Added: 4 years ago
From: KlyeJ
Views: 518
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • aaaaaaaaaam its widely accepted that mutations form new genes translocation and cross over mutations although 99.9999% of mutations are null but they do cause new traits i call BULLSHIT on you

  • I've hard a back and forth email debate with Dr. Jackson and I have to say I am suprised that he has any real education behind him.

  • You are irrational.

  • We can cause resistance to evolve by spontaneous mutation in bacteria. The good doctor doesn't even understand bacterial cell culture and mutagenesis.

  • He is being dishonest throughout the lecture but especially near the end when he twists the facts from the National Geographics article. He quotes the article of saying something like: natural selection uses pre-existing mutations.

    He then goes to say (and im paraphrasing): See. The mutations arent new. They were already there...

    The mutations weren't new AT THE TIME OF THE NATURAL SELECTION PROCESS. They were new at the point of mutation.

  • Lets see. He admits that Natural Selection is true. Which is one of the main mechanisms of evolution. He then says...

    2:55 - "That's true. Germs can really change there DNA quickly."

    He also admits that they can mutate...but that the mutations are 'usually' bad and cause the microbes to die. Remember, 'usually' doesnt mean 'always'. Good mutations only need to be a fraction of the percent of all mutations to enable the evolutionary process.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more