@NatureChasing Back when 'Neanderthal' was taken into English, the German word 'Tal' (=valley) was spelt 'Thal' but pronounced 'Tal'. German spelling was simplified towards the end of the 19th century.
The African humans and the European humans came from different beginnings, Caucasians are not from the same humanoids as Caucasians. We are the cave men hahahah!
The evidence points to the inconceivable - modern Eurasians are not hybrids. Neanderthals were the hybrids. According to the May 2010 paper, they were 12.7 percent "ancestral", which means they got 6.35 percent (3 chromosomes) from apes.
Correct me if I am wrong, it's commonly assumed that humanity started in Africa (or only one human species ?), but if africans have no neanderthal genes, can we assumes that neanderthal like all humans originates in Africa ?
1) First abvious lesson, I thing we must never take all they teach us for granted. And, I am confident that new technology is likely to desmolish all what we take for granted, and maybe even prove to the contrary.
2) Talking about Neanderthal, since they are supposed to come from Africa, how comes that no african has a little tiny bit of Neanderthal gene ?
I am not afraid to use my mind instead of just repeating something I was told.
@meelusine *From Africa,branches of humans went in all directions.The ones that went up by England,were hit with an Ice Age,lasting 20,000+ years,these were the Neanderthal.The ones that stayed south in warmer weather thrived.These became Homo Sapians.When they met,over time some mated,the Homo Sapians brought germs that killed off the Neanderthal.
1) First abvious lesson, I thing we must never take all they teach us for granted. And, I am confident that new technology is likely to desmolish all what we take for granted, and maybe even prove the contrary.
2) Talking about Neanderthal, since they are supposed to come from Africa, how comes that on african has a little tiny bit of Neanderthal gene ?
I am not afraid to use my mind instead of just repeating something I was told.
@meelusine* As I said,I watched ALL of these programs 10 hours or so.OK,where do you portend Neanderthal originated? My logic told me,that if "They" agree that "man" started in Africa,in some way Neanderthal man must stem back to them,in a couple of billion years.Their branch never went back.Please ,now I insist on your view as to the beginning of the Neanderthal,they here said the cold influenced their bodies,so "Where" did "They" begin ??? To you,their start ?....( "read" in a book.).
What I just cannot figure it out, is that african people don't have Neanderthal genes, whereas all other people around the world have a tiny bit of Neanderthal gene.
How comes, if Neanderthal comes from Africa, I just won't a satisfactory answer.
@meelusine Well they aleredy swithced a gene that instructs where to build fly's eyes with the human gene(Probably because it was the same gene), and guess what happened. Fly got fly's eyes.
Even if you place human genes into mousses DNA, genes for specific hardware are still missing. No human mouth and throat, no speech. Now if you have time to find all those genes, and then manage somehow to achieve compatibility then...
@meelusine Planet of the apes, well we already live on the planet of apes. Human is an ape, and other apes are far more intelligent we previously believed. Chimp has an intelligence of a 4 year old and they actually achieved something in teaching them language(sign language). What's interesting they invent their own words. And they can lie pretty nicely.
If we did interbreed with Neanderthals, I would have to speculate that those outside Africa inherited their nearsightedness from Neanderthals. Pure Africans are rarely nearsighted, but outside Africa the number is 25% to 75% of the population depending on the region. You don't need excellent eyesight to run up to a big animal and jab a spear in it. With that said, intelligent people tend to be nearsighted, but not all nearsighted people are intelligent. Nearsightedness was shown to be genetic.
@duckmanjoel You definitely DO need good eyesight to spot a predator, movement in the bushes, etc. Nearsightedness became much more common once good eyesight was no longer essential to survival which was probably after civilizations started.
@mudshovel289 Eskimos are one of the most nearsighted groups of people. In their history, they hunted big game and fished through the ice. Neanderthals had about 300,000 years of hunting big,big game in the open. We already have seen evidence they cared for their sick and were close combat attackers. Evidence is starting to surface that Neanderthal was actually more advanced than thought. Maybe like the Eskimos, they made "pin hole" glasses (works for all prescriptions) to protect their eyes.
@SloveintzWend You are so wrong. Nearsightedness IS most definitely, without out a doubt, GENETIC. The number of females in any race is always more nearsighted than the number of males nearsighted in that same race. So there is a hormonal influence that affects the epigenes (Pregnant females often become more nearsighted). Ex. I have one nephew working on his M.D.: doesn't need glasses. Another nephew, hardly cracks a book, plays sports, but needs glasses (contacts). His mom was nearsighted.
@duckmanjoel So then I wonder how come I am nearsighted, Nobody in in my family is. If they have to use glasses it's because they are farsighted. As a matter of fact all are farsighted.
@SloveintzWend Recessive genes.Or you are adopted.Or your mom had an affair. I just know in identical twin studies, near sightedness is always about equal. I think with nearsightedness, we are getting into epigenetics, unlike blue eyes or red hair that are controlled by a few genes. For example, homosexual men are usually second or more born. There has been a link discovered between the womb environment (hormones released by the mother) and the effect on the unborn in conjunction with the genes.
@SloveintzWend I'm wondering if you know that the "Lucy" theory was debunked about 10-15 years ago as the jaw bone and tooth of a wild pig do some homework my friend.
@SloveintzWend I am man enough to say when I'm wrong and well I was wrong.I confused "Lucy" & "Piltdown man".We can't be right all the time,but you still should read the differences between the two.
@trusoule Even if you confused Lucy and Piltdown man, it was still the Nebraska man who had that pig tooth. Thhat was huge academical mistake and disgrace, while Piltdown man was a forgery(Human cranium+orangutan's jaw).
@SloveintzWend read Genesis 25:19-23 you can continue past there if you want,but my point i sthat all of history can be proven by the Bible(neanderthal had brut like strength he was hairy with redish skin)(Esau was hairy with redish skin and in Gen25:23 it tells that the older will be a servent to the younger)if you continue to read you will learn that Esau was a great hunter just like Neanderthal and later because of the his hatered for his brother he was drivin into the mountains of the north.
@trusoule What fairy tales have you been reading? There are many other austrolopithecan remains that have been found besides Lucy. Even older. Heard of Ardi?
Neanderthals tongues were different to us. Their range of distinct sounds was greatly limited. Whatever speech skills they may have contributed to modern humans, they certainly couldn't have harnessed it to such a degree.
@LegolessVideos If you're referring to the paper by Lieberman and Crelin, that was published in 1971 and has been criticized ever since because it was based on poorly constructed models and biased approximations. Neanderthals share our version of FOXP2, variants of which are also found in songbirds and mice. They could speak. How well they could speak is still an open question.
Its funny how to be regarded as a neanderthal used to imply that you're stupid until europeans found out they have some neanderthal in them. Then the twists and turns of their logic begins...just an observation
I belive that neandertals vas antsistors of modern european vith not black hair, and miditeraynions(Italians,Spanish,Aqvitanians,Skitians,Ilirians,greaks...) antsistors vas homo-sapiens they all vas hav dark skin and black hair vhen they came in coldest climat they skin became more white. Vhy arabs hav black hair and ve hav diferent types of yelow(read, brovn, yelow,dark brov...) From the perenth of black hair you get black hair children, neandertal vas mach more smart then homo-sapians
I have seen this same scientist from the Max Planck Institute in several other videos. He seems passionate about this subject area.
My question is: If autism and other disorders might linked to Neanderthal Man genetic material and Neanderthal DNA remains part of the makeupof all non-African modern humans, wouldn't the incidence of those disorders be 0% among Africans?
@Ozzrya91 maybe you should go into the hood and give a few talks on your theories ,,take a video with you and get someone to post it on here just after your funeral ,,you racist fucking prick
@superhamzah85 your a fucking idiot ,,how about all the white fucking losers fucking people are people and some people are born losers and some people with a far higher iq than you are sitting in a field dying ,,get your head out your fucking arse you fucking moron
Did you just discover the word "fuck" and got all excited?
Black culture in America is a severe drawback, as is redneck culture among white people - which can be worse at times. Racism is when you judge an ethnic group, black people immigrating from Kenya here in my country, are well educated and speak excellent english - are well spoken and smart. I'd rather be around them than a lot of white people here who are in a gang culture. I suppose I should have said gang culture.
@superhamzah85 so people are ok as long as they fit in with your small minded idea of how a person should be ,,so when we get rid of the people that are not acceptable to you what happens when you are bottom of the pile ,,your a small minded fuck witt ,,where do you stop shall we next take out people over a certain height ,,try to think outside of you tiny little mind ,,or better still get a gun and shoot yourself and you family in the fucking face
I don't suggest doing anything - if I don't like someone - I don't do anything. I just ignore them and avoid them. If someone gets a gun out, and points it at me for saying something they don't like - then that's a crime - don't you agree? Or do you think violence is good?
@superhamzah85 violence has its place ,,i,m a pretty peaceful person but every now and then i do enjoy giving a cunt just you a good fucking slap ,,a nice dark place where there is nobody around then give them a good old shoeing ,,putting a boot heel into someones face can feel quite rewarding ,,anyway your a cunt so fuck off and die,,i hope you wake up tmrw and find your kids dead
@Mii20230201 They had advanced tools long, long before any found in Africa. By tens of thousands of years. Glue, handles added to stone blades, burials, language, art. Just the fact their brains are twice as large as modern Africans should lead you to believe they weren't dimwitted, right? Besides, how can anyone, Neanders included, be more primitive and ass-backwards than modern Africans?
All we know is that the Neanderthal increased our ability to create different variations of speech. They also seemed to enjoy religious ceremony and attention to their dead. They were poor at creating and developing tools. In other words, it's the African genes that made us inventive. While the Neanderthal may have made us ... religious? I prefer inventiveness.
Also, does anyone else wonder why the genomes of an Australian Aboriginal, a First Nation American, an East Indian, a native Tibetan or Nepalese, or Southeast Asian, Mongolian, Swede, Irish person were NOT compared to the
I have to wonder, the dude says that two of the Neanderthals may have shared a maternal relative, really, they can't say for sure? And is anyone aware of the reconstruction the degraded DNA had to go through, crap it's like in Jurrasic Park, "well we had to add some shit back in that was missing"
compared them to 5, get that five other genomes and then make a statement. How many folks live on this planet? test one or two africans, one frenchman, one first nation from Canada? Really Really!!!????? and you make assumption from that, about all people on this planet.? This is not proof.
I don't believe the Neandertals went extinct either. I believe that someone used them to breed a new species on this planet; the Homo Sapiens. If you look at findings in the fossil record you'll find that Homo Sapiens' started showing up about the same time the Neandertals stopped.
@Loveoftheoutdoors about a hundred thousand years of coexistance on this planet, considering modern homo sapiens have been around for six hundred thousand, isn't that quite a large chunk of time? just asking not arguing, I'll try to work on that though thank you for pointing it out. All the best.
@Lily2U1515 Ididn't mean to crack about women. I'm not sexist. Just wanted to rile you.
You don't think that Neadertals couldn't have been bred into Homo Sapien-DNA in 100,000 years? And really, after all that time, how could it be possible to find an exact PERFECT link in the DNA to connect us to them? What little they are finding that points to this is incredibly compelling considering all the differences there COULD/SHOULD be.
@Loveoftheoutdoors sure, I do think they could have, but I think the more likely explanation is just some everyday savage rape, gets the gene swapping job done. if one follows common theory ,after that and lots of generations of folks later the helpful genes are selected for. But more importantly to me, I am not convinced by the Max Planke Institute study that draws conclusions about the genetic link.
@Lily2U1515 I think you're underestimating our primitive ancestors' ability to "mate" as opposed to just grabbing females and raping them. That doesn't happen very often in the wild, even with primates. Females breed when they're ready to.
I think alot more people agree with Max Planke than would agree with you. I know I do. But to each their own.
Wait a second I thought race was just a social construct? What happened?
anywayokey 1 week ago
they suddenly display the neatherthals as less primitive or ugly once they found the genes in us,,, lol, PEOPLE
IAmProletariAN 1 month ago 4
Where did they live? In Africa or in Asia? Or in Europe?
Francesko263 1 month ago
@Francesko263 Who, Neanderthals? Their remains have been found in Europe and the Near East (Palestine, I think).
Oswulf1 1 month ago
@Francesko263 according to my vision, everywhere :)
IAmProletariAN 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(8) - Youngest EVER to Pass ADVANCED MATH A Level....watch it on you tube
42012jburnna 1 month ago
STOP SAYING NEANDERTTTTTTTTTTAAAWL
GiveEmHellMCR 1 month ago
@GiveEmHellMCR Somone is a complete retard, go look up Latin and then the phoneme for TH, its pronounced as a hard T. MOROOOOON.
NatureChasing 1 month ago in playlist Neanderthal
@NatureChasing Back when 'Neanderthal' was taken into English, the German word 'Tal' (=valley) was spelt 'Thal' but pronounced 'Tal'. German spelling was simplified towards the end of the 19th century.
Oswulf1 1 month ago
The African humans and the European humans came from different beginnings, Caucasians are not from the same humanoids as Caucasians. We are the cave men hahahah!
mikeysdreamgal 2 months ago
The evidence points to the inconceivable - modern Eurasians are not hybrids. Neanderthals were the hybrids. According to the May 2010 paper, they were 12.7 percent "ancestral", which means they got 6.35 percent (3 chromosomes) from apes.
Mdebacle 2 months ago
Thanks to genetics, they actually didn't know much, they only made speculations that they sold us as "science".
The truth is still to be discovered ...
And, the first truth I learned so far, is to always be critical on what the official science or authorities tells us, never take it for granted.
meelusine 2 months ago
Correct me if I am wrong, it's commonly assumed that humanity started in Africa (or only one human species ?), but if africans have no neanderthal genes, can we assumes that neanderthal like all humans originates in Africa ?
meelusine 2 months ago
@meelusine Ancestors of neanderthals originated in Africa, but the evolved in Middle East and Europe
SloveintzWend 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SloveintzWend
....
1) First abvious lesson, I thing we must never take all they teach us for granted. And, I am confident that new technology is likely to desmolish all what we take for granted, and maybe even prove to the contrary.
2) Talking about Neanderthal, since they are supposed to come from Africa, how comes that no african has a little tiny bit of Neanderthal gene ?
I am not afraid to use my mind instead of just repeating something I was told.
meelusine 2 months ago
@meelusine *From Africa,branches of humans went in all directions.The ones that went up by England,were hit with an Ice Age,lasting 20,000+ years,these were the Neanderthal.The ones that stayed south in warmer weather thrived.These became Homo Sapians.When they met,over time some mated,the Homo Sapians brought germs that killed off the Neanderthal.
billy1212ist 2 months ago
@billy1212ist
Sorry to insist billy, but all you said about Neanderthal being an earlier african branch of humanity, who told you ?
You red it in books.
Now, remember those books no long ago were telling us that Neanderthal had completly Disappeared.
But, now recent genetical research say that all humain, except african, have a tiny bit of Nerderthal gene.
meelusine 2 months ago
@meelusine
....
1) First abvious lesson, I thing we must never take all they teach us for granted. And, I am confident that new technology is likely to desmolish all what we take for granted, and maybe even prove the contrary.
2) Talking about Neanderthal, since they are supposed to come from Africa, how comes that on african has a little tiny bit of Neanderthal gene ?
I am not afraid to use my mind instead of just repeating something I was told.
meelusine 2 months ago
@meelusine* As I said,I watched ALL of these programs 10 hours or so.OK,where do you portend Neanderthal originated? My logic told me,that if "They" agree that "man" started in Africa,in some way Neanderthal man must stem back to them,in a couple of billion years.Their branch never went back.Please ,now I insist on your view as to the beginning of the Neanderthal,they here said the cold influenced their bodies,so "Where" did "They" begin ??? To you,their start ?....( "read" in a book.).
billy1212ist 2 months ago
@billy1212ist
What I just cannot figure it out, is that african people don't have Neanderthal genes, whereas all other people around the world have a tiny bit of Neanderthal gene.
How comes, if Neanderthal comes from Africa, I just won't a satisfactory answer.
meelusine 2 months ago
What if they introduce some of our genes (like the ability to think and to speak, etc.) into a mouse'brains, and the mouse reproduces itself !?!
It's not a nightmare or bad imagination, they are actually truying to do this in this video.
Strangly enough it's the beginning of the planet of apes.
The mouse is already said to be intelligent, do you imaging them tricking us and dominating us !?
Help !
meelusine 3 months ago
@meelusine Well they aleredy swithced a gene that instructs where to build fly's eyes with the human gene(Probably because it was the same gene), and guess what happened. Fly got fly's eyes.
Even if you place human genes into mousses DNA, genes for specific hardware are still missing. No human mouth and throat, no speech. Now if you have time to find all those genes, and then manage somehow to achieve compatibility then...
SloveintzWend 3 months ago
@meelusine Planet of the apes, well we already live on the planet of apes. Human is an ape, and other apes are far more intelligent we previously believed. Chimp has an intelligence of a 4 year old and they actually achieved something in teaching them language(sign language). What's interesting they invent their own words. And they can lie pretty nicely.
SloveintzWend 3 months ago
If we did interbreed with Neanderthals, I would have to speculate that those outside Africa inherited their nearsightedness from Neanderthals. Pure Africans are rarely nearsighted, but outside Africa the number is 25% to 75% of the population depending on the region. You don't need excellent eyesight to run up to a big animal and jab a spear in it. With that said, intelligent people tend to be nearsighted, but not all nearsighted people are intelligent. Nearsightedness was shown to be genetic.
duckmanjoel 3 months ago
@duckmanjoel You definitely DO need good eyesight to spot a predator, movement in the bushes, etc. Nearsightedness became much more common once good eyesight was no longer essential to survival which was probably after civilizations started.
mudshovel289 3 months ago
@mudshovel289 Eskimos are one of the most nearsighted groups of people. In their history, they hunted big game and fished through the ice. Neanderthals had about 300,000 years of hunting big,big game in the open. We already have seen evidence they cared for their sick and were close combat attackers. Evidence is starting to surface that Neanderthal was actually more advanced than thought. Maybe like the Eskimos, they made "pin hole" glasses (works for all prescriptions) to protect their eyes.
duckmanjoel 2 months ago
@duckmanjoel African people don't tend to stare at objects(books. computers, close up objects..) for the whole day like other people do.
Nearsightedness is not inherited it's not genetic. It's mechanical(over-usage).
SloveintzWend 3 months ago
@SloveintzWend You are so wrong. Nearsightedness IS most definitely, without out a doubt, GENETIC. The number of females in any race is always more nearsighted than the number of males nearsighted in that same race. So there is a hormonal influence that affects the epigenes (Pregnant females often become more nearsighted). Ex. I have one nephew working on his M.D.: doesn't need glasses. Another nephew, hardly cracks a book, plays sports, but needs glasses (contacts). His mom was nearsighted.
duckmanjoel 2 months ago
@duckmanjoel So then I wonder how come I am nearsighted, Nobody in in my family is. If they have to use glasses it's because they are farsighted. As a matter of fact all are farsighted.
SloveintzWend 2 months ago
@SloveintzWend Recessive genes.Or you are adopted.Or your mom had an affair. I just know in identical twin studies, near sightedness is always about equal. I think with nearsightedness, we are getting into epigenetics, unlike blue eyes or red hair that are controlled by a few genes. For example, homosexual men are usually second or more born. There has been a link discovered between the womb environment (hormones released by the mother) and the effect on the unborn in conjunction with the genes.
duckmanjoel 2 months ago
Comment removed
SloveintzWend 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@duckmanjoel I look like my dad way too much to be adopted. Identical twins? Well identical twins tend to have identical habits.
Maybe it's only the inclination towards myopia that is genetic, but it's the environment that makes you nearsighted.
How about those orthodox Jews? Why are most of them nearsighted? If you ask me it has something to do with this:
watch?v=Gz1z3NmuYYg
That's right wiggle with that book back and forward, that's very healthy for your eyes.
SloveintzWend 2 months ago
@duckmanjoel , I guess intelligents and nearsightedness wasn't necessary to build all that neat shit in Khemet?
jerome4445 3 days ago
Exciting.
KennyReddwooddforest 3 months ago
@Mii20230201 pure what? what are you talking about? LAME
jdbgrizz 4 months ago
WAKE UP AND READ YOUR BIBLES ALL IS WRITTEN. THE NEANDERTAL IS ESAU,HIS STORY IS TOLD IN THE BIBLE.
trusoule 5 months ago
@trusoule cave dwellers
thebear559 5 months ago
@trusoule If neanderthal is Esau, then Abraham is Lucy.
SloveintzWend 4 months ago
@SloveintzWend I'm wondering if you know that the "Lucy" theory was debunked about 10-15 years ago as the jaw bone and tooth of a wild pig do some homework my friend.
trusoule 4 months ago
@trusoule Lucy debunked, since when? LOL.
There was no jaw with a pig tooth. That was so-called Nebraska man.
Either way since the first discovery there has been many Lucys, and not single specimen has a pig tooth in their Jaws.
SloveintzWend 4 months ago
@SloveintzWend I am man enough to say when I'm wrong and well I was wrong.I confused "Lucy" & "Piltdown man".We can't be right all the time,but you still should read the differences between the two.
trusoule 4 months ago
@trusoule Even if you confused Lucy and Piltdown man, it was still the Nebraska man who had that pig tooth. Thhat was huge academical mistake and disgrace, while Piltdown man was a forgery(Human cranium+orangutan's jaw).
What's with Jacob and Esau?
SloveintzWend 4 months ago
@SloveintzWend read Genesis 25:19-23 you can continue past there if you want,but my point i sthat all of history can be proven by the Bible(neanderthal had brut like strength he was hairy with redish skin)(Esau was hairy with redish skin and in Gen25:23 it tells that the older will be a servent to the younger)if you continue to read you will learn that Esau was a great hunter just like Neanderthal and later because of the his hatered for his brother he was drivin into the mountains of the north.
trusoule 4 months ago
@trusoule Sorry but Neanderthal man was long extinct before any biblical person allegedly lived.
If I want to I can even prove some history using J. R. R. Tolkien works.
Mountains to the north? I thought he went to the south into a land called Edom or later Idumea.
SloveintzWend 4 months ago
@trusoule neanderthal never had reddish skin...stop making up stories
BOGZASV8MA 3 months ago
@SloveintzWend Jacob and Esau that is.
trusoule 4 months ago
@trusoule What fairy tales have you been reading? There are many other austrolopithecan remains that have been found besides Lucy. Even older. Heard of Ardi?
8698gil 4 months ago
@trusoule I am man enough to say when I'm wrong and well I was wrong.I confused "Lucy" & "Piltdown man". We can't be right all the time.
trusoule 4 months ago
I know now why Jesus was nuts
siquitibum 6 months ago
Technically if neanderthals and humans interbred then our most recent common ancestor is actually closer to 40 000 years ago than 400 000 years ago.
NorseWarriorKing 6 months ago
Neanderthals tongues were different to us. Their range of distinct sounds was greatly limited. Whatever speech skills they may have contributed to modern humans, they certainly couldn't have harnessed it to such a degree.
LegolessVideos 6 months ago
@LegolessVideos [Citation needed]
pccalhoun 5 months ago
@pccalhoun lol bro, jfgi
LegolessVideos 5 months ago
@LegolessVideos If you're referring to the paper by Lieberman and Crelin, that was published in 1971 and has been criticized ever since because it was based on poorly constructed models and biased approximations. Neanderthals share our version of FOXP2, variants of which are also found in songbirds and mice. They could speak. How well they could speak is still an open question.
So why the neanderthal hate?
pccalhoun 5 months ago
Its funny how to be regarded as a neanderthal used to imply that you're stupid until europeans found out they have some neanderthal in them. Then the twists and turns of their logic begins...just an observation
puffy230 6 months ago
Comment removed
puffy230 6 months ago
I belive that neandertals vas antsistors of modern european vith not black hair, and miditeraynions(Italians,Spanish,Aqvitanians,Skitians,Ilirians,greaks...) antsistors vas homo-sapiens they all vas hav dark skin and black hair vhen they came in coldest climat they skin became more white. Vhy arabs hav black hair and ve hav diferent types of yelow(read, brovn, yelow,dark brov...) From the perenth of black hair you get black hair children, neandertal vas mach more smart then homo-sapians
Jeykob3 6 months ago
I have seen this same scientist from the Max Planck Institute in several other videos. He seems passionate about this subject area.
My question is: If autism and other disorders might linked to Neanderthal Man genetic material and Neanderthal DNA remains part of the makeupof all non-African modern humans, wouldn't the incidence of those disorders be 0% among Africans?
FlyUnicornsFly 7 months ago
@Ozzrya91 maybe you should go into the hood and give a few talks on your theories ,,take a video with you and get someone to post it on here just after your funeral ,,you racist fucking prick
simpleearthling 8 months ago
@simpleearthling
Black culture is the problem - people who leave the culture do as well as anyone else. Your comment proves it.
superhamzah85 7 months ago
@superhamzah85 your a fucking idiot ,,how about all the white fucking losers fucking people are people and some people are born losers and some people with a far higher iq than you are sitting in a field dying ,,get your head out your fucking arse you fucking moron
simpleearthling 7 months ago
@simpleearthling
Did you just discover the word "fuck" and got all excited?
Black culture in America is a severe drawback, as is redneck culture among white people - which can be worse at times. Racism is when you judge an ethnic group, black people immigrating from Kenya here in my country, are well educated and speak excellent english - are well spoken and smart. I'd rather be around them than a lot of white people here who are in a gang culture. I suppose I should have said gang culture.
superhamzah85 7 months ago
@superhamzah85 so people are ok as long as they fit in with your small minded idea of how a person should be ,,so when we get rid of the people that are not acceptable to you what happens when you are bottom of the pile ,,your a small minded fuck witt ,,where do you stop shall we next take out people over a certain height ,,try to think outside of you tiny little mind ,,or better still get a gun and shoot yourself and you family in the fucking face
simpleearthling 7 months ago
@simpleearthling
lol you are mentally not quite right.
I don't suggest doing anything - if I don't like someone - I don't do anything. I just ignore them and avoid them. If someone gets a gun out, and points it at me for saying something they don't like - then that's a crime - don't you agree? Or do you think violence is good?
superhamzah85 7 months ago
@superhamzah85 violence has its place ,,i,m a pretty peaceful person but every now and then i do enjoy giving a cunt just you a good fucking slap ,,a nice dark place where there is nobody around then give them a good old shoeing ,,putting a boot heel into someones face can feel quite rewarding ,,anyway your a cunt so fuck off and die,,i hope you wake up tmrw and find your kids dead
simpleearthling 7 months ago
@simpleearthling
You do know everyone who sees your comment is laughing at you, right? lol
Get help - therapy is there for a reason.
superhamzah85 7 months ago
a ,lot of women say i fuck like a cave man
simpleearthling 8 months ago
@Mii20230201 They had advanced tools long, long before any found in Africa. By tens of thousands of years. Glue, handles added to stone blades, burials, language, art. Just the fact their brains are twice as large as modern Africans should lead you to believe they weren't dimwitted, right? Besides, how can anyone, Neanders included, be more primitive and ass-backwards than modern Africans?
gvman3670 8 months ago
@Mii20230201
Neanderthals were more advanced than the Homo Sapiens. ;)
MembThePenguinII 9 months ago
Wow ! As new evidence comes in... Danny Vendramini's theory continues to hold true !!! Amazing !!
younwhosarmy 11 months ago
All we know is that the Neanderthal increased our ability to create different variations of speech. They also seemed to enjoy religious ceremony and attention to their dead. They were poor at creating and developing tools. In other words, it's the African genes that made us inventive. While the Neanderthal may have made us ... religious? I prefer inventiveness.
celainea 11 months ago
Refreshingly pro-white.
Illimitus 1 year ago
You too lady. See you around. ;)
Loveoftheoutdoors 1 year ago
Also, does anyone else wonder why the genomes of an Australian Aboriginal, a First Nation American, an East Indian, a native Tibetan or Nepalese, or Southeast Asian, Mongolian, Swede, Irish person were NOT compared to the
Neanderthal Genome? Why only those five people?
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
I have to wonder, the dude says that two of the Neanderthals may have shared a maternal relative, really, they can't say for sure? And is anyone aware of the reconstruction the degraded DNA had to go through, crap it's like in Jurrasic Park, "well we had to add some shit back in that was missing"
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
compared them to 5, get that five other genomes and then make a statement. How many folks live on this planet? test one or two africans, one frenchman, one first nation from Canada? Really Really!!!????? and you make assumption from that, about all people on this planet.? This is not proof.
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
@Lily2U1515 I see from your page you like arguing. Typical woman....
Loveoftheoutdoors 1 year ago
I don't believe the Neandertals went extinct either. I believe that someone used them to breed a new species on this planet; the Homo Sapiens. If you look at findings in the fossil record you'll find that Homo Sapiens' started showing up about the same time the Neandertals stopped.
Loveoftheoutdoors 1 year ago
@Loveoftheoutdoors wrong, not "about the same time" thousands of years of both on the planet at the same time.
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
@Lily2U1515 In the life of our species, that's "about the same time".
Loveoftheoutdoors 1 year ago
@Loveoftheoutdoors about a hundred thousand years of coexistance on this planet, considering modern homo sapiens have been around for six hundred thousand, isn't that quite a large chunk of time? just asking not arguing, I'll try to work on that though thank you for pointing it out. All the best.
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
@Lily2U1515 Ididn't mean to crack about women. I'm not sexist. Just wanted to rile you.
You don't think that Neadertals couldn't have been bred into Homo Sapien-DNA in 100,000 years? And really, after all that time, how could it be possible to find an exact PERFECT link in the DNA to connect us to them? What little they are finding that points to this is incredibly compelling considering all the differences there COULD/SHOULD be.
Loveoftheoutdoors 1 year ago
@Loveoftheoutdoors sure, I do think they could have, but I think the more likely explanation is just some everyday savage rape, gets the gene swapping job done. if one follows common theory ,after that and lots of generations of folks later the helpful genes are selected for. But more importantly to me, I am not convinced by the Max Planke Institute study that draws conclusions about the genetic link.
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
@Lily2U1515 I think you're underestimating our primitive ancestors' ability to "mate" as opposed to just grabbing females and raping them. That doesn't happen very often in the wild, even with primates. Females breed when they're ready to.
I think alot more people agree with Max Planke than would agree with you. I know I do. But to each their own.
Loveoftheoutdoors 1 year ago
@Loveoftheoutdoors cool, thanks for the conversation,
Lily2U1515 1 year ago