Added: 3 years ago
From: sonicbombHD
Views: 155,686
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (540)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Reenginered from a UFO!

  • @BluWolf2012 ..The Habu is a UFO.......

  • This is a very beautiful aircraft,

    also my favorite.

  • cherylw1958, tu a faux quand tu dit qu'il n'est plus en service, les USA nous mente et se serais pas la première fois, je le confirme

  • i love sr 71 blackbird =)

  • This is so beautiful. The most lovely airplane ever and this music fits so perfectly i watch this at least once a day. So sad that it's been retired. I love it so much i have a model of it on my computer desk it is the only decoration i have, nothing could beat it for such elegance. I envy all who flew her.

  • Turn up the Volume!

  • Reminds me of G.I. Joe ,the Cobra planes looked exactly like the SR-71 :D

  • makes me wanna cry when I just Know My eyes will never see this Beauty take Flight.

  • america designe alot of stuff but belfast goo things such as the ejector seat and the hovering jet and the harrier jump jet and america takes credit for it huh bullshit

  • @jgrindy494 ..And don't forget, you folks can also take credit for building the TITANIC...Cheers from America...

  • HD my ass

  • Love this Plane.In my opinion its the #1 Stealth plane

    This Plane is Beast

  • SR 71 FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • the music is wonderful when you see this plane.

  • The reality is the true capabilities of this aircraft are still classified, its most probable it went around mach 3.4 max, the SR-71 is the fastest plane ever built, non could match her speed and range at those speeds.

    Rumor has it after they developed the SR-71, the us airforce went to work on an even faster aircraft, otherwise known as the aurora.

    And dont even get started on the TR-3B black triangle, that stuff is deep black, its the type of area that men like Nickola Tesla were pioneering.

  • i definitely saw a yf-12 in that video during one of the clips

  • why the did retire the aircraft?

  • another thing u claim u did peneterate ussr borders, but everyone knows that was never happend. they just approach our borders, but never flied in. as we built mig-31 u stopped to fly along our borders. btw we always followed it with our AAW, so we could take it easily down, but as i allready said sr-71 never broke our borders unlike china, korea, vietnam. so stop to dream yanks. its another most expensive crap-toy of americunts

  • Comment removed

  • @pipercub123456

    ofc georgy! i just said,that sr-71 (sound like russian rocket btw) never penetrated soviet borders. now u can go suizide, biatch!

  • @Russia2010 Wow! You certainly are a very literate person. "that was never happened"? "stop to dream"? I'll tell you what: how about you learn to write English, and then you can come back and make fun of Americans. Ok? Ok.

  • @seththeincredible96

    Try to learn same level of russian how i can english! btw my native language is russian, not most primitive language of the world like english is!

  • Comment removed

  • @Russia2010 Then please do explain to me where you got the evidence that English is primitive? Я не в расизме, просто говорю, если вы хотите критиковать английский, изучать его в первую очередь.

  • For pure speed, with no payload, test pilot Mikhail M. Komarov averaged 2,982.5 km/h over a 500 km closed circuit in 1967, three months after the new aircraft was first shown to the public at Domodedovo. On the same day A. Fedotov reached an altitude of 29,977 metres (98,350 ft) with a 1,000 kilogram payload. But the MiG could go higher and eventually it became the first aircraft to go higher than 35,000 metres (115,000 ft)

  • Its funny how americunts take a credit for ussr records.

    every americunt should be proud and claim about this shit-crap? haha

    so u americunts really mean that this aircraft absolute high altitude, right?

    but most ppls besides americunts ofc, know that mig-25 belong these records.

  • sr-71 online

  • Our SR-71's in the air?

  • Such a majestic plane. words cannot describe it. i'm having difficulty trying to explain how amazing this plane is.

  • beautiful airplane and beauty song... I would want to fly with this machine... This is my dream...

  • thumbs up if Beakman's World brought you here

  • now you americans cant even get out of debt you owe the chinese,

    you people = fallen lol

  • In terms of sheer beauty aesthetics, likely no other plan designs will ever approach this one. The ghostly profile of this one makes it otherwordly. The current stealth F-22, in profile, looks down right ugly, although it obviously possesses radar obserbent and deflecting technologies --- in addition to the ability to carry high yielded weaponry --- that the SR-71 didn't have at the time it was designed.

  • This aircraft was decades ahead of its time. It represents the pinnacle of aviation, an unrivalled, unparallelled acheivement. Satellite imagery rendered this aircraft obsolete, but what an incredible aircraft it was!

  • It is a magnificent video with a suggestive music! Compliments from Udine, Italy!

  • Comment removed

  • Star Wars designers took this plane when designing the Naboo spaceship seen in Episode 1

  • batman borrowed this many times

  • Are there any SR-71s still flying?

  • A bird that should have never left the sky: SR-71.

  • I was there at RAF Mildenhall, UK in 1975 or so when HABU made the speed record for trans atlantic flight. When it departed on the return leg of its speed run to LA. there was great fanfare and publicity, the BBC was there and I think a Royal or two. Less than an hour after departure we were notified that the aircraft had to shut down an engine and was returning.

  • The crowds were gone and HABU made an uneventful landing. They left a day or so later and the rest is history. I know this to be true because I was there, I drove the FOLLOW ME truck when they landed and I debriefed the crew. wasn't a serious problem but why take chances at Mach 3+.

  • I had to make 2 posts. Read the second one first

  • @MrGeorgieo

    we did record this!

    files.radioscanner.ru/files/do­wnload/file7504/11243DOTmp3

  • @Russia2010 Your link doesn't work. B4 calling me a name, all I need is proof.  From what I've read is that the Mig 25's burned out at top speeds, and that when the American scienitists got their hands on the Mig when one defected to Japan that they literally laughed at it.

    BTW, compliments on your efforts to discuss in English. You do very well considering its not your native language. Peace.

  • @asusucks

    radioscanner.ru/files/records/­file7504/

    Click on winamp icon somewhere there.

    so now to ya stupid saying about mig-25. as belenko was landed in japan ameriCUNTS (sorry i dont fucking like ya race, cuz all of u are stupid retards w/o any knowledge, u even dont know fucking another language, und want that fucking everyone learn ya fucking primitive language, and btw u stupid cunts are most aggressive race of the world.)

  • @Russia2010 One thing I've learned in life is that people who tend to swear and call others names typically are uneducated. You fall into that mold. Fact is the SR-71 flew higher and faster than the Mig 25 ever did, and yes, US scientists did actually laugh at the Mig-25's makings once they got a look at it and took it apart. The aircraft had crappy welds, transistors, its turning radious was the size of Texas, and it literally is a a rocket with wings. Believe me, there are many things I

  • could say about the "typical" Russian, but i'm not going to stoop down to your level of a low life.

  • @Russia2010 HAHA U R such a retard. You call us americans stupid; yet we have more nobel prizes, inventions, etc, than your shitty country. What's even funnier is that Russiacunts like youself don't even live in your nation. I even read recently where thousands of students are participating in a contest in Russia to come to US to study. They want to get out our your hellhole. It's also funny how we're so stupid yet all your country can do is copy us time & time again. Shut your hole bitch!

  • @Russia2010 Waite you call Americans agressive, bro your trying to defend Russia? Open a history book and then we can talk. Not to mention English is a very complex language to learn. and calling it primitve is basically like calling all Romance Languages and German primitive. Since English is rooted from German but our words have basis in Latin, and Latin is basically the father of all Romance languages

  • @asusucks

    were impressed about mig-25 cuz it was designed for resistance against EMP WEAPONS. yes it could be still used by fucking nuclear strike. not fucking one of americunts jet of this time had such properties.

    anyway read the fucking manual, dude, before u start to carry a conversation with me about things u dont have any idea.

  • 32 of these were made. 12 of them, or more than a third, were destroyed in accidents. That's not a great service record.

  • @euclid901.. The Habu went from 1972 to 1989 without a single write off, this is an envious safety record considering the speed and altitude envelopes in which the aircraft operated,..THX

  • @pipercub123456 Whatever the stats/performance, it's perhaps the most aesthetically pleasing aircraft ever made, imo.

  • @bonds2k89

    your lame.

  • First time I listened to this song I was high on bombs, and I'll never forget how it felt. It was the most beautiful thing I ever heard.

  • EXCELLENT music choice

  • Corrected

  • It was developed for the CIA not the USAF

  • Days gone by definitely, perhaps someday we can return to times like these. Times where american enguinty and innovation were taking us to quite literally new heights and places.

  • @seanmartin1989 You mean nazi ingenuity. I'm not saying the U.S.A. doesn't have great minds. I'm just saying, the minds behind the german war machine were "borrowed" by both U.S and the former soviet union. And people call conspiracy theorists loonies and kooks. FIFTY YEARS AGO YOU HAD THIS PLANE. WHAT TECHNOLOGY DO YOU HAVE NOW? more history, less charlie sheen

  • @seanmartin1989 It still is. This plane was replaced by better ingenuity and innovation... orbit based satellites.

  • @seanmartin1989 imagine how we could improve with todays technology...

  • @seanmartin1989 caugh caugh without help off germans and soviets america could not of gotten far with their american "enguinty"

  • @rcnator101 ..The important thing, is America did get there first......what does the means matter?? do you think the Cold War had some kind of rules for these countries to abide by??? if its important to you, all the Germans were American citizens as are a very large group of the population..German..in America, it your aren't a native American, then you had to come from a different country..understand?? I'M of German ancestry and proud of it...I just don't understand your point about Germany>>>

  • I almost cry.

  • my big love <3

  • I read that sometimes these planes were too hot to touch upon landing. I find this amazing given that at 40,000 feet, the air temps are -50 to -60; cold enough to chill things down very quickly...

  • It's so strange... 40 years ago we where able to go higher and faster than ever and now, looking to the past marvelous, it seems like an picture of an impossible future.

  • @marendur

    Too bad the US seems destined to decay, mostly due to our inability to govern ourselves effectively as the Founding Fathers envisioned.

    The SR-71, the Space Shuttle, the moon program, using the Russians, what's next to go?

  • @marendur true words 

  • @marendur even i agree we could go faster than now BUT, don't think about 1 side of the coin, see the second side, how much was the safety, i mean SUPPOSE the plane malfumctions, what will happen to pilot especially during ejection... should i say.. he will freeze to death at that altitude :) so its safer but slower now

  • the two people who disliked this video will be shoved up the devils ass

  • Blade Runner OST FTW!!!

  • Thumbs up if you only found out about this plane in transformers and black ops

  • @Steelerguy6178 No, I don't. If they had them they would have used them. Never underestimate a man driven by his god to act. Reason and logic do not apply.

  • @Steelerguy6178 See, that's why I disdain discussing conspiracy theories, there never is an end to argument. If you believe the conspiracy, you will believe anything ignoring the evidence. And yes my cousin was on the Pennsylvania crashed flight. so in ONE case of four the passengers had an uprising, but every terrorist/police briefing I have seen always says "give them what they want, and don't resist" Terrorized people FREEZE and become indecisive. TRAINED people react based on training.

  • @Steelerguy6178 You under-rate the terrorists. First they were highly trained, in Europe and in Florida, second Bin Laden was much more than a "caveman," It was a well planned and executed mission. nothing amateur about any of it. Plastic handled Box knives with single edged razor blades, ENOUGH to cut people's throats.

  • sometimes it's hard to believe this was made in the 60s

    just amazing

  • Sorry 14 airworthy USAF airframes.

  • Comment removed

  • I see you now ... That one goes to scismgenie :-)

  • So little time to catch up to who gave me that mail ... Did that person mean one of the SR-71 family as there was an Interceptor version armed with two missiles that had the same roll as our English Electric Fork Lightening now out of service ... The plane was considered an 'X' fighter whilst it's bigger brother the SR-71 was a recon plane only ... I know NASA owns some of what remains ... Anyway I'll catch up to you :-)

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • I flew this once...

  • I LOOVE THISSSSSS I WANNA FLY ONEEEE

  • @RedKeso I wanna fly a F-35 Lightning :D

  • Wow! The song really describes how beautful the blackbird is when it's flying.

  • Does it make everyone below it red triangles? :o

  • Black Ops 

  • i love when the afterburners ingnite at 1:00

  • behold the glory of JETFIRE

  • the sr-71 became my fav plane cuz megan fox touched one

  • @LilJew96 yes

  • Beautiful.

  • @Steelerguy6178 They have video footage from onlookers watching the planes impact the building. Also, we never gave Israel any SR-71's, so I don't think they flew any of them into the towers. I don't believe conspiracies that have surfaced about stuff like that from anyone, but irrefutable video evidence of two jet airliners flying into the towers is pretty hard to not believe. But who knows, maybe the people that filmed it are spies from Israel.....

  • @Steelerguy6178 actualy it was the U.S. that did 9/11, but what ever.

  • @Steelerguy6178 They flew SR-71's into the towers? Jesus youre a fucking moron...

  • wow *-* what a amasin thing of HIGH TECHNIK !!!! a masterwork !!!!

  • OMG SR-71 so fucking sexy looking 

  • @lgnroberson I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT THOUGHT THAT! IM NOT ALONE!

  • OMG COD BLACK OPS *nergasm*

  • noobs using blackbird xD jk

  • why can't the aliens make up their own design?

  • 2 former KGB agent dislike the video

  • id love to see one if these fly over head!!

  • ridiculous that at least half of the commenters wouldnt know about the existence of this plane without that awful shitty game.

  • @ahgnfjie naw they would have known cuz of X-men

  • @ahgnfjie I used to work on them, and my grandfather was a skunkworks electrical engineer designing and building them. These wacko conspiracy theories are more wacko than anything I can think of.

  • @ahgnfjie Hmm, Call to duty, D.A.R.Y.L., Transformers 2, and 30 years of covert surveillance of Soviet Cold War assets. Windows Flight simulator, and any number of other things, I think I'll claim the 30 years part.

  • has something been replaced for the blackbird, is it the u-2 spy plane or what

  • @Nazizombies97 no. play your call of duty.

  • @pobbart13 Ok asshole. I barely play it and i just saw it in the game and I am interested in it now. And I know that a U-2 spy plane has reached up to 70,000 ft or something close to that so just wait to criticize me because I have played a video game, and I have always liked looking up planes to see what they have accomplished in the sky. I was looking the blackbird up and there was a video of the u-2 spy plane that looked like a similar concept of it, so sorry for asking a question.

  • @Nazizombies97 The U2, also made by the Skunkworks is a few years older than the Blackbird series. I think the U2 is up to the s or T model by now, and that includes the newer TR-1 derivatives. U2s can hit 80,000 feet +.

  • @pobbart13 Anyways I am not the kid who plays the game 8 hours a day to get pissed off and waste my time on something that isn't real, and you must know something about the game if you know it references to black ops

  • @pobbart13 And by the way, I checked your channel a minute ago, and your profile pic is cod, and all your fav videos are cod so fuck off

  • I love seeing this beauty cut trough sky.

  • The music and the video went together perfectly. AWESOME :D

  • I don't know which art is greater, this plane or this song. Perfect combination.

  • Black Ops

  • @finnishockey wrong plane. go away.

  • It was truly a work of art.

  • Why the fuck would someone dislike this???

  • Comment removed

  • was that a "secret black project" like the B-2 Stealth

  • When we made this machine we were saying " Hey! Now try and shoot this sucker down!!"

  • Our SR-71 is in the air

  • Our SR-71 is in the air

  • I'm not american... I'm Brazillian, but you people shown a great work here...

  • the blackbird was far ahead of its time. there were to many problems that we couldnt solve like the unsealed gas taks on it. it lost tons of fuel do to this. even the titanium would stretch 2 to 3 feet. it served its purpose back in the 60s and 70s but it would of been much more badass with the new technology that we have today.

  • @suzukirm33rider The leaky fuel tanks were on purpose. It grew 18 inches when at speed/altitude, the panels sealed when it expanded from heat/friction. This aircraft was cooled by its fuel.

  • is that area 51 at 1:19?

  • US. Air Force Secretary Robert C. Seamans deemed the Mig-25 as "Probably the best interceptor in production in the world today". In 1967 a stripped down Mig-25 set a world record by achieving a speed of 1,852 MPH and another aircraft set the altitude record by soaring to 118,898 feet.

  • @Vore667 But mig 25 wasn't cheap with interchangeable parts and as aircraft with perfect conditions it couldn't archive Mach 3 with some damage from prolonged use. USA in that time lacked real interceptor. A-12 prototype (Sr-71) was started as interceptor. You see this program "failed" plane was too good for interceptor. Later backshlash against mig 25 created Tornado, F15-16 various planes. Mig 29 was created to replace 25's sometimes unreliable nature.

  • Its not made by lockheed anymore. Its made by Lockheed Martin. And for the people out there that think that it stopped flying a wile ago, u r wrong. Area-51 actually still uses them. This plane is sooo old though. It is my favorite plane. If you live in manhattan and you go to the south street sea port, you can see a navy vessel docked there and on the deck ther is an actual a-12 blackbird. wen it was still the a-12 and not the sr-71. Coolest plane ever. Super cool cameras on the bottom

  • amazing video i love that plane and if i could and had enough cash i would buy one off these and keep it in my back yard :D

  • @harper9494 I'd settle for a pressure suit.

  • the most amazing and pretty plane ever made it all most makes me cry that as a race we are goin backwards

  • 1:09 - That's the interceptor before the SR-71, the YF-12 isn't it?

  • @WonkyTonkBotty the sr-71 is the blackbird nooble

  • @WonkyTonkBotty Exactly, few people saw that. Good observation.

  • None of you will know what this plane was really capable of, unless you flew it.

  • @tqure yeah. because you did.

  • @Burntpies990

    I did not state anywhere that i am an exclusion to this, anyone who knows this bird will know that this is true! ask one of the habu's.

  • @tqure Not true, I know.

  • This has been my favorite video for a really long time...it's so beautiful. Thank you.

  • Beautiful aircraft ... and the only one ever known to hold four World records at any one time ... most of all whilst it was in Military Service it also had 100% safety record which I consider a World Record in itself ... it's true what they say that something that looks so beautiful also performs well ...

  • Comment removed

  • @scismgenie ..The SR-71 went from mid 1973 to mid 1989 without a single loss.during this period.the best safety record of any other U.S A.F. aircraft...

  • @pipercub123456 12 Blackbirds were lost due to crashes and accidents. That is over the entire career of the airframe. There were during MOST of this time only 14 airworthy airframes, although 36 (some say 33) aircraft were built and flown in all variations. Operational loses during the cold war period were not publicized. Some are mentioned by past pilots and experts on the program in various works.

  • @scismgenie ..My records show the following.. A-12..18 A/F [A-12924 thru A-12941].. built, 8 lost// included YF-12 ..3 A/F built, [ YF-12934 thru YF-12936.] also included M-21 [A-12940 and A-12941]//.//...SR-71..32 A/F built..[ 71950 thru 71981]..12 lost..total of 50. TI -Mono Frames in total....but no A/F losses from mid 1973 to mid 1989....

  • @pipercub123456 I didn't have the breakdown, but the best safety record isn't really that impressive considering that there weren't that many flying. Also you have to realize that the program had a zero error tolerance, and all shops which worked on it had a lot of pride that no significant errors were made. The rules at Beale were much stricter than on the average flightline. Everything got triple checked, and a 5-7 year stay in the assignment was normal (Code 51).

  • @scismgenie ..In the enviroment in which the Blackbird operated, I'd call their safety record, outstanding...as where most SAC run units..still an impressive record.for the Habu....

  • @pipercub123456 I worked the program at PSD from 1979-82. By normal operational squadron size our "fleet" was 25% of the aircraft of a normal wing. By that ratio it would be expected to have significantly less opportunity for mishaps, and there were "incidents" which did not result in airframe loss. I can think of many emergency landings and quite a lot of LRT deployments to recover birds which landed in unexpected places. There were also classified deployments and OLs.

  • @scismgenie ...You should take pride in the fact the Habu had such a great safety record, especially working in the PSD shop, commenting on reasons why the Blackbird safety record in the 70's and 80's was just a fluke, perhaps your exposure to all the toxic materials in your shop enviroment has colored your feelings towards the whole Habu program..you and the other airmen in your shop, made aviation history....just my opinion....THX

  • @pipercub123456 No, the safety record was earned by hard work of everyone involved, but even with a great safety program and quality control accidents could happen outside of the actions of man. That much is simply luck. My comments were that because there were so few flying, in comparison, the achievement is less remarkable. Everyone in the program expected no aircraft losses, and did their daily jobs exceptionally, the safety record is coincidental. Zero Tolerance for error, (Rule 1).

  • @scismgenie I would question your statement that "everyone in the program expected no aircraft losses". Anybody expecting no losses - especially given the extremes of the SR-71's operating range(s) - is making a wholly unrealistic presumption. In others words, Shit Happens. Always.

  • Working in a "zero defect" environment is tough, no-one did expect failures, and they were generally NOT disappointed. In comparison to a normal wing of aircraft, we had very few in the air, and intense inspections at all times. If an aircraft had a red X for flight, and cancelled a flight that would be a wasted $1M. EVERY effort to keep the birds flying in 'perfect' condition was made, even to the point of having a hangar queen aircraft to k-ball parts from on short notice.

  • @scismgenie Once again, I would say that it was unreasonable not to expect failures. It is not in the nature of things mechanical to remain in perfect working order no matter the maintenance schedule or amount of preparation. Entropy is a fact of life and people make mistakes no matter the penalty. Anybody not expecting an eventual mechanical failure is not familiar with the Zen of machinery. You can shoot for perfection but you must acknowledge the reality of eventual failure.

  • You confuse expectation with contingency planning. If you plan for a contingency (what if scenarios) you do not EXPECT it to happen, but have a plan in place IF it happens. In order to expect a problem to occur you need some indication that there is a problem, The system was so tightly managed that there was virtually no room for errors, and thus no expectation of 'aircraft loss', and since I dealt with the egress system, if any anticipation came to pass, MY equipment would be the exit route

  • The suited pilots and RSOs were in suits my shop built, overhauled and inspected, sitting on survival kits we also built, with Oxygen systems we also built, etc, and with a parachute, life-raft and Preservers we also assembled, and inspected before and after each flight. EVERY other shop did the same, with their areas of responsibility. EVERY worker had a minimum 1 year of training before working the Flightline. Everyone who touched the plane had experience and supervision.

  • We also TRAINED the crews in survival, escape, evasion, Rescue procedures, Parachute control and landing, use of the suit and survival systems. WE gave Chamber training and therapy. We taught the physiology of Flight. We debriefed the crews on the flight parameters, of speed, altitude, cabin altitude, rates of climb/descent. We built and overhauled regulators and suit pressure controllers. Electronics calibration, radios, pyrotechnics. Liquid Oxygen Converters. We did more than dress pilots

  • @scismgenie You're a little batty and oversensitive...I wasn't questioning your preparation, skills, or work ethic - just your expectation of zero failures. Lighten up, Francis...