About Me: Artist/Writer.

I see many atheist/ evolutionist on here, but I also see a lot of Christians spreading love amongst the hate. And that inspires me. I believe in Jesus Christ, I trust in Him.

Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D. Physical Chemist
Science refutes Evolution...
1) Theory T predicts O will not be observed;
2) O is observed;
\ T is false.
"The theory of evolutions" (T) predicts, (O) "development of all living things from a single cell," (O) Can not be observed, therefor..(T) is false
.
The theory of evolution really means the development of all living things from a single cell, which itself came from non-living chemicals. This directly contradicts the Bible and has no scientific support.

Newton " This most beautiful system of the sun, planets and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and domination of an intelligent and powerful being. He is eternal and infinite' Newton writes " omnipotent and omniscient; that is his duration reaches from eternity to eternity; his presence from infinity to infinity; he governs all things and knows all things that can be done". - Newton.


When asked to name a real modern scientist who believes in creation, we might start with Henry Morris. Of course, evolutionists will immediately object, claiming he isnt a real scientist. Why? Because he believes in creation. From an evolutionists point of view, anyone who believes in creation cant be a real scientist. Therefore, scientists like Henry Morris, John Morris, Larry Vardiman, Steve Austin, and Duane Gish can be discounted immediately because they work for the Institute for Creation Research. Likewise, evolutionists wont acknowledge Michael Behe, Andrew Snelling, Donald deYoung, and Kurt Wise, regardless of their academic credentials, because their creationist leanings are well-known.

This is another example of how evolutionists use circular reasoning. Circular logic concludes that no real scientist rejects evolution because the very fact that he rejects evolution means he isnt a real scientist.

Who Are Real Scientists?

But, some might argue, DeHart, Haley, and LeVake arent really scientists. They are just high school science teachers.

If high school science teachers arent really scientists, then we have to accept the fact that a large segment of the general public (specifically, people who have high school diplomas and no higher education) were taught everything they know about science from unqualified non-scientists. This line of reasoning leads to the conclusion that many people have been taught that evolution is true by non-scientists who dont know what they are talking about.

We consider science teachers to be real scientists. We think engineers are real scientists. We dont limit the term scientist to professors of evolutionary biology.

Darwins primary racist viewpoints summed up: 1. Humans are divided into sub-species
2. The strongest live and the weakest die, which is good (Hitler and Marx agreed)
3. The sub-species are not simply variants
4. A "race war" would be beneficial to mankind
5. Blacks and Aborigines occupy a sub-species between Apes and Caucasians
6. The extinction of blacks and gorillas to advance the white "race" is good
7. Sub-species are also known as races
8. Different sub-species have different characteristics, such as mental capabilities
9. Irish are also non-Aryan and should be extinct
10. Europe doesnt owe any ancestry to the Greeks
11. It would be good if a wealthy nation replaces a less privileged race
12. Christianity is a damnable doctrine, and Hitler agreed saying it is a rebellion against nature
13. Social Darwinism includes imperialism, racial extermination and sexual inequality and Darwinism was intended to explain society as a whole
14. "lower class" races should not normally be cared for; they should not multiply and should become extinct