THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION MURDERERS!!! TORTURERS!!!!DEMONS!!!! MURDERERS!!!!THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THTHE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION MURDERERS!!! TORTURERS!!!!DEMONS!!!! MURDERERS!!!!THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION MURDERERS!!! TORTURERS!!!!DEMONS!!!! MURDERERS!!!!MURDERERS!!!!
@tjttzcspplt i think u just proved my point for me.... the phrase..... "watched the cloaks" is or so i have read a very loaded phrase... which basically means..... guilty of the crime..... i could b wrong, but that is what i read. Im no lawyer, but im pretty sure if u or i am caught on video tape of watching a murder go down and do nothing to stop it and leave with the murderer. we can b prosecuted for murder..... im pretty sure
@PInk77W1 It says the witnesses laid down their cloaks at the feet of a young man named Saul. You are reading into it. Be a man, get some humility, and admit you were mistaken. Believe it or not, it will not be the end of the world. He was guily by consent, and may have even been in charge, but, he did not do the stoning.
Besides, Paul converted, and David was repentant. Their sin was forgiven. That's the point of the whole Bible. Why don't you focus on that?
@tjttzcspplt um news flash, i am catholic, i dont go by my own opinion, so there is no humility to get. Secondly u are not reading the original transcript so u get some humility and understand there are numerous translations. Thirdly, y did they lay down their cloaks at the feet of Saul? maybe he was the leader? maybe a leader is MORE guilty of murder than anyone else? ever hear of Charles Mansion? What i was saying to you is not my belief it is from the Church Fathers.
@PInk77W1 There is no humility to get? That's a good one. You just called a saint of the Church a murderer for the sole purpose of baiting someone, and, trying to come off as some sort of intellectual superior making some goofy claim about something you know nothing about. That's rich. Plus, it's Charles Manson. and that man is a possessed lunatic. Not even close. Paul thought he was being zealous for God. He did it in good faith. Accusing people of forgiven sin is the devil's trick, BTW.
@tjttzcspplt "for the sole purpose" ? Thats funny, i didnt know you were inside my brain. "i know nothing about" thanks for your opinion. Also i wasnt comparing paul and charles in the sense u seem to imply, what i meant was they were both in charge. I guess u missed that because u were too busy attacking me. Charles was a lunatic? Paul thought he was being zealous for God? thx for the info( l learned those facts in 1970s) your just full of information, speaking of not knowing anything about
@tjttzcspplt i really dont know what u r getting at? of course i focus on forgiveness, again i am catholic and i go to confession often. My favorite author GK Chesterton became catholic because of "forgiveness".... David and Paul were brought up because they were changed, repentant, i guess u missed that
@PInk77W1 Guess it's time to go back. We are both wasting precious time we will be making an account for on this stupid boob tube. You mentioned them both being "murderers", so, I don't think I missed anything. I think you are too big for your britches, among other things.
@tjttzcspplt i did mention them both being murderers, in relation to what? Someone was saying the pope or popes were evil. So that is y i mentioned paul and david. The point being, if God could use these murderers and of course change them, then is it a stretch to think the pope or popes could be evil and or change? In other words evil popes are not a new thing. "im too big for my britches"? ok. paul was a murderer, so your point is?
@tjttzcspplt i have been to canada, mex. japan, korea, aussie, india, nepal, philippines, taiwan, thailand, singapore, new zealand, hawaii many times, all over the usa, going to europe july-aug. But i will try to LIVE A LITTLE...... never been to africa or china, but i got those in my sights...... LOL
@dusttracks The inqusition (what a show), the inquisition, (no, no, no), I'll bet you're wishin' that we'd g awaaaay. But the inquisition's here and it's here to stay,,,,,--History of the World I.
Why didn't the catholic church claim that Adam was the first pope? They could have. Just like what they did claiming that Peter was. It was so easy and convenient then specially when the "church" was also the Roman empire at the time.
@271828183141592654 they kind of do claim adam as the first, but adam was pre church to say the least, and there is a unbroken line from today all the way back to adam thru the jewish leaders. so in a sense they kind of do. In other words the pope today is in response to adam's role back then.
Isn't the catholic church so smart when it categorize Peter as the first pope? If so, then Peter should have resided in the Vatican or the city of Rome. But he couldn't because he'd be killed by the Romans. The catholic church would have been more credible had it chosen Paul instead because Paul was the apostle of the Gentiles.
@martlut , No I ain't so smart. Please provide me with the documentary evidences that Peter was crucified upside down in Rome and buried there. I will appreciate Biblical references and not from the catholic documents please.
@martlut, Where does it say that it is not the Bible alone that should be the basis of faith? If it is written in a catholic manuscript, then you must think that the rest of the world besides you must be a fool.
@martlut Good day. Whoa! Hold your horses! I do not believe in easter, trinity, etc, etc. Why do you accuse me of believing these? Isn't it that I criticize the catholic church? Are you lost? Don't call me a fool. You might be the one for accusing me to be of a faith I do not belong to. Why use foul words? Have I? By the way, you have not answered my question about Peter hang upside down and is buried in Rome. Don't answer my question with a question.
@271828183141592654: Well no one can provide documentary evidence, we can only go by what the traditional writings of those in that time era understood.
@martlut Hello, am waiting: @martlut , No I ain't so smart. Please provide me with the documentary evidences that Peter was crucified upside down in Rome and buried there. I will appreciate Biblical references and not from the catholic documents please.
Kefa(Peter) was not the first pope in fact he was never a pope. If Kefa was alive right now he would tell u that he not a pope and that the catholic church he dont know.
After his life there would be that many more....Bennedict is now the last elected pope.. the 112th wasn't counted by Malachi...Peter the great may be a new name for the current pope or one that takes office without election?
@anddihier Prophecy of the Popes is most likely a fraud it didn't appear till years after St. Malachi died. I was reading a good Church History book from the 40s written by a priest and even he was dubious about its validity.
I don't know why you think this is a prophecy. The Catholic church is simply naming each succeeding pope in accordance with that list! Then saying "look!" "The prophecy is being fulfilled!" That's like me making a grocery list and calling it prophetic. I wish Catholics would read their bibles and 10 commandments so they could realize that they practice idol worship, fail to uphold the true sabbath, worship Marry and the pope before God. The list goes on. Most Catholics don't even realize this.
Please read the 1st commandment. Now tell me why the pope is deemed by the Catholic church to be God? If this allowed longer comments I could show you an entire page of entries from Roman Canon Law to the Ferraris Ecclesiastical dictionary and much more saying just this.
Please read the 2nd commandment. Then take a look around your home and your church.
Read the 4th commandment. Now tell me what day the bible calls the sabbath and why? Also show me where the bible commands Sunday worship.
I'm not saying YOU believe the pope is God etc. I'm saying the Catholic Church as a denomination teaches extra biblical and false doctrines.
2 cherubs were placed there as a representation of the real thing in the most holy place in the temple in heaven. It was instructed BY God that it be constructed so. It's not an idle and it was to be on ONE arc.
Sunday mass is fine, but show me where it says you don't have to uphold the sabbath?
Jesus said he came to fulfill the law not change it.
Acts 20:7 says they Gathered together to break bread (dinner time) on the first day and Paul preached to them about departing on the morrow. Goes on to say that he continued his speech until midnight. This verse does not say that this was a newly commanded Sunday mass in commemoration of Christ. This verse tells me they gathered together to eat and discuss tomorrows journey. Other references in acts that refer to the breaking of bread as dinner; Acts 27:34-35, Acts 2:46. Just an ordinary meal.
A grade 6 Literature class would be able to take Acts 20:7 and disect it to the true core: Which is firstly : This verse simply leads up to the punchline which clearly tells the story of a young man falling from the ceiling.That s it. If he did not fall and cause a commotion then guess what. No Acts 20:7 . This is in no way a directive for First day Sunday service.
@7istheAnswer I totally and completely agree. Yet so many still try to use that verse as an excuse for Sunday sabbath or the abolishing of the 7th day sabbath. I find it perplexing to hear Catholics and protestants alike use that verse as an excuse, yet by the Vatican's own Q and A's, there is absolutely NO scriptural doctrine that gives the authority to change the sabbath.
Secondly: This service clearly started on the Saturday .Dont be fooled by other translations read.KJV Acts 20:7:" 7And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came...." The key word is "Upon" This means that when the first day came upon them i.e. at sunset that Saturday night t. i.e. the meeting HAD to start sometine on Saturday the seventh day for the "Upon" to make any sense at all. Suge212 I agree with you and I just pray that more people will awaken to the SABBATH TRUTH
Secondly: This service clearly started on the Saturday .Dont be fooled by other translations read.KJV Acts 20:7:" 7And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came...." The key word is "Upon" This means that when the first day came upon them i.e. at sunset that Saturday night t. i.e. the meeting HAD to start sometine on Saturday the seventh day for the "Upon" to make any sense at all. Suge212 I agree with you and I just pray that more people will awaken to the SABBATH TRUTH
You say your church as a whole doesn't worship Marry? What is with all the statues of her then? Why do Catholics pray the Hail Marry? Why does the pope obsess over the Fatima prophecies. What's with all the Marry sightings and hype?
You honor the person the idol represents? I wont even comment on that.
You know I'm not trying to come down on you here. I love all my Christian brethren. I was once a Roman Catholic. Then I read the bible. Please watch "A Woman Rides The Beast" by Dave hunt.
Mary is not worthy of worship. Actually, the Church excommunicated a number of nuns who worshiped Mary. The statues are a visible reminder of her and her fiat. Hail Mary comes from the Book of Luke. Regarding the Marian Apparitions, the Church investigates whether an apparition is true or not.
Yes, we honor (not worship) the person (saints) the statue or icon represents.
i once became doubtful but after reading the Bible and understanding the Church i grew to love and believe in the Church.
@bordz120891 According to you my friend, and intellect.No apparition ever happened..They all lied..no stigmata..all lied..So did the children at fatima Miracle of the son//They were willing to did for a lie?You like me my friend..all mixed up..God showed me the real truth while I was tring to destroy the Catholic church..God proved to me the church is the true Church of christ..seek my friend..I witnessed a stigmata..I am here to tell you.Early church fathers.You can not find God with intellect
Its about time to renew ur faith. Our faith is an ancient faith..This is the faith passed on us through the bishops that were ordained by the original apostoles. I think studying d early christianity would help you a lot....especially @ d time when there was no bible 2 be looked upon...@ that time when our only source were d early church fathers...d bishops of d church. I'll be praying 4 u. Read also the Faith Explianed by Jesus Urteaga, the Cathecism of the Catholic Church, the Compendium...etc
Idol Worship....images help us 2 remember d face of christ & in this way it helps us 2 encounter God who is spirit....this isnt idolatry.
Failure 2 uphold Sabbath......I dont think so
Worship Mary...no. If we honor our mother and father how much more do we and must honor the Blessed mother of God.
The pope b4 God...no We honor the pope because he is the successor of the apostle peter the prince of the apostoles. latria is different from dulia...please dont confuse it my friend.
A false claimant of the Holy See in opposition to a pontiff canonically elected. At various times in the history of the Church illegal pretenders to the Papal Chair have arisen, and frequently exercised pontifical functions in defiance of the true occupant.
@FIDESetRATIOihtys I thought the gates of hell wouldnt prevail??? Why do priests have sex with little boys?? Surely that wouldnt happen in Jesus church?Or i guess youll explain that one too?lol
Well, you have urself in a dichotomy here. IF there is no pope then VI was wrong. either way you are saying that the gates of hell previaled. You are not Catholic. Get to Confession FAST!
Then you deny Vatican I, which stated there would ALWAYS be a pope, with the exception of the small time b/t elections. VII was not Dogmatic it does not alter the Faith.
nice video.. a very strong proof that the Roman Catholic Church is the original Christian Church and protector of the real teaching of Jesus Christ and the Apostels and the Church Father until the end of time..
Check out TheForerunner777's channel for more info.
TheCarl6661 2 months ago
So, the first music is "Himno e Marcia Pontificale".
And the second?
0YTMan 4 months ago
I noticed that in the early years, they were mostly saints. Later, it fizzles out.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
I wanna go back in time to smack Pope Innocent III with my Holy Bible
Catastraphecdv 1 year ago
@Catastraphecdv Why, what did he do?
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION MURDERERS!!! TORTURERS!!!!DEMONS!!!! MURDERERS!!!!THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THTHE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION MURDERERS!!! TORTURERS!!!!DEMONS!!!! MURDERERS!!!!THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION THE INQUISITION MURDERERS!!! TORTURERS!!!!DEMONS!!!! MURDERERS!!!!MURDERERS!!!!
dusttracks 1 year ago
@dusttracks boring, as if paul wasnt a murderer. as if david wasnt a murderer.
PInk77W1 1 year ago
@PInk77W1 Who did Paul murder?
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt ST. STEPHEN
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 He stood by and watched the cloaks. He didn't actually do the stoning.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt i think u just proved my point for me.... the phrase..... "watched the cloaks" is or so i have read a very loaded phrase... which basically means..... guilty of the crime..... i could b wrong, but that is what i read. Im no lawyer, but im pretty sure if u or i am caught on video tape of watching a murder go down and do nothing to stop it and leave with the murderer. we can b prosecuted for murder..... im pretty sure
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 It says the witnesses laid down their cloaks at the feet of a young man named Saul. You are reading into it. Be a man, get some humility, and admit you were mistaken. Believe it or not, it will not be the end of the world. He was guily by consent, and may have even been in charge, but, he did not do the stoning.
Besides, Paul converted, and David was repentant. Their sin was forgiven. That's the point of the whole Bible. Why don't you focus on that?
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt um news flash, i am catholic, i dont go by my own opinion, so there is no humility to get. Secondly u are not reading the original transcript so u get some humility and understand there are numerous translations. Thirdly, y did they lay down their cloaks at the feet of Saul? maybe he was the leader? maybe a leader is MORE guilty of murder than anyone else? ever hear of Charles Mansion? What i was saying to you is not my belief it is from the Church Fathers.
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 There is no humility to get? That's a good one. You just called a saint of the Church a murderer for the sole purpose of baiting someone, and, trying to come off as some sort of intellectual superior making some goofy claim about something you know nothing about. That's rich. Plus, it's Charles Manson. and that man is a possessed lunatic. Not even close. Paul thought he was being zealous for God. He did it in good faith. Accusing people of forgiven sin is the devil's trick, BTW.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt "for the sole purpose" ? Thats funny, i didnt know you were inside my brain. "i know nothing about" thanks for your opinion. Also i wasnt comparing paul and charles in the sense u seem to imply, what i meant was they were both in charge. I guess u missed that because u were too busy attacking me. Charles was a lunatic? Paul thought he was being zealous for God? thx for the info( l learned those facts in 1970s) your just full of information, speaking of not knowing anything about
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt i really dont know what u r getting at? of course i focus on forgiveness, again i am catholic and i go to confession often. My favorite author GK Chesterton became catholic because of "forgiveness".... David and Paul were brought up because they were changed, repentant, i guess u missed that
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 Guess it's time to go back. We are both wasting precious time we will be making an account for on this stupid boob tube. You mentioned them both being "murderers", so, I don't think I missed anything. I think you are too big for your britches, among other things.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt i did mention them both being murderers, in relation to what? Someone was saying the pope or popes were evil. So that is y i mentioned paul and david. The point being, if God could use these murderers and of course change them, then is it a stretch to think the pope or popes could be evil and or change? In other words evil popes are not a new thing. "im too big for my britches"? ok. paul was a murderer, so your point is?
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 My point is that you should have explained the meaning of what you said earlier. This venue requires a different mode of communication.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt in case u havent noticed. only allowed 450 some odd characters, sorry, this venue confuses the heck of me too. patience is a virtue
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 Ok, well, try watching Herb Alpert and Chuck Mangione YT videos and chill out a while.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt those guys are not my style, in fact chilling out is not my style...... LOL
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 Live a little. It's a big world out there.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
@tjttzcspplt i have been to canada, mex. japan, korea, aussie, india, nepal, philippines, taiwan, thailand, singapore, new zealand, hawaii many times, all over the usa, going to europe july-aug. But i will try to LIVE A LITTLE...... never been to africa or china, but i got those in my sights...... LOL
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@dusttracks Protestant, heretic, IGNORANT. 'Nough said.
ChrisDaron 1 year ago
@dusttracks The inqusition (what a show), the inquisition, (no, no, no), I'll bet you're wishin' that we'd g awaaaay. But the inquisition's here and it's here to stay,,,,,--History of the World I.
They didn't do a good enough job, apparently.
tjttzcspplt 11 months ago
Why didn't the catholic church claim that Adam was the first pope? They could have. Just like what they did claiming that Peter was. It was so easy and convenient then specially when the "church" was also the Roman empire at the time.
271828183141592654 1 year ago
@271828183141592654: But writings of the the churches past show that St. Peter laid his hands on St. Linus.
RockyBalboa211 1 year ago
@271828183141592654 they kind of do claim adam as the first, but adam was pre church to say the least, and there is a unbroken line from today all the way back to adam thru the jewish leaders. so in a sense they kind of do. In other words the pope today is in response to adam's role back then.
PInk77W1 1 year ago
@PInk77W1, thanks.
271828183141592654 1 year ago
Isn't the catholic church so smart when it categorize Peter as the first pope? If so, then Peter should have resided in the Vatican or the city of Rome. But he couldn't because he'd be killed by the Romans. The catholic church would have been more credible had it chosen Paul instead because Paul was the apostle of the Gentiles.
271828183141592654 1 year ago
@271828183141592654 aren't you so smart he was crucified by the Romans upside down in Rome and Buried their.
martlut 1 year ago
@martlut , No I ain't so smart. Please provide me with the documentary evidences that Peter was crucified upside down in Rome and buried there. I will appreciate Biblical references and not from the catholic documents please.
271828183141592654 1 year ago
@271828183141592654 where is the biblical reference for Easter the trinity Sunday service ect ect your faith.
martlut 1 year ago
Comment removed
271828183141592654 1 year ago
@271828183141592654 where does it it say bible alone in the bible that's right not in the bible what a fool
martlut 1 year ago
@martlut, Where does it say that it is not the Bible alone that should be the basis of faith? If it is written in a catholic manuscript, then you must think that the rest of the world besides you must be a fool.
271828183141592654 1 year ago
@271828183141592654 "where does it say that it is not the bible alone. Mt. 18:17 "go to the church"
PInk77W1 1 year ago
@martlut Good day. Whoa! Hold your horses! I do not believe in easter, trinity, etc, etc. Why do you accuse me of believing these? Isn't it that I criticize the catholic church? Are you lost? Don't call me a fool. You might be the one for accusing me to be of a faith I do not belong to. Why use foul words? Have I? By the way, you have not answered my question about Peter hang upside down and is buried in Rome. Don't answer my question with a question.
271828183141592654 1 year ago
@271828183141592654: Well no one can provide documentary evidence, we can only go by what the traditional writings of those in that time era understood.
RockyBalboa211 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@martlut Hello, am waiting: @martlut , No I ain't so smart. Please provide me with the documentary evidences that Peter was crucified upside down in Rome and buried there. I will appreciate Biblical references and not from the catholic documents please.
271828183141592654 1 year ago
If you watch it in 360p it is a bit blurry, just click to watch it in 480p and it will be fine :-)
FIDESetRATIOihtys 2 years ago
Kefa(Peter) was not the first pope in fact he was never a pope. If Kefa was alive right now he would tell u that he not a pope and that the catholic church he dont know.
dkarlarivera 2 years ago
My has the catholic church drastically changed since Saint Peter
klimaxxx06 2 years ago
The church is the same, it is just some of the human people that have changed....Church will always be the same as guided by the Holy Spirit...
HappyCatholicMum 2 years ago
@klimaxxx06: Like an acorn, it has now grown into a mighty oak.
RockyBalboa211 1 year ago
if this is true then why did st. malachy say there are to be 112 popes
jetan11 2 years ago
After his life there would be that many more....Bennedict is now the last elected pope.. the 112th wasn't counted by Malachi...Peter the great may be a new name for the current pope or one that takes office without election?
anddihier 2 years ago
@anddihier Prophecy of the Popes is most likely a fraud it didn't appear till years after St. Malachi died. I was reading a good Church History book from the 40s written by a priest and even he was dubious about its validity.
Liezei 1 year ago
This is the list of the sons of Cain or the worm seed!
This is the list of the sons of Cain or the worm seed!
missionoc 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The very idea of a vicar of Christ is ludicrous.
catholicexodus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't know why you think this is a prophecy. The Catholic church is simply naming each succeeding pope in accordance with that list! Then saying "look!" "The prophecy is being fulfilled!" That's like me making a grocery list and calling it prophetic. I wish Catholics would read their bibles and 10 commandments so they could realize that they practice idol worship, fail to uphold the true sabbath, worship Marry and the pope before God. The list goes on. Most Catholics don't even realize this.
Suge212 2 years ago
We do not worship idols, we honor the person they represent.
Jesus rose on Sunday.
We do not worship Mary, if we do, then we will all be excommunicated.
We do not worship the Pope, we pay him respect as the Pontiff.
The Catholic Church teaches that ONLY the Most Holy Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) is worthy of worship, no one else.
bordz120891 2 years ago
Please read the 1st commandment. Now tell me why the pope is deemed by the Catholic church to be God? If this allowed longer comments I could show you an entire page of entries from Roman Canon Law to the Ferraris Ecclesiastical dictionary and much more saying just this.
Please read the 2nd commandment. Then take a look around your home and your church.
Read the 4th commandment. Now tell me what day the bible calls the sabbath and why? Also show me where the bible commands Sunday worship.
Suge212 2 years ago
We do not look at the pope as if he is God, the pope is the earthly leader of the Church, that's it. There is only One God.
Why would God allow two cherubs to be placed on the Ark of the Covenant?
Early Christians held the mass on Sunday, look it up on Acts 20:7.
bordz120891 2 years ago
I'm not saying YOU believe the pope is God etc. I'm saying the Catholic Church as a denomination teaches extra biblical and false doctrines.
2 cherubs were placed there as a representation of the real thing in the most holy place in the temple in heaven. It was instructed BY God that it be constructed so. It's not an idle and it was to be on ONE arc.
Sunday mass is fine, but show me where it says you don't have to uphold the sabbath?
Jesus said he came to fulfill the law not change it.
Suge212 2 years ago
Acts 20:7 says they Gathered together to break bread (dinner time) on the first day and Paul preached to them about departing on the morrow. Goes on to say that he continued his speech until midnight. This verse does not say that this was a newly commanded Sunday mass in commemoration of Christ. This verse tells me they gathered together to eat and discuss tomorrows journey. Other references in acts that refer to the breaking of bread as dinner; Acts 27:34-35, Acts 2:46. Just an ordinary meal.
Suge212 2 years ago
A grade 6 Literature class would be able to take Acts 20:7 and disect it to the true core: Which is firstly : This verse simply leads up to the punchline which clearly tells the story of a young man falling from the ceiling.That s it. If he did not fall and cause a commotion then guess what. No Acts 20:7 . This is in no way a directive for First day Sunday service.
7istheAnswer 2 years ago
@7istheAnswer I totally and completely agree. Yet so many still try to use that verse as an excuse for Sunday sabbath or the abolishing of the 7th day sabbath. I find it perplexing to hear Catholics and protestants alike use that verse as an excuse, yet by the Vatican's own Q and A's, there is absolutely NO scriptural doctrine that gives the authority to change the sabbath.
Suge212 2 years ago
Secondly: This service clearly started on the Saturday .Dont be fooled by other translations read.KJV Acts 20:7:" 7And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came...." The key word is "Upon" This means that when the first day came upon them i.e. at sunset that Saturday night t. i.e. the meeting HAD to start sometine on Saturday the seventh day for the "Upon" to make any sense at all. Suge212 I agree with you and I just pray that more people will awaken to the SABBATH TRUTH
7istheAnswer 2 years ago
Secondly: This service clearly started on the Saturday .Dont be fooled by other translations read.KJV Acts 20:7:" 7And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came...." The key word is "Upon" This means that when the first day came upon them i.e. at sunset that Saturday night t. i.e. the meeting HAD to start sometine on Saturday the seventh day for the "Upon" to make any sense at all. Suge212 I agree with you and I just pray that more people will awaken to the SABBATH TRUTH
7istheAnswer 2 years ago
You say your church as a whole doesn't worship Marry? What is with all the statues of her then? Why do Catholics pray the Hail Marry? Why does the pope obsess over the Fatima prophecies. What's with all the Marry sightings and hype?
You honor the person the idol represents? I wont even comment on that.
You know I'm not trying to come down on you here. I love all my Christian brethren. I was once a Roman Catholic. Then I read the bible. Please watch "A Woman Rides The Beast" by Dave hunt.
Suge212 2 years ago
Mary is not worthy of worship. Actually, the Church excommunicated a number of nuns who worshiped Mary. The statues are a visible reminder of her and her fiat. Hail Mary comes from the Book of Luke. Regarding the Marian Apparitions, the Church investigates whether an apparition is true or not.
Yes, we honor (not worship) the person (saints) the statue or icon represents.
i once became doubtful but after reading the Bible and understanding the Church i grew to love and believe in the Church.
bordz120891 2 years ago
@bordz120891 According to you my friend, and intellect.No apparition ever happened..They all lied..no stigmata..all lied..So did the children at fatima Miracle of the son//They were willing to did for a lie?You like me my friend..all mixed up..God showed me the real truth while I was tring to destroy the Catholic church..God proved to me the church is the true Church of christ..seek my friend..I witnessed a stigmata..I am here to tell you.Early church fathers.You can not find God with intellect
airplanman 1 year ago
Its about time to renew ur faith. Our faith is an ancient faith..This is the faith passed on us through the bishops that were ordained by the original apostoles. I think studying d early christianity would help you a lot....especially @ d time when there was no bible 2 be looked upon...@ that time when our only source were d early church fathers...d bishops of d church. I'll be praying 4 u. Read also the Faith Explianed by Jesus Urteaga, the Cathecism of the Catholic Church, the Compendium...etc
lac38219 2 years ago
Idol Worship....images help us 2 remember d face of christ & in this way it helps us 2 encounter God who is spirit....this isnt idolatry.
Failure 2 uphold Sabbath......I dont think so
Worship Mary...no. If we honor our mother and father how much more do we and must honor the Blessed mother of God.
The pope b4 God...no We honor the pope because he is the successor of the apostle peter the prince of the apostoles. latria is different from dulia...please dont confuse it my friend.
lac38219 2 years ago
32-47 ?
Sf Peter was Patriarch of Antioch!
VyckRo 2 years ago
When I was in Highschool, I had to rattle off every single Pope.
I graduated from Pius XI, and yep..............I rattled off every single Pope mentioned, all the way down to the late Pope John Paul II.
KAMIKAZR 2 years ago
That's a goal of mine
belltownboy2012 2 years ago
So, having a list of Popes proves that there should be Popes. I'm convinced!
And if one has a differing list, then that group just isn't the right list-maker, says the 'True list-makers'. Sounds circular to me!
JohnPaulPatrick 2 years ago
Gret job!
BigDink57 3 years ago 2
so what's an antipope?
parascon 3 years ago
A false claimant of the Holy See in opposition to a pontiff canonically elected. At various times in the history of the Church illegal pretenders to the Papal Chair have arisen, and frequently exercised pontifical functions in defiance of the true occupant.
FIDESetRATIOihtys 3 years ago
@FIDESetRATIOihtys I thought the gates of hell wouldnt prevail??? Why do priests have sex with little boys?? Surely that wouldnt happen in Jesus church?Or i guess youll explain that one too?lol
douglasdolly 1 month ago
Do u see the dichotomy? YOu are saying that the Church taught heresy thru VI b/c VI taught that there would always be a pope.
evi410 3 years ago
That is, vulle86, no answer to my question.
Since when does an individual have the right to judge if Church is right or wrong?
paxcoder 3 years ago
Well, you have urself in a dichotomy here. IF there is no pope then VI was wrong. either way you are saying that the gates of hell previaled. You are not Catholic. Get to Confession FAST!
evi410 3 years ago
Great job, Josip!
papsttreu 3 years ago
Thank you!
FIDESetRATIOihtys 3 years ago
lulzy
Is it up to some ignorant lay person to decide whether a pope ir truly one or not? Or is it rather the job of the College of Cardinals?
papsttreu 3 years ago 5
Then you deny Vatican I, which stated there would ALWAYS be a pope, with the exception of the small time b/t elections. VII was not Dogmatic it does not alter the Faith.
evi410 3 years ago 4
nice video.. a very strong proof that the Roman Catholic Church is the original Christian Church and protector of the real teaching of Jesus Christ and the Apostels and the Church Father until the end of time..
EYANFIAN 3 years ago
Ahhhh see.
Only Catholics can have a 5 minute video dedicated to Popes alone. Never mind the teachings, this is just Popes. Just names!
Anyway, very well done!
onecatholicchurch 3 years ago
LoL, thx!
FIDESetRATIOihtys 3 years ago
Since when does an individual have the right to judge if Church is right or wrong?
paxcoder 3 years ago
Oddly enough, I was going to do a video simular to this to kick off my series on Catholicism. Now I'm not so sure I will do it.
SexyScientist6 3 years ago