Added: 5 years ago
From: Eltimple
Views: 791,961
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (239)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Wankel Engine", misleading people just makes you a dirty fucking liar.

  • Proof my ass. You can already see it start to lose momentum after 2 cycles! There's no such thing as "free" energy. Stop treating science like mythology.

  • @athealis

    "There's no such thing as "free" energy."

    LOOOL

    ROFL

  • @bruckator well, there is, its just also called the sun, or the wind etc. personaly, I think people should invest in that instead of this

  • @coatduck The suns energy is not free, the wind isn't free, it gets its energy from the sun, and the sun gets its from fusion and fusion is not free.

  • @sayaks12 I ment "free" in the sence that we don't have to pay for it, and we are not exactly going to run out of sun. I think the consept of free energy is compleatly bogus

    if it was possible, heres how it would work, but there are flaws:

    enstein-rosen bridge, on end on top of the other, make it a vaccuum, eccelerates infinatly, because it has no terminal volicity in a vaccuum

    problem? it takes all the power of all the stars in the milky way to make one, so thats a bit of a snag

  • Um.. WTF was that..

  • fucku

  • create a wanker engine and i might buy one

  • Proof of concept means a working model, even if crude, this is not "working."

  • Wankle was a Wanker...

  • Im glad that I'm not the only one that found "wankle" funny

  • haha wankle.

  • never thought I'd see a magnetic Wankel, Though wankel engines have always intrigued me

  • So question, what if you put more magnets and make a full loop?

  • @paulthehanna i dont think u can bcaus the magnets at the end repel the magnet on the disk and those have to be far away enough or else they will stick to each other

  • @gameroxer a wankel moves in a figure 8 with a triangular piston. I dont see anything like that.

  • What has this to do with Wankel? I see nothing at all.

  • build your own generator

    buildgenerators.co m

  • Tesla tech in videos: "Wonderful ebnergy" by HorizonDelta ;-)

  • James has it rattrap, we don't know much about dark energies or what was around before the event nicknamed the big bang. Also time is not a concept of reality. Is length a concept of reality? no, it is a dimension and time is much the same, we just cannot percieve it only its effects on the three previous dimensions around us. The existance of man is irrelevent to the universe and its existence

  • lol wankel :)

  • Can ! please have my 7 seconds of my life back, please?!? :((( You're doing it wrong!

  • LAME

  • heheh wankel..

  • Sorry? Proof of the Magnetic Wanker Engine?

  • if only we could harness the power of masturbation. Now theres an un-taped resource if I've ever seen one.

  • if you aim all the poles at each other . . then the force pattern will spiral in the centre

    and allow a ring magnet to spin . . watched a bedini video on it and it seems to work

  • Physics...

    You're doing it wrong.

  • There are thousands of videos like this on web, but no one really shows us a working prototype.

  • That is not the magnet. The magnet is you're hand... XD ...

  • good job

    see my oscillating project.

  • fail

  • lol, I thought it said the magnetic wanker machine... I wonder, could this form of kinetic energy be transformed into wanking energy?

  • nice horizontal pendulum

  • It's nothing more than a pendulem.

  • hey naive idiots who take this seriously: stop being ripped off by asswipes who sell magnets and stainless set-screws & spend the money u save on a physics degree. Then get a decent job & you can afford to pay your heating and electricty bills on time, enabling u to bring nice chicks back to your nice warm fuck pad & fuck them senseless, rather than vigourously spanking your monkey to the weather girl when she has a tight skirt on OK are we clear?

  • @thetrolone Im pretty sure spending like 3$ is going to prevent you from doing any of those things...

  • @thetrolone watch?v=us7YB7eiOeQ. the "law of thermodynamics" is mistaken..

  • lol, wankel

  • fail...

  • 248thEvan, I guess, he forgot the weapons-grade naquadah (Nq).

    (\_/)

    0_0

  • ...why the fk are you spamming that on every video >:[

  • For every sceptic, there are at least two fucking short-educated open-minded (gullible) idiots who believe anything who are hoping for new things to alter their boring, day-dreaming-filled lives.

  • Righto, you figured it out but won't reveal the secret until you "see some justice in this world."? That is a frequent claim by crackpots, (next to "when I get a patent", or the variation "when the world is ready for it"), that is used to conveniently cover up the fact that you ain't got shite.

    You are only one of a million, a legend in your own mind. Get in that long line with the other deluded crackpots, mate.

  • Fine. If you believe I said God would give morons the secret to free energy, and you believe that, as a moron yourself, you have a secret from God, that's OK with me.

  • SlackerSlayer: Read it again and stop quoting me out of context. There would only be a contradiction if I said I believed God would give them the secrets, I was saying that the morons who follow these people believe that. I do not believe these magnet tinkerers will devise means of creating energy, except by some metaphysical breakthrough (God, the Force, or Cosmic Muffin), which I don't believe will happen.

  • Comment removed

  • @ greenlivingitup . com it shows how to build a free energy device with magnets

  • Are you saying this video doesn't show how to build one?

  • LOL....all of you people who keep commenting on the laws of physics..explain infinity...and explain how space continues to grow without any "INPUT" just because some dude made some laws a hell of a long time ago that doesn't mean things are set in stone...0 doesn't truly exist..but according to the smartest guys in the world it does..keep an open mind and you may surprise yourself...i am not saying this stuff works..cause obviously it doesn't, but there is a more obvious reason to research it.

  • What do you mean "explain" infinity? In terms of what? Math, philosophy, topology, physics, geometry, etc.? The dictionary definition?

    The universe seems to be expanding, and the "input" is the big bang. Things are not set in stone, but until someone actually makes a working free energy device that can be replicated and reviewed by anyone, I will fall back to what has been shown to work time and time again -- the laws of thermodynamics. So far no one has and no one can explain how it COULD work

  • Comment removed

  • actually i reviewed the other videos and (@ video poster) im impressed with the ideas that you have. despite whether or not perpetual motion exists, these are great ideas nonetheless

  • Notice how the video stops as soon as the system locks up over one magnet.

  • free energie XD oh my god !

    NO

    its kinetic engine !

    magnet engine goes to force engine

    it would like work 30 years !than did you need new magnets

  • IF .... that works...

  • The thing didn't even make a full turn. It is only a pendulum using magnetic ***FORCE*** instead of gravity **FORCE***

    There is no energy in magnets, only force. It takes motion to make power and time to make energy.

  • is there a magnet motor that doesnt need electricity?

  • There is no such thing as free energy.

  • @octelcogopod yet

  • "Free energy" cannot exist. It violates the laws of thermodynamics.

    You cannot create something out of nothing.

    Please take a basic physics class.

  • @octelcogopod they devided the law of newton, so why not the laws of Thermodynamics?

  • What are you talking about? "Devided" is not a word. You're not making any sense.

  • @octelcogopod thats why XD

  • Prove it.

  • Look up "laws of thermodynamics".

    QED

    (the burden of proof is on you to refute well-established and tested laws of physics, not on me to disprove "free energy" magnet contraptions built by idiots)

  • I know of the laws of thermodynamics. Just because some group of renowned scientists made them and they're well established, that doesn't make the laws infallible. As far as quantum physics goes, the laws of thermodynamics DON'T WORK. Hello!? The atom is a perpetual motion machine.

    Why is the burden on us? You're just puking out knowledge other people have figured out just to make yourself sound intelligent. After all, why are you even here commenting on these videos if you think they're stupid?

  • Scientist didn't "make" laws, they discovered them. It's like saying a bunch of scientists "made" the concept of gravity.

    The atom is not a perpetual motion "machine" -- you cannot extract work from a stable atom. Unstable atoms are simple, just look up "nuclear fission".

    Yes, I will grant you that the laws of thermodynamics are not infallible. This is how science progresses -- when someone proves a new idea. So go ahead, build a working free energy device, publish a paper, and be famous.

  • I totally agree - if an idiot-savant with minimal education named, for purpose of illustration, Nathan, could come up with a device that violated existing physical laws, then we could proclaim "Nathan's law of thermodynamics". Until then, we would still call Nathan a loser who should get a job and move out of his parent's basement. That's how things work, fortunately for us all, but unfortunately for the Nathans.

  • Imagine walking down the street, and you see a man beating his head against a brick wall, and a crowd has gathered to egg him on. Wouldn't you be a little tempted to say something? Though not much good will come of it, knowing the mental level of the crowd, and their propensity to hurl insults at the "renowned scientist" type who should just shut the fuck up or get his head bashed in.

  • if i am correct the moment where he cut is the moment where it stops

  • I think we have a new meaning for the word "wankel".

  • it will work, if he made it so the magnet moved away from the "hump" at the end, it will move over it, then the magnet moves back in places, and it will turn again. and no, none of these magnet motors are meant to be breaking the laws of physics, they are using the magnets natural "charge" of energy that will run out, but only after hundreds of years.

  • You have no idea what you are talking about. Find a video that shows one working or why don't you make one yourself to prove it; they simply don't work.

    Magnets do not have a charge of energy that runs out after 100 years. Where on earth did you get that nonsense from?

  • Ha! Your thinking about magnets like fridge magnets, or computer HD magnets, or anymagnets you can buy in the shop, lol they do run ot and are very weak, I'm talking about Neodymium magnets, they are naturaly made, and last for AGES! read them on Wikipedia

  • Magnets do not run out as you describe unless they are heated (high temps) or shocked (frequent dropping). All magnets can fail this way.

    As for you comment "naturally made". What does that mean? Things are either "natural" or "man made", you can't have it both ways. Neodymium is not found as an element, but as a compound. Neodymium magnets are made of a compound of neodymium, iron and boron.

    Neodymium is used to make magnets in computer hard drives units - check your facts.

  • Do you mean to say "Neodymium is not found as a PURE element"? For it is indeed an element, in the periodic table of elements with atomic number 60.

  • @SuperArglebargle - as I originall posted: "Neodymium is not found as an element, but as a compound. "

    I'm not suggesting it is not an element.

    A "pure element" is tautology. I was saying neodymium is not found in elemental form, but as only in compound form.

    English for some can be confusing. Have a nice day.

  • Mea culpa, "pure element" is a tautology, or at least redundant.

    But:

    "Neodymium" is an element, and "compound" means "neodymium combined with other elements". Saying "Neodymium is not found as an element" is logically incorrect, as is the second part, "but as a compound", since neodymium is always (by definition) an element, and cannot be found to be a compound by itself. Better wording?: "Neodymium is not naturally found in its elemental form, but only in compounds with other elements".

  • @SuperArglebargle -"Neodymium is not found as an element, but as a compound. "

    Live with it.

    If you focus on grammar and not the intent then you'll find few to listen.

  • Neodymium iron boron magnets are created. If you read all of the info about them on Wikipedia, you would know this. They may exist in nature, but the majority that you find for purchase are created, not found. BTW, neodymium magnets are used in hard drives. They are used in a lot of things because of their durability and magnetic energy. I've even seen them used as fridge magnets.

  • I have actually made one of these "magnetic motors" out of curiosity many years ago. I realised then it couldn't work. People have been trying for years and everyone offers suggestions on magnet types, angle of placement, shielding and all that happens is ...nothing!

    Like I have said - find just one working example - preferably one that you can verify by watching it run unaided with no external power source. Or you can go read a good physics book and understand why they can NEVER work.

  • If I am correct it is because once the magnet is overwhelmed by such polarity and has no where to go, it will just stall.

    And no momentum will come from it.

  • Yes. The force required to bring two opposing magnets together is the same as that when they force each other apart. Therefore when such devices spin, they slow down due to friction and stop. There is no way around these facts no matter how hard people try to say otherwise.

  • mmm im kind of sick of this psuedo science, the reason the clip is as short as it is because it eventually stops working. The push/pull of the magnets may be beneficial to extend or redirect the energy but inertia still applies.

  • I agree. You need to look at the hundreds of similar videos and you'll see even more loony ideas.

    The push of the magnets = pull of the magnets. Therefore no free energy.

    At best if there was no friction it would spin for a long time, but magnets moving pass each other create eddy currents in each other, and heat each other up, further transferring the potential energy into wasted heat. Therefore it will stop.

  • you need to put more than 1 magnet on the disc

    watch?v=sSfdzCEVzso&feature=pl­ayer_profilepage#

  • The number of magnets on the disc doesn't make any difference.

    The energy required to bring two magnets together is the same as the energy released when the two magnets repel.  So where is the net gain of energy? There isn't any.

    If there were no friction at all then these devices would spin like a top, forever, the magnets doing no useful work at all. Apply any load and it will stop.

    Basic high school physics.

  • I'm glad you tried it out. I'm so tired of these mag-monkeys saying "why don't you build one for yourself and prove it doesn't work?" or some such statement. Now that you have tried it, I wonder if that will be good enough for them. Probably not.

  • @SuperArglebargle - those pro these devices aren't going to be easily convinced of a negative finding no matter what. They argue lack of proof just means it is yet to be discovered - all the while ignoring very robust and elegant laws of thermodynamics and the like.

  • Yes, but also amazing is how much time is wasted by people sitting on their arse, gawking at these failed projects. Some people are trying to devise the means of creating energy, whilst others are listlessly using it up!

  • No, they are not ever going to devise means of creating energy. They are just pud-pulling, and they do it for years without a clue, except for the fraudulent ones, who get all the other morons excited and defending them as well-intentioned heroes who God will eventually let in on a secret.

    If you see someone wasting their lives, do you encourage them?

  • @skankystupidbitch 'Creating energy'? You slept through all your physics classes, didn't you? ;)

  • Comment removed

  • @Kokuyo666 And everything about physics is to the best of our understanding, 200 years ago if you told people half the things we know now their would call you crazy. in 200 years I can see people loking back and saying " why didnt those idiots see this? it was right in front of them". I ask only one thing, is it possible for science to be wrong? if you say no then your no better then a religious person who says god created everything. think about it.

  • @adamslurch71 Oh, I don't believe in science. Even gravity is only a theory. Unless we've seen every last place in this universe and have watched every last place till the end of time, some day, somewhere gravity might backfire on us. There are no laws of nature... but there is a lot of 'coinciding' 'evidence'. There's a good chance, after all we know, that gravity is real. Therefore I go through life assuming. I assume that scientific facts are indeed facts until there's reason to doubt.

  • @Kokuyo666 Thats sad, always believing until theres a reason to doubt, try living a life where you assume nothing and know nothing, your just living life, you get hungry you eat, you need to use the bathroom, then do so, stop trying to see the world they way we have changed it and start looking at it for what it is, stop knowing what things are and start questioning everything. How else will you get answers that you can understand?

  • @adamslurch71 No, you just don't understand what I'm saying. Questioning everything is the basis of my whole belief system. In order to question, you must first establish a starting point. That's what you do when you grow up. You learn things and think whatever the adults say must be true. Then you start to question. If a concept can hold its own, I assume it to be valid ... for now. You, on the other hand, sound like everything is false until proven plausible. Sounds exhausting.

  • @Kokuyo666 Nothing exhausting about it, question everything others say and take nothing as fact. The thought that I will live to see tomorrow is great but I never know I could die in a car crash so why bother making plans? I know it sounds odd but its true live each day as if it is something new and don't worry about anything other then the here and now. Science is telling us how we must live out our lives if you think about it they limit what we think is possible.

  • @skankystupidbitch

    Energy cannot be created.

  • @James89B Yeah yeah, I know. I was merely paraphrasing an argument above. Sheesh.

  • @James89B If it cannot be created then how did it come to exist?

  • @rattrap1985 energy can only change from one form to another, quantum physics has many different pheories to how energy began and the most prevailent is the dark energy pheory, before the 'big bang' energy was in a dark energy form.

  • @DeathcageLMH Okay.. so... you do mean theory right? How did this 'dark energy' come to exist? My point is, stuff just doesn't appear, it can't have been there forever. There had to have been nothing at some point. Maybe energy can be created and we just haven't observed it yet. I'm trying to help science here, and I'm not a fan of religion. I just think there has to be a creator, that's all. It doesn't have to be 'God'. That's something for you to think about.

  • @rattrap1985

    It didn't come to exist, it always exists, like time has no beginning or end.

  • @James89B Nothing exist only the big bang.

    yOUR BRAING hURt yeT

  • @MultiIPwnage

    That happened a long time ago and the energy from that event has since been converted into many other things.

  • @James89B Time is a concept of reality. Energy can be felt, seen, heard and therefore must have been created. Time was created when man perceived time and created the word for it.

  • @rattrap1985

    What a shallow thought path, The universe does not revolve around human beings and their senses.

    If life did not come to be, the rest of the universe would still be there working in the same ways it does now.

  • @rattrap1985 deep bro, deep.

  • please review the first law of thermo dynamic's or the law of conservation of energy. Infact go to your local library and read every physic's and math book you can find and enlighten your self as to why this will never work.

  • why is it that each time i see this the loop isnt close there always a gap cloe the gap and it will work

  • I don't see what this has to do with a wankel engine.

  • its used for magnetic trains?

  • well, this 3/4 rotation could make a gear spin, so it's good enough to prove a concept. Sadly all magnet powered stuff I tried home failed.

  • needs more gluons

  • "Perpetual motion machines are powered by belief and stopped by reality." Adam Peenum

  • Yeah, it's bouncing back because it ran into reality and collided.

  • maybe if we all work together we can develop and create a perfect one

  • it is facinating that alot of us from different parts of the world came up with the same idea around the same time

    i got it while i was playing with the (play with magnet) in year 2006

  • damn it just close the circle

  • he he he he. you said wankel

  • ...Wankel....

  • if I could harness that 3/4 rotaion, Im sure it would power my car. I would just have to be real fast with the clutch. let it out only when its moving clockwise

  • ha wut

  • what a funny name to give it xD

  • Comment removed

  • and the first wanking that doesn't involve a hand the whole time

  • first this isn't a Wankel engine 2nd you run out of kinetic energy not magnets.

  • I don't see why people are rating this bad. Personally, I think this is a wonderful proof of concept. Magnets and gravity are related (In my opinion), there is a way to get that this going without outside force acting upon it. Just keep trying, you never know what you may create :P

    5 Stars :D

  • Because it's not a Wankel motor at all, Wankel motors are a type of internal combustion engine.

    And no matter how hard you try, you will never get free energy from magnets.

  • well it has the same basic layout, just differant properties

  • Humans and stick figures have the same basic layout, too.

  • there ya go, you just proved my point.

  • um turn it around under the table?

  • physics arguments aside, i don't see anything that could be described as a Wankel engine.

  • i think it's quite possible cause it's not creating energy from nothing, its only converting the magnetic forces into different state of energy. as we know from physics- to make some work(for instance to move an object) we need to apply some energy to this object(move it with the hand or with somthing else)but with magnets you dont need energy(as two strong magnets attract,just put them close to each other)i think we'll find a way to convert these forces to energy someday :)

  • Dont forget there was a time when the laws of physics said that heaver than air flight was impossible.

  • ...that's absolutely untrue.

    You honestly think that Galileo and Newton would just plug their ears and close their eyes every time a bird or insect flew by and scream out "YOU'RE NOT REAL!"

    The "laws of physics" you want to discard are based on scientific observation of the natural world. In this natural world (which we call reality), energy comes with a cost.

    Through hundreds of years of insisting and scaming, no free energy device has ever worked, not even once. Why is that?

  • I See exploration. Not proof of a free energy device. No discovery will ever be made by someone like you! lol the people who believe in the impossible. Just sit on the side lines and experience the things we bring to you. The dreamers. :)

  • You're confusing dead beats with real scientists. People are free to dream as they will, and despite what you may think, I do dream, just as every other person does.

    There are those who look for actual discover, those who are humble to the majesty that is the universe..

    ...then there are those, such as yourself, who instead of trying to learn and discover instead decide to insist that they're right without a shred of evidence.

    Just because you can "dream" something doesn't mean it's possible.

  • Well you must be confusing me... because my very first comment on this video was this past one. So i never claimed a thing... I just know your arguing about is more "ego tennis" then anything usefull. Since im not claiming anything i do not need to provide evidence? I simply stated that i see these kinds of videos as exploration and brainstorming concepts then a scientific claim. I mean you did watch the video right?

  • You may want to read what I said again, as you've misunderstood.

    I never said you claimed anything without evidence, aside from that "dreamers" are the only people who discover anything.

    I was alluding to the fact that the over-unity crowd in general considers "facts" and "evidence" to be simply unnecessary, as the prospect of free energy is worth more than things like scientific accuracy.

    Yes, I watched the 6 second video. Nothing special going on here.

  • The second law of thermodynamics. You cant produce more gains than you produce total losses. If you leave your refrigerator open, the room will not get cold, it gets hot, for the very same reason.

  • Inventors of perpetual motion

    have fervent faith and saint's devotion.

    The Gods of physics duly smite them

    to be reborn ad infinitum.

  • keep trying, the nobel is near

  • VV yea you cant make a perpetual motion machine. if you could u'd be bloody rich right now. 25 grand down the drain for the conclusion we already knew, failure of the project. magnetmotorman. that's what we call cute.

  • Yep. But it was a nice try though.

    I think I will leave my cheque book in the drawer.

  • absolute failure indeed! LOL @ you

  • I gave it five stars for honesty, because you can see how quickly the rotor slows down.

    Most of the 'magnetic motor' videos on YT are fakes by free energy hippies and liars.

  • I think you'll find if you put an electromagnet for getting that the electric energy put in is always greater than or equal to the mechanical energy that you take it.

  • That's IT???????????? What a waste of time. h.ah.ah.aha I didn't even see you do anything.

  • nah mate! you just make the gate magnet spin, that solves the problem!

  • Boioioioing!

  • I have no idea what you all are talking about. But I'm intrigued. This is SEXY!

  • If the momentum in your video was enough to allow the wheel to continue passed the first half of magnets in the ring, one can only wonder how the wheel would react if the magnets in the ring were all of ascending strength. Would the built up momentum propel the wheel passed the gap in the gate to repeat the cycle?