Added: 2 years ago
From: StreetfireNetwork
Views: 18,376
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • kick ass burnout with a sweet ass car

  • damn that was awesome

  • Is this the real ceasar's palace?

  • @FanFerrari23 haha

  • 2003 nice v8

  • dont forget that the mustang was first intended to appeal to the average middle class females of the time, which is why they put a 170 cu. in. Falcon engine in it.

  • So cool!!!!!!!!!

  • "I hope you had fun"?????

    wOOOt!!!!

    That was freakin awesome!

    The illusion, the driving, the location? Sweet!

  • how the hell they do that??

    mirrors?

  • mustangs for the wins motherfuckers

  • its so cold the hookers went home, classic lol :D

  • lovin the slo-mo burnout ha

  • yea yea yea...mustangs are so lame they have u (a mustang hater) searchin videos of them online..it never gets old how many people talk shit about rustang bustangs and watever other names u lamos have for it but always seem to be lookin them up

  • LOL i never looked it up, it was in my featured list, and i dont got any names for them and im not saying there a shitty car, because they beat any import hands down in my opinion, but i think they are produced and are a cheap muscle car, and when anyone brags it up and says its better than any challenger or camaro it makes me mad

  • @challengerman15 Featured videos my ass because it was just uploaded!

  • @cubsfreak13 It was on my home page list..........

    I am subscribed to streetfire network, I don't like mustangs.....

  • @madjimms How can you not like mustangs? Do you see Other cars pulling magic tricks? Didn't think so....

  • @cubsfreak13 Yes making magic tricks trying to make the mustang look better, does that make it a better vehicle? OF COURSE! -_- (not)

  • @madjimms Yes it does. Well it would if it could because it doesnt need anymore help looking better.

  • @cubsfreak13 I would much rather have a Dodge or Volvo than this junk....

  • fuck it was so you fucking moron like i would search for a fucking mustang video, it was in my featured box and it had around 165 views at the time i watched it

  • Any new car nowadays are made cheap bud just how it is. I own to Cobra and if I could afford a new challenger I'd get one cuz they look like orginals and the camaro is nice but I'd still rather have a new stang or challenger. There hasnt been a decent car made since the the mid 70's its all fiberglass and thin metal bs now. If I do recall the GT500 still owns the SRT8 and the SS so ford must be doing sumthing right and dont go start saying will its S/C bullshit. If GM and Mopar was smart the

  • would do the exact same thing. Thats why the new ZR1 is supercharged cuz GM finally relized how much of a difference it makes

  • dude i have a 2009 challenger and a 2001 camaro, both 10 and a half second cars lol, and i agree only select cars have been made decently since before 75, one of my favortie cars made after would be the grand national, THAT being said im still not a fan of those cheap stangs, yeah your cobras okay but im talking about any stand made from 1994- now, garbage im sorry

  • The Grand National is nice and the mustangs and trash cuz if that was the case they wouldn't still be going on for 50 years strait while your Camaro and Transam had to take some time off to figure out a new idea to sell their cars again cuz nobody wanted them. You see a hell of a lot mores stangs on the road then you do camaros and TA's. For the power that the GT has and the power that Camaro has you take the displacement and GT would win hands down. Thats why its the best car for the price

  • no they retired the camaro because they went from 1966-2002 , oh yeah and the 1980's-2002 mustangs (v6) had on average 10-30hp less then the camaro, lol your your 5.0L had 180hp in 1993 where the camaro had an LT1 with 275hp

  • @challengerman15

    No the Mustang was rated Net 205. Not 180. Notice I said NET. RWHP was in the 190's. The Camaro was in the 215-220 range, but had almost 400 lbs on the Mustang.

  • wtf are you getting your facts the 93 5.0 Had 240 bhp and they didnt retire the camaro they wasnt able to make sells look it up plus the first year of the Camaro was 67 as a production car very few where made for car shows in 66 u fuck tard. Plus nobody gives a ratass about V6 cars

  • one of the reasons why i got a 89 5.0......you get more bang for the buck...

  • @IvIustangsvt2003 I don't like mustangs & I didn't "search" for this video, I simply clicked what was on my home page....

  • ok good for u..u didnt search it..but u did click on it to watch a video after u urself said u dont like mustangs...and u werent bashin them like this loser was..if u dont like then dnt watch videos then bash on them is wat im tellin this guy..

  • @IvIustangsvt2003 Because I like to make fun of people with no life (I do however have one.)

    Mustangsvt2003 Seriously? Just another stupid redneck that loves F0rd..........

  • @madjimms yea bro u have a life..lemme tell u. u come on to talk shit about a car, more then once at that....dam i wish i had ur life...redneck ok..the classic redneck joke...just stick to ur computers u fuckin geek..just some geek squad fag tryin to talk shit..judgin how u look u shouldnt talk shit....

  • @IvIustangsvt2003 Learn to spell & construct a sentence.

  • @madjimms nice one

  • bull shit, thats so lame

  • lol this magic trick is so full of shit, a nice stunt double gets "chained down", while the real dude hides in the car.... cool video

  • Great video

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more