Added: 4 years ago
From: TheBadAstronomer
Views: 3,161
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 42 :) i wouldnt love that number as much as if more people had read those books.

  • "SETI Booth?" That's like saying, "Biology Booth." There is no universal SETI search. SETI is a science and nobody has a monopoly on that. What you meant was the SETI Institute Booth.

    BTW, it's DR. Griffin.

  • Silly Effort to Investigate.

  • when will you cowards start to ask for sub 50m resolution images from the japanese and chinese probes currently orbiting the moon?

    Be suspicious until the images are delivered then we can say that for sure, there are no alien artifacts on the back side of the moon.

  • Jill and Phil....sorry just my juvenile sense of humerus

  • "goldfish in a bowl who have never experienced fresh air". Quite the opposite in fact. By studying science and the surrounding universe, are we not completely immersing ourselves in the wonders around us? Surely we would rather have this than the secular paranoid and bitter negativity of many (if not most) conspiracy theorists who have themselves completely lost touch with reality.

  • ...didn't notice anyone emotionally disabled in the video. I did, however, notice a detachment from reality in your comment and your channel, michaelstmark. Keep up the exhaustive investigative research and maybe one day you'll prove men never reached the moon. Then what? Denial of the holocaust?

  • michaelstmark: If anyone is displaying supreme arrogance it is you ...by your condescending statement "they cannot know this". You intimate that you have privileged, undisclosed information involving a moon hoax that the rest of us are too ignorant to realize. Lo and behold, if we all had your intellect and insightfulness, how far could we see?

  • With moon dorks, the premiere issue is self-aggrandization and a persecution complex. They cant stand that other people make decisions that affect their lives, that those people dont ask the opinion of amateurs, therefore these people HAVE TO BE evil and conspiratorial and liars and etc etc etc all around bad guys.

    Good thing the moon dorks are here to expose them though. I was getting worried.

  • "though of course like goldfish in a bowl who have never experienced fresh air"

    And yet, as evidenced by this video, Phil does seem to be getting out and about, much more than you are st mark.

  • Good video. Great channel! Keep it up.

  • What exactly do you expect Phil Plait to say, other than the fact that the CIA had some imaginative people back in the 60's. You haven't provided *any* evidence that they carried out such a plan, that the even had the capabilities to do so, and your four page memo is essentially nothing more than one CIA analyst's spy game wet dream.

  • "Are yes, the UV photographs. Perhaps you'd like to explain why NASA (by their own admission) cannot tell if those photos are of stars, nebula or galaxies?" Perhaps if you give me a citation. I'm not sure what the issue is, the stars line up with not only any star map out there, but also the observed UV magnitudes of those stars (which can not be observed from earth because of the atmo, and where unknown at the time of the photo).

  • cool vid!

  • She doesn't look like Jodie Foster.

    ;-P

  • I understand why 42. lol h2g2 rox

  • pretty cool stuff. wish i had millions of dollars to donate!

  • Good stuff Phil.

  • Thanks!

  • Hey Phil. Are you ready to talk about Operation Dirty Trick and exactly why the Kaysing vs Lovell suit was thrown out of court?

  • Hey Jarrah, Can you explain to me how they faked AS16-123-19650?

  • "Hey Jarrah, Can you explain to me how they faked AS16-123-19650?"

    Are yes, the UV photographs. Perhaps you'd like to explain why NASA (by their own admission) cannot tell if those photos are of stars, nebula or galaxies?

    Perhaps you'd like to tell us why Plait here won't comment on the aforementioned Operation Dirty Trick and the true reason behind the Kaysing/Lovell suit getting thrown out?

  • Because he has better things to do than to talk to people like you.

    This video is about SETI, not the moon hoax.

  • "Perhaps you'd like to explain why NASA (by their own admission) cannot tell if those photos are of stars, nebula or galaxies?"

    I don't know the specifics of your claim, can you provide a source for it? I can imagine that because the magnitudes of the stars in the UV spectrum were unknown at the time, the information in those UV photos being wholey new, that there would have been trouble identifying what certain celestial bodies were. Of course this is further proof yet of their validity.

  • Jarrah, your fixation with Dr Plait and the moon hoax is at an unhealthly level. I suggest you either get over it, or get some help. Big time.

  • Pretty much what you claim Jarrah are lies, in the light of science.

    The claims you make against Apollo aren't just about you verses a govt entity. It's about going against science, science that you and others like you appearently do not understand, nor wish to understand.

    What more, is that if any of your claims had merit, then why only apply such scrutiny against Apollo? You appearently only approach Apollo with beliefs, not evidence.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more