@2112116 STILL he is the best CB in the WORLD....and probably the best captain(next to casillas)...so all of you haters...fuck off because nobody's perfect
Trudnych decyzji. Lampard przyszedł, ale jego stadniny są zbyt wysokie i Alonso przyszedł jak byk. Alonso zasługuje na czerwono więcej niż Lampard nie bo on podbiegł stóp lampards i przewrócił się. Jest to pochodzący z kibiców i ja nienawidzę chelsea tyle.
The description asked for all comments to be written in polish so use google translate to translate my comment
the red card was cancelled out.But I'm a liverpool fan,I say this is not even a red or a yellow,Its nothing really! its exactly like the Rodwell tackle on Suarez!
you guys don't know jack... many referees show players the red card if they go first with their sole and with a stretched leg... some do some don't...you have to deal with it.
This kind of shit happens evey weekend around the world , just because its Chelsea its a big deal , Refs makes mistakes like people do . we all see its wrong cause we see the slowmotion replay , but on the field its looks differant .
You are all not intelligent people, the fact that someone is going for the ball or not doesnt matter. He went studs up, and even though he did get a bit of the ball he caught xabi, its a dangerous tackle and a deserved red card
Here's the thing. At first look, it's nowhere near a red card, just a yellow card. On closer inspection, it wasn't even a yellow card, just a free kick.
Lampard's studs were high, no doubt, but look closely. He got the ball first, just that slight touch on the ball before Alonso came in, and mind you, Alonso came in like a bull. The foul is that his studs were abit too high (relatively harsh in my opinion). But a red card? A joke and a Lousy decision.
Since he playes the ball, it's not a "foul because he hits the opponent". It could be a foul if you tackle with both legs and one gets the ball, the other the opponent, but here Lampards uses only one boot. So it can only be a technical foul because of "dangerous play". In this case it is possible to give in very extreme situations a red card, but this was not the case here, so a yellow card should have sufficed. btw to both players, since Alonsos kick was dangerous play too.
@Sharhind77 It's the correct decision. According to the laws of the game it doesn't matter whether you get the ball first, it how reckless the tackle is and that is a really reckless takle, reckless = yellow card, excessive force = red card (His studs were to high, equalling excessive force, so it's a red card, the Ref was right.
@Sharhind77 that's because the referee is gollum...and we all know he's short....and his precious is the yellow card...he would never show that to ANYONE, so he had to give the red...it's basic logic.
@Sharhind77 You just proven why it is a red card. Studs were way to high, and he endangered Alonso. Yes Alonso comes in hard, but that will never make a tackle with studs up high legal. So the ref got this 100 % right according the Fifa's Laws of football!
@Sharhind77 It's the new laws, if you make a challenge studs up, you get at least a yellow. Here, Alonso was going first to the ball and Lamps throws himself studs up to get to the ball first. He does, but it is a dangerous tackle. According to the laws of the game, the ref is totally in his right sending Lamps off
That's so silly. 2 legs is not more dangerous than 1. It actually distributes the power more evenly, so in many circumstances it's LESS dangerous.
It is not the number of legs, it is the wrecklessness of the tackle. So why do ppl talk about 2 legged tackles? They are harder to control, thus always wreckless.
Typical 'pool fans not understanding the rules. Lamps got the ball, he wasnt going for a tackle, he was going to kick it, and he kicked it. Alonso ran into Lamps foot after Lamps had kicked the ball.
I HATE THESE REFEREES barca won the match when the referee didnt give chelsea penalties .... QPR 1:0 Chelsea 7Yellows 2Reds for chelsea and 3 Yellows for QPR thats pathetic
it's not just about "getting the ball first". Although that's what everyone says is the rule it's not. If you go in a dangerous manner or with excessive force, i.e. flying in with a stiff leg with your studs up, its classed as dangerous play and you're off.
U idiots do know that the red card was reviewed by officials and they decided to let him play next league match. U guys don't even know wat happened and go assuming like this... STUDS UP!!!! CLEAR RED CARD!!!! and one more example... TWO LEGGED CHALLENGE OFF FOR SURE... wat idiots are these people. STUPID FUCKING DUMBOS!!!!
the only reason why he got a red card cos the ref saw alonso hurt on the ground after the tackle! I hate refs who know nothing about soccer!! Especially stupid old mike riely
Doesn't matter if he got the ball, his leg was up and he showed his studs, thats a dirty tackle in football. You should always go into a slide tackle with your studs DOWN AND AWAY from the ball. From a professional player that is disgraceful and totally inconsiderate to the other player. What if he didn't get the ball and got the player, that player could have been seriously injured with a broken leg/ foot. Fair red card.
@Likkivi yes he does tackle the ball, but why did he go studs first into the tackle? why not stretch his foot out and flick the ball away? he would have got to the ball faster and it would have been safer, right? he either intentionally risked badly injuring a player which would be a red card or simply didn't care about the player being hurt which is also a red card.
@qrrbrbirbel2 That is not a red card. It was a 50-50 challenge in which the only one who got kicked was Lampard. It's your kind of attitude that is making football pathetic.
@qrrbrbirbel2 Your saying what if he got the player . . . . He didnt. Thats just like saying if he punched him it would of been a red card, but he didnt. Stupid point made by you.
@Chops95 not quite, it's not the fact that Lampard wins the tackle, the card has nothing to do with the tackle, it the fact he went into it carelessly with the possibility badly hurt another player when he has no reason to. Lampard could have made a challenge in a way where if he either wins the challenge or doesn't, it he won't be risking hurting the other challenger, but he didn't. THAT is the offense, which i believe he should have been carded for.
@qrrbrbirbel2 And also, the FA appear to disagree with you, considering this red card was actually rescinded (that makes the decision was overturned as they agreed it was a fair tackle).
@OnlyOneTreeHill8 Yes he won the ball but it's not that. Its the WAY lampard wins the ball that got him sent off, he risks the safety of that opponent to win the ball when he absolutely doesn't have to. In fact, he could have got the ball earlier if he'd tackled in a safer way, compared to going in studs first.
@CptQuakers it is to do with his tackling, look at 0:23 as lampard makes the tackle, his leg is straight and fixed, which it shouldnt be, especially in a head on challenge where he's likely to go through the ball and take the player too. Also, his foot is pointed up showing his studs you should never do that in football ever because it can cause serious injury. At least a yellow should be given for that challenge and theres reason for a red here a bit harsh if it's lampards first fault.
@qrrbrbirbel2 Also I would like to refer you to my comment:
"And also, the FA appear to disagree with you, considering this red card was actually rescinded (that makes the decision was overturned as they agreed it was a fair tackle)." - of course, the FA can't know anywhere near as much about the rules of the sport and League they govern over as you.
showed his studs during the tackle, thats dangerous in a head on tackle especially as the liverpool player is going in for a hard kick, lampard should have backed out of the tackle or done a hook tackle. a fair red card.
@qrrbrbirbel2 nope its not a fair red card he got the ball idiot, thumbs up if u agree :) thats why the match ban was ruled out and next match he was able to play do u even know about soccer, FAIR RED CARD LOL are u serious!!!!
@vt006 When he attacks with f the bottom of the shoe it's a clear red card, does not matter if you hit the ball first, learn football ffs, ppl who plays like that must be sent of the pithch.
I fail to see how it is a red card, yellow perhaps! (studs were showing)
1) Lampard got the ball
2) One footed
3) Lampard touches the ball when Alonso is almost 1 metre away. watch 0:23-0:25 carefully
MrCrappy97 6 hours ago
Idk how alonso got hurt from that.
VVLD 1 day ago
Im blind and retarded, perfect for a ref
xXOrangeMunchkinXx 1 day ago
Fucking horrible tackle by lampard! dirty cheating bastard!
G4RR34 1 day ago
What language is this?
Cocaine8711 2 days ago
what the fuck? lampard kicked the ball first !!
jakerobinsonkeevers 4 days ago
@hoyeeyuen and hates the blacks
idkmaibffrose 6 days ago
bitch referee...
ysnkrcc 1 week ago
If anything it should have been a free kick to Lampard as Alonso kicked him.
Mythicalcurse 1 week ago
Nice tackle, not even a freekick
otteee 1 week ago
I was at this game 2-0 late on Torres scores 2
willTHErandom 1 week ago
thats what alonso gets for kicking lampard!
dandiufc 1 week ago
@hoyeeyuen more like- John Terry, the captain, the man who sleeps with every teammates wives
xRapidClaWx 1 week ago
Lampard just touches the ball! Not the player....
vador723 1 week ago
Red card for Lampard .. that rhymes well ..
but he didnt deserve the red card ..
TrueClue 1 week ago
Alonso should had a red card. Shit referee
JensStarum1 1 week ago
@JensStarum1 lampard went in studs up?
GleesonBoyz 14 hours ago
@hoyeeyuen and is a racist adulterer
reduolf 1 week ago
Terry looks hella pissed.
mIsSsOcCeR4eVeR 1 week ago
Whoever thinks this is a red card doesnt know football.
robert33182 1 week ago
Defenitly red card
mentalaaron99 2 weeks ago
he got the ball and the player got him? No red card there
kiewea14 2 weeks ago
@hoyeeyuen he would fight for every team mate .. JT IS A LEGEND !!
othmane49 2 weeks ago
lampard broke alonsos foot in alonsos first season, and never got punished, what goes around, big fat frank
MrJcarden 2 weeks ago
why is that a red card?
TeamGamingTV 2 weeks ago
So he hits the ball first then gets kicked and finally sent of? I hope this ref is retired what an idiot
JimBeek 2 weeks ago
for lampard ???
MrMaciek0007 2 weeks ago
kopnoł?
dobrze że twoi widzowie nie znają polskiego
CFCPatryk 2 weeks ago
how many pinits ref?
BROWNIE04URZ32 3 weeks ago
what a loser referee..Lampard got the ball first!!
TheJoCity 3 weeks ago
that was a fucking excellent tackle... whats the ref smokin?
mlold 3 weeks ago
i agree with the ref. if lampard was going for the ball his foot would have gone further. his intention looks more like lunging in on alonso
pianpawakapan 3 weeks ago
@hoyeeyuen yeah by fucking their wife.
Tiyong55 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Video referee - Successful testing Premier league Czech Republic, second year.
video clip for youtube.com/watch?v=1eaGTrTMb50
henn96 3 weeks ago
Not a foul
glaztheman 3 weeks ago
@hoyeeyuen yeah and fuck there wives...
2112116 3 weeks ago 29
@2112116 STILL he is the best CB in the WORLD....and probably the best captain(next to casillas)...so all of you haters...fuck off because nobody's perfect
sarghous117 1 week ago
@2112116 no, that was only 1 teammate. so shut the fukk up
antibarca1905 6 days ago
im a liverpool fan i was fukin so pissed of with the ref
xxxiscopeztdxxx1 4 weeks ago
caca means "poop" in french soccer players you should all try getting a life sometime soon
skatergirl12rox 1 month ago
that wasn´t a foul from lampard
TheMetalfreakXP 1 month ago
refs suck ass i hate em all either they screw my team over or they make the game to easy for my team
steamingmidget 1 month ago
more looks like alonso's red card
naumaanhamid 1 month ago
red card all day, if he thought he could get the ball he should of challenged not do a faggy studs up.
TheMysteryPotatoe 1 month ago
of course red
yaco77y 1 month ago
yellow is ok
Luddddeluxe 1 month ago
Trudnych decyzji. Lampard przyszedł, ale jego stadniny są zbyt wysokie i Alonso przyszedł jak byk. Alonso zasługuje na czerwono więcej niż Lampard nie bo on podbiegł stóp lampards i przewrócił się. Jest to pochodzący z kibiców i ja nienawidzę chelsea tyle.
The description asked for all comments to be written in polish so use google translate to translate my comment
lamo543 1 month ago
Polish your comment. Lampard is seen with the ball first kopnoł and later slain in August at him Alonso, the error Judge!
lamo543 1 month ago
@lamo543 Haha what? That did not make any sense!
Strongone112 1 month ago
@Strongone112 yea google translate sucks
lamo543 1 month ago
everyone shut up he gpot the ball but he left his feet up with his studs showing!!! YNWA
Bigballzer94 1 month ago
błąd sędziego? to na piłce się nie znasz.
marc25052005 1 month ago
yellow for Alonso!!! Hist studs hit Lampard... not the other way round!
ADRtobi 1 month ago
Nothing was wrong! ref was just high on weed I guess
SuperHuggiez 1 month ago
Not sure what he did wrong there.....
SDLRob 1 month ago
the best of lampard
xonn834 1 month ago
thats two men going for a 50-50 ball i saw nothing wrong there
Epixs420 1 month ago
Rules Same For Every Player
Babakarkhail4Ever 1 month ago
yellow not red....
MrHotmose 1 month ago
@MrHotmose free kick not yellow
lamo543 1 month ago
no man, thats hes foot ...
JonzyBonzy 1 month ago
at 0:41 Terry is like: "Which wife am i going to fuck tonight?"
EminemFanDK 1 month ago
Liverpool actually kicked lampard's boot lol
Mirpuria 1 month ago
Studs up, left the ground. Red card.
mikefoyemail 1 month ago
he got the ball
767jason 1 month ago
that was an attack with a straight leg in the air.
he could break alonso`s leg.
very good decision by referee.
cuban8810 1 month ago
@cuban8810 Dude, it's a yellow at the most. Xabi Alonoso came in like a freaking bull.
Thepawan98 1 month ago
SĘDZIA CHUJ !!!!!!!!!!!
masterofwoj 1 month ago
The BPL overturned this call and changed it to a yellow after wards
liljj231997 1 month ago 2
wtf is wrong with that referee!!!!!! OPEN YOUR DAMS EYES YOU BOLD SOB. He got the ball only
emehall 1 month ago
All ball at first, and yet he doesn't even argue. What a player.
drummerkid909 1 month ago 2
the red card was cancelled out.But I'm a liverpool fan,I say this is not even a red or a yellow,Its nothing really! its exactly like the Rodwell tackle on Suarez!
AidanAdam97 2 months ago
he got the fucking ball!
penceyboi3000 2 months ago
you guys don't know jack... many referees show players the red card if they go first with their sole and with a stretched leg... some do some don't...you have to deal with it.
acharem 2 months ago
He hit the ball ?
PrinceKarim10 2 months ago
Alonso kicks Lampard.. Alonso should have got a red card.
Alpecofreak 2 months ago
shit happens... the issue isnt the tackle, the issue is that THIS referee doesnt belong at THIS level... he makes mistakes week in week out
check out my channel :)
bigmoslim 2 months ago
Got the ball and so what ?? he went in with studs first and could have injured Alonso
TheCaketastic 2 months ago
Got the ball, therefore no foul.
Krentzifier 2 months ago
and lampard looks like Matt bellamy
jisandongcat 2 months ago
Terry will fuck referee's wife
jisandongcat 2 months ago
This kind of shit happens evey weekend around the world , just because its Chelsea its a big deal , Refs makes mistakes like people do . we all see its wrong cause we see the slowmotion replay , but on the field its looks differant .
mennostar1 2 months ago
You are all not intelligent people, the fact that someone is going for the ball or not doesnt matter. He went studs up, and even though he did get a bit of the ball he caught xabi, its a dangerous tackle and a deserved red card
Theshow2100 2 months ago
He hit the ball first. That's so dumb. The other player tripped over him.
lionelmessifan101 2 months ago
Another example of terrible decisions that go against Chelsea. Over the years this Chelsea team has had to tolerate some real shockers.
osgood100 2 months ago
ref can go to hell
hornswogglr 2 months ago
studs showing = red card in some occasions, cant complain. doesnt matter that he's "going for the ball"
DLyonCub 2 months ago
the guys sound makes the video shit
KiingMadrid 2 months ago
obviously red.
IAmaaaZeEU 2 months ago
@IAmaaaZeEU wtf thats fucking bullshit he goes for the ball
maximus59111 2 months ago
Wtf? he touch the ball first :s
Lessdrugs 2 months ago
Here's the thing. At first look, it's nowhere near a red card, just a yellow card. On closer inspection, it wasn't even a yellow card, just a free kick.
Lampard's studs were high, no doubt, but look closely. He got the ball first, just that slight touch on the ball before Alonso came in, and mind you, Alonso came in like a bull. The foul is that his studs were abit too high (relatively harsh in my opinion). But a red card? A joke and a Lousy decision.
Sharhind77 2 months ago 71
@Sharhind77 Defo wasn't a red but it was a yellow.
YourManNugget 2 months ago
@Sharhind77
Since he playes the ball, it's not a "foul because he hits the opponent". It could be a foul if you tackle with both legs and one gets the ball, the other the opponent, but here Lampards uses only one boot. So it can only be a technical foul because of "dangerous play". In this case it is possible to give in very extreme situations a red card, but this was not the case here, so a yellow card should have sufficed. btw to both players, since Alonsos kick was dangerous play too.
Jonathanizer 2 months ago
@Sharhind77 straight leg, studs almost knee height ? sending off you idiot !
DarrenPunter1 2 months ago
@Sharhind77 Totally, this decision lost Chelsea the game (2-0).
AzzurroVincerebbero 2 months ago
@Sharhind77 It's the correct decision. According to the laws of the game it doesn't matter whether you get the ball first, it how reckless the tackle is and that is a really reckless takle, reckless = yellow card, excessive force = red card (His studs were to high, equalling excessive force, so it's a red card, the Ref was right.
SimplemindedGamers 2 months ago
@Sharhind77 that's because the referee is gollum...and we all know he's short....and his precious is the yellow card...he would never show that to ANYONE, so he had to give the red...it's basic logic.
Powleh 2 months ago
@Sharhind77 Dude it was 2 years ago get over it
godigydog 1 month ago
@Sharhind77 You just proven why it is a red card. Studs were way to high, and he endangered Alonso. Yes Alonso comes in hard, but that will never make a tackle with studs up high legal. So the ref got this 100 % right according the Fifa's Laws of football!
cphthomsen 1 month ago
@cphthomsen brilliant response! keep up the good work
timhugel 1 month ago
@Sharhind77
But that's the rule mate , studs up is extremely dangerous for anyone else going for the ball.
JustTrickSHT 1 month ago
@Sharhind77 ...if you go with your studs first it's automaticly a yellow card...and 2 yellow card = red card...
xXxImM0rT4lxXx 1 month ago
@Sharhind77 he even got the ball
nates1007 1 month ago
@Sharhind77 It's the new laws, if you make a challenge studs up, you get at least a yellow. Here, Alonso was going first to the ball and Lamps throws himself studs up to get to the ball first. He does, but it is a dangerous tackle. According to the laws of the game, the ref is totally in his right sending Lamps off
guicharguichar 1 month ago
@guicharguichar WRONG
ihadoukens 1 month ago
@guicharguichar WRONGGGGG!!!
robert33182 1 week ago
Comment removed
Sharhind77 2 months ago
Wtf? Lampard just went for the ball and Alonso fucking kicked his leg, Alonso deserves the red card.
Lortagreb 2 months ago
@Lortagreb No, it just shouldn't of been a free kick.
Gazzzams10 2 months ago
@Lortagreb
What!?! NO! what happened was lampard went to try to get the ball. Hit it and alonso just got in the way.
megamessi321 2 months ago
lampard is a real gentleman and i swear, lampard never lies..
CAKEvid 2 months ago 95
@CAKEvid
I agree with you, and I agree with the ref.
DavenSaloon 1 month ago
Straight up legit, no card.
DeludoSui 2 months ago
fat frank :D
1337Boredness 2 months ago
@1337Boredness you fat son of a bitch
Pikangu 2 months ago
as a Liverpool fan i must say... that is definitely.. 100% not a red card
Leakx5 2 months ago
if anyone thinks thats anything other than a red card then their a fucking idiot
marshall1993 2 months ago
TYPIC REAL MADRID!!!
xXFallOutBoyJXx 2 months ago
@xXFallOutBoyJXx You are either an excellent troll or a fucking idiot
1InchofPleasure 2 months ago
@1InchofPleasure nerv nööööcht
xXFallOutBoyJXx 2 months ago
one leg is up, that's a yellow
multimashpotatoes 2 months ago
@multimashpotatoes
That's so silly. 2 legs is not more dangerous than 1. It actually distributes the power more evenly, so in many circumstances it's LESS dangerous.
It is not the number of legs, it is the wrecklessness of the tackle. So why do ppl talk about 2 legged tackles? They are harder to control, thus always wreckless.
japphan 2 months ago
Maybe ref saw it as some form of 2 footed challenge.
LawlietShadow 2 months ago
this also will get red card? refree go eat shyt la!
simonliewac 2 months ago
Polish commentary?
TheZombiespwn 2 months ago
Typical 'pool fans not understanding the rules. Lamps got the ball, he wasnt going for a tackle, he was going to kick it, and he kicked it. Alonso ran into Lamps foot after Lamps had kicked the ball.
jerichok 2 months ago
I HATE THESE REFEREES barca won the match when the referee didnt give chelsea penalties .... QPR 1:0 Chelsea 7Yellows 2Reds for chelsea and 3 Yellows for QPR thats pathetic
ReflectRohff 2 months ago
Red card. Foot is off the ground and studs are showing. rules are rules. Dangerous Foul Play.
TheJPDH 2 months ago
y r u gus arguing, thiis is a clear red, hez leg is up.
ashley44170 2 months ago
probably the only guy next to ronaldinho who smiles and goes off after recieving red
jeyamrama12 2 months ago
i totaly agree with the commentator
KingCookiee1206 2 months ago
it's not just about "getting the ball first". Although that's what everyone says is the rule it's not. If you go in a dangerous manner or with excessive force, i.e. flying in with a stiff leg with your studs up, its classed as dangerous play and you're off.
raskillable 2 months ago
Ya thts right... he hit the ball first ..its unfair.. bt unfortunately refree cant see the replay before deciding..
TheSidgame 2 months ago
U idiots do know that the red card was reviewed by officials and they decided to let him play next league match. U guys don't even know wat happened and go assuming like this... STUDS UP!!!! CLEAR RED CARD!!!! and one more example... TWO LEGGED CHALLENGE OFF FOR SURE... wat idiots are these people. STUPID FUCKING DUMBOS!!!!
88pok 2 months ago
Worst red ive ever seen lol....
Ocyil 2 months ago
what a dive queen
Benni2509 2 months ago
SPAIN IS PERFECT FOR XABI
MrStfupls 2 months ago
its a two footed tackle! and his foot leave the ground so, yes its at least a yellow card!
DittBess 3 months ago
@ChrisssyM
Youre a good fan!
manuel9490 3 months ago
Im a Liverpool fan and thats not a red card. I respect Lampard most of out of any Chelsea player.
ChrisssyM 3 months ago in playlist More videos from jedrek1808
what does this have to do with barcelona?
MrGaladys 3 months ago
this is definitely NOT for a red card. Lampard is on of the most careful players I have ever seen... referees make lot of disgrace to Chelsea
988adis 3 months ago
@988adis the ref was right lampard went in studs up and high moron.
nick1177 3 months ago
Tylko man utd ^^
TheAdixonTV 3 months ago
xD
TheAdixonTV 3 months ago
i hate lampard i hate the fucking team with all my heart but fuck me that was harsh...
TheRspk123 3 months ago
lol that was never a sending off
Saucytomo007 3 months ago
The title rhymes:)
DBeatz1997 3 months ago
the only reason why he got a red card cos the ref saw alonso hurt on the ground after the tackle! I hate refs who know nothing about soccer!! Especially stupid old mike riely
Chops95 3 months ago
alonso suck
Ultragog 3 months ago
wtf? he takes the ball!!!!!!!
anas139 3 months ago
i thin its more a foul from the red player :O
Hamma295 3 months ago
I saw that Lampard get the ball first
mark4807 3 months ago
standard of refereeing is appalling. He's actually fouled there.
Buth1983 3 months ago
I'm a United fan, and I frankly (haha coincidence) don't like Chelsea.
But how the f*ck is that a RED CARD?
nGzPuromatic 3 months ago
IT is obviously Xabi who kicks Lampard. Not just yellow for Xabi. Red.
Likkivi 3 months ago
Doesn't matter if he got the ball, his leg was up and he showed his studs, thats a dirty tackle in football. You should always go into a slide tackle with your studs DOWN AND AWAY from the ball. From a professional player that is disgraceful and totally inconsiderate to the other player. What if he didn't get the ball and got the player, that player could have been seriously injured with a broken leg/ foot. Fair red card.
qrrbrbirbel2 3 months ago
@qrrbrbirbel2
NO IDIOT.
He tackles the ball.
It's a yellow to Xabi Alonso for arriving too late. If Xabi is in danger here it is completely his own fault.
Lampard gets the ball. Xabi Alonso gets the man. Yellow card for Alonso.
Likkivi 3 months ago
@Likkivi yes he does tackle the ball, but why did he go studs first into the tackle? why not stretch his foot out and flick the ball away? he would have got to the ball faster and it would have been safer, right? he either intentionally risked badly injuring a player which would be a red card or simply didn't care about the player being hurt which is also a red card.
qrrbrbirbel2 3 months ago
@qrrbrbirbel2 That is not a red card. It was a 50-50 challenge in which the only one who got kicked was Lampard. It's your kind of attitude that is making football pathetic.
OnlyOneTreeHill8 3 months ago
@OnlyOneTreeHill8 tell you what, if everyone made tackles like lampard did, more players would have broken legs.
qrrbrbirbel2 3 months ago
@qrrbrbirbel2 If everyone made tackles in which they cleanly won the ball?
OnlyOneTreeHill8 3 months ago
@qrrbrbirbel2 Your saying what if he got the player . . . . He didnt. Thats just like saying if he punched him it would of been a red card, but he didnt. Stupid point made by you.
Chops95 3 months ago
@Chops95 not quite, it's not the fact that Lampard wins the tackle, the card has nothing to do with the tackle, it the fact he went into it carelessly with the possibility badly hurt another player when he has no reason to. Lampard could have made a challenge in a way where if he either wins the challenge or doesn't, it he won't be risking hurting the other challenger, but he didn't. THAT is the offense, which i believe he should have been carded for.
qrrbrbirbel2 3 months ago
@qrrbrbirbel2 And also, the FA appear to disagree with you, considering this red card was actually rescinded (that makes the decision was overturned as they agreed it was a fair tackle).
OnlyOneTreeHill8 3 months ago
@OnlyOneTreeHill8 Yes he won the ball but it's not that. Its the WAY lampard wins the ball that got him sent off, he risks the safety of that opponent to win the ball when he absolutely doesn't have to. In fact, he could have got the ball earlier if he'd tackled in a safer way, compared to going in studs first.
qrrbrbirbel2 3 months ago
@qrrbrbirbel2 It's nothing to with Lampard's tackling the ref made a mistake.
CptQuakers 3 months ago
@CptQuakers it is to do with his tackling, look at 0:23 as lampard makes the tackle, his leg is straight and fixed, which it shouldnt be, especially in a head on challenge where he's likely to go through the ball and take the player too. Also, his foot is pointed up showing his studs you should never do that in football ever because it can cause serious injury. At least a yellow should be given for that challenge and theres reason for a red here a bit harsh if it's lampards first fault.
qrrbrbirbel2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@qrrbrbirbel2 Also I would like to refer you to my comment:
"And also, the FA appear to disagree with you, considering this red card was actually rescinded (that makes the decision was overturned as they agreed it was a fair tackle)." - of course, the FA can't know anywhere near as much about the rules of the sport and League they govern over as you.
OnlyOneTreeHill8 3 months ago
showed his studs during the tackle, thats dangerous in a head on tackle especially as the liverpool player is going in for a hard kick, lampard should have backed out of the tackle or done a hook tackle. a fair red card.
qrrbrbirbel2 3 months ago
@qrrbrbirbel2 nope its not a fair red card he got the ball idiot, thumbs up if u agree :) thats why the match ban was ruled out and next match he was able to play do u even know about soccer, FAIR RED CARD LOL are u serious!!!!
88pok 3 months ago
50/50 wernt it
JMEcooper 3 months ago
Fucking UEFA can suck my dick there should be fucking replays and not this gayshit
kuro450 3 months ago
it was not lampard who deserved a red card...lampard got the ball first...he had no intention to tackle the opponent ...
xerxesq7 3 months ago
Райли пидар, тут даже желтой небыло...
MegaAlex560 3 months ago
i dont think that warranted a red card at all
jamie150741 3 months ago
I love how is his reaction after getting the red card. Humble. <3 Lamps.
duskhunter891 3 months ago
how is this red?
DunKillMePlz 3 months ago
Tackles like that should give a three month long suspencion...real scum who does assaults like that.
Layon86 3 months ago
@Layon86 Tackles like that? he got to the ball first you idiot. If anything he should get a yellow but he was certainly getting the ball not player.
vt006 3 months ago
@vt006 When he attacks with f the bottom of the shoe it's a clear red card, does not matter if you hit the ball first, learn football ffs, ppl who plays like that must be sent of the pithch.
Layon86 3 months ago