Added: 4 years ago
From: Porsche51688
Views: 4,950
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (49)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This lefty socialist couldnt change a housing project in chicago and u lemmins think he run this country???LOL youll get change ok a pocket full of just that..coins-

  • cool

  • One man can change the world, with enough ammunition.

  • Revolution: A momentous or sweeping change: cataclysm, convulsion, upheaval. See change See William Ayers See Race war

  • We voted for change in '06 and the Democrats took the House.

    Food prices up 45%

    Fuel Costs up 65%

    Unemployment up 10%

    Change is not always good, BOTH parties are selling us out!

  • Change is good. We just didn't get enough in 2006. Put in a dem prez and bigger majorities in the house and senate and you will see meaningful progress.

    Oh and your statistics mean nothing w/o a start and end date. you could be saying they have risen 45% since 1900 for all we know.

  • NEITHER party has the answer, all they can do is spend, spend, spend and it s KILLING US!

    Barack Hussein Obama has promised $967 BILLION dollars in additional spending!! We're already in a $8 trillion dollar deficit, & "cutting spending in various areas" won't get it done.

    Obama = HIGHER TAXES!!!

    He has no executive experience, hasn't even completed a term or passed a bill.

    He's loaded with agenda, and is so unprepared he doesn't talk issues, just pure rhetoric and HYPE!

  • None of the candidates have executive experience. He has shown that he can run a large operation though. Not once has his campaign budget been insolvent this entire season. Hillary's on the other hand is 20 million in the red. These campaigns are the largest ventures any of the candidates have had to run, and Obama's total cash earned and spent would probably be equal to the GDP of a small country (or small state).

  • "Positive Changes Award" to be given to a special Obama supporter.

    For details please click user name simon6071 at top left of this post.

  • As a result of the current administration, The American gov't has lost the moral authority to do anything to anyone, especially beyond the reach of its borders. This was not a mission emarked upon for humanitarian purposes! If that were the case, we would have invaded DPRK, Russia, China and a long list of other nations that were far worse than Iraq long ago. Iraq is simply an embodiment of neo-con fantasy. Don't think of it as fuck and run, think of it as putting an end to a very long rape.

  • Having spent time there, people in the Middle East tend to make no distinction between the Bush administration and others, including future leaders. You seem comfortable having Iraq understood as a neo-con rape fantasty, but when we leave too soon the raping will get far worse and WE will be to blame for selfishly voting withdrawal into office. Shame shame shame on us when we willfully and knowingly act to withdraw from Iraq leaving behind a failed state!

  • I am challenging you to really examine how and why you think leaving Iraq will end the rape. This is NOT a minor point. Since leaving behind a failed state will sign the death warrent of 10's of thousands, please provide us with some really good, substantive arguments about how withdrawal is a morally and ethically superior policy.

  • Nixon's former defense secretary (a republican) said: "We owe it to the rest of the people back home to let them know that there is an exit strategy. And more important, we owe it to the Iraqi people. Our presence is what feeds the insurgency. And our gradual withdrawal would feed the confidence and the ability of average Iraqis to stand up to the insurgents"

  • In other words, just as you said that the Iraqi people make no distinctions between administrations, they cannot discern the difference between an American force that is trying to prevent a failed state, and an American force that is there to exploit the state for its own ambitions. In other words, they dont know that we are not there to kick their ass and take their gas. That notion is what fuels the insurgency.

  • Plus, I dont know if u are a republican, but if you are, then u probably hate the idea of people relying on the government to solve all their problems. Well, let the Iraqis have the same freedom. The people do it better than the government can, isn't that a core tenet of Republican ideology?

  • Where's my hope?

    Where's my change?

    Where's my government cheese?

  • Hey Porsche - not bad!! You have some talent!!

    But you forgot to mention that he belonged to a church that hates the country in which it operates, you forgot to show that he is giving tax dollars in earmarks to his wife's hospital, and financially supports a man who spouts hatred of other BLACKS who just don't get it, hatred of Whites and Jews! Get real!! Really look at this man and what he stands for!!

  • hsabin, don't get too bogged down by details.

    Libs don't need results, they just need good intentions and a scapegoat.

  • Time to vote for REAL CHANGE in 2008.....Let's celebrate the end of 20 years of Bush/Clinton Oligarchy!!!!

  • Yeah change is coming and I hope your pockets book will stand it! The BIGGEST TAX INCREASE in the history of the US is the new spending bill supported by OB. The global tax initiative is another tax he is putting on the US - change is coming my friend and YOU are NOT going to like it!

  • You bet...we have to pay China back for financing Bush's war on Iraq!

  • China has not funded Bush's war! They have set up an inbalance of trade for which our government should be yelling and screaming as they ship us tons of goods and won't import our good to their country.

    The global tax initiative is for POVERTY all over the world. OB wants to charge US citizens an additional .7 percent ON TOP OF THE BILLIONS we already send to countries for helping with their poverty! He doesn't address poverty in this country! Start reading casunray - and learn!

  • I'll keep on reading your crap....if you stop watching FOX.

  • I watch FOX, CNN, MSNBC< and other stations along with listening to both sides of the issues on talk radio. Start discussing with facts and we could have some good discussions. For example - under Bush, more minorities have home ownership for the first time, there were 1.65 million new businesses for BLACK WOMEN created in his administration and more people moved into the middle class while he was in office. I look forward to the debate with you. Use facts - not opinion/

  • ron paul doesn't need change...he needs votes...

    OBAMA 08'

  • Change? What change?

    Obama voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act. Is this "change?"

    Ron Paul voted against the Patriot Act BOTH TIMES and denounced it soundly. Check his record.

    Obama voted to continue funding the Iraq War. What Change?

    Ron Paul has been an outspoken opponent of this war of lies since the start, and has denounced it soundly. Check the record.

  • Obama voted to fund the troops but ALWAYS voted against the war and was the only house democrat running for state senator that voted AGAINst the war. Every state senator for reelection authorized the war, afraid of public opinion. You are using hilary's argument that he flip-flopped on Iraq. Its basically a Karl Rove / Swiftboating of Obama. Don't do it. Ron Paul supporters are switching to Obama, and rightly so.

  • Obama voted to fund the war, period. $845 billion tax on the american middle (working) class to be controlled by the UN. He is on the committee who created HR1959. Supports AIPAC. CFR member. In this order: Obama 1st Globalists 2nd, then America 3rd. Many of the search results I used to get on Obama are no longer. Beware of the false promisses.

  • OB's voting record is only ONE away from being different - they voted alike MOST of the time!

  • OB's voting record is only ONE different from that of Hillary Clinton. This is change? For all those including porsche who think change is coming - you're right! Higher taxes, lower control over your own pocket book and a man who places Africa above America. Now there's change for you!!

  • "change" What a ridiculous slogan.

    He NEVER specifies "change".

    "Change" is NOT an idiot saying "change"

    If you want the same old Bullshit, go ahead, vote for Obama.

  • And the alternative would be what? Clinton? McCain? Romney? Huckabee? If those guys represent change to you, then I am moving to Canada. Super Tuesday is behind us buddy. Unless Ron Paul can go con some of his KKK supporters into lynching Obama's black base of support, Obama is the only hope we've got.

  • You buy into that slimy racist BS smear attack on Ron Paul.

    It couldn't be farther from the truth.

    How does Obama stand on SR1959, the bill that will target us for thought crimes and specifically target free speech on the Internet?

    You've been tricked into following another establishment candidate under the empty, mindless platitude of "change."

  • oh no, not the thought police. God forbid. Let me go get my tin foil cap.

    It is mathematically impossible for Ron Paul to get the nomination now. So either vote for the best of the bunch (Obama), or deal with a really awful gov't with either Clinton/McCain in power. Your choice.

  • Have you read the bill? Or are you content to sit back and decry those who have as conspiracy theorists, because they're complaining and the mainstream media isn't (so everything must be ok...)

    I'll vote Ron Paul, a vote of my conscience, no matter who you project as the "winner."

    All losers.

  • Oh I've read about everything Ron Paul's supporters have been so kind to enlighten me on. From the CFR, to the fed, and the UN. All crap. What's funny is that I see this kind of alarmist thinking from a certain sitting president everytime he wants something done. Oh and Ron paul's credibility is greatly diminished when u consider that he thinks volcanoes cause global warming, his support for H.J. Res 46, and the fact that the KKK and the JBS think this guy is God.

  • I have a porsche, but you make me want to sell it,

  • It is an ABSOLUTE LIE that it is mathematically impossible for Ron Paul to win. Learn math.

    RON PAUL 2008! (It is NOT to late)

  • Sorry obama, but this guy isn't about change, it's more of the same.

    that's because he is a CFR Scum and a snake (north american union anyone?)

    I Voted for ron paul, because he brought change to america.

  • I think i got a crush on obama, jajajaja.

    but im not a obama girl. If I lived in the United States I vote for him¡¡¡. the man is so handsome and carismatic. is a hottie

  • i think i got a crush on obama. jajaja

    but im not obama girl. he had a lovely smile. and if I lived in United States. I Vote for Obama.

  • That was beautiful! Thanks so much for sharing that with us! He is incredible! He has to win for the sake of this country....... I will do everything I can to get him there!

  • I like Eric Clapton too.

  • Yet another Obama video with ZERO substance. The only thing I know about Sen. Obama is that he busses in supporters for campaign events here in New Hampshire, paid Democratic college students, to disrupt our electoral process. At all of the rallies I have been to, I have only met 1 Obama supporter who is actually from New Hampshire, and none of them have any substance to their support for the Senator.

  • Hmm, what is substance to you? If this was a slideshow of a bunch of pictures of Ron Paul set to some punk rock music (the kind he likes putting in the videos on his channel) you would probably think that the mere image of Ron Paul was substance enough.

  • There is plenty of substance to Obama:

    -Far reaching healthcare reform

    -Support for environmental protections (95% from League of Conservation of Voters)

    -Advocation of diplomatic foreign policy, with an emphasis on aiding developing nations.

    -Eradication of poverty from U.S., with greater aid to New Orleans.

    He cares about the things Ron Paul doesn't

  • LOL, SO Funny! Nice going porsche.

    You're right, Obama does lake substance. Like I mean he only got 39% of the vote in Iowa. Thats not more than three times what your "homeboy" Ron Paul got. You're absolutely right, Ron Paul is obviously much better. Shut up and watch the next president of the United States.

    OBAMA 08

  • yeah, and those are things that ALL presidential candidates are for. Whats the specific policy plans?

    Or how about the specific causes of what makes people poor in the first place?

    Or how come I can't go to the market and buy healthcare the same way I buy groceries? If the damn thing were that easy to buy wouldn't it be cheaper and better for the people?

  • what most democrats dont understand is that using the government to throw money at the problem doesnt solve the problem. it just causes the bureaucrats in the middle to STEAL more.

    Ask FEMA what they did with all the federal aid that was meant to help the people of new orleans. Oh, thats right it was spent on trailers, most of which didn't even reach the people.

  • Oh wait....wasn't that under Bush's watch? And isn't Bush Republican? So it sounds like the Republicans have a bigger problem with throwing money away. And just as a last comment it seems to me that Bush is throwing money away with the war in Iraq and his corporate tax breaks on the filthy rich oil industry.

  • Bush and the Neo-Con Republicans need to be wiped out. Ron Paul is not a neo-con republican and if you look at his voting record he's voted against the wastefulness of the Bush regime every single time. Dennis Kucinich wants Ron to be his running mate. Besides the "republican" title, Ron has nothing in common with Bush and the '94 "Republican" Revolution that brought gingrich, delay and all those crooks

  • yeah good point, but precisely because he's not a Neo-Con Republican is the reason that he won't win. Huckabee with his "praise god" rhetoric will have the best shot, unfortunately.

  • obama cares about a lot of things but his approaches often times aren't correct. He lacks an understanding of core economic principles and that is fully illustrated by his policy plans.

  • Really, because obama is a CFR Member trying to destroy this country, if you seen lou dobbs tonight about the north american union, then you will see how horrible it is.

    we are heading into slavery.

  • I hope he does win... he has raised over 30 million dollars again in this latter stage of the race.. but am afraid dirty politics (fox news and some racist news outlets) that are poluting the air waves with lies about him and the fact that there are people out there that believe everything they read will cost him in the end(i hope not god willing) hopefully am wrong and he'll be our first black president of the united states of this great americas

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more