go to transcendinglight. On youtube. 2011 plug-in radio.the best.trip hi r go home "earth" how do u translate. Smile.GOOD on any drug of ur choice.GET HI and DOSE.The SUPER STRING 11
Consider the fact that is called the big bang THEORY. Also if this is true im not sure the laws of science agree with it. What was there in the very very begining? Nothing? how can something be made from nothing? last i checked 0+0=0 not 1, 2 or anything else. Last i checked the human body and the world around it is much to complex to be a mistake.
@Merderotika I have no power to convert you! The only power i have is to kindly invite you to read the quran (God's last revelation to mankind). Concerning the divinity of the quran, God says:
Do they not then reflect upon the Qur'ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein many contradictions. (82) of surah 4 Quran
Many watching videos like this one ask, "where did all the matter come from? You can't make something out of nothing."
Well you might be able to do just that. The theory of cosmic inflation answers that and is pretty well accepted by most cosmologists.
The LHC creates matter every day. It was also created also during the creation of the universe. To help understand this, a start is to search for and watch the YouTube video "Cosmic Inflation and the Accelerating Universe, parts 1 & 2".
of course the bigger question is why do religious people feel threatened by our universe and the study of it? was there the same mistrust and backlash with people who proved the earth was round and it revolved around the sun? religion is always trying to hold humanity back while science leaps forward with or without them.
it seems religious conservatives with their global warming denial would rather the earth kill us than admit they're wrong.
@xDisturbedDemon its because christianity is more in youre face with creation, heaven and hell, earth being the only planet with life and so on, All these ppl dont believe in any religion but since most ppl are christfags we bash them.
we could go on about all the lies and bullshit every religion ''offers'' ppl but you wouldbt care
Thanks great video and excelent music in it too which reflects the beauti of creation! I listen to it twice, particuly for the song again. Good job in matching song to video!
at the end of the day all the brightest minds past and present have ideas, hunches even dreams but if you were to ask them they would say that they just do not know and the dream is to find out but then what?
well, your guess about the "big bang" is as good as mine. If that's what it takes for you to describe God, so be it. All you really need is the Bible though. It says "let there be light". duh
i believe in god. but i stick my nose in science cuz im curious and its interesting.the big bang is simply dumb. the theory doesnt make sense. it takes billions of yrs to form even light. so how would we even kno wat happened. and as far as our galaxy growing. every galaxy grows but a massive black hole feeds on every galaxy from the center but on rare occasions tht black hole may not be feedin then its invisible. maybe ours isnt feeding thts why our galaxy is growing
wow we have proof of an expanding universe.......if you talk to a scientist he will say we can almost see the edge...well go a little bit further i wana see you shit yourself when you find jesis with a baseballbat getting ready to kick your ass for being so ignorent. lmao
Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them, and we made every living thing of water? Will they not then believe?
Quran surah 21 verse 30
I sincerely invite all the sincere people to Islam in order to save themselves from the hellfire!
@2009abuabdullah i sincerely ask you to shut the fuck up and take your fairy tales elsewhere. why does you god not save you from your shitty ass sand wars? im dedicating the next month of my life to making things very hard for islamic people
@Toro953 Gods says: Fain would they put out the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah will perfect His light however much the disbelievers are averse. (8) He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the religion of Truth, that He may make it conqueror of all religion however much idolaters may be averse. (9) of surah 61
@Toro953 Its a natural instinct to believe in God, just like the natural instinct to be attracted to the opposite sex and to know that killing is bad and saving a life is good and so on! No person in their right mind can deny these instincts. Peace!!!
@2009abuabdullah Just because a belief in god may be an instinct it doesn't mean it's true. It simply means that there may have been some survival advantage for our ancestors to believe in a god. It may have made a more cohesive society to rally around a common belief or it may have made the prospect of death less frightening and thereby reducing stress. It, in no way, gives any reason to think that the instinct is based on there actually being a god.
@gregrutz I dont think, I know! I kindly invite you to humble yourself and believe and worship Him in order to be successful in this world and the hereafter!
@gregrutz Allah (God almighty)! There Creator of all things, including Jesus, Ra, Zeus and all the rest you can thing of! He says:
The Most Gracious (Allâh)! (1) He has taught (you mankind) the Qur'ân (by His Mercy). (2) He created man. (3) He taught him eloquent speech. (4) of surah 55 Quran
Anything that came into existance, something was responsible to cause it to exist and it will also come to an end! As for the Creator, He always existed! He has no begining or ending!
Allah, God Almight! Whose free from creation attributes and qualities! He says: There is nothing like Him, and He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer. (11) of surah 42 Quran
@2009abuabdullah Why does your imaginary friend not need a creator whilst everything else does? It's very convenient for the religious to just make shit up. Does it say anywhere in your holy-text that the creator itself does not require a creator or is that the casual religious justification?
@afroschlan I challenge you to read the quran with an open mind, sweatheart! You will come to realise that no man capable of authoring such a book. God says concerning the divinity of the quran:
Do they not then consider the Qur'ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein many contradictions. (82) of surah 4 Quran
@2009abuabdullah You didn't answer my question! I would not read the Quran with an open mind, I would base it's correctness on my current knowledge of how things work, something that primitive sand-people did not have the opportunity to do ;) Your Quran holds no weight in my presence, the little I have read from it comes off as being fuck-boring and unnecessary. People live long and happy lives without severe confrontation without religion.. because now they can ;)
@2009abuabdullah Evolution is not imaginary sweetheart, there is evidence for evolution yet there is no evidence for your imaginary friend.. thus for "imaginary" friend ;) Don't worry about it, I expect this from the population of 3rd world countries.
@afroschlan Evolution is an imaginary theory constructed by the enemies of God, sweatheart! There is absolutely NO evidence of it ever happening! No inter -transit fossil records that have ever been found! This is the truth most atheist find bitter to swallow!
@2009abuabdullah So how does the theory of evolution go? Could you summon it up for me so we can verify that we're on the same page. I'm going to assume that you have no idea how the theory goes.. although you have probably read it with "an open mind" ;) What does atheism have to do with the fact/theory of evolution? You don't even grasp the difference between the two yet I'm supposed to take your word for it.. dude, seriously ;) May your imaginary friend bless your imaginary soul ;)
@afroschlan Watch 'the collapse of evolution' in youtube videos. Very interesting video for those who can handle the TRUTH! Do watch and let me know what you think?
@2009abuabdullah Wow, psychological warfare.. does that mean that you've lost all ability to contribute to the debate anything of value? By searching the video your recommended I ended with with a variety of videos, ranging from stupid to border-line retarded. Being amazingly bias seems to be the general structure of these videos. Pro-creation and thus for anti-evolution.. why? Well, it's either that or changing one's mind and that seems difficult to primitive men ;) Why can't I comment on them?
@2009abuabdullah Let me correct you there.. yawning is something you do when you're tired or bored.. Like: I just yawned after reading your stupid claim ;) Religious people don't like it when people comment on their videos because the videos are aimed at the exceptionally stupid, those with little knowledge of logic (yes, you're included). No one really expects freedom of speech around the religious, it's just contradictory in reality. Religion = No freedom of speech, or freedom in general.
@afroschlan Well the fact that you lie to your about God's non-existance, sets the foundation of many lies to come. Its a natural instinct to believe in God, just like the natural instinct to know that saving a life is good and being attracted to the opposite sex. No one in their right mind deny these basic natural instincts.
@2009abuabdullah That's very scientific of you ;) You just made up some shit and tossed it forth like it was a fact. Interesting.. It seems your dilutions are growing and becoming more and more severe. Let's just hope you won't end up flying a plane into a building like the last 19 turds who went absolutely insane from unfounded faith in stupid crap ;) You're just a basic megalomaniac, there is nothing more to bring forth here. Be insane in peace but please be silent about it.
I disagree it is not all natural. I think it may be natural to say that people want to believe in something; whether that is themselves, an idle or a god. What an individual believes in is a choice. Just as saving a life is a choice, however, that depends on the moral beliefs of that individual. To you someone "in their right mind" is someone who thinks as you do; it is subjective to the individual.
@2009abuabdullah Until the discovery of DNA, evolution was not as strong as it is today. Today it is both a fact and a theory.. all this information and more can be found on the very thing you're using right now, the Internet ;) The only thing that has not been verified in your bickering is your religion. It probably cannot be verified anyway given all the mystical variables so I just conclude that it's, like many things from the past, crap ;) Did your mommy and daddy indoctrinate you?
@2009abuabdullah You're just rambling crap at the moment. I'm going to stop responding to you from now on, you have nothing left. You've tried presenting your religion and you failed. You tried to present some pathetic video made by some pathetic turd with no knowledge of how things work and you've failed.. and now, happy times, you're rambling on about reflecting, consciousness, right and wrong, truth and lust.. Bring forth some facts not your personal opinion, it means nothing to me ;)
It seems that the widely accepted big bang theory does not account as well for this difference in the experience of time, as it does for the change of space. Although space and time are intimately and inseparably related. One was changing, the other was too, but how? Noone ever says.
Do you know if any scientist has addressed the question of space AND time being different than we experience it today at the beginning of the universe? If space expands very rapidly after the beginning, how is time experienced at this time? Is it possible that many more events occured within a set time interval that we would experience today? For example, could the occurences of 5 days happen within one hour, and even more extreme as we go further back? Has anyone ever addressed this problem?
"Do you know if any scientist has addressed the question of space AND time being different than we experience it today at the beginning of the universe?"
Quantum physics has confirmed that space and time are "constant" because mathematically space and time are complex conjugates. This means their product has to equal a constant term. So math tells us they are always constant.
The relative force of gravity has changed at different eras in history however.
You cant make any science test with space. So, you cant proof, space expanding or curving.
I have science test and i can proof, photons emit energy and thats why light bending and redshifting with out expanding space and with out curving/bending space!
Etimespace videos and you know how visible Universe born and how visible Universe energy/matter moving in space who already been there!
alah,,jesus..all faiths are the same...and all belive in a god,,,,,and with respect ,my question is not about god,,,i asked what people think was there b4 the big bang,,,where did the atoms come from 2 create the big bang,,,,and also if the universe is expanding,,then what is it expanding into?and i to have faith in god,,but i dont belive he created everything in 7 days.....
And the last clarification in your post - "... Big Bang is not actually an 'explosion' - it's an expansion.." is correct and often not understood by many pro-science arguments themselves.
@rcmadiraju I think that it is often portrayed as such, an explosion, but yes it is an expansion of space/time. I would like people to stop with the explosion nosense.
"An explosion is a rapid increase in volume and release of energy in an extreme manner, usually with the generation of high temperatures and the release of gases." Of course there are other definitions of explosion that would definately not fit the big bang. But for all intents and purposes, when someone refers to the Big Bang as an explosion, in many respects they're not far off, and in some respects they're exactly right.
You used some great photos and I like the music! Could it be that Time has symmetry and geometry? Newton believed Time was a thing in itself and connected to motion and Einstein believed there was something missing from quantum mechanics. In my video The Paradox of Schrodingers Cat an artist view it is Time that is the Hidden Variable.
Time only exists because conscious beings are around to experience it.Otherwise time is irrelevant and only exist as a tool of measurement.Its hard to comprehend, but without conscious beings/life everything happens almost instantly.Time sums up growth and change and technically doesn't exist.
I used to think that time was invented as well. Maybe there is no "time," just change. The change is what we perceive as time. Now I haven't gotten into the complex math of it yet, but time is warped around massive objects, and time slows down in things such as a black hole. It would at least slow for things like a wristwatch. Additionally, time would slow down for something moving near the speed of light. So perhaps time is something beyond our measurements.
@Zando24 The illusion of time is really just our limited ability the perceive the timelike dimensional component of the four-dimensional minkowski manifold (spacetime) our universe occupies. If spacetime were merely three dimensional, it would be static...This four-dimensionality becomes apparent when we talk about very large distance and size scales. Look at the sun- you are seeing it as it was 8 minutes ago- but you are seeing it now. It's almost impossible to visualize except in the abstract.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
if the big bang existed, then WHO created it? who BANGED it? There had to be some living being that either CREATED it or BANGED it! Therefore, GOD had to either BANG it or CREATE the big bang, because GOD is TIMELESS, SPACELESS, and SUPERNATRUAL!!!
@manhunt48 It can't be proved or disproved since it ocurred prior to spacetime achiving Plank scale (the size of the smallest possible wavelength of light)- at that point all current mathematics breaks down, and no observations or measurements as we know them can be made. We can only theorize what happened in the first instant of the universe's existence- if you insist on applying faith in place of scientific observation- it may apply beyond the Planck threshold....
@vesposito27 - Isn't it funny how the FIRST thing said by God was " Let there Be LIGHT " ..... How would some ancient writer know "Light" would be needed first ... Any human , from 5,000 years ago , would never had said "Let there be Light" first .... He would have simply said " God created the sun to give us light " .... The Bible account of creation is the inspired word of the Creator , and there is proof of that , if one seeks it
After the Big Bang, first was created the 4th dimension of the universe the time vector (without that nothing can exist). Matter and antimatter were also created. The matter created stars and planets, filled the empty space.
After billions of years stars will transform in Black Holes and will suck everything near by, After that they will pull small Black Holes inside them and every thing will end up in the Apple size sphere of the Big Bang.
It seems that actually you're treating physics as a religion, a common mistake.
We cannot know what happened before big bang.
However it is recognized that the universe is accelerating its expansion. Black holes probably "evaporate",too, thus thermodynamics will predict that eventually all matter wound transform into iron atoms at near 0K.
yea...its thought to be a continuous cycle, no one knows how many times the big bang has happened, it may have happened billions of times,, every time a universe expands, it starts to contract again until there's a huge bang when all matter has no space to move and that bang creates more matter and that expands and contracts and this happens again and again and again 4eva
Before the Big Bang there was nothing, just an empty space, no particles, no matter, no antimatter. Albert Einstein proposed a theory that the space always existed and the universe expands and collapse. Is a process that it takes 100 billion years or so?
But nobody would accept that theory they even call him crazy, stupid, insane.
When Stephen Hopkins took the Noble Price about the Black Holes and the fate of the universe, other scientists accepted that Hopkins and Einstein theory was correct.
and know what how can the big bang exist if matter and energy can't be created or destroyed and before the big bang nothing existed? think about it...
Before the Big Bang, the 11 dimensions were curled up and indistinguishable from each other in a perfectly symmetric microscopic volume. Something shattered that symmetry, unleashing 4 of those dimensions to expand forever as space and time, and the other 7 dimensions to remain curled up and become the subatomic particles. So the Big Bang was nothing less than a complete change in the nature of reality. That's where all the energy came from.
Existence will always remain unexplained. Where the hell does space come from? Has it always been there? What was there before that? And before that? Is there really a creator? Who created the creator? Some questions is just best remained unanswered. The more you think about it the more it bothers you. Therefore i have chosen to not believe´in anything anymore and enjoy my life. Btw, i've just watched a very interesting video about scientific proof, that the creator exists. Tell if u interested
NO ONE CAN KNOW HOW UNIVERSE CREATED... NO ONE! it is imposible to figure it out. There are no proof tht there was a bang or jesus just made the universe i bet 100% tht all those teories ar wrong... and i will repeate again it is imposible to know how universe was created... you cant know mby it was created 1,000,000,000 yrs ago or 100 bilion or 1,000,000,000,000,000 bilion yrs ago deal with it ppl are just to stupid to know thing like "how universe created, or what is the meaning of life.
You seem to confuse Theory with Hypothesis, thru scientific method they are both different, and have dif definitions, and usage. Plus we don't have to believe it, we can observer it. By either seeing Hubble Images or listening or seeing to the Big Bangs echo (white noise on non broadcasted TV channels).
Well, I suppose you don't understand what a theory is in science. The meaning is much different then what is used in everyday english. Gravity is a THEORY, Electromagnetism is a THEORY, germs are a THEORY, computers are a THEORY.....
If the big bang did actually happen.. Is there anyway of looking at how much matter there is in the universe, and how fast its travelling, combining that info and correlating it with information we have now to work out what gravitational pull the X point had before it exploded?
Because I was wondering why it would explode to begin with, and if it did whats the limit of mass before it reacts. And could this reaction alone over-ride the intense gravity?
If you notice the time since the Big Bang is 13.7 billion years ago. Seeing that light travels at 186,000mps then the UDF images from Hubble Telescope should be able to witness the event by peering back nearly 14BLY. But when the images came back strangely fully aged galaxies were found not hot gas & radiation. So if it takes light 13.7 billion years to travel 13.7BLY's then why are they imaging old galaxies if the light is just now getting here? Which is wrong the speed of light or the theory?
The BB theory needs revamped. Clearly noted by images from the Hubble telescope. The effects of light acting upon it's source is an instant. The concept that we can look into the past by looking light years away is in error. When we look into the heavens we see everything as it is happening in the now. This effect was found when experimenting with photons & freed electrons. See quantum entanglement. The information contained in one twin electron is transmitted to the other without time, Eternal!
Sorry, but I believe you misunderstood my comment. Of course the universe is not flat and that has nothing to do with the idea that light coming from a star a billion light years away would take a billion years for it's light to reach us, therefore seeing the star as it was back then, a billion years ago, not now. That idea was shown to be wrong when Hubble took photos of those old galaxies 13.7BLY away & not hot gas and gamma radiation that was first theorized. We cannot see into the past!
Of course we can, you are completely misunderstanding the whole concept. I had a look at your other comments here and if I had of read those first I would not have left a reply, cause I can't be arsed to explain it to you, you got too much wrong already.
The big bang theory is just as retarded as the "creationist" theory. Think about it, the earth is approx 4 billion years old, which is supposed to be 1/3 of the age of the universe, a star lives for over 10 billion years so how can a star live and be alive for longer than the universe itself? The numbers don't add up. If our sun is going to be around for another 4 billion years, then that means it's already older than the universe.
since when did this become a bible topic? something created us. and were here now. my beleifs are the there is a god out there but not in are reach. end of story
nothing created us. We came about through abiogenesis and evolution. To state that we were created requires proof beyond the insane scribblings of an unscientific bronze age comicbook like the bible
Well vacuum energy does not exist. A vacuum is the absence of pressure, there is no energy. I did not lie, all them require some force to start things off. Besides, they are only theories not fact. No one was there to witness the big bang. When facts are found the theories are not discarded they merely change them, even if they are wrong. Saturn's outer rings are younger than the inner ones, not conforming to current theories. Will the theories change or will a new wild idea be invented?
This seems to be the case with all theories when facts show them to be wrong. Like dark matter & energy was added to the big bang when it was shown to be wrong (inflating space) even if the idea contradicts the speed of light. Much needs to be learned through insight, not a theoretical textbook that is governed by collusion. Apparently the truth is not within your grasp of intellect. Keep looking for the truth & do not believe theories as fact, it will only confuse you as I see by your post.
The Big Bang was shown to be wrong? When was this? Which journal was this published in? Dark Matter has nothing to with the Big Bang. Dark matter explains the movement of the galaxies in relation to each other. Dark energy explains the fact that the expansion is accelerating. Non of this invalidates the Big Bang. The Big Bang was an expansion OF space, not IN space, so the speed of light does not apply. Do some proper research.
lol, you must be young. See the theory was changed to accommodate the blunders in the theory when it was first published. Einstein wrote that the universe expanded after the big bang and then because of gravity would eventually collapse upon itself. It was a major blunder on Einstein's part when astronomers found the universe was in fact doing the opposite. Gravity was not causing the universe to collapse like predicted from gravity. they quickly made up dark matter & energy.
The expansion & acceleration can be accounted for by using scientific data while understanding the observations. Just because it is written in scientific journal does not mean it is a fact. Just by inserting inventive forces that cannot be seen does not make the BB theory right. You believe in invisible matter? You're merely a clueless follower who believes everything you hear. Our planet needs people who can think clearly, not continue to follow past mistakes! Fight for the truth, not with me.
Lol, you must be ignorant. The theory was not changed. 1. The ultimate fate of the universe has nothing to do with how the universe started, which what the Big Bang theory is about. 2.Einstein noticed that his relativity equations were predicting an expansion of the universe, but as the current theory was the Steady State universe, he fudged his equation to include a cosmological constant to keep universe STEADY, not to collapse it. This was all BEFORE the Big Bang had even been proposed.
3. Dark matter has nothing to do with the Big Bang theory as the Big Bang theory is about how the universe started, not how it ends. The observable matter in the universe cannot account for the movement of the galaxies, therefore the must be more matter than we can see i.e. its dark. Dark energy is hypothetical (and openly admitted to be so) and is used to explain the acceleration of the expansion. There are other hypotheses. Like I said, do your research.
Wait matter has mass, thus g. How can dark matter, which would pull because of g, allow the universe to expand? Wouldn't more m, even thought it was not seen, cause more g? Adding more problems no matter how being represented. I did the research, I even understand the imaginary terms & wild explanations. If you add more g to the whole system then the universe contracts, not expands. Matter cannot cause expansion! Only one solution, extra energy is being added to the universe constantly!
Yes the BB was wrong when it was found that all the galaxies are not moving away from one point, they are moving away from each other. This shows that the BB is wrong. The Inflation theory was then invented. The I theory contradicts the BB theory. If galaxies are moving away from galaxies, expansion?, then there was not one BB but countless. The galaxies are roughly the same age too, see 2DF Sky Survey. My hypothesis explains this without dark matter/energy & I will be damned if I share it here.
A theory is a large body of work that is the best explanation of a natural phenomena. It changes with our understanding of the Universe. What is bad about that? Are you suggesting Scientists should just stop and be content? How ridiculous! We'd still be in the Dark ages - And Creationists.
Yes, that is how natural forces are explained, a theory. I wonder if that is ant different than a religious persons saying God did it? Neither one can be proven so both are theories right? In the end, we will all find the truth. I now wonder why I spent over a decade looking for answers and getting nothing but theories. I am not a follower of theories,but do research facts. The only problem I see is that there are not enough facts to convince me. When all the facts are in, then we will see.
Like, Cassini finding the outer ring material of Saturn to be older than the inner rings. It completely goes against the Nebula theory. I hypothesized the reason for the expansion of the universe using known facts. This idea actually predicted the outer rings of Saturn to be younger, long before the data came back from Cassini. NASA said it will take them a few years to come up with an answer for the new rings. So what is right , my idea or current theories which did not predict the young rings?
The problem with "god did it" is that you don't need ANY facts or anything to support your claim. God in that sense can do anything and doesn't need any explanation. That's why it's unaccepted by a lot of people. It doesn't make sense because it doesn't have to, which is a lame excuse really.
The point at which it happened is in your palm. And, mine, and everyone elses, and on Venus, and at the centre of the galaxy. In essence, because everything is moving away from everything alse, the central point of the expansion, the position of the metaphorical "Explosion" is wherever the observer is observing from.
Relative to the imaginary point where the big bang was said to have happened. If all galaxies are moving away from that point then use that as a reference.
I hypothesized that when matter reaches the speed of light it converts into pure energy, gamma rays. Evidence supports this idea as noted by the extreme explosions that occur near the extents of our universe. Can you tell me what these violent explosions are called? You should know seeing that you told me to "Educate yourself".
Wouldn't the inflation of the universe eventually cause matter to reach the speed of light? Assuming we use the point where the big bang happened as a still reference point. Then we can see that this is the cause for GRB's that happen near the outside edges of our universe. The gamma ray bursts that occur near the furthest reaches of space defy the drop off law for energy. The only way to get that much energy from matter is if a galaxy instantly turned into energy.
I can see what you are thinking, that expansion means galaxies rush away from one another at great speed, eventually accellerating to light speed, which causes them to turn into energy?
But the fatal flaw is that the galaxies are moving furthur apart, but not due to speed. The very space, the fabric of our universe is stretching, unfurling. Any object wouldnt be moving. In essence, 2 static objects can be furthur away than they would be even if they WERE at SOL with no inflation.
Well if they are moving apart physically then the distance between the two can be measured as a speed.
The SOL says I am right, yet theory says I am wrong. I always believe in the facts not theories. Theory should never be thought of as a fact, because when the facts contradict theories they are easily ignored & take many years to become recognized. I guess we will have to wait for a new generation to fix the mistakes in todays theories. This would not happen if theories were simply ignored.
"Well if they are moving apart physically then the distance between the two can be measured as a speed."
Yes, but heres the important bit... They arent actually moving. They have no speed. The space between is expanding, they arent going anywhere. And since THEY arent going anywhere, the SOL does not come into play in the slightest. So theres no galaxies hitting (or breaking) the light barrier.
Why does the SOL say you are right and the theory wrong?
You know if the inflation theory was right then it would be impossible for two galaxies to collide seeing that each point gets further away. Yet astronomers say that eventually the Andromeda galaxy will merge with the Milky Way. Plus many other galaxies are found to be colliding. So the whole balloon idea is not a good analogy. You can still believe it, just explain how galaxies are able to be traveling in a direction towards one another if inflation happened? No, gravity is a weak force.
THe sound is like Dwarf Screaming..
WeaponOfficer 10 months ago
maybe this big bang theory is totally wrong.
210482fmj 10 months ago
who the heck put this to action
class10snps 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
go to transcendinglight. On youtube. 2011 plug-in radio.the best.trip hi r go home "earth" how do u translate. Smile.GOOD on any drug of ur choice.GET HI and DOSE.The SUPER STRING 11
krishay12345 1 year ago
lol i luv the big bang theory show... its bad ass
lilturpin12 1 year ago
I can't believe this is what I masturbate to.
quasiphatpaul 1 year ago
please read the history of jinn's before mocking at islam, i think jinns are at your back at the moment now
bismillah
l0ckz3r0 1 year ago
this song sucks
Quinny934 1 year ago
Consider the fact that is called the big bang THEORY. Also if this is true im not sure the laws of science agree with it. What was there in the very very begining? Nothing? how can something be made from nothing? last i checked 0+0=0 not 1, 2 or anything else. Last i checked the human body and the world around it is much to complex to be a mistake.
Merderotika 1 year ago
@Merderotika Are you a muslim?
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah
No I am not a muslim and dont bother trying to convert me.
Merderotika 1 year ago
@Merderotika I have no power to convert you! The only power i have is to kindly invite you to read the quran (God's last revelation to mankind). Concerning the divinity of the quran, God says:
Do they not then reflect upon the Qur'ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein many contradictions. (82) of surah 4 Quran
pEACE
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
22 people are rellegious.
Hamodyxxx0 1 year ago
Many watching videos like this one ask, "where did all the matter come from? You can't make something out of nothing."
Well you might be able to do just that. The theory of cosmic inflation answers that and is pretty well accepted by most cosmologists.
The LHC creates matter every day. It was also created also during the creation of the universe. To help understand this, a start is to search for and watch the YouTube video "Cosmic Inflation and the Accelerating Universe, parts 1 & 2".
TheQRabbit 1 year ago
e=mc2
so it means the mass is from energy!
and that means that this energy was gods
leparditas 1 year ago
of course the bigger question is why do religious people feel threatened by our universe and the study of it? was there the same mistrust and backlash with people who proved the earth was round and it revolved around the sun? religion is always trying to hold humanity back while science leaps forward with or without them.
it seems religious conservatives with their global warming denial would rather the earth kill us than admit they're wrong.
tomitstube 1 year ago
Comment removed
xDisturbedDemon 1 year ago
@xDisturbedDemon Look up the definition of a scentific theory before you make a remark such as that.
s4stem 1 year ago
@xDisturbedDemon Hello dumb dumb. I'm a book. Please read me.
Joshden1 1 year ago
@xDisturbedDemon its because christianity is more in youre face with creation, heaven and hell, earth being the only planet with life and so on, All these ppl dont believe in any religion but since most ppl are christfags we bash them.
we could go on about all the lies and bullshit every religion ''offers'' ppl but you wouldbt care
schuldiner1441 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xDisturbedDemon ALSO '''You don't have to believe this is what REALLY happened, cause it's not proven""
PROVE GOD YOU FAG<
theres more evidence for science and evolution then your stupid fukcin BOOK!
schuldiner1441 1 year ago
Check out the image at point 2.18..I can see so many faces in there! Are these real reflections of people who once lived?
JoeyMars1 1 year ago
@JoeyMars1 no.
BlackSunSerenade 1 year ago
Thanks great video and excelent music in it too which reflects the beauti of creation! I listen to it twice, particuly for the song again. Good job in matching song to video!
JoeyMars1 1 year ago
at the end of the day all the brightest minds past and present have ideas, hunches even dreams but if you were to ask them they would say that they just do not know and the dream is to find out but then what?
smigbabb 1 year ago
well, your guess about the "big bang" is as good as mine. If that's what it takes for you to describe God, so be it. All you really need is the Bible though. It says "let there be light". duh
seethelightofgod 1 year ago
I actually like the music.
KucingKayap 1 year ago
i believe in god. but i stick my nose in science cuz im curious and its interesting.the big bang is simply dumb. the theory doesnt make sense. it takes billions of yrs to form even light. so how would we even kno wat happened. and as far as our galaxy growing. every galaxy grows but a massive black hole feeds on every galaxy from the center but on rare occasions tht black hole may not be feedin then its invisible. maybe ours isnt feeding thts why our galaxy is growing
davinci585 1 year ago
@davinci585 you believe in god. therefore you cant believe in science? what are you deliberately retarded? you religious fucks piss me off
Toro953 1 year ago
wow we have proof of an expanding universe.......if you talk to a scientist he will say we can almost see the edge...well go a little bit further i wana see you shit yourself when you find jesis with a baseballbat getting ready to kick your ass for being so ignorent. lmao
zackwestrules 1 year ago
Man this music totally piss off my ears!
TheChosenOneOfRussia 1 year ago 18
Turn the sound off.
s4stem 1 year ago 14
@TheChosenOneOfRussia Get a new ear... one that works..and one that can see the beauti of things..
JoeyMars1 1 year ago
@JoeyMars1 Wow,im got to have new ears to "see",hmm and you got to have new eyes to wiew what you writing!
TheChosenOneOfRussia 1 year ago
@TheChosenOneOfRussia Wtf is this shit?
TheChosenOneOfRussia 1 year ago
@TheChosenOneOfRussia Oh god, you just don't know how to appreciate it! Durak....
Wintella 1 year ago
where did the first molecule come from?????:S
kilosmaks 1 year ago
not god! ;D
CONNOREXPLOSION 1 year ago
@kilosmaks Where did your education come from?
gregrutz 1 year ago
1430 years ago, God says:
Have not those who disbelieve known that the heavens and the earth were of one piece, then We parted them, and we made every living thing of water? Will they not then believe?
Quran surah 21 verse 30
I sincerely invite all the sincere people to Islam in order to save themselves from the hellfire!
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah i sincerely ask you to shut the fuck up and take your fairy tales elsewhere. why does you god not save you from your shitty ass sand wars? im dedicating the next month of my life to making things very hard for islamic people
Toro953 1 year ago
@Toro953 Gods says: Fain would they put out the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah will perfect His light however much the disbelievers are averse. (8) He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the religion of Truth, that He may make it conqueror of all religion however much idolaters may be averse. (9) of surah 61
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@Toro953 Its a natural instinct to believe in God, just like the natural instinct to be attracted to the opposite sex and to know that killing is bad and saving a life is good and so on! No person in their right mind can deny these instincts. Peace!!!
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Just because a belief in god may be an instinct it doesn't mean it's true. It simply means that there may have been some survival advantage for our ancestors to believe in a god. It may have made a more cohesive society to rally around a common belief or it may have made the prospect of death less frightening and thereby reducing stress. It, in no way, gives any reason to think that the instinct is based on there actually being a god.
TheQRabbit 1 year ago
@TheQRabbit God created us with these instincts and the instincts you see in animals, in order to live a prosperity life!
Evolution is imaginary and has no mind of its own!
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah so you thing allah made us?
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz I dont think, I know! I kindly invite you to humble yourself and believe and worship Him in order to be successful in this world and the hereafter!
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah HIM who? Jesus? Ra? Zeus?
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz Allah (God almighty)! There Creator of all things, including Jesus, Ra, Zeus and all the rest you can thing of! He says:
The Most Gracious (Allâh)! (1) He has taught (you mankind) the Qur'ân (by His Mercy). (2) He created man. (3) He taught him eloquent speech. (4) of surah 55 Quran
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah "There Creator of all things, including Jesus, Ra, Zeus and all the rest you can thing of! He says:"
That sounds weird to me... because, who created Allah ?
dietermauer 1 year ago
@dietermauer Who created the Creator?
Anything that came into existance, something was responsible to cause it to exist and it will also come to an end! As for the Creator, He always existed! He has no begining or ending!
Allah, God Almight! Whose free from creation attributes and qualities! He says: There is nothing like Him, and He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer. (11) of surah 42 Quran
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Why does your imaginary friend not need a creator whilst everything else does? It's very convenient for the religious to just make shit up. Does it say anywhere in your holy-text that the creator itself does not require a creator or is that the casual religious justification?
afroschlan 1 year ago
@afroschlan I challenge you to read the quran with an open mind, sweatheart! You will come to realise that no man capable of authoring such a book. God says concerning the divinity of the quran:
Do they not then consider the Qur'ân carefully? Had it been from other than Allâh, they would surely have found therein many contradictions. (82) of surah 4 Quran
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah You didn't answer my question! I would not read the Quran with an open mind, I would base it's correctness on my current knowledge of how things work, something that primitive sand-people did not have the opportunity to do ;) Your Quran holds no weight in my presence, the little I have read from it comes off as being fuck-boring and unnecessary. People live long and happy lives without severe confrontation without religion.. because now they can ;)
afroschlan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@afroschlan All those comments you made...
Nugwrangler 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Evolution is not imaginary sweetheart, there is evidence for evolution yet there is no evidence for your imaginary friend.. thus for "imaginary" friend ;) Don't worry about it, I expect this from the population of 3rd world countries.
afroschlan 1 year ago
@afroschlan Evolution is an imaginary theory constructed by the enemies of God, sweatheart! There is absolutely NO evidence of it ever happening! No inter -transit fossil records that have ever been found! This is the truth most atheist find bitter to swallow!
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah So how does the theory of evolution go? Could you summon it up for me so we can verify that we're on the same page. I'm going to assume that you have no idea how the theory goes.. although you have probably read it with "an open mind" ;) What does atheism have to do with the fact/theory of evolution? You don't even grasp the difference between the two yet I'm supposed to take your word for it.. dude, seriously ;) May your imaginary friend bless your imaginary soul ;)
afroschlan 1 year ago
@afroschlan Watch 'the collapse of evolution' in youtube videos. Very interesting video for those who can handle the TRUTH! Do watch and let me know what you think?
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Wow, psychological warfare.. does that mean that you've lost all ability to contribute to the debate anything of value? By searching the video your recommended I ended with with a variety of videos, ranging from stupid to border-line retarded. Being amazingly bias seems to be the general structure of these videos. Pro-creation and thus for anti-evolution.. why? Well, it's either that or changing one's mind and that seems difficult to primitive men ;) Why can't I comment on them?
afroschlan 1 year ago
@afroschlan Maybe the dont want people to read the lies you might intend to put on them! Its purely knowledge for those who yawn for the truth!
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Let me correct you there.. yawning is something you do when you're tired or bored.. Like: I just yawned after reading your stupid claim ;) Religious people don't like it when people comment on their videos because the videos are aimed at the exceptionally stupid, those with little knowledge of logic (yes, you're included). No one really expects freedom of speech around the religious, it's just contradictory in reality. Religion = No freedom of speech, or freedom in general.
afroschlan 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Also, if I might add, how would they know that I would "insert lies" before I've done so?
afroschlan 1 year ago
@afroschlan Well the fact that you lie to your about God's non-existance, sets the foundation of many lies to come. Its a natural instinct to believe in God, just like the natural instinct to know that saving a life is good and being attracted to the opposite sex. No one in their right mind deny these basic natural instincts.
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah That's very scientific of you ;) You just made up some shit and tossed it forth like it was a fact. Interesting.. It seems your dilutions are growing and becoming more and more severe. Let's just hope you won't end up flying a plane into a building like the last 19 turds who went absolutely insane from unfounded faith in stupid crap ;) You're just a basic megalomaniac, there is nothing more to bring forth here. Be insane in peace but please be silent about it.
afroschlan 1 year ago
I disagree it is not all natural. I think it may be natural to say that people want to believe in something; whether that is themselves, an idle or a god. What an individual believes in is a choice. Just as saving a life is a choice, however, that depends on the moral beliefs of that individual. To you someone "in their right mind" is someone who thinks as you do; it is subjective to the individual.
Merderotika 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Until the discovery of DNA, evolution was not as strong as it is today. Today it is both a fact and a theory.. all this information and more can be found on the very thing you're using right now, the Internet ;) The only thing that has not been verified in your bickering is your religion. It probably cannot be verified anyway given all the mystical variables so I just conclude that it's, like many things from the past, crap ;) Did your mommy and daddy indoctrinate you?
afroschlan 1 year ago
@afroschlan FYI, I discovered the beauty of islam 10 years ago!
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah Why? Did you end up in some sort of an accient?
afroschlan 1 year ago
@afroschlan Through reflecting on life and having the consicous of right and wrong! Its wrong to deny the truth and follow one's own lusts!
Peace
2009abuabdullah 1 year ago
@2009abuabdullah You're just rambling crap at the moment. I'm going to stop responding to you from now on, you have nothing left. You've tried presenting your religion and you failed. You tried to present some pathetic video made by some pathetic turd with no knowledge of how things work and you've failed.. and now, happy times, you're rambling on about reflecting, consciousness, right and wrong, truth and lust.. Bring forth some facts not your personal opinion, it means nothing to me ;)
afroschlan 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It seems that the widely accepted big bang theory does not account as well for this difference in the experience of time, as it does for the change of space. Although space and time are intimately and inseparably related. One was changing, the other was too, but how? Noone ever says.
bonners11 1 year ago
Comment removed
bonners11 1 year ago
Do you know if any scientist has addressed the question of space AND time being different than we experience it today at the beginning of the universe? If space expands very rapidly after the beginning, how is time experienced at this time? Is it possible that many more events occured within a set time interval that we would experience today? For example, could the occurences of 5 days happen within one hour, and even more extreme as we go further back? Has anyone ever addressed this problem?
bonners11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bonners11
"Do you know if any scientist has addressed the question of space AND time being different than we experience it today at the beginning of the universe?"
Quantum physics has confirmed that space and time are "constant" because mathematically space and time are complex conjugates. This means their product has to equal a constant term. So math tells us they are always constant.
The relative force of gravity has changed at different eras in history however.
lynchmobb2000 1 year ago
^ He is correct. Mind blowing eh?
signwearer 2 years ago
dID THIS GUY GET A TITLER FOR XMAS OR SOMETHING ??......
tchekitout 2 years ago
wait a minute, before the big bang there was nothing. Nothing. So what made the particles come, i mean, because nothing was created. Just black.
zazamaniz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Big bang theory is religion!
You cant make any science test with space. So, you cant proof, space expanding or curving.
I have science test and i can proof, photons emit energy and thats why light bending and redshifting with out expanding space and with out curving/bending space!
Etimespace videos and you know how visible Universe born and how visible Universe energy/matter moving in space who already been there!
Etimespace 2 years ago
what was there to make the big bang?
where did the atoms come from to create the big bang,and thus everything in the universe.........
PATRICKEIRE 2 years ago
As theory goes all matter was compressed into a single point.
2014andBeyonD 2 years ago
@2014andBeyonD
Not just matter- but all of sapcetime itself too.
vesposito27 1 year ago
Good f'in question buddy lol
TwentyYearDenial 2 years ago
@PATRICKEIRE
ALAH IS THE CREATOR
ANTIDARWINISMO 2 years ago
alah,,jesus..all faiths are the same...and all belive in a god,,,,,and with respect ,my question is not about god,,,i asked what people think was there b4 the big bang,,,where did the atoms come from 2 create the big bang,,,,and also if the universe is expanding,,then what is it expanding into?and i to have faith in god,,but i dont belive he created everything in 7 days.....
PATRICKEIRE 2 years ago 2
@PATRICKEIRE
the time is relative my friend
peace
ANTIDARWINISMO 2 years ago
@PATRICKEIRE the molecules were always here, in the vastness of empty space. beyond the universe i think there is just blackness - pure space.
Toro953 1 year ago
why?
alex4allofyou 2 years ago
in fact nonexistence is impossible you just dont know yet
ppedalen 2 years ago
you wanna c the simplest explenasion for the universe and count me crasy ,,,your problem.
1>0=2>1 and therefore there is probably more than one LOL.
ppedalen 2 years ago
you got some bad ass lame spelling.
DeathWishDac 2 years ago
Excellent attempt. Thanks for that.
And the last clarification in your post - "... Big Bang is not actually an 'explosion' - it's an expansion.." is correct and often not understood by many pro-science arguments themselves.
rcmadiraju 2 years ago
@rcmadiraju I think that it is often portrayed as such, an explosion, but yes it is an expansion of space/time. I would like people to stop with the explosion nosense.
s4stem 2 years ago
According to wikipedia:
"An explosion is a rapid increase in volume and release of energy in an extreme manner, usually with the generation of high temperatures and the release of gases." Of course there are other definitions of explosion that would definately not fit the big bang. But for all intents and purposes, when someone refers to the Big Bang as an explosion, in many respects they're not far off, and in some respects they're exactly right.
psychosavant 2 years ago
Nice Video!
You used some great photos and I like the music! Could it be that Time has symmetry and geometry? Newton believed Time was a thing in itself and connected to motion and Einstein believed there was something missing from quantum mechanics. In my video The Paradox of Schrodingers Cat an artist view it is Time that is the Hidden Variable.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
@nickharvey7 Thank you. Time is relative, it is also considered the fourth dimension.
s4stem 2 years ago
Time only exists because conscious beings are around to experience it.Otherwise time is irrelevant and only exist as a tool of measurement.Its hard to comprehend, but without conscious beings/life everything happens almost instantly.Time sums up growth and change and technically doesn't exist.
ra1n8ow 2 years ago
I used to think that time was invented as well. Maybe there is no "time," just change. The change is what we perceive as time. Now I haven't gotten into the complex math of it yet, but time is warped around massive objects, and time slows down in things such as a black hole. It would at least slow for things like a wristwatch. Additionally, time would slow down for something moving near the speed of light. So perhaps time is something beyond our measurements.
Zando24 2 years ago
@Zando24 The illusion of time is really just our limited ability the perceive the timelike dimensional component of the four-dimensional minkowski manifold (spacetime) our universe occupies. If spacetime were merely three dimensional, it would be static...This four-dimensionality becomes apparent when we talk about very large distance and size scales. Look at the sun- you are seeing it as it was 8 minutes ago- but you are seeing it now. It's almost impossible to visualize except in the abstract.
vesposito27 1 year ago
So then you're saying that time is an illusion, or at least our definition of time? It's just the way we perceive the fourth dimension?
Zando24 1 year ago
I would really be grateful if someone would tell me whats the tittle of the song,,thanks in advance
udhtari1 2 years ago
@udhtari1 I have it posted in the description, but the song and band are, Song: Goodbye Milky Way Band: Enigma
s4stem 2 years ago
Why the hell do you think SOMEONE had to bang it?! Thats just your dogmas speaking
Saaur1 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if the big bang existed, then WHO created it? who BANGED it? There had to be some living being that either CREATED it or BANGED it! Therefore, GOD had to either BANG it or CREATE the big bang, because GOD is TIMELESS, SPACELESS, and SUPERNATRUAL!!!
BakuganVentusBrontes 2 years ago
Prove it.
manhunt48 2 years ago
@manhunt48 It can't be proved or disproved since it ocurred prior to spacetime achiving Plank scale (the size of the smallest possible wavelength of light)- at that point all current mathematics breaks down, and no observations or measurements as we know them can be made. We can only theorize what happened in the first instant of the universe's existence- if you insist on applying faith in place of scientific observation- it may apply beyond the Planck threshold....
vesposito27 1 year ago
@vesposito27 - Isn't it funny how the FIRST thing said by God was " Let there Be LIGHT " ..... How would some ancient writer know "Light" would be needed first ... Any human , from 5,000 years ago , would never had said "Let there be Light" first .... He would have simply said " God created the sun to give us light " .... The Bible account of creation is the inspired word of the Creator , and there is proof of that , if one seeks it
shure46 1 year ago
Big bang makes little sense to me, Where did the star originally come from?
Alexispelling 2 years ago
There was no star originally, it was a singularity.
s4stem 2 years ago
After the Big Bang, first was created the 4th dimension of the universe the time vector (without that nothing can exist). Matter and antimatter were also created. The matter created stars and planets, filled the empty space.
After billions of years stars will transform in Black Holes and will suck everything near by, After that they will pull small Black Holes inside them and every thing will end up in the Apple size sphere of the Big Bang.
The cycle goes on. NO GOD NO DEVIL "PHYSICS 1ON1"
ataho2000 2 years ago
It seems that actually you're treating physics as a religion, a common mistake.
We cannot know what happened before big bang.
However it is recognized that the universe is accelerating its expansion. Black holes probably "evaporate",too, thus thermodynamics will predict that eventually all matter wound transform into iron atoms at near 0K.
dsrjkjhg 2 years ago
I was replying to ataho2000
dsrjkjhg 2 years ago
yea...its thought to be a continuous cycle, no one knows how many times the big bang has happened, it may have happened billions of times,, every time a universe expands, it starts to contract again until there's a huge bang when all matter has no space to move and that bang creates more matter and that expands and contracts and this happens again and again and again 4eva
yamjayamjabulba 2 years ago
Before the Big Bang there was nothing, just an empty space, no particles, no matter, no antimatter. Albert Einstein proposed a theory that the space always existed and the universe expands and collapse. Is a process that it takes 100 billion years or so?
But nobody would accept that theory they even call him crazy, stupid, insane.
When Stephen Hopkins took the Noble Price about the Black Holes and the fate of the universe, other scientists accepted that Hopkins and Einstein theory was correct.
ataho2000 2 years ago
and know what how can the big bang exist if matter and energy can't be created or destroyed and before the big bang nothing existed? think about it...
sporeman1331 2 years ago
Before the Big Bang, the 11 dimensions were curled up and indistinguishable from each other in a perfectly symmetric microscopic volume. Something shattered that symmetry, unleashing 4 of those dimensions to expand forever as space and time, and the other 7 dimensions to remain curled up and become the subatomic particles. So the Big Bang was nothing less than a complete change in the nature of reality. That's where all the energy came from.
mosquitobight 2 years ago
what would it be like living in a 1D dimensional world?? HAHAHA wud be really funny in that dimension if life existed there.....
yamjayamjabulba 2 years ago
God is real
sporeman1331 2 years ago
I like the song in this video. Who is it by?
AhaBach4Life 2 years ago
Existence will always remain unexplained. Where the hell does space come from? Has it always been there? What was there before that? And before that? Is there really a creator? Who created the creator? Some questions is just best remained unanswered. The more you think about it the more it bothers you. Therefore i have chosen to not believe´in anything anymore and enjoy my life. Btw, i've just watched a very interesting video about scientific proof, that the creator exists. Tell if u interested
InkosiDeVinyl 2 years ago
What video is that?
LouisBellton 2 years ago
What video is that?
LouisBellton 2 years ago
but i can bet poaple know how this fucking land, planet, and universe will end.
Amfitamin15 2 years ago
NO ONE CAN KNOW HOW UNIVERSE CREATED... NO ONE! it is imposible to figure it out. There are no proof tht there was a bang or jesus just made the universe i bet 100% tht all those teories ar wrong... and i will repeate again it is imposible to know how universe was created... you cant know mby it was created 1,000,000,000 yrs ago or 100 bilion or 1,000,000,000,000,000 bilion yrs ago deal with it ppl are just to stupid to know thing like "how universe created, or what is the meaning of life.
Amfitamin15 2 years ago
what you mean is you are to stupid to understand it and so you have given up or just asumed that NO ONE can.
ASBO1THE1GREAT 2 years ago
one God made the universe and two it was (most likley) 6,000 to10,000 years ago
sporeman1331 2 years ago
Three: If you were really secure in your faith you wouldn't feel the need to post it on the message board of a science video.
mosquitobight 2 years ago 2
Terminology fail
FreeInquisition 2 years ago
You seem to confuse Theory with Hypothesis, thru scientific method they are both different, and have dif definitions, and usage. Plus we don't have to believe it, we can observer it. By either seeing Hubble Images or listening or seeing to the Big Bangs echo (white noise on non broadcasted TV channels).
hank1972 2 years ago
Well, I suppose you don't understand what a theory is in science. The meaning is much different then what is used in everyday english. Gravity is a THEORY, Electromagnetism is a THEORY, germs are a THEORY, computers are a THEORY.....
s4stem 2 years ago
If the big bang did actually happen.. Is there anyway of looking at how much matter there is in the universe, and how fast its travelling, combining that info and correlating it with information we have now to work out what gravitational pull the X point had before it exploded?
Because I was wondering why it would explode to begin with, and if it did whats the limit of mass before it reacts. And could this reaction alone over-ride the intense gravity?
TheOv3rlordK1ng 2 years ago
the galaxy is flat.
georgiarizz 2 years ago
If you notice the time since the Big Bang is 13.7 billion years ago. Seeing that light travels at 186,000mps then the UDF images from Hubble Telescope should be able to witness the event by peering back nearly 14BLY. But when the images came back strangely fully aged galaxies were found not hot gas & radiation. So if it takes light 13.7 billion years to travel 13.7BLY's then why are they imaging old galaxies if the light is just now getting here? Which is wrong the speed of light or the theory?
BigNewGames 2 years ago
The BB theory needs revamped. Clearly noted by images from the Hubble telescope. The effects of light acting upon it's source is an instant. The concept that we can look into the past by looking light years away is in error. When we look into the heavens we see everything as it is happening in the now. This effect was found when experimenting with photons & freed electrons. See quantum entanglement. The information contained in one twin electron is transmitted to the other without time, Eternal!
BigNewGames 2 years ago
That's not how it works, you can't see back 14 billion light years because the universe isn't 'flat'.
FreeInquisition 2 years ago
Sorry, but I believe you misunderstood my comment. Of course the universe is not flat and that has nothing to do with the idea that light coming from a star a billion light years away would take a billion years for it's light to reach us, therefore seeing the star as it was back then, a billion years ago, not now. That idea was shown to be wrong when Hubble took photos of those old galaxies 13.7BLY away & not hot gas and gamma radiation that was first theorized. We cannot see into the past!
BigNewGames 2 years ago
Of course we can, you are completely misunderstanding the whole concept. I had a look at your other comments here and if I had of read those first I would not have left a reply, cause I can't be arsed to explain it to you, you got too much wrong already.
FreeInquisition 2 years ago
Really? What did I get wrong? Tell me please. Maybe, I can learn something.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
The big bang theory is just as retarded as the "creationist" theory. Think about it, the earth is approx 4 billion years old, which is supposed to be 1/3 of the age of the universe, a star lives for over 10 billion years so how can a star live and be alive for longer than the universe itself? The numbers don't add up. If our sun is going to be around for another 4 billion years, then that means it's already older than the universe.
G0dsAssassin 2 years ago
Wtf are you talking about? If the universe is 13Byo then how is the sun older than the universe?
FreeInquisition 2 years ago
how many extra chromosones do you have?
fowlermon 2 years ago 3
since when did this become a bible topic? something created us. and were here now. my beleifs are the there is a god out there but not in are reach. end of story
ghmyrockband 2 years ago
nothing created us. We came about through abiogenesis and evolution. To state that we were created requires proof beyond the insane scribblings of an unscientific bronze age comicbook like the bible
amadain17 2 years ago 2
You are kind of simplistic!
You actually belong with the 'bible' people.
Dumb, unenlightened and childishly
ignorant.
These kind of conversations, are not for
you!
fntime 2 years ago
Personally I'm not convinced.
matrags 2 years ago
K.I.S.S.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
listen you fuckin moron, next time leave out the shitty music. you fuckin idiot.
KulDeeSak 2 years ago
Well vacuum energy does not exist. A vacuum is the absence of pressure, there is no energy. I did not lie, all them require some force to start things off. Besides, they are only theories not fact. No one was there to witness the big bang. When facts are found the theories are not discarded they merely change them, even if they are wrong. Saturn's outer rings are younger than the inner ones, not conforming to current theories. Will the theories change or will a new wild idea be invented?
BigNewGames 2 years ago
This seems to be the case with all theories when facts show them to be wrong. Like dark matter & energy was added to the big bang when it was shown to be wrong (inflating space) even if the idea contradicts the speed of light. Much needs to be learned through insight, not a theoretical textbook that is governed by collusion. Apparently the truth is not within your grasp of intellect. Keep looking for the truth & do not believe theories as fact, it will only confuse you as I see by your post.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
The Big Bang was shown to be wrong? When was this? Which journal was this published in? Dark Matter has nothing to with the Big Bang. Dark matter explains the movement of the galaxies in relation to each other. Dark energy explains the fact that the expansion is accelerating. Non of this invalidates the Big Bang. The Big Bang was an expansion OF space, not IN space, so the speed of light does not apply. Do some proper research.
dominickearney 2 years ago
lol, you must be young. See the theory was changed to accommodate the blunders in the theory when it was first published. Einstein wrote that the universe expanded after the big bang and then because of gravity would eventually collapse upon itself. It was a major blunder on Einstein's part when astronomers found the universe was in fact doing the opposite. Gravity was not causing the universe to collapse like predicted from gravity. they quickly made up dark matter & energy.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
The expansion & acceleration can be accounted for by using scientific data while understanding the observations. Just because it is written in scientific journal does not mean it is a fact. Just by inserting inventive forces that cannot be seen does not make the BB theory right. You believe in invisible matter? You're merely a clueless follower who believes everything you hear. Our planet needs people who can think clearly, not continue to follow past mistakes! Fight for the truth, not with me.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
Lol, you must be ignorant. The theory was not changed. 1. The ultimate fate of the universe has nothing to do with how the universe started, which what the Big Bang theory is about. 2.Einstein noticed that his relativity equations were predicting an expansion of the universe, but as the current theory was the Steady State universe, he fudged his equation to include a cosmological constant to keep universe STEADY, not to collapse it. This was all BEFORE the Big Bang had even been proposed.
dominickearney 2 years ago
3. Dark matter has nothing to do with the Big Bang theory as the Big Bang theory is about how the universe started, not how it ends. The observable matter in the universe cannot account for the movement of the galaxies, therefore the must be more matter than we can see i.e. its dark. Dark energy is hypothetical (and openly admitted to be so) and is used to explain the acceleration of the expansion. There are other hypotheses. Like I said, do your research.
dominickearney 2 years ago
Wait matter has mass, thus g. How can dark matter, which would pull because of g, allow the universe to expand? Wouldn't more m, even thought it was not seen, cause more g? Adding more problems no matter how being represented. I did the research, I even understand the imaginary terms & wild explanations. If you add more g to the whole system then the universe contracts, not expands. Matter cannot cause expansion! Only one solution, extra energy is being added to the universe constantly!
BigNewGames 2 years ago
Yes the BB was wrong when it was found that all the galaxies are not moving away from one point, they are moving away from each other. This shows that the BB is wrong. The Inflation theory was then invented. The I theory contradicts the BB theory. If galaxies are moving away from galaxies, expansion?, then there was not one BB but countless. The galaxies are roughly the same age too, see 2DF Sky Survey. My hypothesis explains this without dark matter/energy & I will be damned if I share it here.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
Vacuum energy does exist.
manchester26m 2 years ago
A theory is a large body of work that is the best explanation of a natural phenomena. It changes with our understanding of the Universe. What is bad about that? Are you suggesting Scientists should just stop and be content? How ridiculous! We'd still be in the Dark ages - And Creationists.
manchester26m 2 years ago
Yes, that is how natural forces are explained, a theory. I wonder if that is ant different than a religious persons saying God did it? Neither one can be proven so both are theories right? In the end, we will all find the truth. I now wonder why I spent over a decade looking for answers and getting nothing but theories. I am not a follower of theories,but do research facts. The only problem I see is that there are not enough facts to convince me. When all the facts are in, then we will see.
BigNewGames 2 years ago 2
Like, Cassini finding the outer ring material of Saturn to be older than the inner rings. It completely goes against the Nebula theory. I hypothesized the reason for the expansion of the universe using known facts. This idea actually predicted the outer rings of Saturn to be younger, long before the data came back from Cassini. NASA said it will take them a few years to come up with an answer for the new rings. So what is right , my idea or current theories which did not predict the young rings?
BigNewGames 2 years ago
The problem with "god did it" is that you don't need ANY facts or anything to support your claim. God in that sense can do anything and doesn't need any explanation. That's why it's unaccepted by a lot of people. It doesn't make sense because it doesn't have to, which is a lame excuse really.
Back2BackJack 2 years ago 2
My Stars its full of GOD...
neilzep 2 years ago
haha. Nice.
avenuePad 2 years ago
Also, the point at which the big bang occured...
Hold out your hand.
The point at which it happened is in your palm. And, mine, and everyone elses, and on Venus, and at the centre of the galaxy. In essence, because everything is moving away from everything alse, the central point of the expansion, the position of the metaphorical "Explosion" is wherever the observer is observing from.
manchester26m 2 years ago
As for what would happen to a galaxy moving very quickly... Relative to what?
What would you expect to happen?
manchester26m 2 years ago
Relative to the imaginary point where the big bang was said to have happened. If all galaxies are moving away from that point then use that as a reference.
I hypothesized that when matter reaches the speed of light it converts into pure energy, gamma rays. Evidence supports this idea as noted by the extreme explosions that occur near the extents of our universe. Can you tell me what these violent explosions are called? You should know seeing that you told me to "Educate yourself".
BigNewGames 2 years ago
Ok, lets see your data.
Have you written a paper?
manchester26m 2 years ago
Wouldn't the inflation of the universe eventually cause matter to reach the speed of light? Assuming we use the point where the big bang happened as a still reference point. Then we can see that this is the cause for GRB's that happen near the outside edges of our universe. The gamma ray bursts that occur near the furthest reaches of space defy the drop off law for energy. The only way to get that much energy from matter is if a galaxy instantly turned into energy.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
I can see what you are thinking, that expansion means galaxies rush away from one another at great speed, eventually accellerating to light speed, which causes them to turn into energy?
But the fatal flaw is that the galaxies are moving furthur apart, but not due to speed. The very space, the fabric of our universe is stretching, unfurling. Any object wouldnt be moving. In essence, 2 static objects can be furthur away than they would be even if they WERE at SOL with no inflation.
manchester26m 2 years ago
Well if they are moving apart physically then the distance between the two can be measured as a speed.
The SOL says I am right, yet theory says I am wrong. I always believe in the facts not theories. Theory should never be thought of as a fact, because when the facts contradict theories they are easily ignored & take many years to become recognized. I guess we will have to wait for a new generation to fix the mistakes in todays theories. This would not happen if theories were simply ignored.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
"Well if they are moving apart physically then the distance between the two can be measured as a speed."
Yes, but heres the important bit... They arent actually moving. They have no speed. The space between is expanding, they arent going anywhere. And since THEY arent going anywhere, the SOL does not come into play in the slightest. So theres no galaxies hitting (or breaking) the light barrier.
Why does the SOL say you are right and the theory wrong?
manchester26m 2 years ago
You know if the inflation theory was right then it would be impossible for two galaxies to collide seeing that each point gets further away. Yet astronomers say that eventually the Andromeda galaxy will merge with the Milky Way. Plus many other galaxies are found to be colliding. So the whole balloon idea is not a good analogy. You can still believe it, just explain how galaxies are able to be traveling in a direction towards one another if inflation happened? No, gravity is a weak force.
BigNewGames 2 years ago
"No, gravity is a weak force"
Yet even light cannot escape a black hole - Which is, coincidentally, what is found at the centre of galaxies.
A gravitational field also warps space clawing back any expansion.
True, you can negate gravity by using a magnet to pick up a coin, but ultimately against 2 supermassive black holes, there is only one outcome.
manchester26m 2 years ago 2