Added: 1 year ago
From: starzmedia
Views: 60,112
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The movie is more like a hold video game senario you know and i wase disapointed of that movie because i was like holy shit theres a motherload of good actor so i was like that movie is going to kick ass and stuff but its wase just you know ok but not that good

  • @IboCino1985 And you're dead to me. So there's that.

  • i gave u a z-

  • God, I hate Jason Statham!!!!

  • Stallone should have just made Rambo 5 like he was going to do! In Rambo 2 he said that an Expendable is like someone that you don't miss at a party. That is exactly the same way that I feel about Big Barney Ross in The Expendables. Rambo would kick Barney's ass! What kind of an action hero name is Barney anyway.

  • What the fuck, the movie could be a B- but you got to admit it´s fucking great,explosions,stabbing,I love it,despite of "being there done that",it´s Stallone you have to give him some credit it´s rambo, he managed to put film stars,legends of the UFC, a wrestling legend,stars already dead (Mickey Rourke,Dolph Lundgren,Bruce Willis (excuse me)),Terry Crews(great), hell he even managed to nudge the former governor of California(how great is that is old buddy ahah) LOVE IT.

  • this review actually complimented the movie

  • i give a F 4 fuckin guys

  • And I give you a D. Cuz you like dicks. Faggot!

  • C- says the guy with nice shiny, nice little mouth... C'mon, I loved it, of course it was full of cliches, but that was the point of it!

  • yeah this movie could have been better, it's just there wasn't much character development, the middle of the movie was horrible to watch as it was painstakingly boring and there wasn't much use of the action hero cast. Mickey Rourke should have had a bigger role than being the tatoo artist!

  • c- ARE CRAZY

  • you suck man

  • This movie is a freakin' love letter to the action movies of THE 80's! And the cast was amazing. Personally, Micky Rourke was the cherry on the cake for me and i enjoyed EVERY SECOND of this movie. But still let's hope they manage to get Jean-Claude Van Damme for the sequel.

  • THANK GOD FOR SLY STALLONE AND TEAM. I THOUGHT THEY WERE BEING OVER-RUN BY SOFT ASS WIMPS. HEY RICHARD ROEPER. PERHAPS YOU'D PREFER SOMETHING MORE FEMININE. YA PUSSY

  • This is my personal favorite movie of 2010! Sly Stallone is real genius and the best action star ever. You can really feel the atmosphere of old good 80's and 90's. It was awesome to see Stallone, Statham, Lundgren, Austin, Li, Crews, Couture, Roberts, Rourke, Daniels in one film. Statham and Charisma Carpenter made a very beautiful and hot screen couple. Now I hope Willis and Schwarzenegger will get more screen time in the future sequels. Also it would be great to see Sandra Bullock in it

  • Its a simple solution. If u don't like the expendables then your gay. Simple as that

  • HATER u just a hater, yeah Im brown and u are white, no one cares, I thought u could get over your femminin bullshit, u remind me of the bullys that could not become a COP, robo ass hata. Opinions, yes, Bet u never seen Terminator, yeah u must have too be. a typical Machine

  • I tell you check videos where are people over their 70 or 80,and do bodybuilding,they looks younger,his skin is amazing,and that is SLY too,thanks young think,food,and work out

  • are you kidding me ?? c-?? if u cant appreciate some rough actions, crazy action scenes than go play with my little pony or something

  • Comment removed

  • i give richard roeper a F- because the expendables ROCK

  • This gay, unqualified “critic” dares to critique? Because he no experience as a film director, or in film production or creative aspects related to filmmaking, which he criticizes, the fagot is not entitled to an opinion. Richard Roeper, this “critic”, is an ordinary person who respects his opinion far, far too much.

  • This gay, unqualified “critic” dares to critique? Because he no experience as a film director, or in film production, acting, or any other creative aspects related to filmmaking, which he criticizes, the fagot is not entitled to an opinion. Richard Roeper, this “critic”, is an ordinary person who respects his opinion far, far too much.

  • I understand you don't like it. It's not a movie for 40+ (no offence)

  • CHUCK NORRIS decided he is going to be part of The Expendables 2, check his Filmography!

  • One of the best movies of the year! This reviewer did not get the point of the movie...

  • Very stupid movie. Nothing happend. Literally NOTHING. Saved the girl and left her... Statham saved the girl and left her... WHAT THE HELL? Dolph Lundgren gets bad and everyone forgive him. Statham shooting from a flying plane without anything infront of him... this movie is full of CRAP. And at the end when they were running for the Helicopter... HOW big is this yard? The Heli was 3 steps away and they were running for 15 minutes? Full of CRAP!

  • I wish that someone would invent a time machine and travel back to the 1976 Oscars and kidnap Sylvester and then sit down with him and make him watch The Expendables in hopes of deterring him from losing all credibility as a writer and artist.

  • I wish that someone would invent a time machine and travel back to the 1976 Oscars and kidnap Sylvester and then sit down with him and make him watch The Expendables in hopes of deterring him staining his

  • it sucked

  • this moie was awesome the action scenes were on point its not supposed to be like today it was based on 80s action and made one hell of a good job a fuckin + u wanna talk about a shit movie avatar was just fuckin retarded

  • I wanna shoot this douche with an AA-12

  • you guys gotta admit this film could have been way better. Too much time was focused on Statham and Stallone. Rourke felt kinda wasted. And the cliches kind of got irritating. The "You and I are the same" speech was annoying. I enjoyed it. Don't get me wrong. B- in my opinion. I love action movies. Just could've been better. Besides, it's Roeper's opinion. Seriously.

    SPOILER ALERT

    plus it wouldn't have hurt to have killed off a couple more important characters

  • @AKenjiB With all respect

    After watching the secound time...

    This movie clearly points out against the palestinians.

    Pause the movie at 30:14 and you will see clearly a palestinian flag on the soldier.

    Maybe thats why hollywood appointed the israeli producer Avi Lerner to do this?

    You can see many examples... its really disgusting and sublime propaganda by Hollywood.

    General Garza is very similar to "Gaza". But i lost totally lost respect for this movie

  • @ivan200060

    I think your looking into things, but I fail to even see how that's relevant to my comment

  • Richard... fuck you.

  • Man this review sucked ass

  • Are you serious Roper? "The stories too fimiliar" "Its 20 years out of date." Dude do some research next time, the movie is a throw back to 80s action movies. Thats why it feels like its from the 80s, you know, when action movies were good! I give this review a C-.

  • fag

  • you suck

  • Ur a looser the movie is awesome

  • Expendables was a badass movie!! 

  • C'mon the movie was enjoyable for what it was. Roeper also completely failed to mention the best part of the film: SCWARZENEGGER & STALLONE sharing a scene together! That was fun.

    My review of this movie is much better... hint

  • They missed one action hero... CHUCK NORIS!!!!!!!!

  • dident know your where a girl?!

  • Roeper you have no idea of how to judge a movie you need to stop making reviews cos they suck!!!!!!!

  • I have to disagree with Roeper on this one. This movie is supposed to be a take on all the old school 80s action movies with all the action stars together.

  • as much as i love richard roeper, he missed the point with this movie. its supposed to be a standard action movies 80s style. it was the whole reason this was made.

  • 20 years out of date hey..good..i like the action films from the 70s and 80s..to much poncing about in alot of films now...it's a good old action film and I for one am glad it sticks to the old routines.

  • EXPENDABLES IS THE GREATEST MOVIE EVER. FUCK THE HATERS.

  • Expandles Was SHIT! ...Not the Shit...Just Shit. horrible

  • @dgeet915  You're just a low testosterone bitch.

  • @croczrule112 hahaha Its funny because i like Smart movies. if they arent smart than a good action movie or fun action movie...this movie want close to being fun. it was Unbareable from the beginning, CGI fake blood....Plot was Crappy as Fucked... They werent even the "greatest action heros". Sorry your just a low IQ'd bitch

  • as a female who went and saw the movie it fuck'n rock... i love the action, and if they change their minds to do another on i will go and see that one....i am going back to see it again....... great action movie, need more like it.

  • 20 years behind schedule, well i think Stallone said this quite exactly, it`s gonna be an old fashioned action fest, i don`t think this movie was supposed to be anything other than a kick-back to the old 80`s(or 90`s)

  • Testosterone fest!

  • I saw this movie four times this weekend and think its better than The Godfather and Steel Magnolias !!!!!

  • This fool is really a fool. He stands here and says that the movie is 20 yrs too late and it's just a dumb action violent movie with no plot. Really? When asked Stallone wha the movie was about I'm pretty sure he says this exactly. Anyone that remember the old movies knew what to expect. Like the past dude said. This the guy that gave twilight an A lolololololol. The only reason i listen is to point out how foolish they really are

  • right on just a bad film

  • He gave this a C-, but gave Twilight: New Moon an A-. Since he's a man, shouldn't it be the other way around?

  • @1981bendover he has a inner anima

  • this movie is SUPPOSED to be old school, why bother saying that it's 20 years too late? hell, half of Predator's awesomeness come from the homages.

  • wish you were still on TV

  • This is 100 times better than "The A-Team" remake & it's an humorous, the only actors short of making this the "It's a mad, mad, mad, mad, mad, mad world" of the action genre is Chuck Norris, Steven Segal & Jean Claude Van-Damme!

  • @NY4Life Those guys are definitely missing and so is Jackie Chan!

  • @NY4Life Van-Damme and Segal declined there roles so it their fault they weren't in it

  • Alright First!!!!!!!!!!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more