Can people leave GaGa out of this? Seriously GaGa has NOTHING to do with this. They're TWO separate artists. Both amazing in their own ways. I'm a proud fan of both. Now, that said,This is an amazing video. I love how even when she messes up the words,she keeps going. <3
@UnleashTheVoice She actually did hit one of the E5's in the studio version at 3:14 but it was thin and weak.
Anything she's hit during Fighter performances that are above C#5 aren't in the studio version, except for 2007 at the New Years Eve performance. She opts to make the climax into a B4 then sing an E5 at the end, which makes no sense.
@CorneliaHaleReal4Eva No way!!! For God, do you really think that Demi could ever be like Christina in the voice department? Well, you're really wrong. Demi sings OK, but she hasn't the voice that Xtina has, and not even being born again she could sing like Christina. Anyway, I have to say that if I have to choose between Demi, Selena, Miley and other Disney Stars in these day, I'll choose Demi.
she got the lyrics wrong at 3:45 lol.. but it still sounds nice and shows how professional christina is as a performer.. not very obvious... love her so much!
@yacner33 porque le exige mucho y se apoya en las coristas. esa canción en estudio tiene muchos arreglos vocales, muchas voces por todos lados. Eso, en vivo, es duro de replicar y es necesario el apoyo, ya sea en coristas, o en pistas.
@chocolatechipcokies Everybody has good and bad days, but this is not a bad performance, is just not perfect as others. Anyway, all the performance she can do will be better than performance from other singers such as Gaga, Katy Perry, Kesha, Miley Cyrus, and seudo-singers like Demi Lovato or Selena Gomez.
@NausAllien I agree but I don't think that Demi Lovato is a pseudo-singer, she's really talented you know. Selena is sure a pseudo-singer and her BFF is Autotune. But Lovato has a strong voice.
OMG OMG OMG OMG!!! SHES IN NEW ORLEANS!! GAY PRIDE!! *faints* i mean, i know i live in Australia and this was years back but im still pissed i didnt know XD
this is what she looked like when she was DOWN RIGHT GORGEOUS! Hate how she mimics the Marilyn Monroe look. She looks far better, sexier, as Christina. And Marilyn Monroe doesn't even come close to looking as good as Christina.
Ever since she was little she had the habit of tapping her microphone with her fingers, and when she does her high notes, she bends down. Her little girl tactics are cute :) AMAZING SINGER.
It is true that I do consider "x-tina" is very EVIL. I state this from the perspective of the deliberate deception and manipulation that is abundantly evident here. If you do not believe this, then I strongly suggest that you research these matters more thoroughly. For example, examine the "inner artwork" of the recently released "Bionic album." Or, view other various portrayals of "x-tina" to further validate this.
@SatanicaLvx666 "x-tina" is not the dangerous one here, the top dogs are.
MK victims are just puppets for them. they CAN be dangerous if their handlers orders them to do something dangerous, but overall they're just innocent people who have had their lives taken away from them.
BULLSHIT. Let's face it, the "illuminati" and the "masons" are completely FULL OF SHIT. I, myself, have visited several "masonic lodges," personally, but I found it very absurd to ever presume that I had any intention of "following orders" or reducing myself to servility and abasement. This is the problem. Most of the masses are far too dumbed down and fucking STUPID. This is due, in large part, to BRAINWASHING which must also be STOPPED.
This is why THEY MUST BE STOPPED. The sad part is the most of the masses are far too ignorant, unprepared, and idiotic to do anything concrete or substantial. It is not my purpose to provide any of you some kind of "motivation" or "purpose" to fight these deluded motherfuckers. I am simply here to prove a very basic argument and nothing beyond this. Yes, I find these fucktards very sickening, especially the fact that they have so drastically polluted the internet with their pretentious and vapid
It only seems as if these retarded nitwits are "invulnerable," but this is only an effect that they have, themselves, created in order to "shield" themselves from any possible contravention. This is mainly why it is that they work so incessantly to further delude and deceive the masses. They must perpetually "maintain the illusion" that they are somehow "important" to you. If they fail to do this, then they, more often than not, fade into utter obscurity.
It may seem to most, if not all, of you that these fucking "rich people" or these "celebrities" are somehow "untouchable." Or, it may appear that they have some sort of contrived "divine right" of illusory "superiority." But, I assure you, they have NONE of these "attributes." In reality, they are probably more boring and ordinary than anyone else. They only become "celebrities" or "important" if you "think" they are. Otherwise, they become uninspiring, boring, and stupid.
obstructing and/or preventing it from hypothetically becoming "yours." This is, in utero, the concept of private property or "natural right." There are only various "means" or "apparatuses" which may be employed to "enforce" this "right to ownership." These chiefly involve tools of violence or the implication of violence. However, throughout all of this, there is no "rule" which debars any opposing party from utilizing such tools of violence for its own deprivatory prerogative(s).
If you "believe" that the matrix is "real," then it "becomes real." Essentially, the only real "control" that the illuminati has or will have over you is limited to the degree to which you BELIEVE that they have this "control." I am sure that most of you will simply assume that it is not this simple, but it truly is. I shall provide a very SIMPLE example to prove it. If I "own" something, then it is, theoretically, "mine," even though there is really nothing objective in existence thereby --->
@SatanicaLvx666 sorry to say this, but you are not as smart as you think you are.
i can't believe how cruel you are! how can you say that the childhood abuse christina went throug, was good for her?
she's a monarch victim, period.
and to say the illuminati are not important, is the most stupid thing i've heard. ofc they're important! if they rule the world and our lives, why wouldn't they be important?
@chocolatechipcokies 'illuminati' ? Is there such a thing or have people been influenced by fictional programmes such as Mutant X? There are vested interest groups with great influence within closed shops such as doctors, barristers, secret service heads but one single governing body beyond the G7? I doubt it but I could be wrong. Just because one is paranoid doesn't mean that someone isn't after you as they say.
So, how is this valid? In other words, who are the "illuminati?" The illuminati is only a VERY, VERY SMALL and highly insignificant group of mostly males, and a few females, which control the vast majority of global wealth and/or property. So, why are they important? The answer: THEY ARE NOT IMPORTANT. The reason why? They have no "real" power. The only "power" that they may "seem to have" is only in the MINDS of the masses. In other words, it is very similar to the matrix in that --->
etc.. on multiple levels. So, in this vector, the alleged "childhood abuse" supposedly suffered at the behest of its father "Fausto" was, in point of fact, a "good thing." The second argumentation pertaining to the "new world order" is even more poignant. The "new world order" and the "illuminati" are not, in fact, coterminous. In fact, they are diametrically opposed. The "new world order" is, in fact, indicative of the TIME when humanity will have liberated itself from the "illuminati."
In other words, it becomes increasingly vital to analyze and/or ascertain the "true nature" of a monarch robot such as "x-tina," in this particular example. Secondly, many will question as to why it must be necessary to destroy this entity. The reason: this entity is a THREAT and a DANGER to either a) humanity or b) the "new world order" or c) both. I should explicate this argument further. This entity, "x-tina," is a danger to HUMANITY because it represents propaganda, manipulation, deception,
It is important to note that there appear to be two primary objectives for us seriously dedicated "outsiders." These are: 1) attempt to unravel and understand the "true nature" of this entity referred to collectively as "x-tina," and 2) attempt to undermine and exterminate this "x-tina" entity. Explanation: if this entity is truly a monarch, of which there is very little, if any, countervailing data as to this, then this entity must, in fact, possess multiple personalities or "masks" -->
I do believe that there is some validity to the notion of "mk ultra" or "monarch programming" in relation to "x-tina." There are innumerable indications as to this, yet I fail to see how this makes "x-tina" so "special." I am sure that there are countless monarch victims which are never multi-millionaires or "celebrities." This may indicate that "x-tina" may be perceived as something of a "higher level pawn" in the Illuminati agenda.
Personally, I do wish that I could "connect" with "x-tina," but I fail to see how that is even a possibility. I do not know if "x-tina" did "sell it's soul to Satan" in exchange for money and/or notoriety. This is still a dubious proposition that has yet to be verified accordingly. It is very bizarre and curious that "x-tina" is associated with a Jew of obscure origin. I also find this very disturbing and, by all accounts, a temporary phenomenon.
Overall, I find it sad that even if "x-tina" did have this "miraculous voice" in the distant past that "x-tina" would blatantly and deliberately "sell one's soul to Satan" or "the Illuminati" or what have you. It is, of course, possible that "x-tina" had already "sold one's soul to Satan" ever since childhood or infancy. After all, it was true that "x-tina" was indoctrinated or inculcated in the "mickey mouse club" which, as we all know, is an Illuminati front organization.
cute. she was so stressed she changed the lyric :) but fortunatelly the got it straight :) i love love love love her. her voice still keeps getting better - every year. <3333
no, u said MESSING up the lyrics.. as in she was making mistakes.. and i agree she definitley was making mistakes, but all im saying is i cant really blame her cus what she does.. singing live in front of thounsands od ppl, rememebering all the lyrics to every song, every high note, every "ad lib".. i just think she's entitled to fuck up here and there
pls watch and subscribe to KANDEE JOHNSON, and I swear ul learn a lot of things especially in applying MAKEUP basiclly bcoz shes a makeup artist. . shes cute and quirky. . hehe and i swear again dat u'l have fun watching her. .
lav yah guyz!
"always SMILE bcoz it can brightens someones day!"
@repenttyourself What on earth are you talking about? if you have listened to her sing throughout all of her career you would have realised that her vocals have gotten from great to amazing. She has so much more control of her voice now than she ever did before and she was amazing before. She isnt "dodging" notes just because she doesnt sound like the recording. It just means that she is in fact singing LIVE and its not a playback, its her own version. Can singers nowdays do that; sing live?
@KostancaKo LOL. Yes, many singers sing live, and sound better than Crusty. Some examples are Kelly Clarkson, Beyonce, Carrie Underwood, and Jennifer Hudson. They all are much better vocalists than Floptina. Trufax. Xtincta's voice nowadays is TERRIBLE. She cracks in almost every performance I've seen of hers lately. She can't even go up to a D5 without croaking; it's sad. She's never been as good live as in the studio, as proved by this performance. She IS dodging every big note here. FACT.
@repenttyourself I'm sorry, I meant sing live and sound good. I never said that the other singer, K.Clarkson, Beyonce, etc. weren't good. I was simply stating that not many of the singers out there could do that. And you're criticizing her, but maybe you need to get your ears checked. She can hit a D5 and hit it perfectly.
@repenttyourself You are criticizing her for not sounding like the recording, which is just sad. She doesn’t need to prove that she can sing by sounding like the recorded version because if she wanted to risk people thinking she didn’t sing live, she would have sung the recorded version of the song. She is not a terrible singer just because you don't like her voice. You're entitled to your opinion, even though it is not correct in any way. Your opinion doesn't matter to her fans or her inthe end
@KostancaKo It's not an opinion. Her voice is in terrible shape. Someone can say that their FAVORITE voice is Christina's, but one cannot say she has the BEST voice, because it's simply not true. That is a FACT. Maybe I exaggerated a bit with the whole D5 thing, but she can certainly not sustain anything above an E5 any longer, which is sad. She literally croaks up there, and sometimes cracks all over the place. She has terrible stamina these days, and she strains in almost every performance.
@repenttyourself I couldn't agree with you more. I have been thoroughly listening to "x-tina's" live shows versus studio recordings. The discrepancy is obvious. There are two viable possibilities for this, and these are the following: a) "x-tina" did not really have a "miraculous voice" to begin with and merely was a studio engineered pawn or b) "x-tina" used to or apparently had a "miraculous voice" which has seemingly degenerated and deteriorated over time. If a), then --->
it may be valid that "x-tina" is truly no different than any other corporate ruse, such as "lady gaga," "britney spears," "beyonce," etc.. If b), then it may be valid that "x-tina" could have possibly retained a somewhat "miraculous voice" if a proper technique or instruction had been instituted during childhood or infancy. However, it is abundantly clear that "x-tina's" albums continue to flop and descend into complete obsolescence.
i beg to differ.. she can easily sustain E5s!!! just take a listen to what a girl wants at the VH1 storytellers and at the Early show... she hits and sustains E5s with ease...
and at the storytellers she hits a F5!! XD her voice isn't detiorating at all.. :) her voice is amazing
i wouldnt say she 4got, i thinks its just because its such a breathe-taking song...... literally. its super fast and has really high notes, i think it would still be a tough song 2 sing even if she was in a more comfortable and relaxed setting
fortunately she's really good at performing so people wouldn't notice that if they don't know the lyrics. She sang as if those were really the lyrics!
why is her buttcrack always showing?
taytay265681 1 month ago
I lov her even when she forgets the lyrics XD
dannytATu 1 month ago
she is really good! omg
levinmoses 4 months ago
Can people leave GaGa out of this? Seriously GaGa has NOTHING to do with this. They're TWO separate artists. Both amazing in their own ways. I'm a proud fan of both. Now, that said,This is an amazing video. I love how even when she messes up the words,she keeps going. <3
xToxicAddiction 5 months ago 2
SHE'S CHRISTINA FUCKING AGUILERA, WHAT THE HELL BITCH! THIS IS MUSIC.
charmbramida 6 months ago
BAD GIRLS FOREVER ♥
RockStarCasper 6 months ago 5
yeah so proud of being her fan!!!!!1
XtinaThaiFan 6 months ago 5
What city is that?
Tima5543 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Tima5543 New Orleans, Louisiana
geetony123 7 months ago
@Tima5543 New Orleans
tomsk14 7 months ago
love her hair here!! :D
bLuebhErie 8 months ago 8
She is absolutely great. She is a Singer-singer!
starpatt 8 months ago 2
F**k Gaga !
CHRISTINAAGUILERAISR 9 months ago 7
so proud of being her fan
TheDanny2a 9 months ago 6
this sounded more like the studio version. nice. :D
ronmico92 9 months ago
kayo na talaga.... galing niyo a. :))
ronmico92 9 months ago
Her voice was SO thin and weak here.
But it was one of the few Fighter performances where she tried to hit some of the D5's in the song.
AMOBBDOWNNE 10 months ago
@AMOBBDOWNNE
ahhhhh but she hit the E5s after the bridge :)
UnleashTheVoice 10 months ago
@UnleashTheVoice She actually did hit one of the E5's in the studio version at 3:14 but it was thin and weak.
Anything she's hit during Fighter performances that are above C#5 aren't in the studio version, except for 2007 at the New Years Eve performance. She opts to make the climax into a B4 then sing an E5 at the end, which makes no sense.
AMOBBDOWNNE 10 months ago
@AMOBBDOWNNE
no i meant at 2.54... she hits the E5s really well :)
which part of the 2007 one are you talking about?
UnleashTheVoice 10 months ago
@UnleashTheVoice I didn't even notice that one. But she was really trying that day lol.
But I'm talking about this video: watch?v=umOoGGsuJAs
She did the E5 at the bridge despite lowering the key beforehand.
AMOBBDOWNNE 10 months ago
@AMOBBDOWNNE
she hits a couple of E5s there.. which one are you talking about?? soz.. like what time ??
UnleashTheVoice 10 months ago
@UnleashTheVoice She hit E5's at 1:19, 1:54, and 2:02.
But I was talking about 1:54.
AMOBBDOWNNE 10 months ago
@AMOBBDOWNNE
ahhh that one yea XD
UnleashTheVoice 10 months ago
@AMOBBDOWNNE
actually also look up on google... Christina Aguilera Fighter SNL... its a pretty good performance... except her E5s were a little off
UnleashTheVoice 10 months ago
@UnleashTheVoice I've seen that performance a dozen times. It's really bad. :(
But that was when she was trying to replicate the studio version slightly during Stripped.
The song is really hard for her to sing live, so eventually she just stopped.
AMOBBDOWNNE 10 months ago
@AMOBBDOWNNE
Thats absolute rubbish.... Its still one of the songs she performs all the time live, including last year and 2006 on tour.
tomsk14 9 months ago
STOP TALKING ABOUT LADT GAGA SHE WAS HERE WAY BEFORE LADY GAG AND CHRISTINA WILL ALWAS BE BETTER THEN HER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tracylovesmakeup2 10 months ago 3
STRIPPED ERA! the best!
TeamTonyPerkis 10 months ago 2
I love this performance!! But I like it better when she 'growls' some parts, it makes the song more gritty I gues.....
DirrtyFighterr 10 months ago
Love this look!
hasonopinion 10 months ago
she messed up!
hasonopinion 10 months ago
always love you Christina
chrissy2244 10 months ago
@CorneliaHaleReal4Eva No way!!! For God, do you really think that Demi could ever be like Christina in the voice department? Well, you're really wrong. Demi sings OK, but she hasn't the voice that Xtina has, and not even being born again she could sing like Christina. Anyway, I have to say that if I have to choose between Demi, Selena, Miley and other Disney Stars in these day, I'll choose Demi.
NausAllien 11 months ago 5
she got the lyrics wrong at 3:45 lol.. but it still sounds nice and shows how professional christina is as a performer.. not very obvious... love her so much!
ritz1622 1 year ago
la noto cansada en este video como si no tubiera ganas no lo se :(
NatalyNeck 1 year ago
en el minuto 2:53 ella tiene un buen control , porque ahora no puede hacer eso alguien q me explique?
yacner33 1 year ago
@yacner33 porque le exige mucho y se apoya en las coristas. esa canción en estudio tiene muchos arreglos vocales, muchas voces por todos lados. Eso, en vivo, es duro de replicar y es necesario el apoyo, ya sea en coristas, o en pistas.
paulodomic 11 months ago
she sang very bady here. not hating, but i've heard her sing better.
chocolatechipcokies 1 year ago
@chocolatechipcokies Everybody has good and bad days, but this is not a bad performance, is just not perfect as others. Anyway, all the performance she can do will be better than performance from other singers such as Gaga, Katy Perry, Kesha, Miley Cyrus, and seudo-singers like Demi Lovato or Selena Gomez.
NausAllien 1 year ago 2
@NausAllien I agree but I don't think that Demi Lovato is a pseudo-singer, she's really talented you know. Selena is sure a pseudo-singer and her BFF is Autotune. But Lovato has a strong voice.
MarisolDDL 1 year ago 2
@chocolatechipcokies i agreee
lighthouselithium 1 year ago
she is so pretty and great vocals!! ♥ i wish i could see her in concert some day =]
hollywood151852009 1 year ago
3:03-3:08 what a pity that she never sang original melody. It's interesting, if she can the same notes like a studio version, if she can hit E5 yet.
paveleq94 1 year ago
3:03-3:08 what a pity that she never sang original melody. It's interesting, if she can the same notes like a studio version, if she can hit now E5.
paveleq94 1 year ago
Thats it ! POP ROCK !!! WOAH !! QUEEN OF MUSIC !! NO ONE ELSE !
johnyvie 1 year ago 2
OMG OMG OMG OMG!!! SHES IN NEW ORLEANS!! GAY PRIDE!! *faints* i mean, i know i live in Australia and this was years back but im still pissed i didnt know XD
GodSaveTheEmoz 1 year ago
@GodSaveTheEmoz
I know. Does anyone know when this was?
cayet408 1 year ago
!!1christina !!!! FREAKING HOT!!
30mav97 1 year ago
haha at 0:53 she messes her lyrics up
blazin1122 1 year ago
GAGA WHO ??
luiscurtolo 1 year ago 95
@luiscurtolo the pop queen better than xtina
iamaverysmartboy 1 year ago
@luiscurtolo gagan nothing XD
elt4ever 1 year ago 2
@luiscurtolo gaga nothing XD
elt4ever 1 year ago 2
@luiscurtolo lol
Jenpop12 11 months ago
@luiscurtolo NOT GAGA!
LoveUDallas 10 months ago
this is what she looked like when she was DOWN RIGHT GORGEOUS! Hate how she mimics the Marilyn Monroe look. She looks far better, sexier, as Christina. And Marilyn Monroe doesn't even come close to looking as good as Christina.
hablo1233 1 year ago
hot! amazing song.
Schmetterlingstraube 1 year ago
how can she sing so fast, good and high? I wonder, cauz i can't!
AFlowerOfPeace 1 year ago
What a voice, what a body!
pedvictor525 1 year ago 2
Ever since she was little she had the habit of tapping her microphone with her fingers, and when she does her high notes, she bends down. Her little girl tactics are cute :) AMAZING SINGER.
matayababy 1 year ago
I love Christina..................
JEFFBlackout2010 1 year ago 4
That video makes me that much stronger <3
Clemanga 1 year ago 4
perfect vocals!! best singer of all times!!
KirFarrugia 1 year ago 102
This has been flagged as spam show
It is true that I do consider "x-tina" is very EVIL. I state this from the perspective of the deliberate deception and manipulation that is abundantly evident here. If you do not believe this, then I strongly suggest that you research these matters more thoroughly. For example, examine the "inner artwork" of the recently released "Bionic album." Or, view other various portrayals of "x-tina" to further validate this.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
@SatanicaLvx666 lol no one cares haha GO XTINA!!
babiiray1 1 year ago
@SatanicaLvx666 Dude WTF?! Stop spamming the video with this stupid crap! No one could care less!
MsLovelyChika 1 year ago
@SatanicaLvx666 "x-tina" is not the dangerous one here, the top dogs are.
MK victims are just puppets for them. they CAN be dangerous if their handlers orders them to do something dangerous, but overall they're just innocent people who have had their lives taken away from them.
chocolatechipcokies 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BULLSHIT. Let's face it, the "illuminati" and the "masons" are completely FULL OF SHIT. I, myself, have visited several "masonic lodges," personally, but I found it very absurd to ever presume that I had any intention of "following orders" or reducing myself to servility and abasement. This is the problem. Most of the masses are far too dumbed down and fucking STUPID. This is due, in large part, to BRAINWASHING which must also be STOPPED.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is why THEY MUST BE STOPPED. The sad part is the most of the masses are far too ignorant, unprepared, and idiotic to do anything concrete or substantial. It is not my purpose to provide any of you some kind of "motivation" or "purpose" to fight these deluded motherfuckers. I am simply here to prove a very basic argument and nothing beyond this. Yes, I find these fucktards very sickening, especially the fact that they have so drastically polluted the internet with their pretentious and vapid
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It only seems as if these retarded nitwits are "invulnerable," but this is only an effect that they have, themselves, created in order to "shield" themselves from any possible contravention. This is mainly why it is that they work so incessantly to further delude and deceive the masses. They must perpetually "maintain the illusion" that they are somehow "important" to you. If they fail to do this, then they, more often than not, fade into utter obscurity.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It may seem to most, if not all, of you that these fucking "rich people" or these "celebrities" are somehow "untouchable." Or, it may appear that they have some sort of contrived "divine right" of illusory "superiority." But, I assure you, they have NONE of these "attributes." In reality, they are probably more boring and ordinary than anyone else. They only become "celebrities" or "important" if you "think" they are. Otherwise, they become uninspiring, boring, and stupid.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
obstructing and/or preventing it from hypothetically becoming "yours." This is, in utero, the concept of private property or "natural right." There are only various "means" or "apparatuses" which may be employed to "enforce" this "right to ownership." These chiefly involve tools of violence or the implication of violence. However, throughout all of this, there is no "rule" which debars any opposing party from utilizing such tools of violence for its own deprivatory prerogative(s).
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
@SatanicaLvx666 you cannot get in touch with her alters unless you know her. and why would you want to get in touch with x-tina?
chocolatechipcokies 1 year ago
If you "believe" that the matrix is "real," then it "becomes real." Essentially, the only real "control" that the illuminati has or will have over you is limited to the degree to which you BELIEVE that they have this "control." I am sure that most of you will simply assume that it is not this simple, but it truly is. I shall provide a very SIMPLE example to prove it. If I "own" something, then it is, theoretically, "mine," even though there is really nothing objective in existence thereby --->
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
@SatanicaLvx666 sorry to say this, but you are not as smart as you think you are.
i can't believe how cruel you are! how can you say that the childhood abuse christina went throug, was good for her?
she's a monarch victim, period.
and to say the illuminati are not important, is the most stupid thing i've heard. ofc they're important! if they rule the world and our lives, why wouldn't they be important?
and x-tina is just another alter of christina.
chocolatechipcokies 1 year ago
@chocolatechipcokies 'illuminati' ? Is there such a thing or have people been influenced by fictional programmes such as Mutant X? There are vested interest groups with great influence within closed shops such as doctors, barristers, secret service heads but one single governing body beyond the G7? I doubt it but I could be wrong. Just because one is paranoid doesn't mean that someone isn't after you as they say.
norrisonthespot 1 year ago
So, how is this valid? In other words, who are the "illuminati?" The illuminati is only a VERY, VERY SMALL and highly insignificant group of mostly males, and a few females, which control the vast majority of global wealth and/or property. So, why are they important? The answer: THEY ARE NOT IMPORTANT. The reason why? They have no "real" power. The only "power" that they may "seem to have" is only in the MINDS of the masses. In other words, it is very similar to the matrix in that --->
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
etc.. on multiple levels. So, in this vector, the alleged "childhood abuse" supposedly suffered at the behest of its father "Fausto" was, in point of fact, a "good thing." The second argumentation pertaining to the "new world order" is even more poignant. The "new world order" and the "illuminati" are not, in fact, coterminous. In fact, they are diametrically opposed. The "new world order" is, in fact, indicative of the TIME when humanity will have liberated itself from the "illuminati."
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
In other words, it becomes increasingly vital to analyze and/or ascertain the "true nature" of a monarch robot such as "x-tina," in this particular example. Secondly, many will question as to why it must be necessary to destroy this entity. The reason: this entity is a THREAT and a DANGER to either a) humanity or b) the "new world order" or c) both. I should explicate this argument further. This entity, "x-tina," is a danger to HUMANITY because it represents propaganda, manipulation, deception,
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
It is important to note that there appear to be two primary objectives for us seriously dedicated "outsiders." These are: 1) attempt to unravel and understand the "true nature" of this entity referred to collectively as "x-tina," and 2) attempt to undermine and exterminate this "x-tina" entity. Explanation: if this entity is truly a monarch, of which there is very little, if any, countervailing data as to this, then this entity must, in fact, possess multiple personalities or "masks" -->
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
I do believe that there is some validity to the notion of "mk ultra" or "monarch programming" in relation to "x-tina." There are innumerable indications as to this, yet I fail to see how this makes "x-tina" so "special." I am sure that there are countless monarch victims which are never multi-millionaires or "celebrities." This may indicate that "x-tina" may be perceived as something of a "higher level pawn" in the Illuminati agenda.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
Personally, I do wish that I could "connect" with "x-tina," but I fail to see how that is even a possibility. I do not know if "x-tina" did "sell it's soul to Satan" in exchange for money and/or notoriety. This is still a dubious proposition that has yet to be verified accordingly. It is very bizarre and curious that "x-tina" is associated with a Jew of obscure origin. I also find this very disturbing and, by all accounts, a temporary phenomenon.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
Overall, I find it sad that even if "x-tina" did have this "miraculous voice" in the distant past that "x-tina" would blatantly and deliberately "sell one's soul to Satan" or "the Illuminati" or what have you. It is, of course, possible that "x-tina" had already "sold one's soul to Satan" ever since childhood or infancy. After all, it was true that "x-tina" was indoctrinated or inculcated in the "mickey mouse club" which, as we all know, is an Illuminati front organization.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
where was this concert held?
loveu813 1 year ago
@loveu813 On Bourbon St, in New Orleans! Best damn place ever :).
ashleeyv 1 year ago
うめえなアギュレラ。こぶしが利いてなかなかよい！
腹肉が気になるけどさｗ
royalhunt0603 1 year ago
how can people criticize her? shes one of the best vocalists ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!
welovevanessah 1 year ago
christina if a can sing and dance a choreography
angeelstyle1 1 year ago
XTINA THE BEST!GAGA is BETTER OFF A PORN STAR!eew!
EARTHLYMUSIC1 1 year ago
2:46 I love it, shes forgotten the lyric for a moment an sing another part than her background singers. *grinning*
Eabool 1 year ago
That girls keeps it crunk. you see the audiences response to her...
saffron1922 1 year ago
the best voice!♥
manikpoison 1 year ago
@PleaseSupportMiley
Yeaah , Christina is MUCHHHHHHHH Better than Gaga
09neftali 1 year ago 6
sorry!
estyh1 1 year ago
How can people compare lady gaga to Christina? HOW!?
PleaseSupportMiley 1 year ago 4
love this song (LLL)
estyh1 1 year ago
@estyh1
estyh1 1 year ago
У Кристины самый роскошный голос на планете. Спасибо ей за песни!)) I love you Cristina.
NastayRain 1 year ago
lmao i think that is lady gaga at 3:20 your right .
Breal43 1 year ago
one of her best performances of fighter ever..... she pulls it off almost like the studio version
yea xtina!!!!
UnleashTheVoice 1 year ago
cute. she was so stressed she changed the lyric :) but fortunatelly the got it straight :) i love love love love her. her voice still keeps getting better - every year. <3333
aguilerafun 1 year ago
this has to be one of her best performances of fighter ever!!!!!
she gets all the high parts really well!!!!!!!
UnleashTheVoice 1 year ago
Did you see lady gaga at 3:20-3:21?? Hahahahaha! That gaga bitch!
bishadora114 1 year ago
@bishadora114 It`s not Lady Gaga
danil941 1 year ago
@danil941 haha. i know! i was just joking! :)
bishadora114 1 year ago
@bishadora114 was gaga even born back then? ops
lawwyCand 1 year ago
she fucked up the lyrics... but still a great performance haha
luizusa 1 year ago
maybe her best song!
willdrakesongs 1 year ago 3
SHE IS AMAZING!
crimsonnewborn17 1 year ago
yes she forgot the lyrics!
But this is the best proof that she always sings live
SayItLoud14 1 year ago 6
fantastic voice!
WhiteCrownlessQueen 1 year ago 7
"coz your bluff time is up coz i've had enough"
must be the coolest part of the performance
sahradaad 1 year ago 2
She forgot the lyrics @ 3:45..!!! then she realized that her background singers are singing differently from her and then tried to correct herself
mcloverboy09 1 year ago
probably the best performance of Fighter
titanicbiggestfan 2 years ago 4
nooooooooooo her performance on her Back 2 Basics tour is THE BEST!
NickGaGaboy 1 year ago
@NickGaGaboy Now I think that the best is that one from Storytellers
titanicbiggestfan 1 year ago
(catgriffen) its awsome. even if you turn the sound off.
hornsby1001 2 years ago
Ela canta muito. Linda!
rbd151 2 years ago 3
i love her clothes and hair! she's so A-M-A-Z-I-N-G!!!!
Saolynn 2 years ago 2
Buttcrack! Lol.
I love this performance and song
avicutez 2 years ago 4
Spring break 03 NOT 04.
she was off that day...felt kind of sick and was that time of the month
aguilerafanaz 2 years ago
spring break 04 baby.
snacks123 2 years ago
Love it, I love FIGHTER!!!!!
thewriterfanlJesus 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why is she messing up the lyrics?
SubliminalxVerse 2 years ago
That is the lyrics she always uses in a live concert with fighter.
walk away is also different live.
NADIACHANTAL 2 years ago 2
u think its easy doing what she does????
DanniDezno 2 years ago
@DanniDezno no, did you hear me say that?
i was just wondering why she's using different lyrics.
SubliminalxVerse 2 years ago
no, u said MESSING up the lyrics.. as in she was making mistakes.. and i agree she definitley was making mistakes, but all im saying is i cant really blame her cus what she does.. singing live in front of thounsands od ppl, rememebering all the lyrics to every song, every high note, every "ad lib".. i just think she's entitled to fuck up here and there
DanniDezno 2 years ago
which was her best fighter live performence?
hurricaneioke 2 years ago
on stripped tour..
ybet0ula 2 years ago 3
i think on her tours both back to basics and stripped.
also there is a one when she performed in somthin like olympic or something
jessicania20 2 years ago
she looks tireddddd!
dnangel109 2 years ago 6
yeah a lot
jessicania20 2 years ago
this wasn't one of her best performances. she looked gorgeous though
SarahWalker25 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone who likes R&B should check out Jimi productionz song called Test me. Its a Scott Storch type beat its amazing
TheMickswagga 2 years ago 2
probably the BEST FIGHTER LIVE PERFORMANCE!!!
KISSMAJUICYASS 2 years ago 2
@KISSMAJUICYASS I agree
starpatt 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hi guys,gurlz and gayz ^__^
pls watch and subscribe to KANDEE JOHNSON, and I swear ul learn a lot of things especially in applying MAKEUP basiclly bcoz shes a makeup artist. . shes cute and quirky. . hehe and i swear again dat u'l have fun watching her. .
lav yah guyz!
"always SMILE bcoz it can brightens someones day!"
^______^
iHeartKandEe 2 years ago
christina aguileeeeraa is honestly THE BEST DDAMN SINGERRRRRR EVERRR.
livetodancexox 2 years ago 94
@livetodancexox Why is she dodging so many notes here, then?
repenttyourself 1 year ago
@repenttyourself to perserve her voice!!!!
malfoyrocks 1 year ago
best singer evaaaaaaa the haters can keep hating the more they hate the better she getssss
BerryCherry007 2 years ago 66
@BerryCherry007 LOL, yep. That's why she keeps flopping harder and harder with each album. Ok.
repenttyourself 1 year ago
@BerryCherry007 LOL, yep. That's why she keeps flopping harder and harder with each album. Ok.
repenttyourself 1 year ago
@repenttyourself What on earth are you talking about? if you have listened to her sing throughout all of her career you would have realised that her vocals have gotten from great to amazing. She has so much more control of her voice now than she ever did before and she was amazing before. She isnt "dodging" notes just because she doesnt sound like the recording. It just means that she is in fact singing LIVE and its not a playback, its her own version. Can singers nowdays do that; sing live?
KostancaKo 1 year ago
@KostancaKo LOL. Yes, many singers sing live, and sound better than Crusty. Some examples are Kelly Clarkson, Beyonce, Carrie Underwood, and Jennifer Hudson. They all are much better vocalists than Floptina. Trufax. Xtincta's voice nowadays is TERRIBLE. She cracks in almost every performance I've seen of hers lately. She can't even go up to a D5 without croaking; it's sad. She's never been as good live as in the studio, as proved by this performance. She IS dodging every big note here. FACT.
repenttyourself 1 year ago
@repenttyourself I'm sorry, I meant sing live and sound good. I never said that the other singer, K.Clarkson, Beyonce, etc. weren't good. I was simply stating that not many of the singers out there could do that. And you're criticizing her, but maybe you need to get your ears checked. She can hit a D5 and hit it perfectly.
KostancaKo 1 year ago
@repenttyourself You are criticizing her for not sounding like the recording, which is just sad. She doesn’t need to prove that she can sing by sounding like the recorded version because if she wanted to risk people thinking she didn’t sing live, she would have sung the recorded version of the song. She is not a terrible singer just because you don't like her voice. You're entitled to your opinion, even though it is not correct in any way. Your opinion doesn't matter to her fans or her inthe end
KostancaKo 1 year ago
@KostancaKo It's not an opinion. Her voice is in terrible shape. Someone can say that their FAVORITE voice is Christina's, but one cannot say she has the BEST voice, because it's simply not true. That is a FACT. Maybe I exaggerated a bit with the whole D5 thing, but she can certainly not sustain anything above an E5 any longer, which is sad. She literally croaks up there, and sometimes cracks all over the place. She has terrible stamina these days, and she strains in almost every performance.
repenttyourself 1 year ago
@repenttyourself I couldn't agree with you more. I have been thoroughly listening to "x-tina's" live shows versus studio recordings. The discrepancy is obvious. There are two viable possibilities for this, and these are the following: a) "x-tina" did not really have a "miraculous voice" to begin with and merely was a studio engineered pawn or b) "x-tina" used to or apparently had a "miraculous voice" which has seemingly degenerated and deteriorated over time. If a), then --->
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
it may be valid that "x-tina" is truly no different than any other corporate ruse, such as "lady gaga," "britney spears," "beyonce," etc.. If b), then it may be valid that "x-tina" could have possibly retained a somewhat "miraculous voice" if a proper technique or instruction had been instituted during childhood or infancy. However, it is abundantly clear that "x-tina's" albums continue to flop and descend into complete obsolescence.
SatanicaLvx666 1 year ago
@repenttyourself
i beg to differ.. she can easily sustain E5s!!! just take a listen to what a girl wants at the VH1 storytellers and at the Early show... she hits and sustains E5s with ease...
and at the storytellers she hits a F5!! XD her voice isn't detiorating at all.. :) her voice is amazing
UnleashTheVoice 1 year ago
@BerryCherry007 LOL, ok. Yep, that's so true. That's why she's flopping harder and harder with each album. LOL.
repenttyourself 1 year ago
@repenttyourself hahahha okay you wish you could sing like her
BerryCherry007 1 year ago
what about fighter from back to basics tour.... she doesnt get those high notes... but right at the end she hits an awesome high note!!!
sproggos 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
One of her worst performances, back-up singers saved this show!she could do much better!
izuniaaa21 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i think she totally forgot the words haha
BlondieBarbieLuvT 2 years ago
i wouldnt say she 4got, i thinks its just because its such a breathe-taking song...... literally. its super fast and has really high notes, i think it would still be a tough song 2 sing even if she was in a more comfortable and relaxed setting
cinthos 2 years ago 4
fortunately she's really good at performing so people wouldn't notice that if they don't know the lyrics. She sang as if those were really the lyrics!
Christina rocks :)
ilikedpp 2 years ago 7
I remember watching this live...
Thanks for posting.
WestmorelandL 2 years ago
67418 views
when gets 68 thousands views, please someone reply, im doing a research on youtube
brupacce 2 years ago
what kind of research
zeckblader11 2 years ago
there are 68,320 views now
veronikavv94 2 years ago 2
way past 68K, go Christina, you rock!
hollyturn 2 years ago
it's more
lawkiiify 2 years ago
ahhh its at like 69 now. . .
alexallyal 2 years ago
i love you christina the best
emoboytulgaa 2 years ago 6
this is a great live performance. finally. wish it was a requirement. great talent!
tubemaster141 2 years ago 8
always good
gunface10 2 years ago 5
Omg! I love her hair. She nails every performance! I'd love to have a voice like hers!
pinkpeipei 2 years ago 10
que cofrinho hein
petitgateauvn 2 years ago
SSSSSSHEEEEEEEES SOO GOODD
livetodancexox 2 years ago 8
type in 'fighter - bercy '
She hits that1
tomsk14 2 years ago
hey, no idea hun. this is the best ive seen
Sexyfrootapple 2 years ago