Added: 5 years ago
From: RedBeret1010011
Views: 195,051
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (482)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • whats next??? is any thing else in design

  • Rdr range est...750+

    Berkely just developed new powered outer-skin material...that will be basically redirect not only all band's of radar waves but 99.9 of UV rays and Infrared freq's around aircraft...That plus 2 of the new Engines make you a whole new toy to play with guys...

    F-44..........................­.

    "Super Flanker" this Putin...lol

    If ya cant see it ya cant kill it...!

    as a show vech the Su-37 and Su-47 are ok

    (37 better)but I think inside of 5 years we Guarantee...

    AIR SUPREMACY.

  • two more words ya might wanna consider...

    mounts on F-44...

    Phoenix V.....!

    lol

  • What is the radar range of the f-35.

  • turkey is buying this cool jet

  • whats the name of this song?

  • I Against I

  • i believe the military has secret aircraft that we dont know about yet. reasons, 1 nasa has a pilotless x plane prototype that does mach 6 or 7 cant remember, also what if these new aircraft were diversions from what is about to be uncovered in 30 years, the b2 started in 93 and we didnt hear about it until 02, also i read a guy tached a ufo in the desert doing mach 5 on accident theres no telling what our country has until a major war breaks out that requires more

  • well duh! . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
  • love the song, awesome jet

  • it looks like sometin from the jetsons the things be hind the engine

  • sexy music for another tax dollars void. How many times are they gonna remake the F22 in order give us the strategic air power advantage we need against the Soviets?

  • how does this compare to the raptor?

  • The F-35 is a fighter bomber, the raptor is an air superiority fighter. Basically the F-35 can fight most other jets and drops bombs. The F-22 is faster and more focused on destroying other jet fighters. The F-22 clears the skys of major threats then the F-35s come in and do the bombing. The F-22 is like the F-15 were the F-35 is like the F-18.

  • F-35 Joint Strike Fighter For The Win!

  • Sad to know that the F-35 is going to replace the F-4 Phantom for the Turkish Air Force. But what a plane this is :) Way better than the Eurofighter Typhoon...

  • what song is that?

  • I Against I by Mos Def & Massive Attack its off of the Blade II OST

  • if this plane has thrust vectoring it'd own the air and ground

  • cool music

  • its good that its replacing the harrier. harrier is old, and if you look at its record, it has a bad habit of killing pilots:P

  • I like the F-35 more than the F-22.

  • f-22 would own this or any other fighter

  • Doesn't matter. An F-22 and F-35 would never face off in real combat. Unless we get stupid and start selling them off to other countries...

  • its a different role:P a stovl plane can land and take off anywhere. it can refuel reload and then go back to supporting ground troops.

  • f22 best jet in da world..

    also check the f22 b lock steel

  • what model will be used by the marines? the F-35B or the F-35C?

  • F-35B, thats the version that can start up vertical. F-35C is build stronger so it can take more en heavier weapons/rockets.

  • which is newer/better/more advanced

    f-22 raptor or f-35?? need someone to fill me in here

  • f35 is newer (it's not even in service yet!) and has 3 varients - conventional take off and landing (F35A), short take off and landing (F35B) and an aircraft carrier based version (F35C). It's smaller and lighter than the f22, has more thrust and a bigger combat radius - It's pretty good really, but it's still no harrier or typhoon!

  • ok thank you i was always wondering about it because i seen a show on tv about it and i was like "wow" and didnt know how it was compared to the f 22

  • harrier or typhoon? those old pieces of junk? f-35 is a cheap man's f-22. f-22 is the next gen air superority fighter to replace the ancient f-15. the russians are building one to try to compete with the f-22, su-47.

  • mmk thanks for the info lol, i was watching military channel and the f-22 is ranked #10 on the top ten fighters of all time, p-51D mustang tops off as number one and the f-15 is ranked #2 which with watching a video on how one survived and kept flying and landed with one wing, it diserves #2

  • ya but on that show they put the f-22 as number 10 because it hasn't actually had to time to prove it use

  • The SU-47 is just a testbed/demonstrator for PAK FA

  • wow refuelling looks dangerous

  • nice i think the music is ok

  • There's several different versions of the JSF which will be used by each branch, the STOL and VTOL are primarily for the marines and navy

  • that's mos def

  • plane is good, music is fucking awfull

    sounds like some crap from team america taking the piss out of r and b

  • ha ha ha ha ha!!!

  • mookalakka mookalakka lol

  • jamming the whole time to the music

  • It looks like a modern F5

  • This is NOT "F35 Lightning II"

    This is X-35B VTOL test flight from 2001 !!

    F-35B will NOT VTO.

    (and the music sux)

  • f35b can but not f35a

  • Wow...now THERE's a new concept! Put fucking shit rap music behind a great video. It's a shame that other countries see this video and the only thing you fucking wiggers care about is putting adolescent rap music to it. Here's a wake up call....being white is NOT a crime! Being a violent criminal is NOT cool. Fuck this song and fuck your mom.

  • chill out mad its just an instrumental, beside would you rather had "other" countries listening to this or System Of A Down

  • Those things are so ugly...Whats with the coverage on the canopy? I wont be able to see missle kill me? Or if its comin from over there im fucked.

  • dude the f-35 is cheaper than the f-22 so they wont make in limited productions stupid ass it provides more than the f-22 but the f-22 has a better supercruising speed and more weapons bay holding

  • krap music

  • they don`t build planes for the look, they are built because they are needed, many nations will applay the F-35 JSF in their airforces.

  • Like our till 2020 :)

    It was good choice to buy that F-16.

  • sweet plane, glad the democrats didnt destroy it in prototype, but they will probably limit production.

  • Music Sucks.

  • Eurofight = delta winged pos

    F-22/ JSF series + stealth = cant shoot down what you cant see.

    every militry related video i see, some eurofaggot is bashing US equipment in one way or another (minus GB yall our brothers) and while sometimes you do have a point, and most of the time you talk EXCESSIVE bullshit on us, aint no fucking with US aircraft sorry keep your fucking mouths shut or suck off your faggot boyfriends dick bitches we dont want to hear you.

  • nice vid,but the "music" is a retarded choice.

  • Excellent jet fighter! Can you use the Top Gun music instead?

  • dont get me wrong. the f-35 is a great plane... hell its amazing! but as far as air to air... the f-22 is very capable.

  • they aren't that different If you ask me theres at least 1 more model in TS development.

  • Lol are you kidding me? The F-22 could destroy a plastic winged Euro fighter easyly. Lol The F-22 has jamming capabilities, 4 multiple target locks, 50.cal machine guns, etc. Also stealth, so when you say a bunch of crap, like that, just take it back, the F-22 so far is the best available plane. PWNED...

  • i agree with you, because you speak FACT.

  • yes but i thought the F-22 had a 20mm cannon?!?

  • Yes it does have a 20 mm cannon, but there isnt that big of a difference between 20 and 25 mm, if it had 30 mm you would have had a point there. Also I also do not like that hover ability, we use our aircraft to fight more in urban environments all hovering would get you is a heat seeking missle in your tailpipe from muhammad on the ground.

  • You would be better off using a laser guided bomb with the target being painted by a troop on the ground. The f-22 covers more of what we need today, the f-35 just looks fancy because it can hover.

  • the plane is a support aircraft so the hover helps but not all of them will have it (plus if by some miricle the hemet alone will scare the crap out of the enemy

  • u are correct...the design is soo good its disgusting...its supposedly only 9 feet in height or something like that when cruising...u can barely see it coming at you...and the f-22 jamming capabilites is bar none...

  • the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Norway, Denmark, Australia and Turkey have contributed US$4.375 billion toward the development costs of the program.[3] Total development costs are estimated at more than US$40 were did all the money go? they used it to build their new 5th Gen plain f-22 im just glad the JAS,Eurofighter out class the F-22 fucking USA RIPOFF!

  • lawl not rly...but keep thinking that

  • they needed a air to ground fighter aswell as a AF fighter, they made the 35 as a air to ground close combat fighter in open combat, it's like the hind is to the apache or the comanche (wich didnt even reach production)

  • F-22

    F/A-22

    F-22A

    Retrofit for attack role (more laser bombs)

  • its not about stealing takeoffs its about making the best jet you can make...

  • lockheed stole the the harrier take off

  • So why are they making another plane with one engine this time? i dont get it anyone care to explain? whats wrong with F-22?

  • f-22 is really really expensive there going to still use the f-22

  • f-35 does not use the same engine as the f-22, f-22 has less powerfull engines but made to move arownd for more manuevering, since f-35 has 1 engine it has to be stronger, its the powerfullest JET engine ever made BUT it doesnt move arownd, F-35 is made for a multirole fighter, not for a showcase.

  • Ummmm, I already said that. The F-22'a engines weren't just made to move around, they're designed for supercruise. The F-35's engines gave up supercruise efficiency for more power. Yes, it is the most powerful jet engine ever, but the lack of thrust vectoring is for lower cost. The F-22 isn't just a showcase, by the way.

  • both are kickass aircraft both are built for difrent roles so when can i get mine hahaha

  • im british yes, but i have to say this plane is much better lookin then the harrier! sorry please dont spam mr or rate me low im sorry but its my opinion! :)

  • I agree. The Harrier is impressive, but the JSF looks a bit more menacing.

  • F-35 is a multirole fighter though which is being sold to UK, Japan and Australia allthough US is having second thoughts of selling it, the procces is super slow, US doesnt want to give away some of its stealth tech?

  • the f22 is the air superiority fighter for the whole world, the f35 cant compete with it, what it is is cheaper and faster to produce, f22 is the top plane by far yo

  • the F-22 is the stealth version of this fighter and is only superior in the fact that it has stealth, when it comes to ability the F-35 beats it. the F-22 is only the second best stealth fighter, the YF-23 is a better stealth fighter.

  • the F-22 is the stealth version of this fighter and is only superior in the fact that it has stealth, when it comes to ability the F-35 beats it. the F-22 is only the second best stealth fighter, the YF-23 is a better stealth fighter.

  • The F-35 can't supercruise, it's only rated to +9g and doesn't have thrust vectoring which means the F-22 can turn harder, the F-22 has longer range, has more advanced computers and radar, and is stealthier. The only thing the F-35 can do that the F-22 can't is carry larger bombs. The F-22 is superior in almost every way.

  • The f-35 is the only plane that can VTOL and then go to supersonic speeds

  • like the music!!!

  • No; if anything, it's not.

    It's SHORTtakeoffverticallanding.

    Only this prototype could do VTO.

  • not when it comes to bombing.

  • yup your right, it is and we have a lot stationed in alaska

  • Also, the F-35 is a single jet multirole fighter, the F-22 has 2, for the F-35 to lift a new engine had to be made, F-35's engine is the pwoerfullest thrust per weight engine on earth, its the powerfullest jet engine ever made next to the American X-43C jet [which made X-43c go mach 10]

  • The F-35 uses the same engine as the F-22.

  • Ahhh! I can't believe I said that! It isn't the same, it's based on it. It's uprated for more static thrust, but doesn't have supercruise. Sorry about that. Still, the F-35has a 50000+takeoff weight and only generates around 40000 lbs of thrust. I don't think that stacks up well against some adversaries with positive power to weight ratios.

  • The F-22 is the air superiority fighter, not the F-35. They both have their own specific purposes, with corresponding functionability.

    You have to admit though, 40k lbs of thrust is really impressive for one engine.

  • You're right about the comparison. It's like Comparing a Ferrari to a Dodge Charger. The F-135 engine is awesome, and I'd like to see one crammed into an F-16, but it isn't really set to impress in such a heavy aircraft.

  • The f-35 is an airsuperiority fighters to other nations as the UK, UK has nothing that comes close to the F-35's stealth, overall capabilities, jamming system, computers, etc, this is why UK, Australia and Japan are tryng to buy it. US denied selling the Raptor to them though, the Raptor has more capabilities overall, US isnt selling it to ANY of its alies. F-22 is an AIRSUPERIORITY FIGHTER for the USAF, enoughf sayd? Nothing like them baby!

  • Yeah, the F-35 and F-22 are excellent American planes. US companies developed both planes, but the F-35 JSF program is a more of a multinational program... both the US and UK jointly decided to sign contracts for the F-35 instead of the F-32. Now the JSF program is funded by the nine countries who will buy the plane.

  • I am not that good at jets fighters but How come F-22 looks like F-35!

  • The F-22 is kind of a study model for the F-35. They have looked at the F-22 for a lot of things they implemented in the F-35. The F-35 however is more of a multi-role platform, and only costs half as much a the Raptor :P

  • US needs to stop wasting money in the middle east!

  • Although I can't deny I don't find the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq highly entertaining. Good to see all this modern military equipment put to use to own up some taleban/insurgent bastards (good old fashioned ownage). It's just gone on a little too long. If the US took a break for a few years put some more sick ass weapons into production, then the next war (in a new setting) will be even more entertaining!!! (j/k lol ;-) ) On topic: F35 Lightning II - best fighter in the world hands down.

  • you are so right!

  • haentz, actually we aren't, I was just posting a funny reply to that guy. We are in debt, that does NOT mean we are broke. There are over 20 countries that are in more debt than we are, and you don't see them collapsing. But you can always hope for it! :D

  • I hope these cunts come through with a contract for once.

  • And happyshine how is 70's tech the "latest"? rofl. Now please leave this American website if all you're going to do is talk about russian shit on American military videos.

  • Excellent, i take that as compliment. By the way i'm American too but not an arrogant one like you who dumbly think we american are only the superior power. Arrogant is key to own destruction.

  • Happyshine you're a retard, the f-117 was shot down in 1999. The f-117's technology was 25 years old at the time. Also does it give you a boner that your country only shot down ONE out of the thousand of missions the f-117 was in? The f-117 subject is really getting old, it's brong up by 12 year old russians every 5 mins.

  • US so advanced is it? The F 117 was shot down by obsolete Russia SAM SA 3 GOA in Serbia. What a shame. In Russia obsolete stuff is as lethal as other latest US armament.

  • The reason that it was shot down was because the F-117 made it's runs on the same flight path at least 4 or 5 times. That was the fault of the US, and no credit to Russia. A fool could have done that with prior knowledge of the flight path.

  • US is known for having secret programs like the first FULLY stealth bomber, Area 51 is a military based according to Google Earth observations and iv seen them. Russia military expendiatures been growing 8 times slower then Americas the last 15 years, i highly doubt Russias advanced at all, infact China isnt dependant on Russian technology nomore, their making their own things, only thing Russia can REALLY sells the ak47 to people from 3rd world countries to kill eachother, good job Russia!

  • Good. The more US underestimate Russia & the rest of the world is better. Just dont be surprised when things not going US way.

  • blade II soundtrack...nice video

  • stop wasting my tax dollars.

  • ok russias broke...and the president wants 2 pay women to have kids..population problem i highly highly dont there extremely advance in anything and what the US has in its arsenal russia will find out 5yrs after we retire it u f**ken kiden me? countermesures...

  • US broke not RUSSIA

    Do your homework

  • US - 13 trillion GDP

    Russia - 2 trillion GDP

    US not broke Russia broke.

    US spend 500 billion per year on military Russia spend 80 billion.

    Russia broke not US, Russia fall behind in stealth race and arms race. USSR collapse because economy.

    I no agree with you.

    US not broke, Russia broke :)

  • Wrong numbers, you are looking at the income, not the debt. You can have a high income and still be broke.

  • When I said "are in more debt" I meant the percentage of GDP they are in debt.

    Hope that clears things up.

  • Russia is broke

  • that Russian Yak-141

    it was sold 90s

    way better and safer that harriers

  • I agree. Whatever US have in its arsenal Russian already have the countermeasures. Never under estimate Russian.

  • Us and the brits had this technology before the soviets. Called the Harrier.

  • tech. def. check the engine desine

    way better and safer that harriers

  • The Soviet had this technology long ago. Its called Yakovlev Yak-41/141 Freestyle which begun in 1975. American is so outdated. Don't believe then check it yourself.

  • this is a *tid bit more advanced than an yak ;)

  • Yeah, this is SLIGHTLY more advanced than the Yak-141.

    I don't think the Yak-141 had AESA technology or a LO platform as well as a super advanced weapons system.

  • The fact is Russian is well advanced in its military technology. The level of secrecy is so high beyond top secret. Dont be surprised if Russian already on the 100 next best things.

  • Are you kidding me happysunshinez? It's the US Government that is more secretive.

    Look up the Tu-2000, a plane that is still on the drawing, and it's revealed also.

    If the United States worked on a plane with that capability it would be kept a secret.

    Ever since the collapse of the CCCP, Russia has been EXTREMELY open about their projects.

    Just remember the F-117 was in service 5 years before being revealed to the public.

  • dont forget the su-50, but im not sure how much of a secret that was

  • The Soviet had this technology long ago. Its called Yakovlev Yak-41/141 Freestyle which begun in 1975. American is so outdated. Don't believe then check it yourself.

  • Do you really belive you can be european, is this a jok.

  • OK - it's going to replace lots of current machines. Cool.

    But I think it would be unwise to retire the A10; that machine was built around a timeless design concept. Everytime they're about to retire it, they suddenly need it again - just like they needed the Skyraider in Vietnam.

  • I hate the F-35 it's so ugly

    They should just have focused on one plane and made the F-23

  • Well there was a YF-23. It lost to the F22.

  • rapping wrecked it all

  • anybody know the music to this video?

  • i know it is a song from the blade trinity soundtrack .

  • found it. It's "I against I" from Massive Attack & Mos Def

  • Us Australians should of been able to purchase the F-22, don't the Americans trust us? we've only been in every major war & conflict with them. We were the only UN country that fought with them in Vietnam so wtf?

  • Meevinman, that's been the case for ALL of our "future" planes.

    Just look at the F-117... none sold.

    B-2? None sold

    F-15? Sold... but not for a while

    F-22? None sold... but MAYBE AFTER A WHILE

    F-35? Will sell a LOT OF, resembles the F-16 in foreign sales.

    We just got to keep our best products to ourselves :)

    That's what we've done for some time now.

  • Its just a snapshot of the arrogance the US seems to exude to the rest of the world though. To force an ally nation with numerous defence treaties and as a long a history of comradeship as any is really messed up.

  • Your talking as if the US has to give anyone anything. We dont have to give anyone the F22. The United States paid for it all and noone else helped, so why should we give any to anyone.

  • they probably scared of theft.....

    they want to keep control over their technology. what you can do best within your own country.

    i could imagine a traitor infiltrating australian air force.....

  • Actually, the Australian air force is small and selection is extremely rigorous and competitive. I would put it to you that it's actually HARDER to infiltrate the Australian air force than the US air force!

  • if so, then i really have no answer why australia cant get the raptors....no idea...

  • the countries that contributed more financially to the f-35 project will receive it first, those that paid less to develop it will get it much later.

  • this is a message for nytrospawn...ur an idiot...f22 doesnt have vtol capability like u say it does...the f35 does however...

  • wow your an idiot

  • haahah.. Dummy.. You have it backwards.

  • you have it backwards dummy.

  • WE ARE GIVING THEM TO TURKEY?!?!?!?!?!?! I hope not. I think we should put little "reflectors" on this baby to make it easier to track (and raise the enemies confidence)in peace time then take them off in wartime.

  • Fortunately yes you guys are giving the F-35 because Turkey gave 3 billion for development only third to the U.S and Britain for development cost.

  • Get your facts right. Turkey gave $175 MILLION towards the project not$3 BILLION you numpty. The UK is the second biggest financial backer giving $2.5 Billion.

  • I agree with every1 awsome plane, but u guys shouls think of Australia we've only been here 200 years but with been in every war since the Boar War. I didnt see America in the Malaya Emergency nor did i see britain in the Korean war. nice jet

  • Yeah, I agree a1mint, and that's what I've done here. The F35 is an AWESOME fighter plane that's been engineering and build by Lockheed Martin. Albeit there are several other countries involved in this project, but it's Lockheed's baby and USA is #1!!! If there was no USA there would be no badass F-35!!! I mean, if we relied on China to build this plane then we were be screwed when it came down to battle. The plane would fall apart in the sky due to poor quality and component failures!

  • And lead posioning.

  • lol

  • Don't even mention China manufacturing - my dog just threw up.

  • People make stuff. People live in places. Some live here some live there they live everywhere.

    What's the point about boasting about "a country"? I think we should all work together to do great things. Then we can all take credit for things.

  • this fighter plane is AWESOME! now the USA will be more efficient at killing an commies in our path! BANG! Forget Rambo, this plane will keep the USA where it belongs - #1!! BANG-BANG-BANG!! Jeeeyeeahhhhhh!

  • Nah you guys have even a better plane than this one and that's the F-22 Raptor. Even though this plane is awesome it's the Raptor the other nations will be really afraid of.

  • sure. The only limit of this plane is the pilot.

  • although I still agree with the others who say the F-35 is a great plane. It does in fact use the same technology than the F-22, except it's a little more cost-effective.

    The F-22 is so expensive that they only made 750 of these.

  • Yeah it may be more cost-effective, and there is no doubt this plane is brilliant, but can you imagine what "only" 750 raptors will do to another nations airforce... You could have 2000 hornets and still lose. I just hope America will let us (Aussie's) buy the Raptor. I know we are buying roughly 100 F-35's, I just hope that will be enough though to takle any foreign threat, namely Indonesia. Unless America promises to help us if anything happens, i would sleep better if we had Raptors.

  • Asking this question as an utter babe in the woods, but does the Aussie military establishment consider China more than a remote threat? Also, why do you feel threatened by Indo? Sorry, but we don't get much Asia-Pacific news here. All Sarko and Britney Spears, I'm afraid.

  • Well China is further away from AUS than Indonesia is. And As far as I know we have quite good relations with the Chinese and I think if they were going to attack anyone it would be the US, Tawian or India (though I really don't know it's just a guess). Indonesia is right on our boarder. And especially since East Timor our relationship with them is a bit tense at times. I probably doubt they would try anything or even beat us If they tried. But I'd rather our country be safe than sorry.

  • guess you're right.

    and by "only",I simply meant that there are planes they made 10 times as many.

  • Very true. Too true. Wish we could put some reflectors on in peacetime and take them off in wartime.

  • The 35 is pretty cool, but for air-heads like me, the 22 Raptor will be the real air-show draw. Super sexy air craft.