Added: 2 years ago
From: kangagirl
Views: 15,740
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (93)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 40 years had passed since this hate campaing and it's really sad that in 2011 people still think the same way and promote hate and ignorance.

  • I'm surprised people still remember Anita Bryant. She was popular, hot until that pie in the face incident. She really shot herself in the foot.

    Oh well, she's old news.

  • THE SLUR OF "HOMOPHOBE" IS NEVER ACCEPTABLE.

    “Homophobe” is a hate-loaded slur used by the partisans of the anti-Life, antisocial Aberrosexualist ideology to unjustly discriminate, stigmatize, demean, hurt and offend everyone who disagrees with their extremist ideology and irrational agenda. This slur is as despicable as any other ethnic, racial or sexist slur. It has no place in civil, respectable public discourse and it should be understood that its use is never acceptable. Never!

  • @cosg9531 . . .  Because Hefner promotes equality for all, regardless of sexual orientation.

  • If you are morally corrupt and agree with the faggots demonic, confused, filthy lifestyle they are fine. If you disagree, this is the kind of bedwetting behavior they are best known for. Gays are devastating to themselves and society and they hate anyone that is trying to preserve God's morals and decency. That's because their father the devil resides in them. Repent or burn faggots.

  • The biggest promoter of anti-homosexuality in the world is Hugh Hefner. Beautiful women for men is his agenda, and has been for nearly 60 years. Why don't the queers object to him?

  • She can cure Homosexuality in 10 days ?!! I can cure it in 2 seconds ,,, with a good 357 magnun !!

  • Really stupid and meaningless. What a waste of time. Just like this comment.

  • It's kind of sad that this David Lee put so much time and energy into something this pointless....

  • If her name was Anita Rayze your boss would say NO too !

  • Anita Bryant, of course, expressed her views and did the right thing.  Of course, what she did was 'politically incorrect' - and what is political incorrectness? That's easy; anything that offends the left. Notice how the other 'outspoken celebrities' have never had a pie thrown at them - or suffered for their stances. Because Fonda and Asner stood for liberal causes, they got a free pass....but because Bryant offended the supposedly 'tolerant' left, she paid the price. Hypocrites.

  • @johnlorican Yeah cause as we know conservatives never commited any violent acts of protests... Oh wait! You guys don't throw pies! You shoot and bomb people! You don't take away people's rights,that's what it's about. The only reason Anita was against gays is because a 2000 year old book written by uneducated villagers said being gay was a sin. You people don't think critically, you just use the bible to benefit your bigoted and disgusting views of hatred.

  • @Reasonwillwin....True - conservatives typically DON'T throw pies at people...nor do conservatives 'shoot and bomb people.' Anita Bryant was against homosexuality because there's nothing normative about homosexual behavior. It's impossible to consummate a relationship, you can't reproduce; if we were all homosexual, we'd all be extinct. Through political correctness and demonization, leftists want to pretend that homosexuality is 'normal' - but nature knows better...

  • @johnlorican ''nor do conservatives 'shoot and bomb people.'' Lie, enormous fucking lie. "It's impossible to consummate a relationship, you can't reproduce" So relationships are just about reproduction right? Being in love doesn't have anything to do with it? I bet your girlfriend or wife will be happy to hear that! ''if we were all homosexual, we'd all be extinct." Okay, and this is relevant because...? Gays don't want everyone to be gay you freaking moron.

  • @Reasonwillwin....Correct; conservatives don't 'shoot and bomb people.' Countries - like the USA - DO go to war to fight evil and protect innocent people. The Iraq war was a war to do just that, voted on by conservatives and liberals alike in 2002. Relationships, of course, are not just about consummation - but that's an act integral to marriage that's a physical impossibility with homosexual relationships.

  • Comment removed

  • @johnlorican "leftists want to pretend that homosexuality is 'normal' - but nature knows better'' Homosexuality is found all over nature. And yes, it is normal, wether your bigoted, ignorant ass likes it or not. People who are gay cannot change what they are, you on the other hand you have no exucse for being THIS freaking ignorant.

  • @Reasonwillwin...I want to thank you for being true to your leftist ways - and posting comments on YouTube that are filled with vulgarity and slang. I've yet to converse with a liberal who simply can't resort to cursing. Thanks for continuing that unbroken tradition.

    Also, it would help you to learn how to spell ('wether, exucse'). Correct spelling always enhances the points one tries to make. Though your points are absurd and infantile, they DO come across better when spelled correctly.

  • @johnlorican Freaking, ass, those are the ''curses'' I used. I wonder how in your mind cursing can be worst than being a hate-filled ignorant who wants to take people's rights away. You can't give me a reasonable argument so you have to resort to the little unpretty words I use. How pathetic.

  • @Reasonwillwin....Nobody, of course, is suggesting that anybody's 'rights' are taken away. A homosexual has the same rights that I, a heterosexual, have. A homosexual can marry anybody of the opposite sex - just like I can. A homosexual can't marry someone of the same sex - but then I can't either...EXACTLY the same rights. Any gay person, of course, can have a homosexual relationship; who's stopping them? Certainly, not Anita Bryant. I try to talk logic; you resort to name calling. Sad.

  • @johnlorican ''. A homosexual can't marry someone of the same sex - but then I can't either'' Yeah cause you don't want to marry someone from the same sex doofus, they want to marry the person they love, which you can do but they can't. You using logic? Don't make me laugh! The only thing you use is ignorance. People like you are as hate filled as hitler was, he too wanted to take people's rights away... Anita wanted to take the gays jobs away, keep them hidden from the world. She's satan

  • @Reasonwillwin....Marriage doesn't mean that we should be able to 'marry the person we love.' If that's the case, I should be able to marry one of my relatives - or marry several people at the same time (why not marry three people?...four?...ten?). Once you redefine marriage away from a union between one man and one woman - then it's open season as to what it can be (same sex, polygamy, polyandry). Wanting to keep marriage as it's always been defined is not 'hate' - it's common sense.

  • @53dumey,

    And idiots who support this bitch need to realise we're not all limp-wristed nancy-boys,so bring it on,if you think you're the one to 'beat bloody' some 'butt-plugger',pal.

    @Nemesis7293,

    Oh,that's hilarious,well said,lol.

    @dacanale,

    Why do you think Nemesis7293 would want to be anywhere near yours or anyone elses kids?!

    Well done,orlandofringe for an absolutely hilarious 'homage',lol,to the dried up old bitch.Her vileness even reached across the pond to the UK.

  • Poeple who throw Pies in the faces of Women who disagree with the Butt-Pluggers need to be Beaten Bloody !

  • laughing my ass off

  • Anita Bryant needs to eat the peanuts out of my queer shit.

  • @Nemesis7293 How do you live with yourself saying vile and filthy things like that? No mother would ever let a creature like you near her children.

  • The Sarah Palin of the 1970s!

    Old Mama Grizzley should take heed of Anita Bryant's cautionary life story.

  • Unfortunately Anita Bryant has gotten a real taste of the open-mindedness, tolerance and compassion that only gays and liberals can dish out. Anita, you are a heroine in my book and some day you will wear another crown filled with many jewels. And it will be a crown to wear forever. Just remember; this earth is all the hell you will ever see.

  • @MrReaganismyhero Yeah, poor aneeda. She's really been through a lot. I wonder what she ever did to deserve it.

  • @MrReaganismyhero Not only are you completly insane, you're a bigot too! Great combo.

  • kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

  • she should have saved herself the embarrasment and ended her life... she makes americans look so stupid.

  • AB is an un American christain war and fear monger waving the flag and thumping the bible fore the republican reich she is no different than the terrorists that attacked us ............HATE IS NOT A FAMILY VALUE

  • if anita would have been listened to, millions of homosexual men in this country might still be alive.

  • @turquoise770 yeah right she is a psycho bitch hope that pie throw haunts her for the rest of her life.

  • Help keep youtube neat and tidy. Flag all Kimmo4444's comments.

  • Save Our Children The campaign was based on conservative Christian beliefs regarding the sinfulness of homosexuality and the perceived threat of homosexual recruitment of children and child molestation.

    ...recruitment LOL that is so laughably ignorant and stems from a lack of education. peace

  • iaskojet and kimmo4444 are the same person.

  • @InsertName125 LOL I think this comment is funny for some reason...

  • That pie throw was worthy of Moe Howard and Soupy Sales!

  • objdo;

    hit a nerve have i??????

    hahahaha

  • I swear, the pie reveals that she is really satan. Scariest image ever.

  • Where do you live and where's the nearest pie shop...?

  • Thirty years later and Anita Bryant`s name still can't be mentionned without provoking instant controversy and ridicule for her ignorant comments. Her 1977 campaign will haunt her until the day she days. A good lesson for all as to who is really "marginal."

  • @carribbeandreams2004 Sorry to break it to you, but things are getting better and better for gay people

  • @anthonykovic...Anita Bryant's comments weren't 'ignorant;' they were just politically incorrect...and what is 'political correctness?' That's easy - anything that offends the left. Her comments were rational, common sense and in alignment with reality...which is why the left had to resort to the juvenile action of throwing a pie at her...

  • @johnlorican ''juvenile action of throwing a pie at her...'' At least it was only a pie, if the guy would have been a conservative he would have shot her, that's what you people are good that ;-) Consummation in a marriage is impossible for gays? Oh no it's not lol Gay people consumate they marriage all they can if you know what I mean, and if you're talking about making children, there's plenty of ways they can have children of their own. An alignment with reality? She spew bible bullshit...

  • @Reasonwillwin....Please wake up to reality; your comment about conservatives 'shooting' at people is absurd - along with homosexual consummation. Natural law - and common sense (before common sense became 'politically incorrect') prohibits sexual intercourse between same-sex couples. It's impossible; a person as young as 13 recognizes that. The left REFUSES to engage in reality; they only deal in make believe 'rights.'

    Again, ANY gay has the EXACT same rights as a straight person.

  • @johnlorican Dude if you want a list of crazy c0nsrvatives who shot people who were opposing them I'd be glad to give you one! ''prohibits sexual intercourse between same-sex couples. It's impossible; a person as young as 13 recognizes that.'' Apparently you do not know that gay people can have sex together LOL And yes it is possible for them to have children of their own. ''gay has the EXACT same rights as a straight person.'' Not in the case of marrying the person they love!

  • Comment removed

  • @Reasonwillwin ('Apparently you do not know that gay people can have sex together')....of course, I know that - but they can't have intercourse, it's physically impossible to reproduce - thus, it's impossible to consummate their union. You can pretend that two homosexuals can 'mate,' similar to that of heterosexuals - but, again, the left doesn't live in the world of reality; they only live in a fantasy world where they view a union of the same-sex as equivalent to that of opposite sexes.

  • @johnlorican '' but they can't have intercourse'' Intercourse is having sex dude XD '' it's physically impossible to reproduce'' Well not together but they can adopt, use a surrogate mother or in vitro conception. See everything works out in the end. But then again, lots of married couple can't have children and have to go through the same solutions as gay couples to have kids. Are you against marriage for sterile people too? I really hope not lol

  • ('Not in the case of marrying the person they love')....Y'know, I have many male friends - and I love them - but, golly, I can't marry a single one of them (!).....I also love my grandparents - and a few of my cousins - but, alas, I can't marry ANY of them either (!)

    I'm going to protest! My rights are being trampled on!!! How dare society prevent me from marrying anybody that I may love!! I DEMAND that ALL of society and ALL of civilization cater to my personal whims!!!!!

  • @johnlorican Tell me how YOU would be affected if two gay men or women had the right to marry eachother, what you said about polygamy and incest was pure bullshit. Now if you don't think that a marriage should be between two people who love each other you have BIG problems. Now you can't interfere with people's rights, that's what a totalitarian government does. If you really agree with the horrible acts of ignorance and hate that Bryant did you have to be as ignorant as she is, pretty sad.

  • @Reasonwillwin ...How would I be affected? Gay marriage would have zero effect on me or my marriage.

    The REAL question is: how would gay marriage affect society? It would have incredible effect. Traditional marriage would be rendered meaningless; every textbook, media outlet in America would have to feature same-sex couples alongside opposite sex couples - otherwise schools would be sued and called 'bigots' - because that's how the left operates. It would have TREMENDOUS repercussions.

  • @johnlorican '' Traditional marriage would be rendered meaningless; every textbook, media outlet in America would have to feature same-sex couples alongside opposite sex couples - otherwise schools would be sued and called 'bigots' - because that's how the left operates. It would have TREMENDOUS repercussions.'' This is the biggest load of bullshit I've ever read in my entire life, congradulations sir! Oh no our kids might learn about gay people, THAT'S HORRIBLE! How ridiculous.

  • @Reasonwillwin ('This is the biggest load of bull---- I've ever read in my entire life').....Hey, thanks - again - for cursing in your posts. As I stated yesterday, leftists simply CAN'T post a comment without using vulgarity. It seems to be all they know how to do. Of course, what I stated was factual - every bit of it. The left pushes their agendas in the courts. 80% of humanity wants nothing to do with the liberal worldview; their only force fed through court decisions. It's a travesty.

  • @johnlorican ''Y'know, I have many male friends - and I love them - but, golly, I can't marry a single one of them (!).....I also love my grandparents - and a few of my cousins - but, alas, I can't marry ANY of them either (!)'' Do you realize how STUPID this joke of an argument is? You are not IN love with your friend or your grandma! We're talking about being in love here doofus. And yes, I may curse, but cursing is not as bad as being an ingorant bigot, which is what you are.

  • @Reasonwillwin ....Well, we've reached a stalemate. I'm a firm believer that 'reason will win' (as your name indicates); you hold to positions that are clearly not logical - but represent a liberal view of the world that doesn't conform to reality - all while calling people vulgar names if they don't agree with you. If you believe that's maturity, then we'll have to agree to disagree. Have a good life....

  • @johnlorican Sorry but immaturity is persecuting people who can't change the way they are and keep rights away from them. YOu gave incredibly stupid arguments, you were nonsensical all throughout this conversation and when I cam back at you about your ignorance and lack of logic you cop out by talking about some bad language (not that bad but whatever) I used. Quite sad.

  • In Soviet Russia, views express YOU.

  • My goodness - Do they have laws that forbid pie throwing where you come from emycer? Your country sounds even more backward than the good ol' USA. Well, at least you won't be a target if you stay home:)

  • When she took part in helping to secure the inability to adopt children away from the people from the state of Florida, a pie was well deserved.  In the end emycer what she did was far more detrimental than that pie or the action of throwing it ever was. But if you share her views, I have a feeling you probably won't see it that way. You should check out her playboy interview, there's some real gems in there!

  • love it!!!

  • Pie Face! The Adventures of Anita Bryant looks like a riot!

    Thanks for sharing!

  • Show me proof that from the Mental health institution. Otherwise you're just a moron.

  • @kimmo4444 your saying I have a mental illness?

  • Hilarious! Thanks for loading!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more