Yeah I'll try finding it.

Thank you for being one of the most rational people on YT. I wish more people could hear your very simple and obvious explanation as to how WTC7 could only have been felled with explosives.
I'm not religious but God bless you.

Your videos debunk absolutely nothing.

I believe the government looked the other way that day. In fact, our military aircraft were sent hundreds of miles out over the Atlantic ocean instead of defending Washington, DC. I believe all the building were set with explosives. I believe that unidentified work crews were all over the buildings in the weeks prior to the attack setting the explosives.

I'm no engineer or expert but I believe these engineers and scientists who see too many inconsistencies to accept the government' s version. I admire these people who have the education and bravery to come forward and tell the truth to the American people. Why can't we have a new and independent investigation?

Manelvagorio,
I have heard of scrapie not "scrappie" (preceding and not "preceeding")

Resist.

Re: Your video - "WTC7 - This is an Orange"

Its NOT an orange, but a 'Straw Man' - you see, although they match each other swimmingly, BOTH views you show of the collapse of WTC7 jump in several seconds AFTER the collapse has actually begun. I'm sure this was merely an oversight - BUT WAIT - it seems AE911forTruth almost made the same mistake in their 3-part video "NIST Admits Freefall"?!?!

All through the series they use the same view you show (from the south side) starting when the long mezzanine drops - UNTIL - in video #3 they show the NIST computer simulation, which neither matches the timing, nor the perspective of that video (which of course makes the NIST sim, showing a PRECEEDING INTERNAL COLLAPSE, look rather absurd).

Then at the very end of #3, (the gullible must have been duped by now), they show the clip of the brighter lit version taken from the NW - AND - they show the WHOLE CLIP, including the part you leave out. Not only did the clip exactly match the perspective of the NIST sim, IT SHOWED THE COLLAPSE OF A 2nd MAINTENANCE MEZZANINE TO THE LEFT SIDE STARTED A FULL 6-7 SECONDS PRIOR TO THE START OF THE CLIPS YOUR USING ! ! ! Shocking.

This made it very clear that there WAS a preceeding internal collapse which is what allowed the outer shell to collapse so quickly. So why would an ardent seeker of truth such as yourself fail to bring to light the entire picture even while making this strong "Its an Orange" argument. I confess myself 'disappointed'.

But despite the glaring factual errors - good job because, as you can see from the posts below, the sheep are really eating it up. Apparently they have not heard of 'scrappie' yet.

"WTC7 -- This is an Orange"
One of your best (beautifully concise) videos to get those who have been herded into thinking otherwise to think again.

I like how terrymanning jumps on the leg for attacking the no planers, but fails to recognize that he is addressing someone who does not believe the official story. LOL!!!