I get this kind of comment on my videos a lot too. It's not that the song was ORIGINALLY by Counting Crows, but that this a cappella arrangement was based on the Counting Crows version. I think you'll agree that they did it differently than Ms. Mitchell did.
This reasoning makes no sense. When acknowledging credit, it is customary to mention the songwriter first and then the arranger. Since Counting Crows is not the songwriter, and since they aren't responsible for this particular arrangement, it really doesn't matter from which source the idea for this version was "borrowed."
I didn't say it made sense. I said it was how it's regularly done in the a cappella world. It's done so often, in fact, one might call it a custom. Or customary.
I don't buy it. Serious, knowledgeable musicians credit songwriters and arrangers. In this case the songwriter is Joni Mitchell and the arranger is the person (or people) who've created the particular arrangement that the UCSD group is using. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging Counting Crows for inspiring this version, but it shows ignorance of accepted practice when the songwriter is not credited.
Actually, I take it back. It makes a LOT of sense, and here's why:
For the most part, a cappella groups are cover bands with unique instrumentation. If someone is listening to a cover and really likes it, they may want to know where they can hear the version being covered. If this is the case, they have no interest in who the original artist was - they want to hear the sound they're familiar with. The original is good, but it's simply not what they're looking for.
Awww :] how cuteee dchung :D
bubbleyummygum 3 days ago
i didnt see his last name but the first thingi though of was "Chung" i was right! lol good job guys
iLuv2sing365 1 year ago
nice..
fagri81 2 years ago
hhhhow many times this song revised!
09163338723 2 years ago
that was nice
Michael03mc 4 years ago
Who CAres where it comes from
Devilsfan421 4 years ago
Who the fuck cares where it comes from
Devilsfan421 4 years ago
jeeho is dead sexy.
adoboandryce 4 years ago
umm...well, if you listen to it, we did the Counting Crows version of the song, so...yeah.
DDrumChung 4 years ago
dave !! jeff ahn here.
nice job with ucsd acapella group.
i think you could have done better by singing it the way joni mitchell sings it
gatoradeee 4 years ago
colejohnson81 is right, it is sooooo disappointing for you not to this is Joni Mitchell...
sdbruns 4 years ago
You've gotta be kidding..."Big Yellow Taxi" gets credited to Counting Crows? Ever heard of Joni Mitchell, kiddies?
ColeJohnson81 4 years ago
I get this kind of comment on my videos a lot too. It's not that the song was ORIGINALLY by Counting Crows, but that this a cappella arrangement was based on the Counting Crows version. I think you'll agree that they did it differently than Ms. Mitchell did.
ChiroJoel 3 years ago
This reasoning makes no sense. When acknowledging credit, it is customary to mention the songwriter first and then the arranger. Since Counting Crows is not the songwriter, and since they aren't responsible for this particular arrangement, it really doesn't matter from which source the idea for this version was "borrowed."
ColeJohnson81 3 years ago
I didn't say it made sense. I said it was how it's regularly done in the a cappella world. It's done so often, in fact, one might call it a custom. Or customary.
ChiroJoel 3 years ago
I don't buy it. Serious, knowledgeable musicians credit songwriters and arrangers. In this case the songwriter is Joni Mitchell and the arranger is the person (or people) who've created the particular arrangement that the UCSD group is using. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging Counting Crows for inspiring this version, but it shows ignorance of accepted practice when the songwriter is not credited.
skullsplitter13 3 years ago
Actually, I take it back. It makes a LOT of sense, and here's why:
For the most part, a cappella groups are cover bands with unique instrumentation. If someone is listening to a cover and really likes it, they may want to know where they can hear the version being covered. If this is the case, they have no interest in who the original artist was - they want to hear the sound they're familiar with. The original is good, but it's simply not what they're looking for.
ChiroJoel 3 years ago
one word to describe this.... amazing!
guyin916 4 years ago