Added: 3 years ago
From: MeetTheTruth
Views: 797
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • these men in the government, drunk with power and blind with greed, they just want to be in control of everything. WE the people should never let them have that control. Here in the U.S.A. for example, it is in our Constitution that states that if we see our government acting in a way that puts it's people at risk of anything either it be our freedoms and rights being removed. we have the full birth-given right to remove this faulty government in armed conflict.

  • Look at the laws! The US government can not use our military to control the people (you and I) of the US. They want you to think that, but they can't. And as far as marshal law, the government will lose all hope to restore, no one will listen or trust the government ever again. So really its a lose- lose situation for the government. Stop letting the government think they can push you around!!!

  • lol, like if a coup cant happen, or a revolution, or a civil war, or an invading army. People like you who think that the US has a "full proof" government are the fools. It has, and CAN happen again in history. A government can change quickly, and unexpectedly to tyrannize the people. Just ask Russia and Germany.

  • You dumb shit, I never said the US has a "full proof" government. And as for your comment, you put your foot in your mouth with that one, maybe you should read mine a little better. That is why I want my gun rights for the reasons you mention, to protect my family in the case of a disaster.

  • lol, relax man. I clicked on your name instead of ericpage420. Wrong reply. Now that I re-read it, it looks so much like my statement fits yours.

  • Do you really think that your gun is gonna protect you from the government?

    Yeah,until I have the RIGHT to a thermal-nucluar bomb,i'm not real confident that I can defend myself aganst the government.

  • there are 150 armed citizens for every soldier, and most the the soldiers are outside the nation so its more like 1,000 armed citizens for every soldier! most soldiers shoot a .223 rifle which is like a crappy bb gun compared to the average hunters rifle. we the people could totally crush the police and military in less than a week if we actually wanted to. dont fall for the b.s. that resistance is futile because thats bullshit.

  • I'm not saying resistance is futile,but if you think you can go toe to toe with the government,your delusionul.One good sized bomb would take out the better part of a 150 people. Not to mention the fact that most hunters don't have body armor,and they sure as hell don't have tanks.

    Then there's logistical support. Where are you gonna get your ammo? How do you gather,and desimanate intellegence?

    What about food? "We'll hunt." ain't gonna cut it when every shot could give away your position.

  • To an enemy capable of fielding heavy artilliry,and helecoter gunships,your rifile ain't shit.

    Ask yourself,how many people could you field today if you had to?

    How disciplined are they?

    Do you have a chain of command?

    People should be allowed to keep their guns as far as I'm concerned,but if you think that's all that's keeping the government from oppressing you,I suggest you talk to David Koresh,or Randy Weaver.

  • that is a great point, we cant go toe to toe with the government with our rifles and hand guns when they have tanks, fighter jets, and far superior weapons (some we dont even know exist). that is why you dont go at them head on. you dont fight the strength of an opponent, you get them form the belly. attack the head and the body dies. i.e. get the fukers calling the shots! when it goes down, im not fighting the troops, i will be sniping the leaders.

  • ericpage is just stupid or a quitter. Vietnam is a good example of  rag tag militia stopping our better equipped and trained military, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc are all perfect examples of smaller less equipped military forces defeating a better equipped force. Don't fool yourself, you don't win the war outright unless your lucky ,but by attrition. And our government won't use all those weapons against the people since it would create more rebels. You don't use nukes on your own land either.

  • Yeh the government ALWAYS crushes underarmed forces in urban warfare. They have magical powers to just zap out all the insurgents... because its obviously what has been working so well in Iraq for the last 5 years of occupation. American's by in large probably have more formal weapons training and practice and better small arms then iraqi militia/insurgent forces. There also is no law stating you can't own a nuke, just like explosives I am sure there is some process to go through to own one!

  • So you're pretty much saying that everyone should just roll over and let the government walk all over them. Screw that! If that was the case then we would truly be slaves by now but that hasn't happened because too many people are armed. Yeah they can just nuke us all but if that happens the whole planet would probably cease to exist and the government needs it to keep living on.

  • If they nuke us, they can't tax and us. No tax and work= no funding= no funding=no army. Do your really think armies gonna support the very government that starving their killing? FOR FREE???

  • My cold dead hands.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more