Added: 2 years ago
From: Neurolanis
Views: 16,878
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (173)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Gee no compassion, no intel, and can't be reasoned with... hhmmmm, sounds like a muslim to me. Kill them before they kill us.

  • @BROskavichSKI I understand your side as well. I can respect your feelings on the matter, and they do make sense. Soldiers are people like you and me, agreed. Many fight because they believe they are doing good. But I hope at some point the people can gain and clearer understanding of the pointlessness of war. Peace.

  • @BROskavichSKI Good points, but I do not trust the governments behind this technology. The military industrial complex (as President Eisenhower warned) makes huge profits by funding both sides of a conflict. And lot of wars are also war grabs, completely immoral. The Invasion of Iraq was insane, no matter how you look at it. The current war in Libya is not what it appears either. Men, women, children and clergymen have been killed (and targeted.) I have vids on my channel which show this.

  • @Neurolanis

    Not familiar with the term 'war grab' explain?

  • @BROskavichSKI A. I know it's confusing, but I was partially talking about where killbots are *heading* (AI control.) I apologize for any confusion here.

    B. The "fucking guy at a computer" is indeed a controller for a killbot at present. They say it's like playing a video game. They sit in a cubicle and control a robot by computer in another country. It's a very impersonal way to attack people.

    C. The military is always claiming that their equipment is malfunctioning. Killbots as well.

  • my last comment i was saying to calex 64

  • I think the develepment of these "killbots" is amazing. It brings down the rate of death by a hell of alot and i think that we wil be abled to decrease the hacking of their computers one day like special shapes and painting of modern militairy fighter jets can deflect radar. People like you are the ones the douted humans could fly look at us now some people fly to work. I dont think you yourself did enough research. I put a thumbs down to this video.

  • I think the develepment of these "killbots" is amazing. It brings down the rate of death by a hell of alot and i think that we wil be abled to decrease the hacking of their computers one day like special shapes and painting of modern militairy fighter jets can deflect radar. People like you are the ones the douted humans could fly look at us now some people fly to work. I dony think you yourself did enough research. I put a thumbs down to this video.

  • I think the develepment of these "killbots" is amazing. It brings down the rate of death by a hell of alot and i think that we wil be abled to decrease the hacking of their computers one day like special shapes and paing of modern militairy fighter jets can deflect radar. People like you are the ones the douted humans could fly look at us now some people fly to work. I dony think you yourself did enough research. I put a thumbs down to this video.

  • Warriors and soldiers since the beginning of time have raped, killed, and burned innocent people and homes and raped them again for good measure. Where's the compassion there? Having these would be helpful because at least robots can't rape anymore, unless of course they get hacked like you said and turn their built-in robo-penises onto their fellow soldiers.

  • @JjangMigukin You need to take a look at who creates wars and why. I guess that I assumed that people would understand this when I made this video, and apparently many don't.

  • Hey weirdo, I am actually building theese and you would make a good target practise :D

  • i completly agree with you in every way shape or form

  • @Neurolanis oook really how can an rc millitary robot be political i thought they where made for millitary not for debating laws or running for public office really idc about political crap just robots the only political thing i care about is prolife stuff and also the tests we gotta take for govermet funding really idc sorry for bugging you on a matter idc about

  • hey moron this is for the best the more robosoilders we have the less lives will be lost plus there rc you fucktard a human in the millitary controls them not some retard like you

  • @99superbot Research: military industrial complex. Take a look around. Study politics. You have an awful lot to learn.

  • It's the end of the world as we know it.

  • Who believes that soldiers have compaction?

    Don't mess with the army : D

  • I take it you didnt read the "REMOTE CONTROLLED" bit then, besides im sure that the people programming these bots are going to give them something to determin what is and what is not a threat and if we go back to afghanistan im sure there are plenty of finatic children and grannies ready to give their lives to take out one of our soldiers.

  • @AdmiralMigg Are you talking to me? I know all about the remotes. I was talking about AI being developed (I explained that in a vid attached to this one.) One side fights the other, on and on until someone steps in with the intention of peace. Otherwise Northern Ireland would still be at war.

  • @AdmiralMigg

    I'm sure he realizes these robots are remote controlled (there was a blip @ 2:32 )

    The best way to prevent that from happening ..is to never go there or occupy that area to begin with (I'm sure you know this haha). A lot of people realize this (and sadly, a lot do not). America needs to keep to itself ...its meddling in the world most probably fueled the hate that led to 9/11. I personally think its too late though, just because its been going on for too long...

  • I think you need to relook at this pal the robots at the moment are remote controlled by the soldiers on the ground, their purpose is to go into situations that are of high risk for humans I believe we already have something else like that...hmmm let me think oh yeah....POLICE Dogs, etc. If I was a relative of a soldier I'd much rather that a tin can got blown to pieces looking through an insurgents home than my relative .

  • @AdmiralMigg Things are progressing very quickly. Check out links to learn more.

  • @AdmiralMigg They are remote controlled because of lack of AI not for "remote compassion". Just try to get actual information on the state of the art. In the future congresses and parliaments must not be involved in decisions concerning wars because no soldier will be involved in the fight. This lowers the threshold of attacks significantly. The goal of the military is OF COURSE the fully autonomous, fighting machine. What else?

  • *rofl* are you for real?! ;)

  • Hm?????????????? UFO's????

  • I use the Talon. There is NO artificial intelligence in these tools. Guess what, there's no SkyNet either!

  • wonderful, I'm sure the government is going to devote an entire intelligence devision to watch people sit on their couches all day. In order to moniter all it's citizens 24/7, a nation would need pretty much half it's population devoted to survalance.

  • You are seriously denying the intelligence of human, as humans we are the greatest at destruction and adaptation. You are only looking at this whole situation from one side. You HAVE to look at it in another way. You are only talking about the negatives and not noticing the positives. This reasoning that robots will attack or turn on humans is a Hollywood theme. It has no Merit other than a Theory. In this world, robots have NEVER turned on humans, unless acted on by another human.

  • @halflife103 You are right and wrong, but you are also only looking at it through narrow eyes. If one 5 people die to save 300, then that is a sacrifice. It must be done. Look at it from both Defensive, Offensive, Pro's and Cons instead of just Cons and Offensive.

  • morality? there is no such thing.I can take the most moral person in the world and in three days without food they will eat there own mother!

  • @CONSTRINGACY Bull. I'm an exception to that theory of yours. I would die painfully rather than harm another.

  • @Neurolanis Ha Ha Ha Mate there are no exception to the rule.When your brain breaks down due to lack of nutrience you are not you anymore.There is case after historical case were people turn on each other when they have not eaten in a few weeks.The parts of the brain that deal with persona simply dissolve and the ancient core of the brain takes over to allow the body to survive!There are two things that happen some people lay down and die the others with stronger instincts Kill!

  • @CONSTRINGACY There is an exception to every rule. You have no idea how I can resist things. If it ever came down to harming another person (in theory I couldn't stop myself) I'd killmyself first. This is a moral of mine (death before dishonor (gentleman's code.) I am an animal on one level but a spiritual being on another, and an intellectual on yet another. There are diffferent drives behind me.

    What are you trying so say anyway, that we should just enjoy killing each other?

  • @Neurolanis Im saying your morals are a lie.Formulated to keep the flock in line.As is evident in modern life.On top of that you saying that you never kill anyone WTF have you ever voted? Votes kill worse than bullets.With wars, trade embargoes weapon sales government overthrows.Then you go on to say that you follow the gentlemans code? Well honor has nothing to do with killing others.Many real men of honor duel to the death.If you were a man of honor you would kill for the ones you love!

  • @CONSTRINGACY hahahaha. You're FULL of it.

  • @Neurolanis Am I? Look into every thing i said.I think your just having a technological knee jerk reaction to some great technology! And personally i think your full of it! Your telling me you would just lay down and die if someone tried to kill you or your family?Your telling me you would just lay down and die rather than protect your country your race?Then your just a drone that is no better than a robot.Its kill or be killed, nature makes that very clear.Might Is Right! Deal with it!

  • @CONSTRINGACY You'd aught to pay more attention to the person you're criticizing. If you had seen more of my videos you'd understand that I am far from a blind supporter of the system, and cetainly not a fan of the military industrial complex. There are people who hold to morals though, even in the system. Policemen and even lawyers I've known who are moral-based. You seem to be arguing that morals are lies. Why complain then about corruption in the system if you do not believe in morality?

  • @Neurolanis Nice way to avoid answering basic questions!By asking another question! How droll.Good day sir!

  • @CONSTRINGACY Avoiding what questions? Of course I would protect people in self-defence, etc. It's all within reason, or what feels right or natural.

  • @Neurolanis My point exactly.If you feel it you will do it!Your a killer It just takes the right trigger.Lets say a few days without food or water and no prospect of future food or water!A hungry human has no compassion or morals!Robots are the least of our issues!

  • @CONSTRINGACY A hungry man may have compassion and morals. Here is where we disagree it seems. It depends on a person and what drives them. For glory or expression, and artist will push himself nearly to insanity or even death (as arguably Mozart did.) People will go into war to risk death or torture to fight for a cause they believe in. Some spies are trained to handle torture without giving up information. William Wallace refused to admit he was a "traitor" and thus excepted death by torture.

  • @CONSTRINGACY it is a good theory dude.... however there are some people who's morals overpower stuff like that. Humans can have amazing will's and resilliance. Only the weak break down, i would rather starve to death around another person that die alone.

  • You're such a Canadian. Get educated dip shit.

  • Nobody should feel comfort from these things regardless of hacking or not because they are being built for us, to hunt us. There will be a round up of american citizens and these robots will be used to help assist the military.

  • The Machine/robot can NOT, ever, be smarter than its Creator

    they only do what u "tell" them to do...so, it matters who commands them.

  • @oxiredo One day an AI program may disagree with you lol.

  • this only gets me 1 thought ... AMERICAN EMPIRE

  • with that much noise i think it can only spy on deaf people.

  • Why are you wearing a Star Trek shirt?

  • Down with paranoid luddites!

  • @Neurolanis

    I think you are a bit alarmist, there is a positive side to robotics as well. Think of the guy that lost his arm in a car accident.

  • No! there are not enough killer robots yet!

    They are remotely controlled by people! They dont have AI brains.

    The brain controlling it is a human one behind a screen.

    Stop watching so many Sci-Fi movies.

  • No! there are not enough killer robots yet!

    You twat!

    They are remotely controlled by people!

  • relax computers arent smart... they only do what they told.... terminator is impossible for now... well u get old and die first before is possibly going to happen LOL oh and the hacking thing.... if theyre using theyre own networking technology, then its harder for enemy to hack it.. unless they have a spy to get those codes thingy.... hey i see your point but look at theyre pros cuz it saves soldiers life too you know.... specially for scouting...

  • it is not artifical yet, these robots are all controled by soldiers.

  • Comment removed

  • The robots being used in wars have no compassion and mercy because they have no intelligence. They are weapons being controlled by humans just like every other weapon.

  • Omg! A flying gun! xD What comes then, a flying tank?!

  • "OMG robots have no souls, no fucking compassion..."

    lol, I bet during the medieval time people probably said the same thing about gun.

    "OMG, guns are for pussy with no honor and compassion...swords shiny more HONOR!!!"

    its call get with the time! while you here drowning yourself in negative fantasy about robots. Think of how war will be in the near future...we won't have to shed human blood over war anymore everything shall be fought with machine...

    Go watch more Terminator and jizz

  • @akira357 I'm not sure how old you are so I'll go easy on you, but what you are saying is fantasy. War involves striking a country where they're the weakest--their hospitals and community centres. Of course these are always 'misfiress' but they always happen. War is not about two groups of soldiers meeting, it's the art of deception. Learn *history* and get back to me.

  • @Neurolanis Where the hell you get the idea of attack hospital???

    War involve politic, involve alliance and nations. If you go to war with other countries and think that it'll be a good idea to kill civilians you LOST the damn war already.

    Like the war in Iraq atm. Why do you think the govern always try to come up with morally good reason to fight in war? becuz they don't want to look like the bad guys. If you're invading other nations with no good reason every1 will turn against you.

  • @akira357 Read HISTORY please. Soldiers do not form in two groups and then fight, the winner wins the war. NO. War is the art of deception: you try to force your enemy to surrender by taking him off guard, striking him where he's the weakest. NEVER will a war be decided by two groups of robots fighting each other! If we were that civilized then conflicts would be decided by our leaders playing chess. Please read history and get back to me.

  • @Neurolanis READ reality! why did you completely ignored what I said?

    You can't kill civilians nowadays! don't you get it? if war was really all about forcing the enemy to surrender than who fucking need robots? just nuke the shit out of Iraq city...nuke the shit out of everything becuz...hell nothing is invulnerable to nuclear bombs right? But we didn't, becuz thats make us the bad guy! that'll instantly make half the world your enemy....which is bad!

  • @akira357 I am well aware of them wanting to make wars look good. Hardly any of them are really justified, and there are always things covered up. War is a huge industry, and so there is a lot of political pressure for war. Corporate interests often speak louder than public interests, if you haven't noticed. These killbots are just deadlier, neato toys for the military industrial complex to play with. Not a good thing. That should be obvious. That's all I'm trying to say. Peace.

  • We must stop spending money bilding these Robots.....with a nuke it will be less spendfull.....Better,way dont ya think soo??

    When will people open theyr eyes and see that the only ones winning with these wars,are the griddy Bancksters.....Enemys? from Who? OH I see..Some greedy fammilys want to put theyr hands on theyr oil,thats why

    Afgan,iraki people never did anything bad for me,so why do I have to Kill them?

    Stop being feed by propaganda and open your eyes

  • Fake and gay

  • You gay

  • Well, good luck with that anti killbot campaign, let us know how that goes will ya? Your all upset about killbots, where do you stand on thermo nuclear intercontinental missiles? I grew up thinking we would be vaporized without warning and low and behold, we made it. If we don't develop this stuff, we can't defend against it and the bad guys are developing it. Stop hiding behind morality, get with the program maggot!

  • Maggot huh? Very intelligent people use that word I've noticed (like "moron" and "dumbass". Those words show so much character, they never cease to impress me.

    Psychotic, power-hungry scum are in control as always. These are just their latest and most innovative tools. If you actually think that's a good thing I wonder what you’d think is a bad idea.

  • you have a point but I can't a country how would rather sacrefice men instead of robots

  • Dude, when the aliens come to take over the world, we must have these kind of weapons to bloody defend ourselves !!!!

    Back to real life. I am an engineer and there are more advanced robotics than the once you showed. As a Control engineer I can tell you that seeing these technologies evolving into something so useful is such a feet. This is the same story as when Black Powder was developed, people where like, Shit, this machine can kill 2 at a time without even coming close to the enemy!!

  • People, Dont let the Government Disarm you, Once they Disarm they Exterminate. Give the US back to the People, not the greedy dick head officials. We need grass root people

  • Is that a Star Trek shirt you're wearing?

  • I agree!

    Why give our troops something that can help keep them safe?

    I mean, for instance, we don't need a robot that can go into a highly dangerous building, therefore putting the soldier out of harms' way. After all, we have enough soldiers, so if 4 or 5 get killed because they had to take place of that killbot, hey! At least we have more people to replace those fallen soldiers and it's not like those soldiers have families or anything.

  • ur such a dumbass this robots are clearly controlled by the military they just minimized the reach of their controls in the robots. but i'm pretty sure they control the weaponry so no innocent people will get harm. plus don't look into the negative side that much. think of what it can do and help for the millitary

  • HAY! You saw the Terminator too! I loved that SI-FI MOVE!

  • you're way behind dude. thats old technology.

  • I am all for Military Robots if it means to new tech processes and factories that can also use that same technology for household and utilitarian bots.

  • its calles an off switch dumbass

  • u fukking hippiedeal with the real world ):D

  • oh cool you saw the matrix. how insightful.

  • in future wars the country who has most robots wins

  • @racking1112 Unless one of them have the nuke.

  • Only an idiot will create a robot with AI that doesn't follow what it's programmed to, and go crazy and kill people. Meaning it's almost certain there won't be such thing, because you have to be a genius to make a robot with AI that it can think on it's own. And if you are a genius, you would program it to never disobey orders.

  • if you *were* to make these robots able to tell a human from, say, a leaf blowing in the wind (which is not easy seeing not every soldier moves the same way and to a robot walking is just as much movement as floating),

    then evading the robot would be as easy as removing whatever makes you, the enemy, different from them, the users, and from a leaf. EG. if the 'killbot' is programmed to kill things in enemy uniform...take your shirt off. This is one of MANY problems with the AI you describe

  • @brandd94

    That's easily solved. Friendly personnel would carry an electronic tag or microchip to identify them.

  • I'm for these robots, we can send them into extremely dangerous places without risking the lives of our soldiers.

  • stoned?

  • the kill bot at 5:23 that u refer to is a bomb defusing robot smart guy its saving lives stop talking shit about which u have not done research about, love how u showed a bunch with guns and then said they are using them in iraq and show that.... just wow once again

  • you're a dumb bugger, most of these are remote controlled. What he meant about not feelig is that if the enemy shoots back it doesn't hurt soldiers.

  • My issue isn't with remotes, it's with killbots who operate without remote. It'll be the next thing to turn out (getting rid of remotes would mean less hassle and less expense.)

  • @Neurolanis wow u are stupid if u think that getting rid of remotes is less hassle and expensive, do u have any idea how hard it would be to make an AI that would be capable of doing what u are suggesting.... not even worth explaining further... just wow

  • @Neurolanis

    If I understand you correctly, you're scared of the traditional sci-fi idea that robots will be programmed with a sufficient AI to make the wrong decision, or possibly become uncooperative.

    The thing is, these robots are all remote controlled. Scrapping remotes would not "mean less hassle and less expense"; on the contrary, creating an AI that functions up to military standards is extremely difficult and expensive. The military wouldn't risk a possible threat to friendly soldiers.

  • So you are saying that better a human go through the doorway to clear a room than a robot? "Sorry Mrs. Smith, your son died because someone would not allow us to use technology to minimise the high risk of close range infantry combat".

    I think you have not thought this through properly.

    And if you think the USA is the only country advancing remote control and semi-autonomous weapons, think again. Israel, Russia, China, UK, France... etc. etc.

  • What a load of BULL. When has anything mechanical EVER worked properly? Some people just think killer robots would be cool, but this is not a movie.

  • Sure, they will be like any other weapon... they work sort of... so? Assault rifles jam. Aircraft crash. Artillery has breach prematures. That does not stop armies using them. These fancy things will be no different.

    But if you are being told to go clear a room which might have an IED or just a guy with a Kalashnikov covering the door, I know I'd rather send a tin-can with a gun in first to take a look *before* I stick my head in. These things are just weapons, not evil spirits.

  • The links I provided in this video (and in the video reply) prove how they are striving towards true AI. AI already exists for course, just not yet to the standard that is desired. Look how tazers have been overused by cops (although this may be the result of a lack of proper training.) Robots could be used for practical reasons, I agree, but it is the armed ones that I am concerned with.

  • @Neurolanis Lol, really... That's your argument? It's not about if they're "cool" or not, it's about preventing needless deaths.

  • @Neurolanis yes, and a virus can f-ck up a robot and unleash it on us

    and i believe arnold schwarzenegger is too busy atm being governor to save our asses

  • I remember the first film came out in the 1980s as part of star wars defense propaganda.

  • no, the MKV is fairly new at least the one tested

  • the first one anyway

  • soo fake

  • Not fake.

  • I don't know if everyone realizes this or not but these "robots" aren't like R2D2 or C3PO. These "robots" are remote controlled by human operators.

    Robots have no compassion? Humvee have no compassion. M16s have no compassion.

    Don't panic until the robots become autonomous.

  • This guy should see the movie Hardware or Mark 13.

  • you cannot blame the robots for our action, we command them... its us that make war! its up to us as humans to stop war..

  • Robotics is growing 10x faster than humans, technology has made a massive leap since the 90s. this being said, we are not in any danger yet. you say these robots dont have compassion or judgment. if they did then we need to stop. giving a robot choice, is were problems can happen. robots at the moment are very dependent on us. power,

    programming, mechanical problems, etc.

    im all for AI, but its only once you give it a weapon it becomes dangerous.

    robots also save lives.

    regards,

    A ROBOT BUILDER!

  • My comments were not directed at robots in general, they were directed at killbots. I explained about robotcs and the development of AI only to explain the progress of this technology. But I seem to be the only one concerned anyway, everyone else thinks that killbots are "cool" and will make war more 'neat and tidy' (they obviously haven't read history; war is the art of deception and is always unpredictable.)

  • This is something the human race must do something about. i mean its a time question beffor Terminators will think and creat for them selfs. i mean the human race is a creating race and i think somewhere in time line they will make the mistake to creat a robot that will think and start creat for him self and cause mass destruktion on earth :S thats my thinking in this opinion .... (Sorry for my bad english speling :P )

  • the human race is very wise as a whole there are many very intelligent people. the people calling the shoots aren't intelligent though.

  • To be completely honest if it come right down to it, just like if there was a "nuke attack" i would do my best to find "ground zero" and be first in line because from what I understand, the other side of the veil is a whole lot nicer place than struggling to survive in the "aftermath".

  • this is not good they wil probably do something like 9/11 ''oh someone has hacked into our robots and made them evil. give us your tax dollars to have better protection against these things.''

  • Thank you so much for the post!!!

    Keep it up!!

  • Dont worrie i shall build you a taser robot killer like mind and this taser energy can melt all the all that are electronics? just a theory.......?

  • I agree with the use of robots on the battle field, but on in close support of real troops.

  • They're all remote control as far as firing orders go, though they are allowed to move around by themselves. It'll be a long time before robots are allowed to autonomously decide whether or not to engage, and that's contingent on *high end* AI (that CAN tell between a friend and a foe, which is quite doable but not reliable) becoming practical and the people in charge trusting the bots to make the right decision.

  • I seriously doubt that it will be a long time. Also, what do you think a killbot will do if he is sent after two supposed 'terrorists' running into a residential zone (or while in one?) Hmmm?

  • You seem to think the people running the killbots wont have thought of this...

  • They'd be as aware as the men who command them. Killbots would empower any military authority; imagine how much easier it would be, instead of leading your men into combat, to simply turn to an army of weapons and tell them to go and fight.

  • This is why, ideally, these will become cheap and available to many militaries. That way if one nation does as you describe and sends a pile of bots in, the other guys can counter with bots also. Long term it just removes humans from the equation.  If you try to stop any particular group developing or using these then all that happens is that some have them and some don't (can't stop them all), and we end up with the nightmare scenarios you envision. Better to get them as common as possible.

  • Are you nuts? Some people really don't understand how war works. War is the art of deception! Military forces don't just meet in a safe place out in a field somewhere--and killbots wouldn't either--and kill each other safely away from the innocent. Doesn't happen. It will be a MESS.

  • You didn't understand my point. I never suggested that. In any case I don't agree :)

  • they already have insect size robots... Did you know the goverment is 50+ years ahead of us?

  • Lol this guy is looney. He says robots have no compassion. Its pretty fucking obvious considering the robots are remote controlled and so have no sentient thought. If everyone used killbots you wouldn't be bitching because only robots would kill robots and technically they are not even killing. Those Kill-bots are made so that they do not waste the life of a soldier that could otherwise be killed by an IED or ambushed by crazy Jihadists or some other danger.

  • This guys a fuckin nut, yeah, innocent fucking people die every day, but regular human beings do it, they get messed up so bad because of it, i would rather have a robot do horrible shit than a human. People are already being slaughtered horribly, a robot is not going to introduce cruelty into humanity, humanity is already cruel.

  • The first one is not a "killbot". It is part of a missile defense system - designed to destroy enemy missiles and *save* lives.

  • Okie-dokie.

  • Isn't cool how all we do is make shitastic mahines to kill, when we weren't fighting we went to the moon fuck war.

  • Yeah, I agree.

  • LoL, yes, alarmist, groundless panic.

    And regarding BigDog which I've been creaming over for awhile now. It is on remote control 'as such' you give it input and it heads to that destination, automatically adjusting its balance and route as it goes.

    You are right, that it is artificial intelligence of a kind, but its about as scary and unnerving as a wheel. BigDog is not even as intelligent as an ants basic motor function, ...

  • I am not trying to scare people, I am trying to let them know about something that they should be concerned about. Everything that I have said has been supoorted by PROOF. If you are not interested in facts, then maybe you should involve yourself with fiction instead.

  • Jeez, dude, it's someone with a fucking remote control. There is no fucking AI, you dumbass. The closest we have to AI is laser tripwires or body heat triggers.

    And laser cannons? What the fuck bong have you been smoking from?

  • AI is heavily in development, as you should see just by watching the links I posted. These robots move (like Big Dog) on their own without any remote control (i.e., their legs move automatically to adjust to the environment.) This is proof of a degree of AI at work.

    As for the laser canons, I saw that on Canadian national television. lol. Between the mainstream reporting and vivid images they showed, military figures they interviewed, I seriously doubt that was a hoax! lol.

  • Look up an article on wired called 'Army Moves Ahead With Mobile Laser Cannon'

  • jesus ch... dude its PROGRAMMING. Like video game characters responding to your attacks, it's automatic calculation and adjustment of variables. And yes, these things ARE ON REMOTE CONTROL.

  • Your an actual retard. Its amazing how, stupid this is.

    These 'Robots' are little more then romote control cars with guns attached to the top of them.

    UAVs of the ground as such. Reallly, .... your worse then fox news for scare mongering, without any real facts. Great.

  • Why don't you take a look at the *facts* before saying it's nothing to be concerned about? Only one of my dozen links was from Fox anyway; others include MSNBC, Popular Science, How Stuff Works and Wired.

  • He didn't say you were using only fox news sources, he said your alarmist, groundless panic is worse than fox's. Which it is.

    What are you, afraid of the matrix or some shit?

  • 1. the name "killbot" makes one nervous

    2. That guy said it is a good replacement for soldiers

    3. Civilian technology is said to be 1000 years behind the army. Some have stated that most of the technology we use today is actually extra terrestrial IE LCD Monitors, blu ray, blue tooth and fiber optics

    4. You are correct about that hacking and what happens should the robots ever become sentient?

    5. Isn't it strange, to see this and have all this big brother stuff unfolding at the saame time?

  • Yes, it is unnerving.

    And for anyone who doesn't know, although "killbot" has been a term used only in Sci-Fi, it is now being used in mainstream articles to describe these robots (which are seemingly in favour of them.)

  • I found this. Listen, and understand! That Terminator is out there! It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead. (Kyle Reese, Terminator)

  • The real life Terminator was probably be modelled after this concept. I always thought films like that were there to warn people about the obvious dangers of doing such things, and yet some brainy idiots are actually inspired! It reminds me of a news interview I watched once where a scientist was developing cybernetic technology inspired by the Borg! Real wise. Sometimes I think these people are so afraid of the world that they want to create a new one.

  • Or rather, take away the pain of the real world and let you dream away things when you're not being used a cog in the machine. Once you're 17 hour working day is over, just lay down and put on the dream machine, make sure to hook up the electrodes. And set. Instantly whisked away to a fantasy land where you bang whores and fight dragons and you are known throughout the land as a hero! Then back to work to make sure you can pay for that fantasy.

  • I agree films like that are to warn people.james cameron and stanley kubrik were both ahead of their time in making movies.the few(the bankers) who control our world are afraid of people waking up,but so many millions are still a sleep.lets go back in history,egyption empire,roman empire and so many more,we are facing a new epire, NWO!

  • But the NWO would need a new religion, wouldn't it? Military rule alone never lasts. That's where the New Age religion would come in. And that's where I get worried, looking at that the New Age figures I admire and wondering what their true agendas are. It's hard to know who to trust when it comes to anyone in the public eye.

  • your right. a new religion.i think we are coming back to the time of Babylon.were people will confused.the ones in control and the followers will try to outsmart God,then God will destoy what he created. Babylon exsisted it is 1 of the 1st civilization known to mankind, its currently in Iraq. I think their true agenda is to mislead the people and worship lucifer,brother watch eyes wide shut! amazing!

  • Not you personally. I mean in general. Humans scare me sometimes. I have my truth. It doesn't mean it's the truth for everybody. But because we have comes to a "collective truth", we are being forced to follow this collective truth. It doesn't mean it's true though. And that's what the VIRUS is suppose to do. Help others realize this.

  • Thanks for explaining it to me. I understand what you mean about a mental virus. It's a strange thing.

  • The VIRUS to the system. That of free thought.

    That of understanding what life is really about. Problem is, is there are so many answers and so many people looking to follow a dogma (another thing we a programmed to do) that once you have a truth, anyone who's truth is different from yours, is wrong. And when someone is wrong, you want to correct them. But then you are wrong because you think there is something to correct, which only makes you angry cause no one likes to be wrong..

  • The problem is, is that the VIRUS is not spreading as it should be. Most of the people it's getting are victims of "social darwinism" if you catch my drift. It's hard for the VIRUS to spread to a well programmed and protected mind that's hardware to be loyal to the system. The other problem is is that the VIRUS also spread to those who can not help it spread further as it's programmed to. It's sad.. But maybe the time will come.

  • I assume you're being humorous lol. Time will come for what?

  • Interesting. can't help but think of The Terminator. Mankind has a history of corruption. Kinda scary.

  • Yes, me too. In the links I included an article about a shape-shifting robot they call a "chembot"! Just like in Terminator 2! Unreal..

  • Wow! Great research had no idea. Chap states some of these robots are being used in iraq!! wow, they pump out the oil for free, so america dollar doesnt decrease, by sadam sellin it to europe for euro.now they use mini-version of termiantors.how sad. CYBERNET IS IN PROCESS!

  • Thank you! Yes, there are 'Terminator' robots. It's amazing to me how much reality is reflecting fiction lately. Seems to me that scientists are turning to creative stories for their inspiration.

  • @Neurolanis

    Science Fiction is prescient. It's not always just mindless imagining. Although some of it is crap, alot of scientists write Sci-Fi as a way to speculate the future based on modern science and trends. It's not like fantasy where they just come up with some bs concept that has no way of happening, with alot of sci-fi, there is always the idea that what the sci-fi presents COULD be possible.

  • @drfreemason

    SKYNET DUDE!!! SKYNET IS THE MASSIVE COMPUTER INTELLIGENCE IN THE TERMINATOR UNIVERSE!!! CYBERDYNE BIRTHS THEM!!! CYBERNET DOESN'T EXIST!!!

  • Cyberdyne in the Terminator universe is the corporation that created SkyNet,