I remember seeing this trailer back in 2001 on the tv guide channel along with the dracula trailer, but both trailers don't show the whole thing, just shows half of it.
who would flag this vidoe theres nothing offensive in it its just a classic 30s horror trailer...really are you serious?......try to share it on fb and sumone flagged it im like wtf...
"the awfull, creeping, crawling terror"... come on, I´ve seen this film, it´s a bit silly, but it´s a classic, it´s brilliant and Boris Karloff is one of the most amazing film monsters I´ve ever seen!!!
has anyone ever noticed that first in 1932:The Mummy then in 1933 King Kong two great classics now I wouldn't say they new version sucks cause it doesn't.I enjoy the acting and the chemistry between all the actors is pretty good. However you can't go wrong with this version it's the classic and without this one we wouldn't have had the 1959 remake or 1999 remake. I haven't seen this version but it looks great to me! Does anyone know where I can get this version?
Geez. That giddy music in the middle of the trailer sure took away any possible suspense. It's hard to be frightened by a trailer that doesn't put any effort into it.
i saw this for the first time a few weeks ago i cant believe i didnt see it sooner,im sure not as scary as it once was to people back then but it hasnt lost if spookyness altogether,totaly awesome film still
lol first of all im not a little kid and secondly i HATE Saw... i just like modern technology...
leave it up to a bunch of low life fucking dipshits to make such a big deal out of a fucking MOVIE,, get a life kiddo and sorry but i dont have time for your pathetic temper tantrums so go fuck yourself and buhbye! :)
Anybody that puts this movie down is an idiot, plain and simple. Jack Pierce's mummy makeup has NEVER been topped. The direction of Karl Freund, the acting of Boris Karloff, and the haunting atmosphere is superb. This is true horror. A sense of dread fills every frame of film, and even when nothing is happening, there is an uneasy tension. Leave it to a bunch of diaper wearing morons raised on "Saw" films to think a masterpiece like this sucks.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
classics are full of bad make-up, no special effects and bad camera quality, colour and acting. why would u watch them when you could see much better, NEWER films
-why would u watch them when you could see much better, NEWER films-
Would you tear up the Mona Lisa? Or destroy Michaelangelo's 'Moses'? Would you burn Mozart's music or throw a Shakespearean sonnet in the garbage? If you answered yes to any of these questions, you don't even deserve these 'newer' films you talk about. One day they'll be old, and so will you, and all you've done is desperately try to keep up with the trends of the day. Your kind of people literally make me sick, really.
NO, becuase they dont need to look good. Anyway, i'm just a 15 year old kid who is used to new films with realistic effects and i'm just stating my opinion. can i relly be blamed for that? i didnt intend to cause offence or anger with that comment, okay? And i dont intend to get old. i'd rather be dead before i get to 75
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
not to offend anyone but i just dont understand why everone's so obsessed with "classics" i mean SURE they ARE interesting to watch but i think newer movies are WAY better.
the one that came out in 1999 may not be the original but i think its still the best version cuz its more realistic, has better actors, has a better plot and is more scary. plus the mummy doesnt walk really slow and isnt covered with stupid bandages. so im sorry but i just find newer movies to be WAY more interesting.
whoa,, lets not be a drama queen... its JUST a movie... but if u really feel so passionate about the subject then im sorry to have offended you. However u wont get anywhere in life by threatening ppl who are simply stating their opinnion
it really starts at 1:12 to 1:45.
RoyceTyler345 1 month ago
I remember seeing this trailer back in 2001 on the tv guide channel along with the dracula trailer, but both trailers don't show the whole thing, just shows half of it.
RoyceTyler345 1 month ago
I love Boris Karloff, he is best portrayal actor for the monster! And this movie is much much better than 1999 movie.
vikingscool 2 months ago 3
Mindenkit szeretettel várok Lugosi Béci bá és a horror klasszikusok honlapján: a lugosibela.gportal.hu oldalon.
fnugnu 4 months ago
who would flag this vidoe theres nothing offensive in it its just a classic 30s horror trailer...really are you serious?......try to share it on fb and sumone flagged it im like wtf...
81silversiren 4 months ago
He is the nameless horror. His name and existence was eradicated. Scratched off his tomb and coffin.
Im Ho Tep his name is only discovered later.
volksmariner 5 months ago 2
what's the name of the music in 0:33 ???
pprfilms 9 months ago
@pprfilms I believe it's from Swan Lake...the finale in act IV probably.
miep8675 8 months ago
@pprfilms Swan Lake
Timehn36k9voc 3 months ago
what's the name of the music in 0:33 ???
pprfilms 9 months ago
Horror novel see video book trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
boris karlof owns every horor movie he stared in
slaughtermaster666 11 months ago 2
boris karloff is the best actor on earth
hampsterbrick 1 year ago 2
"the awfull, creeping, crawling terror"... come on, I´ve seen this film, it´s a bit silly, but it´s a classic, it´s brilliant and Boris Karloff is one of the most amazing film monsters I´ve ever seen!!!
blackdahlia1879 1 year ago 2
trollolol
chocotricks 1 year ago
I still like the Hammer version. But this one's a nice joy to the eyes.
a45027 1 year ago
Hold on! Wasn't "The Invisible Man" released in 1933 and this movie is 1932? Nothing makes sense, unless one of these guys saw the future, lol!
a45027 1 year ago 2
There's nothing on Earth like...THE MUMMY 0:56
Deader87 1 year ago
1:22 - 1:45
fittig music xD
EMIN3M97 1 year ago
0:16 -0:21 was in the Bones. Season 5 episode 5 Night at the Bones Museum. :D i love that episode.
ThePinkSneakersss 1 year ago
archive(dot)org/details/PhantasmagoriaTheater-TheMummy1932352-3 For the free movie
slg1131 1 year ago
this movie original is much more better!!!
EgyNefer 1 year ago
has anyone ever noticed that first in 1932:The Mummy then in 1933 King Kong two great classics now I wouldn't say they new version sucks cause it doesn't.I enjoy the acting and the chemistry between all the actors is pretty good. However you can't go wrong with this version it's the classic and without this one we wouldn't have had the 1959 remake or 1999 remake. I haven't seen this version but it looks great to me! Does anyone know where I can get this version?
rachelweiszfan9 1 year ago
the woman at 1:00 looks like drew barrymore
12DeleteYourself 1 year ago
good movie i still need to see the hammer version
LaffinPumpkin 1 year ago
Geez. That giddy music in the middle of the trailer sure took away any possible suspense. It's hard to be frightened by a trailer that doesn't put any effort into it.
Meskenit 1 year ago
not exactly magnificent but i accept that it has its moments - still not one i'd watch all of, though. no offence intended
SingularNinjular 1 year ago
i like the music at 0:30
LaffinPumpkin 1 year ago
@LaffinPumpkin
It´s similar to "The swan lake"
ramjet81 1 year ago
i so wana see this movie.... i stil havn't :(
LaffinPumpkin 1 year ago
Decent film in its day, i'm sure, but its outclassed in many ways by modern films. Okay story though.
SingularNinjular 2 years ago
I remember seeing this as a kid; it gave me the spooks all night.
meenakhan22 2 years ago
i saw this for the first time a few weeks ago i cant believe i didnt see it sooner,im sure not as scary as it once was to people back then but it hasnt lost if spookyness altogether,totaly awesome film still
hamhide 2 years ago
The 1999 Mummy was a grate FX movie. Karloff was the master of fright.
danielmkubacki 2 years ago
The nameless horror...???
Thought his name was Im-Ho-Tep..
tubecontec 2 years ago 20
Isn't the diffrence between a mummy and a zombie is the mummy has some kind of powers or some shit?
Sirduckly 2 years ago 3
can someone please upload this movie?
ShakespeareHamlet 2 years ago
please refer to enyawd1977's message you little fucking kid. not liking the classics? fucking shame on you.
SchutMeNow 2 years ago
lol first of all im not a little kid and secondly i HATE Saw... i just like modern technology...
leave it up to a bunch of low life fucking dipshits to make such a big deal out of a fucking MOVIE,, get a life kiddo and sorry but i dont have time for your pathetic temper tantrums so go fuck yourself and buhbye! :)
heheCRAZYhehe 2 years ago
THANK YOU heheCRAZYhehe that dumbass
SchutMeNow was getting on my nerves!
bellafalcon112 2 years ago
lol, no problem :) haha wut a drama queen huh?
heheCRAZYhehe 2 years ago
yes(:
bellafalcon112 2 years ago
Anybody that puts this movie down is an idiot, plain and simple. Jack Pierce's mummy makeup has NEVER been topped. The direction of Karl Freund, the acting of Boris Karloff, and the haunting atmosphere is superb. This is true horror. A sense of dread fills every frame of film, and even when nothing is happening, there is an uneasy tension. Leave it to a bunch of diaper wearing morons raised on "Saw" films to think a masterpiece like this sucks.
enyawd1977 2 years ago
Well said. Espically for such a old movie. I bet back in the day people who first saw this were shitting their pants.
Sirduckly 2 years ago 2
i forgot to sub thanx for accepting my vid resonse
PropellerBeanie 2 years ago
and why couldn't the just run away from the mummy?
scotty2460 2 years ago
i'm not narrow minded, i'm just a kid who's used to modern films, okay?
scotty2460 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
classics are full of bad make-up, no special effects and bad camera quality, colour and acting. why would u watch them when you could see much better, NEWER films
jakedocker 2 years ago
That's one of the most ignorant comments I have ever seen. You are closing yourself off from a rich heritage with that kind of narrow attitude.
rohmer50 2 years ago
Most horror films from this decade suck
McStiffwiener 2 years ago 2
-why would u watch them when you could see much better, NEWER films-
Would you tear up the Mona Lisa? Or destroy Michaelangelo's 'Moses'? Would you burn Mozart's music or throw a Shakespearean sonnet in the garbage? If you answered yes to any of these questions, you don't even deserve these 'newer' films you talk about. One day they'll be old, and so will you, and all you've done is desperately try to keep up with the trends of the day. Your kind of people literally make me sick, really.
TenderTrap86 2 years ago
NO, becuase they dont need to look good. Anyway, i'm just a 15 year old kid who is used to new films with realistic effects and i'm just stating my opinion. can i relly be blamed for that? i didnt intend to cause offence or anger with that comment, okay? And i dont intend to get old. i'd rather be dead before i get to 75
SingularNinjular 2 years ago
Comment removed
SingularNinjular 2 years ago
@TenderTrap86 Nostalgia est a fossor delusion, remember that.
SingularNinjular 11 months ago
Whoa 1932 i wasn't born by that time.
bendeplata 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not to offend anyone but i just dont understand why everone's so obsessed with "classics" i mean SURE they ARE interesting to watch but i think newer movies are WAY better.
the one that came out in 1999 may not be the original but i think its still the best version cuz its more realistic, has better actors, has a better plot and is more scary. plus the mummy doesnt walk really slow and isnt covered with stupid bandages. so im sorry but i just find newer movies to be WAY more interesting.
heheCRAZYhehe 2 years ago
ur a fucking idiot and u deserve to die
SchutMeNow 2 years ago
whoa,, lets not be a drama queen... its JUST a movie... but if u really feel so passionate about the subject then im sorry to have offended you. However u wont get anywhere in life by threatening ppl who are simply stating their opinnion
heheCRAZYhehe 2 years ago 11
wow way to freak out... lmao now go jerk off in front of the mirror faggot, anger management much??? xD
janeetihw 2 years ago
He clearly stated that he meant no offence so why dont you calm the **** down and not piss us all off?
SingularNinjular 1 year ago
well... i like your thinking even if nobody else does.
SingularNinjular 1 year ago
thnx(: at first i thought u were gonna be another person yelling at me, lol
heheCRAZYhehe 1 year ago
MAN I SAW THIS MOVIE . I AM 5d3vq AND NOW I REALLY THINK THE NEW MOVIE IS BULLSHIT.
HARQUANTUM 2 years ago
the movie poster of this mummy is on kirk hammetts guitar. its awesome
forsoabba 2 years ago
thats a classic i dont know that last year
ivancastillo08 2 years ago
this is classic.
Revenge1986 3 years ago
Zita Johann makes me stiffer than bitumen would.
ysbaddaden2003 3 years ago
Mineral Miracle Supplement is more terrible than THE MUMMY!!!
xltrt 3 years ago
see,i know that a film story like the mummy was too exciting for a time like 1932.but it still cant be said that new movie is bullshit.
5d3vq 3 years ago
This is the greatest Mummy film of all time.
The 1999 remake version is dog shit comparing to this great film.
DrStrangelove646 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck you asshole go like a dorky shit out of your nosie you dumb dick head fuck you
spartan1102 3 years ago
spaetan1102 are you Brendan Fraser or something?
McStiffwiener 2 years ago
0:55 lol
0xshotgunx0 3 years ago
0:55 lol
0xshotgunx0 3 years ago
Legendary actor (Karloff) in a legendary movie. Magnificence.
brnleague99 4 years ago 3