Reason why I believe in God and why atheists like R Dawkins are wrong: 1) Science and logic cannot explain everything. 2) What are we as humans compared with nature or the size of the universe, we are nothing compared with nature. Thanks for reading my message.
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible.
Hands down my favorite scientist. His knack for presenting Biology with such prose and lucidity has me going to school this fall for something in Biology. I have The Selfish Gene, The Extended Phenotype, Unweaving The Rainbow, and The Greatest Show on Earth. I can't wait to buy The Blind Watchmaker on payday. His religious views aside, Dawkins is head and shoulders above a lot of scientists. Long live Dawkins!
@DoSoLittle Survival of the fittest isn't circular in any sense of the term. It's simply what environmental/genetic conditions suit a certain species for life at any given time.
@DoSoLittle You have misunderstood the concept of circular reasoning. You could just as well say:
"Who gets the highest grades? Answer, the smartest students.
Who are the smartest students? Answer, the ones who get the highest grades.", and call that circular. Nobody is arguing that those survive, do so BECAUSE they are the fittest, and that these are the fittest BECAUSE they survive. Circular reasoning must (or should) imply a circular CAUSAL chain. Only then do we have circular reasoning.
@DoSoLittle oh, there you go then, im going to forget any of the in depth research carried out by renound scientists that I have come across. You my freind obviously have the answer.
This has been flagged as spam show
Reason why I believe in God and why atheists like R Dawkins are wrong: 1) Science and logic cannot explain everything. 2) What are we as humans compared with nature or the size of the universe, we are nothing compared with nature. Thanks for reading my message.
megaman7552 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible.
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
You know t he saying "Nice guys finish last"? I think the origin was a sexual thing, if anyone gets what I mean.
rsgirl10 6 months ago
They should have shown a couple of chimps fighting with nunchucks.
ToadsMGodes 9 months ago 2
Hands down my favorite scientist. His knack for presenting Biology with such prose and lucidity has me going to school this fall for something in Biology. I have The Selfish Gene, The Extended Phenotype, Unweaving The Rainbow, and The Greatest Show on Earth. I can't wait to buy The Blind Watchmaker on payday. His religious views aside, Dawkins is head and shoulders above a lot of scientists. Long live Dawkins!
TheeVoiceOfReason 1 year ago
He's cute
Thor22289 1 year ago 7
@Thor22289 ROWR!
authorless 1 year ago
I wish that Dawkins, and the rest of us, wouldn't have to explain to people the phrase 'survival of the fittest.'
Bozantium 1 year ago 10
@Bozantium
Survival of the fittest is a fallacy. It's circular reasoning.
Who survives?
Answer, the fittest.
Who is the fittest?
Answer, whoever survives.
In my experience, it is neither the strongest nor the weakest who survive. Rather it is the luckiest who survive.
DoSoLittle 11 months ago
@DoSoLittle that is not circular reasoning, and you are no scientist if you can't see why.
bloodred345 10 months ago
@DoSoLittle Survival of the fittest isn't circular in any sense of the term. It's simply what environmental/genetic conditions suit a certain species for life at any given time.
Bozantium 10 months ago
@DoSoLittle You have misunderstood the concept of circular reasoning. You could just as well say:
"Who gets the highest grades? Answer, the smartest students.
Who are the smartest students? Answer, the ones who get the highest grades.", and call that circular. Nobody is arguing that those survive, do so BECAUSE they are the fittest, and that these are the fittest BECAUSE they survive. Circular reasoning must (or should) imply a circular CAUSAL chain. Only then do we have circular reasoning.
Pomme843 9 months ago
@DoSoLittle oh, there you go then, im going to forget any of the in depth research carried out by renound scientists that I have come across. You my freind obviously have the answer.
thegarbeen 7 months ago
Richard Dawkins. A man of honesty and integrity. He has proved so through the years from when this was filmed. Oh, @sadlersinengland, well said.
Bandnot01 1 year ago 3
Hey, I'm first !!!!!!
Long live Richard Dawkins
sadlersinengland 1 year ago