@Abrimaal cause it was in the game : Zelda:Collector's Edition on Nintendo GameCube.
I have it , and it is sooo cool !!! There's Zelda (the first) , Zelda II , Zelda Ocarina Of Time , Zelda Majora's Mask , and three quests of Zelda Wind Waker. And the games are the originals !!!
Right. The original Zelda broke barriers that games today just can't. It single handedly launched several genres and its core mechanics and ideas are still used today. Games like Oblivion, while not directly related, owe everything to the original Zelda in terms of open world non linear play. If you think about it even, the first Zelda was the first ever sandbox game. Grand Theft Auto anyone?
No no. Indeed this game is epic, the best Zelda games are a close toss up between Ocarina of Time and Twilight Princess, with Ocarina being the better one.
@1mike20 I have to disagree. It may have been the most revolutionary at the time it came out, but playing it today I must say it doesn't hold up. A Link to the Past is much better, and most modern Zelda games are still amazing.
@1mike20 only reason i don't agree with this....is i borrowed this game off my friend (and still have it)...but if u r to play it without an instruction manual...there is absolutely no story lol....and i didnt like that....so imo ocarina still pwns all
that was "the legend of zelda" the first game, then they released "the adventure of link", they both were for NES, and finally "a link to the past" for SNES
Wow, marked down for the only comment with some common sense. Well enjoy endlessly arguing and flaming over which game happened when, I'm actually going to play them.
wut i dont understand is why on the title screen (shown at :07)is there a rapier? (if u dont no wut im talkin about dont comment plz) isnt the master sword sort o like a viking sword?
It is... if you are a zelda hardore nerd (like me) you will know the story behind this game... Link form Links awakening falls to the ocean at the end... so he looses all his items on the new evil hyrule ruled by once again resurrected GANON... but of course link already had pulled th sword... but he found it again... ;) Even tought is not named "Master Sword" its called "Magic Sword"
Well, I'm a hardcore Zelda nerd and I don't think that. After Link's Awakening, I feel the final Nightmare battle was a prophesy of his greatest fear and the enemies yet to come. When he comes back to Hyrule it seems fine, but soon after, A Link to the Past takes place. The Dark World would take place a little after Adult Link sealed Ganon in OoT. I think the original Zelda takes place after Phantom Hourglass, after the flood goes down. That's why it looks all destroyed and primitive.
Actually, Link to the Past takes place before Link's Awakening, and that takes place before the NES original, which doesn't feature the same Link. Wind Waker and Phantom Hourglass are in another timeline from the originals.
Okay, I understand that a lot of people like to do a split timeline, but for some reason that just doesn't sit well with me. Here's my though on the timeline:
TMC: Tells the story of the Piccori and Link's Hat
OoT: Ganondorf is born
MM: Distinct sequal; rides off on Epona
OoA/S: Rides in on Epona
LA; Sails back from distant land (OoA/S); Prophesizes ALttP
That's a nicew theory, but the split timeline was confirmed back in March of '07 by Eiji Aonuma. You've also got LA in the wrong place. It's not a prophecy. The nightmares are Link's greatest fears, and the game manual references ALttP as having happened in the past. FS and FSA are prequels to ALttP, as in the GBA remake, the Four Sword is in a secret dungeon. TP and TWW are contradictory in what happened after OoT, so they go in separate timelines.
Well, like I said before, a split timeline is unexeptable with me. I understand that my timeline has it's flaws. This is keeping in mind that I sat down and brainstormed with no resources but my memory of playing through the games to come up with it. I don't own all the manuals because most of them I bought used. I'm planning on running a marathon of Zelda over Christmas Break and play through all 14 major games and try to come up with a more convincing timeline.
The game manuals provide most of the universe back story and information about timeline placement. They're essential to understand if you're going to make a timeline theory. As well, the split timeline was confirmed last year with Twilight Princess. A single-timeline is obsolete now, just like a one-Link theory.
There can be no split timeline; the games themselves contradict Aonuma's statement. In WW Link rediscovers the triforce of courage, BUT if you remember back to OoT, Link was sent BACK IN TIME WITH THE TRIFORCE OF COURAGE!! The second hyrule would have no triforce of courage! Therefore WW could not exist! Aonuma needs to play over his own games again, everyone can make mistakes.
There are two universes created because of the time travel in OoT. In the universe that leads into MM and eventually TP, Link has the ToC. In fact, he has it from birth in TP, lending credence to the common theory that TP Link is a direct descendant of OoT Link. However, as per WW's backstory, Link disappeared when he went back in time but left the Triforce behind, leading into TWW. This makes more sense that Hyrule getting destroyed and then randomly un-flooding.
But TP and TWW are explicitly contradictory. In TP, Ganondorf never conquered Hyrule. He failed, and has never fought Link before. In TWW, Ganondorf remembers the events of OoT. As for the ToC, it's a time paradox. In the TP universe, it survives through his bloodline, while in the TWW universe it is lost and split into 8 shards. TP can also not go anywhere else except for after OoT, and neither can TWW, so the solution is a split timeline. Aonuma said as much. You're just in denial.
Aonuma isn't always right. Just because its his game doesn't mean he goes over every single little detail of it every second of every day. I believe that he made a mistake, hes only human. There can be no ToC in WW because Link takes it to the Child Link side of the time line. There is no LOST because it was TAKEN. If you watch the final scene where Link visits Zelda(clearly before she left the castle and before he gets the triforce) You can see the triforce on his hand.
I wasn't disputing that. I was saying that the ToC both remained in the adult timeline and went back with Link. Being the cornerstone of the universe kind of means that it's needed in both timelines. It's a time paradox. It's also impossible to reconcile TP with a single timeline, anyway.
No, what I'm saying is that when link was sent back by Zelda, he was sent back to BEFORE he received the triforce. Therefore both ToCs were in the Child link side of the time line.
In actuality, the triforce has nothing to do with the world itself. It was just a power created after the goddesses collided leaving the world they created in a dimensional pocket called the sacred realm. The triforce was just a byproduct of the world creation, nothing to do with it staying together at all.
Then why did it leave Link when he left to go to another universe (Termina)? Link does not have the ToC in MM, and having two Triforces of Courage in one timeline complicates things even more than assuming that the timeline split. TP and TWW make more sense as being in separate timelines, as do most of the other games. No games except for TWW and PH take place in a flooded Hyrule, and PH does nothing to imply that the world will ever un-flood. The King destroyed Hyrule in TWW's ending.
PH isn't that long after WW. It probably hadn't even been a year in their time.
But I just had an idea. Maybe Aonuma was right, and (although I don't want to accept it xP) maybe there is a split time line, and the sacred realm, being the dimensional pocket that it is, is a LINK between the two time lines?! There may be no evidence of it, but it makes the triforce being in both time lines possible. Maybe when one part of the triforce is taken by one side of the time line, it also transfers to
Sure its only a theory with no evidence, but it would make two ToC existing in one timeline possible because the extra would remain in the Sacred Realm, the dimensional pocket between the worlds.
That's one theory I've heard to explain it. I've also heard the theory that the ToC duplicated itself or that the ToC on Link's hand at the end was just a programmer's error, because he doesn't have it in MM, and we don't see it on his hand in MM when he's still in Hyrule. But Aonuma's split timeline explanation as of now is the only way to reconcile TP and TWW.
You have to keep in mind this is the first game of a franchise, and the rapier in the beginning adds an adventurous quality to the title logo even if it has nothing to do with the game itself.Also, I don't think there is a story behind this game considering once again it was the first in the franchise, and no significant plot had been established. I know many people try to put the Zelda games into a chronology but you really can't. True, some games are connected but dont try and put it together
The number 23 isnt evil! The number 24 is! The Republicans will take over the world in 24 years! The power thats fueling this is the fake religion known as Christianity! The 24 of December was one day before he was born!
ya i have heard this a very long time ago as well.. probly on napster as well. but the only thing that i can say that was added was some very nice power chords.. so i did actualy injoy this alot anyways.
SOAD NEVER DID ANY ZELDA. It was Mr. Bungle, with the immortal Mike Patton. The SOAD thing was just because of idiot of Napster doesn't know who originally did the song and mislabeled it
just like the other song, this is NOT System of a Down
davincent98 1 week ago
The 15 people who downvoted this are minions of Ganon.
jpschreibman 2 months ago
@jpschreibman Maybe those 15 people just didn't like the song. Ever think of that?
StudioHizu 2 months ago
It's dangerous to go alone! Take this Song. ;D
LPfan1076 7 months ago 2
its dangerous to go alone SO ROCK OUT!
comicman427 8 months ago
So?
TheNintendeur 9 months ago
Have you got tabs????????
TheNintendeur 10 months ago
@TheNintendeur want em too
endchrist 9 months ago
superbadass
michaeltburden 1 year ago
Sounds like bees with diarrhea.
ryanisfootdrums 1 year ago
For what system is the game made in 2003?
Abrimaal 1 year ago
@Abrimaal cause it was in the game : Zelda:Collector's Edition on Nintendo GameCube.
I have it , and it is sooo cool !!! There's Zelda (the first) , Zelda II , Zelda Ocarina Of Time , Zelda Majora's Mask , and three quests of Zelda Wind Waker. And the games are the originals !!!
TheNintendeur 2 months ago
this is amazing =D
hjolol 1 year ago
music....for....GODS!
EMERALDanimations 1 year ago
wow amazing i love it
EsoulBlade 1 year ago
@SwordShockwave Epic just isn't epic anymore with a little pee pee.
GenoClown 1 year ago
the intro was sloppy a bit, but this is fricken awesome.
Wow67122 1 year ago
SO.....DAMN....EPIC!!!!!!!!!!
TheDevilsAdmin 1 year ago
Cool vid. Good cover! 1st comment!
brokenseatbelt 1 year ago
x3 i remember playing thissss, gawd gooood times :c EPIC vid. loveee the music~
iK0NAN 1 year ago
EASTMOST PENINSULA!
ThePetruccijunior 1 year ago
This is in my opinion still the best zelda game, even if i compare it to the games that is released over 20 years later.
1mike20 2 years ago 9
Right. The original Zelda broke barriers that games today just can't. It single handedly launched several genres and its core mechanics and ideas are still used today. Games like Oblivion, while not directly related, owe everything to the original Zelda in terms of open world non linear play. If you think about it even, the first Zelda was the first ever sandbox game. Grand Theft Auto anyone?
corvettez06usa 2 years ago 3
@1mike20 gotta love the classics
MrTyty555 1 year ago
@1mike20 have you played Ocarina of time?
krycklund 1 year ago
No no. Indeed this game is epic, the best Zelda games are a close toss up between Ocarina of Time and Twilight Princess, with Ocarina being the better one.
StarTropicsKing 1 year ago
@StarTropicsKing then it isnt a toss up, lol.
DallasTheGreat28 1 year ago
@1mike20 I have to disagree. It may have been the most revolutionary at the time it came out, but playing it today I must say it doesn't hold up. A Link to the Past is much better, and most modern Zelda games are still amazing.
waterguyroks 1 year ago
@1mike20 Ocarina of Time was the best IMO, these Zelda's were good too, but Ocarina of Time as kick ass.
jklilpunk 1 year ago 3
@1mike20 only reason i don't agree with this....is i borrowed this game off my friend (and still have it)...but if u r to play it without an instruction manual...there is absolutely no story lol....and i didnt like that....so imo ocarina still pwns all
piercethru69 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pretty good version of this song!
Check out my Zelda Medley (Metal Style)
Peace !
sbeast64 2 years ago
that was "the legend of zelda" the first game, then they released "the adventure of link", they both were for NES, and finally "a link to the past" for SNES
ilzavo 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck yeah they should use this song for the upcoming Zedla Movie! Castlevania, Metroid, and Zelda movie are going to kick so much ass!!
HardKore5250 3 years ago
if u saw that zelda movie trailer on ign it was a april fools joke
yushool 3 years ago 6
Zelda movie's a joke man. It was April Fool's.
Somedumbassname 3 years ago 6
The april 1st Zelda film was an april fools. However, there is a Zelda movie called "Hero of time" made by an independent film group.
labrat256 2 years ago
Link to the Past = epic
ruckusman333 3 years ago
was that the zelda game on NES Link to the Past?
HardKore5250 3 years ago
No link to the past is for the SNES, zelda 1 and 2 are for the NES
JakkuXsama 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ all these timeline losers, just enjoy the games!
MegaFan1994 3 years ago
Dude...the time line is part of the awesomeness!
Zeldafan69x 3 years ago 3
Wow, marked down for the only comment with some common sense. Well enjoy endlessly arguing and flaming over which game happened when, I'm actually going to play them.
MegaFan1994 3 years ago
Haha, ignorant cunt, you think that's what we do all the time? xD
Yes, that was the only comment with some common sense, your two, however, appear to have none.
virtuastudios 3 years ago
Fuck 54 too!!!
cshcrazy 3 years ago
wut i dont understand is why on the title screen (shown at :07)is there a rapier? (if u dont no wut im talkin about dont comment plz) isnt the master sword sort o like a viking sword?
diegochargers5 3 years ago
No master sword in this game :P
dstcoyote22 3 years ago
It is... if you are a zelda hardore nerd (like me) you will know the story behind this game... Link form Links awakening falls to the ocean at the end... so he looses all his items on the new evil hyrule ruled by once again resurrected GANON... but of course link already had pulled th sword... but he found it again... ;) Even tought is not named "Master Sword" its called "Magic Sword"
cshcrazy 3 years ago
Well, I'm a hardcore Zelda nerd and I don't think that. After Link's Awakening, I feel the final Nightmare battle was a prophesy of his greatest fear and the enemies yet to come. When he comes back to Hyrule it seems fine, but soon after, A Link to the Past takes place. The Dark World would take place a little after Adult Link sealed Ganon in OoT. I think the original Zelda takes place after Phantom Hourglass, after the flood goes down. That's why it looks all destroyed and primitive.
StarTropicsKing 3 years ago
Actually, Link to the Past takes place before Link's Awakening, and that takes place before the NES original, which doesn't feature the same Link. Wind Waker and Phantom Hourglass are in another timeline from the originals.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago
Okay, I understand that a lot of people like to do a split timeline, but for some reason that just doesn't sit well with me. Here's my though on the timeline:
TMC: Tells the story of the Piccori and Link's Hat
OoT: Ganondorf is born
MM: Distinct sequal; rides off on Epona
OoA/S: Rides in on Epona
LA; Sails back from distant land (OoA/S); Prophesizes ALttP
ALttP: Prophecy comes true
FS: Vatti released
FSA: Vaati killed
(next post)
StarTropicsKing 3 years ago
WW: Flood occurs
PH: Flood still there
LoZ: Flood goes down; Hyrule in ruins
AoL: Direct sequal; resurection of Hyrule begins
TP: Forests flourish and Hyrule thrives again; Ganondorf killed
That's just to simplify it. I've got a detailed timeline typed up, but it'd be way too long to post here.
StarTropicsKing 3 years ago
That's a nicew theory, but the split timeline was confirmed back in March of '07 by Eiji Aonuma. You've also got LA in the wrong place. It's not a prophecy. The nightmares are Link's greatest fears, and the game manual references ALttP as having happened in the past. FS and FSA are prequels to ALttP, as in the GBA remake, the Four Sword is in a secret dungeon. TP and TWW are contradictory in what happened after OoT, so they go in separate timelines.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago
Well, like I said before, a split timeline is unexeptable with me. I understand that my timeline has it's flaws. This is keeping in mind that I sat down and brainstormed with no resources but my memory of playing through the games to come up with it. I don't own all the manuals because most of them I bought used. I'm planning on running a marathon of Zelda over Christmas Break and play through all 14 major games and try to come up with a more convincing timeline.
StarTropicsKing 3 years ago
The game manuals provide most of the universe back story and information about timeline placement. They're essential to understand if you're going to make a timeline theory. As well, the split timeline was confirmed last year with Twilight Princess. A single-timeline is obsolete now, just like a one-Link theory.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago
There can be no split timeline; the games themselves contradict Aonuma's statement. In WW Link rediscovers the triforce of courage, BUT if you remember back to OoT, Link was sent BACK IN TIME WITH THE TRIFORCE OF COURAGE!! The second hyrule would have no triforce of courage! Therefore WW could not exist! Aonuma needs to play over his own games again, everyone can make mistakes.
Goten3620 3 years ago
There are two universes created because of the time travel in OoT. In the universe that leads into MM and eventually TP, Link has the ToC. In fact, he has it from birth in TP, lending credence to the common theory that TP Link is a direct descendant of OoT Link. However, as per WW's backstory, Link disappeared when he went back in time but left the Triforce behind, leading into TWW. This makes more sense that Hyrule getting destroyed and then randomly un-flooding.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago
EPIC FAIL!
In the last scene of OoT, link DOES have the triforce on his hand. You can clearly see the triforce on Links hand when he sees young Zelda again.
Goten3620 3 years ago
But TP and TWW are explicitly contradictory. In TP, Ganondorf never conquered Hyrule. He failed, and has never fought Link before. In TWW, Ganondorf remembers the events of OoT. As for the ToC, it's a time paradox. In the TP universe, it survives through his bloodline, while in the TWW universe it is lost and split into 8 shards. TP can also not go anywhere else except for after OoT, and neither can TWW, so the solution is a split timeline. Aonuma said as much. You're just in denial.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago
Aonuma isn't always right. Just because its his game doesn't mean he goes over every single little detail of it every second of every day. I believe that he made a mistake, hes only human. There can be no ToC in WW because Link takes it to the Child Link side of the time line. There is no LOST because it was TAKEN. If you watch the final scene where Link visits Zelda(clearly before she left the castle and before he gets the triforce) You can see the triforce on his hand.
Goten3620 3 years ago
I wasn't disputing that. I was saying that the ToC both remained in the adult timeline and went back with Link. Being the cornerstone of the universe kind of means that it's needed in both timelines. It's a time paradox. It's also impossible to reconcile TP with a single timeline, anyway.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago
No, what I'm saying is that when link was sent back by Zelda, he was sent back to BEFORE he received the triforce. Therefore both ToCs were in the Child link side of the time line.
In actuality, the triforce has nothing to do with the world itself. It was just a power created after the goddesses collided leaving the world they created in a dimensional pocket called the sacred realm. The triforce was just a byproduct of the world creation, nothing to do with it staying together at all.
Goten3620 3 years ago 2
Then why did it leave Link when he left to go to another universe (Termina)? Link does not have the ToC in MM, and having two Triforces of Courage in one timeline complicates things even more than assuming that the timeline split. TP and TWW make more sense as being in separate timelines, as do most of the other games. No games except for TWW and PH take place in a flooded Hyrule, and PH does nothing to imply that the world will ever un-flood. The King destroyed Hyrule in TWW's ending.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago 3
PH isn't that long after WW. It probably hadn't even been a year in their time.
But I just had an idea. Maybe Aonuma was right, and (although I don't want to accept it xP) maybe there is a split time line, and the sacred realm, being the dimensional pocket that it is, is a LINK between the two time lines?! There may be no evidence of it, but it makes the triforce being in both time lines possible. Maybe when one part of the triforce is taken by one side of the time line, it also transfers to
Goten3620 3 years ago
the same person in the alternate time line?
Sure its only a theory with no evidence, but it would make two ToC existing in one timeline possible because the extra would remain in the Sacred Realm, the dimensional pocket between the worlds.
Goten3620 3 years ago
That's one theory I've heard to explain it. I've also heard the theory that the ToC duplicated itself or that the ToC on Link's hand at the end was just a programmer's error, because he doesn't have it in MM, and we don't see it on his hand in MM when he's still in Hyrule. But Aonuma's split timeline explanation as of now is the only way to reconcile TP and TWW.
Ganondorfdude11 3 years ago
i hope you guys realise that you probably are the biggest zeldanerds on the planet.
nothing to be ashamed of by the way.
willemkort 3 years ago 6
You have to keep in mind this is the first game of a franchise, and the rapier in the beginning adds an adventurous quality to the title logo even if it has nothing to do with the game itself.Also, I don't think there is a story behind this game considering once again it was the first in the franchise, and no significant plot had been established. I know many people try to put the Zelda games into a chronology but you really can't. True, some games are connected but dont try and put it together
mre2666 3 years ago 2
Sounds ok... but some sloppiness and a few sharp notes. That's a bit of a bummer
Robkophoofd 3 years ago
Please post the song in MP3 format!
werenotlosers 3 years ago
very good!!
Skorpus 3 years ago
watching this frome my wii it's awesome
SiLeNtXaViOr 3 years ago 2
Nice cover
PoulivoreLeCarnivore 3 years ago
awesome man =D
yogan2 3 years ago
You know Jesus wasn't actually born on December 25, right?
ResChronoNullius 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What does that even have to DO with anything?
CheatMasterK 3 years ago
the site isn't even related to this song. it's just some site about some random guy. :( I think you should just put a link to download the song
SamusvsChief 4 years ago
Freaking awesome i love it
perfectmetalman 4 years ago
and the number 47 is the number of life and death.
gooljr 4 years ago
TABS PLEASE!!
mrk0per 4 years ago
cool
BelphegorBlackMetal 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The number 23 isnt evil! The number 24 is! The Republicans will take over the world in 24 years! The power thats fueling this is the fake religion known as Christianity! The 24 of December was one day before he was born!
DaNumber24 4 years ago
lol wtf
odin275 4 years ago
you are completely right and it is the atomic numer of cromium. also my football practice jersey was 23 and my game jersey was 1 so youre right
bc93285 4 years ago
cool ^^
megaman2500 4 years ago
Lol... this is like so horribly done that it's awesome.
NPwannabe 4 years ago
this is fantastic!!
rebharath 4 years ago
cooooooooooooooooool
VockerOfDeath 4 years ago
check out the stoner version of this at myspace/arrroz
laurenxxx69 4 years ago
Hahahahaha so true.
RunOut1724 4 years ago
SOAD versions is a fun parody.
I like SOAD,but they make lame for this game
(one of my favourites).
This version is a faaaar better than System.
kosnyk89 5 years ago
i think its the band name Game Over . they do some nes song in metal ;)
frank1286 5 years ago
Oh my fucking fuck! This is briljant!
trashcan666 5 years ago
ya i have heard this a very long time ago as well.. probly on napster as well. but the only thing that i can say that was added was some very nice power chords.. so i did actualy injoy this alot anyways.
braindamages 5 years ago
SOAD NEVER DID ANY ZELDA. It was Mr. Bungle, with the immortal Mike Patton. The SOAD thing was just because of idiot of Napster doesn't know who originally did the song and mislabeled it
xzombiesx 5 years ago
Mr. Bungle didnt play any either dumbass, it was the rabbit joint
ThumbTacksHurt 5 years ago
Actually....the parody was Joe Pleiman's doing.
CrimsonZanpakuto 5 years ago
Yeah, the problem with that is that it isn't SOAD anyway, so yeah. :P
NinjaPepper 5 years ago
SOAD played some zelda stuff, but not this one.
zapu 5 years ago
hahaha wtf... that's not SOAD
Sloobag 5 years ago
thats hardcore !!!!
SR20DETT 5 years ago
wow nice work. I like it.
TheHylianShadow 5 years ago
Lmao, wtf? It is not System of a Down, idiot.
Samerius 5 years ago
Great! Power chords were just perfect!
Ownator90 5 years ago
That...kicked...ASS
bryceman660 5 years ago
Very nice work.
BloodWaker 5 years ago
Why is there an IGN logo? And who did this?
MiraiGen 5 years ago
Bullsh*t, its not grunge. Don't insult it.
Rockiroad278 5 years ago
do you have the song recorded??? if you do could you send it to davevis142@hotmail.com its awsome!!!
davevis 5 years ago
gruuuunnngggee!!!!
bopps1 5 years ago
awesome
DarkRage99 5 years ago
great guitaring. excalant!
omacron6 5 years ago
baaaad asss!!!
omacron6 5 years ago
awesome song :)
Daphodil17 5 years ago