for global domination. His plan was for European domination. There's a big diff between the two. You wouldn't have fallen so much as to have force to recognize King Edward VIII as your King and Emperor once again and march in goosestep to Prime Minister Oswald Moseley.

  • @trouzerpants

    Also you say that because let's face it, a British war in your eyes is justifiable and moral, but an American war is immoral. There's hypocrisy inherent there.

    I personally think countries should go to war when and where it's in their vital security interest to do so.

  • I'll be back! lol!

  • @suryavajra

    Don't plagiarise Arnie's immortal line..!

  • @trouzerpants

    Too late...lol! 

  • I reiterate, the UK's largest minority demographic is Indians (well over 1 million), over 1 million Indians fought alongside us in WWI; in WWII, it was Bill Slim's 14th "Forgotten Army" that kicked out the invading Japs from India, without which, you'd have become a vassal state of imperial Japan.

    I think it's fair to say you owe us one, don't you?

  • @trouzerpants

    So why would I owe you one, if Indians were fighting in YOUR war?? Shouldn't it be the other way around??

    Or is that we owe you for the honor of being killed in the service of your King?? lol!

  • @suryavajra

    You misunderstood. Bill Slim's 14th SAVED India from becoming part of the Japanese Empire.

  • @trouzerpants

    Is it that?? Or was it that Bill Slim prevented India from being liberated by Subash Chandra Bose, and the Azad Hind Fauj spearheading the Japanese offensive??

  • @suryavajra

    Either way, the Chindits were happy to fight with Slim's boys. No complaining from them.

  • Comment removed

  • @suryavajra

    Nor are Indians complaining today. They thank Britain for all we've done for them.

    Huzzah the Raj!!

  • @trouzerpants

    Actually no one cares for the British regime in India except for maybe some of the brown nosing political and banking elites....

    If anything among the real people, it's all about Netaji Subash Chandra Bose and Azad Hind.

  • @suryavajra

    You seem to care a heck of a lot, even to the point of posting utter tosh to highlight how "oppressive" the British were to the entire world.

    Typically Anglophobic attitude. I reiterate, yours is but the lonely, lost voice in the wilderness..

  • @trouzerpants

    Well I happen to love history and politics. 

    As for the rest, I'm glad you are so concerned about my voice. lol!!

  • @suryavajra

    If you love them, then I suggest you'd better start to study them..!

  • @trouzerpants

    Aww the French East India Company?? Who said I loved them??

  • @suryavajra

    I was referring to your love for history and politics..

  • @trouzerpants

    Oh yes. Well what I love about history and politics, is it is a subject that no matter how old you are, everyone is a student and no one is a master.

  • @suryavajra

    How old are you?

  • @trouzerpants

    Why does it matter?

  • @suryavajra

    Yeah, it matters to me.

  • Some kids post fake ages to allow them to see restricted material..

  • @trouzerpants

    Is this restricted material?

  • @trouzerpants

    Then you need a new set of priorities, pal..lol!

  • @suryavajra

    Not if you're as young as I suspect you to be..

  • @trouzerpants

    Okay??

  • @suryavajra

    Not 'til you tell me your true age.

  • @trouzerpants

    Why should I tell you my age?? Do I ask your age or any of your personal details??

  • @suryavajra

    I do not wish to speak to minors. Just my lil' rule. Kids don't know shit, just waste your time.

    I know you're from Oakland (or nearby..)

  • @trouzerpants

    I am pleased! How did you know I come from near Oakland??

    Well don't worry your pretty little head, my friend. I am as old as I say I am. I'm 28. Now may I ask how old you are??

  • @suryavajra

    41.

    I have travelled extensively across the US. I reiterate, I'm a worldly man of great perspicacity.

  • @trouzerpants

    Awww I see. Well met, then.....

    Well then as you no doubt have observed, I have the whole Northern Cali attitude..lol!

  • @suryavajra

    Cali is full of homosexuals and Mexicans. It's land stolen from Mexico, analogous to the great plains stolen from the Red man.

    I have stayed in Altadena (got friends down there) and have passed through LA, Hollywood (dirty, full of $5 hookers) and ridden trail horses out in the Cali desert.

  • @trouzerpants

    California was a land which declared independence against Mexico in the first place. Now, it has its drawbacks like many places around the world. But I'll always be Californian at the end of the day.

    Though if you had knowelge of the geography, you'd know that I hail from an area that is 300 miles north of where you stayed. ;)

  • @suryavajra

    Yes, I understand the geography, climate and the topography. CA was originally Mexican land. The white man usurped the red man's land. It's why Bobby Fischer (arguably the most intelligent man ever to come from the US), was so disgruntled, tore up his citizenship and left, never to return.

  • @trouzerpants

    Well then you'd know that California originally was Spanish land before it was Mexican land...lol!

  • @trouzerpants

    So they thank you for making them destitute and poor?? Tell me more....lol!

  • @suryavajra

    Yeah, we made 'em so poor that India today is one of the fastest growing economies...

    Don't take the piss if you expect to keep my time.

  • @trouzerpants

    Well yes, one of the fastest growing despite your policies reducing the country not because of them....

  • THE BRITAIN MUST TO RETURN ALL THE GREEK MONUMENTS BACK IN GREECE.

    FREEDOM TO DHEKELIA. FREEDOM TO AKROTIRI.

    OUT THE ILLEGAL BRITISH BASES FROM THE GREEK CYPRUS. THE CYPRUS BELONGS TO GREECE. THE REAL CYPRIOTS ARE GREEKS

  • @unfukkkmee

    Respect and love to Greece, man. I love reading about Ancient Greek civilizations and all your myths. Truly awesome stuff.

  • THE BRITISH POSSESSIONS IS CREATION OF REPTILIAN ZIONISTS. THE FALL OF BRITISH POSSESSIONS IS CREATION OF REPTILIAN ZIONISTS. I MEAN HOW THE REPTILIANS GAVE  MONEY BILLIONS IN BRITONS

  • FOR ALL THE STUPID RETARDED PEOPLE WHO THINK BRITISH PEOPLE SPREAD EDUCATION AND NEW INVENTIONS AND SHIT. LOOK AT CHINA AND JAPAN, BRITAN NEVER WENT THERE.

    ARE THEY FUCKING LIVING IN DARK AGES ??!?!?!?!??!

  • @codenamerishi

    Sorry mate, the British East India Co went to China in the 19th C twice (1839–1842, then 1856–1860.) Research the Opium wars.

  • @trouzerpants dude I am talking about colonizing china... don't play semantics....

  • @codenamerishi

    "LOOK AT CHINA AND JAPAN, BRITAN NEVER WENT THERE" - you

    With reference to Britain never having gone to China, I had no other motivation other than to repudiate your erroneous statement. Next time you care to post, be a lil' more specific, enabling one to address your points with greater accuracy. Besides, the British Empire exported it's agrarian & industrial revolutions, schools, hospitals, infrastructure etc all around the globe.

    We built the modern world.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @trouzerpants

    You did not build the modern world. The modern world we all know is post 1945. Which if anything is marked by the collapse of Empires, yours being one of them.

    The British did not export their industrial revolution around the world. Because manufacturing techniques were trade secrets. What the British did with their industry was to dump their manufactured goods on other countries.

    As for agriculture, that is also not true.

  • @trouzerpants well no your wrong briritsh salors went there and because they hadnt washed for weeks the japanes were discusted but briton never really saw a point it was miles away and it would take ages to concer and start trading in that area

  • @trouzerpants like how the Roman Empire gave us roads

  • @14warr

    Exactly. There's a very funny scene from Monty Python's "Life of Brian" where John Cleese is asking his mates (who all hate the Romans) "what have the Romans done for us?!" - in the end, they all have to conclude that they did an awful lot!

  • @trouzerpants also the British empire was Shortest Lasting Major empire in all the big empires that had been in history...persian chinese and other empires lasted much longer and were stable.. you went down the shit hole as quick as you rose to power.

  • @code

    Possibly as a consequence of being the only nation (along with France who rapidly capitulated) with the balls to stand up to Hitler, fighting for the entire duration of WWII. Our saving the world (yes, if we'd lost the BoB, Hitler would've invaded prior to using the mighty RN & our atomic research to wipe out the US) cost us dearly in our struggle against the gravest global threat to date. What's your problem? Pissed off at how we dealt with the Indian Mutiny, 1857? Tough.

  • BTW Gupta, you're full of Indian shit. Now, toddle off and go and make me a nice hot curry. Madras with plenty of peppers will do.

  • "Europe's empires are gone and America's imperium is going. It seems increasingly doubtful that the United States will have anything like Britain's success in shaping a succeeding world order that protects its interests, preserves its prosperity and bears the imprint of its best values." - Alfred W. McCoy

    Indeed.

  • @trouzerpants

    There ain't no American Empire, pal...lol! You ought to stop believing inhaling baloney..lol!

  • @trouzerpants

    HA!! You didn't save the world dude. Your war guarantee with a Polish military junta (who had previously colluded with Hitler in the rape of Czechoslovakia) triggered a series of events which would lead all of Central Europe to end up in Stalin's slave quarters in 1945.

    Oh and crumpet humper? Run of and get me some fish and chips, boy....

  • @codenamerishi Obviously, a troll with a single byte of knowledge on the matter, who thinks he can boldy trash the glorious British Empire with FULL CAPS LOCK. What a fool.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @ThePalaeontologist it don't MATTER how BIG the empire was. The imperial army of japan was pretty damn big, hitler set up a huge empire at germany. but if the object of empire was loot kill and rape people then it'd go down as bad and disrespected thing in history. where's 300 spartans who saved there homeland from million persian would go down as heroes.

  • @codenamerishi God it was years ago get over it and all the allies have not left us canada australia northern island NZ america we are apart of Europe face it the british had the best empire the world has seen and it did a lot of good for your country as well as bad so stop bitching

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    Excuse me, why shouldn't people have a difference in opinion?? Since when was having a difference of opinion construed at bitching??

    The historical reality is that there is no BEST Empire in the world. Because Empires to be Empires are based off the exercise of force and coercion to bring peoples in to the said political order. So really.....you might wanna read into something called Free Speech, yeah?

  • @suryavajra Yes but people need to Stop living in the past move on, the british had a Great Empire look at the former Empire countries today great places it's not how we would agree to treat people now but it happened and it did do good aswell parlimentary systems security rail order, the English language infrastructure sanitation systems Education British values , the British shaped the world ok they done it for there own gain but you know

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    I agree, But since we are talking about HISTORY and the PAST. It is necessary to remember.

    As for the rest, I'll repeat what I wrote earlier. Empire is an exercise of Force and Coercion at the end of the day. If you believe that is all right and good, then you gotta explain why your brand of force and coercion is preferable to the French or Spanish or German brand of coercion.

  • @suryavajra I never said it was all good and right, i just admire what the british empire did achieved and left behind same with the romans even tho the romans took over england and killed british people we still use there roads today in england i think they showed the british how to build better things like that. and you can not really compare what the british did to the germans can you? the reason i said move on is because of some lunatic was saying death to all british or something like that

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    Okay, I'm not cool with people saying Death to All British or Death to anyone else for that matter. That's uncalled for.

    Now as for the next point, yeah. Why can you compare the British to the Romans who are separated by two thousand years of history but you cannot compare the British Empire to the German Empire which were existing in the same time in history?

  • @suryavajra Because i think they both had a good impact in the end Ok a bypass through there own gain but still, What good did the germans leave create or leave behind? nothing And if you are white american chances are you would not exist with out the empire.

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    I think the Germans established a colonial empire just like the British. Maybe smaller than the British but still there. Now the Romans themselves? They are more comparable to the Empires of the Classical Age. So compare them to the Persians, the Greeks, etc.

    I am not White American. But even if I were, I'd contend that view.

  • @suryavajra The video title is british empire good or bad iv said it had good and bad and listed the reasons why i thought now can you really name any good that came form the germans? to me they don't compare the germans were evil.

  • @SILVERCLOUD141 racist.

  • @Brangutang Hows i racist?

  • @SILVERCLOUD141 Um, because: "no good came from the Germans." and "the Germans were evil."

  • @Brangutang Yes u got it!

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    It wasn't the Germans per se who were evil but rather the Nazi party. Many in the Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine were simply following orders.

    As for their legacy, it was German science that put man on the moon.

  • @trouzerpants The german people were cheering in the streets for world domination by any means, If that was all they contributed and all the damage and suffering they caused i think we could of done with out it the british done much more for the world.

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    Wel the British people were cheering in the streets for world dominatin, dude. What are you talking about?? lol!

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    Only the rabid, brainwashed supporters of Hitler's National Socialist Party. You have to understand how Hitler's party came to power. After the harsh reparations (Treaty of Versailles) were imposed, it created much hardship within Wiemar Germany with hyper-inflation & much suffering. Through Hitler's oratory skills (not to mention his coercion & bully-boy tactics), playing upon people's fears & prejudices..

    TBC

  • ..he managed to convince enough voters that he was the man to rebuild Germany. Hindenburg (president) told Hitler bluntly that he'd never make him Chancellor, that he knew he was out to destroy democracy. Hitler used Machiavellian plots & schemes to eventually force Hindenburg's hand, politically maneuvering him (against his will) into making him Chancellor in 1933. Hitler even had the Reichstag burnt 4 weeks later to convince Hindenburg there was a communist plot..

    TBC

  • ..to overthrow the gov of Weimar Germany (never proven this was Hitler's work but very likely.) He then urged Hindenburg to pass the "Enabling Act" (including the loss of certain civil liberties) followed by the arrest of all Communists (including the Communist party members.) With their seats gone, Hitler could consolidate power, crucial to the establishment of Nazi Germany. Hindenburg died in '34 leaving Hitler declaring himself head of state with complete autocracy.

    TBC

  • Naturally, this upset a lot of Germans, especially those who Hitler deemed sub-human (all Jews, even Germans ones, homosexuals, the disabled, gypsies etc) with those who opposed his autocratic rule brutally subjugated. Many German civilians (even some in the armed forces) hated Hitler & his policies. The waves of people we've all seen on old news-reels worshipping him were propaganda films, trust me, he had as many enemies as fans, check out the German resistance.

  • @SILVERCLOUD141

    The Germns weren't evil. They had their own Empire and their own order. Some among them were evil. Just as some among the Brits were evil.

  • @suryavajra name one evil brit !!

  • @eunoway

    Very well, I shall....

    Cecil John Rhodes, for one.

    General Reginald Dyer for two.

    Lord Kitchener for three.

    Need I go on??

  • @suryavajra when i said name on evil brit i was being sarcastic !!! are there not bad and evil people in all countries ??

  • @eunoway

    How am I supposed to know whether you are sarcastic or not?? I ain't a psychic, bud...

  • @suryavajra

    How about Bush, one of the most evil (and stupid) men of recent years?

  • @trouzerpants i did not want to go tit for tat with him..........but like you said,we created the modern world......maybe thats why they all have a chip on their shoulder !!!

  • @eunoway

    You did not create the modern world dude...lol! Stop giving yourself airs...

  • @eunoway

    It's Ok. That fella's an Anglophobe, probably brainwashed by Steven Grasse's risible Anglophobic, trash book "101 ways that England ruined the world", even though the author isn't even a historian who's work has been trashed by all credible historians the world over.

    The British Empire (even though not within sin) was overall a force for stability and good. Anyone who thinks otherwise can fuck right off.

  • @trouzerpants

    The funny thing is that I nor 99% of the American public have not even heard of Grasse's books, until some of us logged on youtube and stumbled on the vids...lol!! I find it funny that so many Brits are so butt hurt over a book that very few of us Americans have even heard of in the first place! lol!

    The British Empire was a force for oppression and tyranny.

  • @suryavajra

    Thankfully, you Anglophobes are in the tiny minority. No, we laugh at idiots like Grasse, nothing more than a salesman who's written lies and sensationalism to maximise profit.

    At least we never burnt women on funeral pyres...

  • @trouzerpants

    What makes you think I'm an anglophobe??

    As for the rest, no you didn't. You just starved millions of 'em and their kids.

  • @trouzerpants

    I don't think Bush was evil.  Misguided, yes. Misled by his cabinate officials and think thanks, absolutley. But he himself was not evil. At the end of the day he broke with the neo-cons and did not take their advise after 2006.

  • @suryavajra

    I meant "think tanks"....

  • @suryavajra

    Tanks were what helped to break the trench stalemate of WWI, hastening the end of the war and victory for the Triple Entente.

  • @trouzerpants

    What has that have to do with the debate at hand??

  • @suryavajra

    You mentioned something about "think tanks", I assumed that was more of your Anglophobic BS (as they were a British invention.)

  • @trouzerpants

    Think Tanks are organizations that do specialized research and come out with position papers. They have many experts from academia, the business world and even former military on staff providing analysis. They compete with one another for influence in Washington.

  • @suryavajra

    I know what think-tanks are. I didn't see your original post, only the "think tanks" correction...

  • @trouzerpants

    Oh, I got your self correction post prior to reading the post it referenced hence the confusion.

    Bush was as evil as Pol Pot, committing Iraqi genocide on civilian men, women and children, engineering a war that he knew was unjust, solely for profit. How it's all spectacularly backfired..

  • @trouzerpants

    That is BS....Bush was nothing like Pol Pot...

  • @suryavajra

    So you voted for him? Bit of a fan are ya? D'ya like Palin, too? How about Ann Coulter?

  • @trouzerpants

    I'm no fan of his policies, I just don't think he was evil or that evil was the driving force of his policies.

  • @suryavajra

    So you agree with his policy of invading a sovereign nation who had nothing to do with 9/11 just to steal their oil?

  • It's obvious you're Anglophobic with your risible "oppression and tyranny" BS.

    Everyone knows the Empire was a force for stability and good. Never heard of parliamentary democracy? Guess who banned slavery? Guess who banned sati in India?

  • @trouzerpants

    Well oppression is oppression regardless of whether it's British, French, Russian, etc...

    As for Sati, you were not the first. Indeed Hindus and Muslims banned it before the Brits even heard of it...lol!

  • @suryavajra

    Yet it's a practice that still exists to this day..

    Wasn't our fault that you refused to obey the law.

  • @trouzerpants

    That is fiction. The practice does not exist.

    As for obeying the law, I have no idea what you are talking about??

  • @suryavajra

    "In this case the bride is killed at home by her husband. Kerosene is used as the fuel. It has been a major problem on since at least 1993. This crime has been treated as culpable homicide and if proven, is punishable accordingly (mostly up to death sentence or life imprisonment). According to Indian National Crime Record Bureau, there were 1,948 convictions and 3,876 acquittals in dowry death cases in 2008." - wiki

    Sati = bride burning. Same crime, different name.

  • @trouzerpants

    Well it is a nation of 1 billion. You are bound to have psychos and extremists. I find it funny that you choose to paint me with those folks right there...lol!

  • "Kumar & Kanth point out that bride burning has been recognized as an important public health problem in India.They say that it's a historical & cultural issue accounting for around 600-750 deaths per year in India alone.In '95 Time reported that dowry deaths in India increased from around 400 a year in the early '80's to around 5,800 a year by the middle of the '90's.A year later CNN ran a story saying that every year police receive more than 2,500 reports of bride burning."- wiki

  • @trouzerpants

    So why exactly am I being associated with dowry deaths or sati?

  • @suryavajra you dont sound like a typical american to me !! Where you from ??

  • @eunoway

    He's Indian. Just lives in the US.

  • @trouzerpants

    I am Indian by ethnicity, but American by nationality.

  • @suryavajra

    No shit.

    Anyone can become American, it's merely an immigrant nation.

  • @trouzerpants

    Hence it is a tolerant and welcoming nation. There's dignity and honor here, for anyone who chooses to do the right thing and play by the rules.

  • @suryavajra

    Tolerant and welcoming?! I've been all over the US, even my ex is a young Irish American gal from KS.

    Check HR 1955 - show ya how tolerant, welcoming and free it is...

  • @trouzerpants

    Well I was born and raised here, and I've had a very happy childhood and today am very content to be here. I really have no desire to be anywhere else.

  • @suryavajra

    Possibly 'cause you've never BEEN anywhere else...

    LOL

  • @trouzerpants

    I've been to other countries. I talk to many more people here on youtube from all over the world. I hear about other country's problems and issues on a daily basis. At the end of the day, East or West, home is best.

  • @eunoway

    I am from the US. 

  • @suryavajra why do you hate the brits so much ??

  • @eunoway

    What makes you think I'm hating??

  • @eunoway

    So what does a "typical" American sound like?? There are afterall 300 million here...

  • @suryavajra dyer was a soldier who should have been hung for what he did !! but our idea of evil would me someone like himmler ? best of my knowledge we have not given the world somone like him

  • @eunoway

    Yet Dyer was honored and buried with full military honors.

  • @suryavajra is that my fault...i said he should have hanged ,.........and your other question well in my experiance most americans like the brits !!

  • @eunoway

    Well what makes you think I do not like you?? Is that I dare to disagree with you politically??

  • @suryavajra no one is denying bad things were done.........but if you look at canada,america,aus,nz, plus others they turned out ok...look at the french colonies.and you might understand what i am saying

  • @eunoway

    What makes you think I'd wanna be French?? lol! Facts are I'd not wanna be part of the French Empire anymore than be part of the British Empire. Am I a Francophobe now? lol@

  • @suryavajra you came on here having a go at the former british empire...i stated that those countries turned out ok !! unlike french colonies........so go and have a go at the french not us........

  • @eunoway

    Well I see no Frenchman defending the French Empire. Rather if anything they ignore that part of their history. They must have the kinda common sense that y'all lack??

  • @suryavajra right thats it i give up............whats more i aint ever going to buy another curry in my life !!! you av given me a right headache....i am off to watch a dvd ..and it will be one, on how to get rid of stress..............go get him trouserpants....((.cry god for harry england and saint george ))

  • @eunoway

    You can do whatever you want. We live in free countries and this is a free internet. Unlike you, I support your right to walk away and do whatever YOU WANT so long as it doesn't hurt or harm anyone else.

  • @eunoway

    Easy meat, mate.

    I possess exceptional sagacity, intellect, intelligence and perspicacity. I am a world traveller.

    BTW - Vindaloo is an English dish!!