Global flood proof. The fossils in Florida

[flypaper4weirdos]

NEVER has the earth been entirely submerged by water. The evidence categorically proves no flood, it really isn't in question & has to be the easiest of all biblical myths to refute.

[edgemiky]

There is no point here for an atheist, only for believers.

A great wall of water washed all these shells in Florida and when it all settled the last thing to settle was the lighter sand during this time35 species of the great mammals died off.

This is what is here in Fl. Since sea levels were lower than they are now, not higher.

[gregrutz]

I think I missed something, I missed where you show evidence of a flood.

Clam live under sand, they die of old age under 2 feet of sand.

The Snails lived in the ocean too.

Corals take a long time to grow.

What was the point of this video?

[edgemiky]

I believe that Neanderthals were the end of the line of what evolution produced and it shows, but not in the human line we look nothing like anything prior to Neanderthal or any other ape like creature before them.

All the way up to Neanderthal the fossil progression/record seems to fit, but that line dies out.

[edgemiky]

I consider all the extinctions to be re-creations along with Cro-Magnon.

One of the last times it happened about 70,000 years ago and at 13,000 years ago ended the line of Neanderthals and started Cro-Magnon into modern humans.

[edgemiky]

@NorthForkFisherman You are the one missing the point.

There were many extinctions at least 7 or 8 and many times water covered and receded, that also explains all those salt deposits that you are bringing up.

Now think how many salt deposits are on top of the geological column?

How about the one in South America that is what... 700 miles long or the one in Utah?

[NorthForkFisherman]

Snicker. Chortle. Loose fossils found in sand? OK, you've discovered recent deposition. So what? You've just proven one thing, fossils that are not found where they are formed (in situ) are meaningless. Ask Tim White or Don Johansen what they are good for scientifically and you'll get one answer: Paperweights and souvieniers. You want to make an impact? Describe to me the formation and chemistry salt deposit of the Opeche Shale. Tell me where it came from please.

[edgemiky]

@NorthForkFisherman Do you belive that the Earth was pretty much covered by a shallow sea? If you do there is your explanation.



[NorthForkFisherman]

@edgemiky Sorry Edge. You are missing the point. Salt's an evaporite deposit and as such must be laid down in the order - fill - evaporate - fill again, until a final burial under a different sediment, like aeolian deposits such as the Tarpeats Sandstones are or the great many loess deposits found across the US. Evaporation takes time and energy. From the amount of energy required for just one salt deposit I can falsify Noah's Flood

[edgemiky]

@NorthForkFisherman Look at all my movies these sand layers are all across the country.

Do you believe that the earth was covered by a shallow sea in the past?

Most of the fossils like corals and sea plants are found on dry land are they not?

They lived under water.

[edgemiky]

@NorthForkFisherman

Look up the expanding Earth theory in here on U-Tube. Some of this theory makes sense.

[flypaper4weirdos]

@edgemiky

Try explaining how a flood accounts for angular unconformities, layered forests on top of each other with hundreds of meters of strata between them, or the alternation between calcite seas & aragonite seas through the Phanerozoic, or see if you can explain how Noah managed to cater for such animals like cave-dwelling arthropods who can't survive in less than 100% relative humidity?

[Thunderhead889]

Are you Harold Camping from Family Radio?

[edgemiky]

@Thunderhead889 No why do you ask?

When clams die of old age they are large these are babies.

The dating techniques I used are observations, these layers are the last three on top, it is pretty obvious they are recent, the very top layer is mulch and dirt, then sand and then the fossil layer, they go back to the ice age, about and all within 15,000 years, these layers already dated by the statuesque.

[gregrutz]

''according to dating techniques" What dating method did you use?

[gregrutz]

Do creationists know that clams live under the sand, they don't need rapid burial to stay closed. When they die of old age, they are already buried, closed.

Geologists went looking for evidence of a flood over 200 years ago and didn't find any.

[edgemiky]

@gregrutz Yes if they are old but these are baby clams and the older ones are deeper.

Not only that but when they looked they used the standard creationist timeline of 6000 years.

The timeline should be 12,900 years ago for a flood event.

And creation further back.

[gregrutz]

@edgemiky What did you say? Do you have a point? What flood?

[edgemiky]

I know because these are still around today.

[gregrutz]

WTF is this about? How do you know it is a LAND snail.